Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, February 24, 2013


TNA to head to Geneva
By Our Political Correspondent


A four-member Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentary delegation will leave for UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) sessions in Geneva, to brief the representatives of the member countries, who will be dealing with the US resolution on Sri Lanka.


TNA Spokesperson and Jaffna District Parliamentarian, Suresh K. Premachandran told Ceylon Today the Alliance took the decision to be present in Geneva and to meet the UNHRC representatives on the sidelines of the UNHRC sessions at the parliamentary group meeting of the Alliance, presided over by Leader R. Sampanthan in Colombo on Friday. Premachandran said: “The TNA parliamentary delegation has already sent the letters to the member countries on the meetings the TNA intends to have with them during the Geneva sessions.


“At the UNHRC sessions last year, the TNA kept itself away from being present in Geneva and its stance was made clear to the member countries through the letters sent to them. The US resolution, in Geneva last year, had come out with several recommendations to be implemented, including the LLRC recommendations on improving the human rights conditions and on expediting the political process to find a solution to the Tamil question. But the government has not made any move in improving the human rights conditions in the North and East. The Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in the North and East are still in peril. No action has been taken with regard to the release of the Tamil political prisoners. Two of them have even been killed in the middle part of last year inside the prison in Vavuniya when they agitated for their early release.


“More than 30,000 IDPs in the Jaffna Peninsula are yet to be resettled in their original places, even after the war ended three years ago. Therefore, the TNA will urge the member countries to put more pressure on Sri Lanka to look into the unresolved problems of the Tamils in the island,” Premachandran said.


According to him, several support groups of the TNA has already started lobbying for the US resolution and the presence of the Alliance’s parliamentary delegation will boost the moves further.


The TNA delegation will fly to Geneva on 28 February and the delegation is expected to consist Suresh Premachandran, M.A. Sumanthiran, Mavai Senathiraja and S. Sridharan.
Causes confirmed

By Gagani Weerakoon-2013-02-24


The final report of the investigations and evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease of Uncertain Aetiology (CKDu) in Sri Lanka by the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, has identified pesticides and fertilizers as prime causes for the disease.


One or more pesticide residues were found to be above reference levels in 31.6% of people with CKDu. Residues are demonstrative of the extent of the environmental distribution of pesticides and certain pesticides are nephrotoxic. Simultaneous exposure to nephrotoxic pesticides may be contributing to the progression of the disease in people with CKDu, the report stated.


“Previous studies have reported high Cadmium (Cd) values in fertilizer. The maximum Cadmium, Lead and Arsenic values in phosphate fertilizer from the endemic area in the present study were higher than the levels reported in agricultural soils in certain developed countries.


The concentration of Cadmium, Arsenic and Lead in the soil and their impact on body burden and excretion is known to be influenced by many environmental factors. These includes the pH of soil, ability of soil to preserve and supply soil fertilizer, buffering capacity, content of soil organic matter and water quality. The hardness and high content of fluoride in water in the endemic area may also influence the dynamics of cadmium in soil,” the report stated.


The study report, which is yet to be publicized or shared with other relevant parties, has also stated the level of Cadmium and Lead in vegetables and Cadmium in freshwater fish from the endemic area are above the maximum levels stipulated by authorities.


It stated the pesticide residues and higher level of Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead were detected in samples of urine, hair and nail tested from people in the North Central Province, which was identified as one of the prime endemic area of CKDu.

EU Demands Independent Probe 




By Easwaran Rutnam-Sunday, February 24, 2013
The Sunday LeaderThe European Union (EU) wants an independent investigation and evaluation into the final years of the war in Sri Lanka, in addition to the national enquiries.
Jean Lambert, Chair of the European Parliament Delegation to South Asia, told The Sunday Leader that the EU remains concerned about reports of threats and attacks on human rights defenders and journalists in Sri Lanka, and encourages authorities to hold those responsible accountable.
Recently the European Parliament passed a resolution on the upcoming UN Human Rights Council, re-emphasising the need for accountability and reconciliation in Sri Lanka.
Lambert said that the EU Parliament welcomed the UNHRC resolution last year on Sri Lanka, and would hope that progress has been made since its adoption.
“It is promising to note that there has not been an outbreak of conflict since the end of the war in 2009. We have seen some of the infrastructure investment made by the Government in the former conflict zones and have also discussed issues of job creation and social investment, which are positive steps forward and to be welcomed,” she said.
However, she said many unsettled issues remain such as the inclusion of the Tamil population in post-war reconstruction efforts, and implementation of the recommendations contained in the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission Report.
Commenting on the recent report released by the army on the final stages of the war, Lambert said that the EU Parliament has not specifically discussed the report from the Sri Lankan Army but she took note that one of the conclusions is that the police should remain under the control of the Ministry of Defence.
“In our discussions with the Sri Lankan authorities we have been keen to ensure that the police are seen as a civilian force in order to develop a position of greater trust with the population,” she said.
Lambert said the European Parliament would like to encourage the Sri Lankan authorities to work together with the UN Human Rights Office.
“We are hoping to welcome a Sri Lankan Parliamentary delegation to Brussels later this year, and see this as a good opportunity to hold more in-depth discussions on the overall situation in Sri Lanka,” she said.

Restoring The Relevancy Of The Bar


By Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena -February 23, 2013 
Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena
Colombo TelegraphThe simmering anger by the majority of the country’s legal practitioners in response to the executive’s unceremonious sacking of the 43rd Chief Justiceof Sri Lanka came to a fairly predictable boil this week when an outspoken anti-impeachment lawyer resoundingly defeated a government backed contender in the elections to the Presidency of the Bar.
A message to the political leadership
It is difficult not to be heartened by the categorical warning that this election conveys to the political leadership of Sri Lanka. The Government may have sent its army and its police into the very heart of Hultsdorp. It may have intimidated or induced the then leadership of the Bar and others to engage in their great betrayals which, at a most crucial hour, sapped the strength of a movement that had challenged the executive head on in a most shameful political witch hunt of a Chief Justice. However, despite this ruthless stamping out of dissent, this election shows the core of determined anger that remains intact.
As this column has stated on a number of occasions, the most remarkable demonstrations of outrage to the Presidency’s assaults on the judiciary during the past few months, came from the provincial Bar Associations, ranging from almost the entirety of the Southern Bar to the far flung zonal divisions of the Central, Uva and Northern provinces. This outrage transcended political loyalties in what was undoubtedly a rare show of unity. This unity, displayed again at this election, is what needs to be sustained.
Challenges lie deeper than merely opposing the Government
And the challenge lies not in a pure opposing of the Government alone. Instead, the larger issue is about bridging the divide between the legal profession and the rest of society. Lawyers in Sri Lanka are perceived as being occupied only in their individual practice rather than being concerned about the larger issues of social justice Modern day lawyers have, as is indeed acknowledged by them, neither the time nor the inclination for wider social accountability, let alone love for the law. But as long as phrases such as the independence of the judiciary and the independence of the Bar are perceived as abstract preoccupations only of the elite, whatever struggles that are initiated will have their inherent limitations. Thus, even if the then leadership of the Bar had kept its backbone and resisted the executive to the last during the furore over the impeachment, the movement would have ultimately petered out if it had been confined to the lawyers alone.
We do not have to look far on this sub-continent for examples of positive experiments to the contrary. We should ask ourselves as to why, despite commonly inherited practices of adversarial litigation coming from a colonial heritage, other jurisdictions in South Asia have not been subjected to the ravages that have rendered us so vulnerable. The legal professions in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are formidable forces in the political process of those countries and no Government would dare antagonize them beyond a point. The danger in provoking such antagonism was well seen in the Pakistan example when the lawyers’ movement transformed itself into a vibrant pressure group that is still able to use people power against threatening political forces. This transformation of formal legal systems to “living law” by a vigorous social action oriented Bar was backed by public interest groups together with an investigative press. The public humiliation of a Chief Justice along the lines of what we saw a few months ago in Sri Lanka, would have led to a huge social uproar in any of these countries. We are, in that sense, unpleasantly singular.
Current state of dysfunction not always the case
Yet this state of dysfunction in Sri Lanka had not always been the case. For example, the report of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) for 89-90, acknowledges the events of that period thus; “At the end of such a year of turbulence in the affairs of State and our profession, we are happy to see the profession stronger, its independence strengthened and its position as a bulwark in defence of rights recognised even more. This report will place on record that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka was required to foster and preserve the Rule and the Rights of the Citizen in this country, as well as to hold high the honour and dignity of the legal profession. Our aim was to be just by all members of the profession and also take the necessary steps to protect their personal lives and liberty and their freedom to practise their profession in keeping with the high standards of the Bar.”
The commendable strength that the Bar displayed at that time had its own political impact. As would be recalled, when one of then President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s Ministers referred to the Bar Association as being a terrorist association, President Premadasa compelled the Minister to publicly apologise to the Bar (see the Sunday Times, July 5, 1998).
Negative impact of a corrosively politicized Bar
During recent decades however, a corrosively politicised Sri Lankan Bar impacted less and less on public life. When the Bar was cowed by the highly temperamental (to put it mildly) behaviour of a Chief Justice during 1999-2009, it stayed meekly silent. When attacks were carried out by government goons on its own members, it only engaged in ineffectual protests and issued bland statements. It displayed no initiative in regard to internal and external subversion of the institution of the judiciary and only resorted to appointing useless committees when far reaching constitutional reforms that reduced liberties were pushed through.
Rather than challenging these stupendously unjust actions, the main effort of the Bar Association was to function as a social welfare organisation and cajole the executive to provide greater facilities and privileges for a chosen few. Unsurprisingly, public respect for the Bar greatly lessened and the time became ripe for a frontal attack by politicians on once sacred legal institutions as we saw during recent months. The possibility of a Minister apologizing in regard to name calling the Bar or a judge would be unthinkable now. In fact, as we saw, the Bar and the Bench were both crudely and repeatedly insulted by this Government’s henchmen with no consequences during the witch hunt of the country’s 43rdChief Justice recently.
Granted, the great expectations with which the Bar had elected candidates to the Presidency previously have yielded to compromise, capitulation and finally utter ignominy. These are all lessons well learnt. Now it is the time to look forward. The primary task facing the new President of the Bar is how to productively harness the support displayed at this election and collectively bring the Bar Association of Sri Lanka back to a state of politico-legal relevance in this country. Certainly this is a struggle that needs to be carried out with resolute conviction and no compromise.

Govt. efforts at investigating alleged war crimes lack credibility: NP

Sunday, February 24, 2013
The Sundaytimes Sri Lanka

Namini Wijedasa in an e-mail interview with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (HR) Navi Pillay �
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (HR) Navi Pillay says none of the steps taken domestically in Sri Lanka, to investigate allegations of war crimes, have inspired confidence. This made an international investigation essential. Excerpts from her email interview with the Sunday Times:
There is to be another resolution on Sri Lanka at the upcoming sessions. What use are such resolutions, when (as is evident from your most recent report to the Council) the last one had such little impact?
I disagree. It is not that the last resolution has had little impact, but rather, that the Govt. has made little progress in pursuing true accountability and reconciliation measures. But in response to the resolution, the Govt. has at least made commitments and plans of action, and there is a framework in which to measure progress. I also think the resolution has sparked a proper debate on these issues in Sri Lanka, in which, calmer and more rational voices from civil society can be heard.
The Govt. says it serves no purpose to introduce “resolution after resolution” on Sri Lanka, so soon after it defeated a brutal terrorist organisation; that such resolutions are impediments to reconciliation and its domestic programmes.�
I welcome the fact that decades of terrorism by the LTTE have come to an end. They were indeed a very brutal organisation. It is, nevertheless, important to address all situations where there have been massive HR violations, so that they are not brushed under the carpet, with the inevitable result that resentments begin to fester and harden, dramatically jeopardizing the chances of long-term peace and stability. It is hard to see how real reconciliation will be possible, if the truth is not told, and if justice is not seen to be carried out.
You expressed strong concern about the impeachment of the Chief Justice (CJ) and its impact on the rule of law. The Govt. accused you of overreaching your mandate. Didn’t you?
No. My mandate is to protect and promote the HR of everyone everywhere. And for HR to be protected, obviously, you must have an effective system of rule of law. There must be all the necessary checks and balances. As a former judge myself, both at home in South Africa and in international courts, I am acutely aware of how important it is to maintain the integrity and independence of the judiciary. And I have questioned politicised actions against the judiciary in many other countries.
The CJ was impeached after last year’s resolution was passed, and pending your report to the HRC this year. What does this tell you about the Govt.’s attitude?�
My concern is that the impeachment of the CJ actually runs contrary to achieving accountability and reconciliation. The Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission rightly recognised that strengthening the rule of law is necessary for Sri Lanka to overcome the legacy of the conflict, but this action has eroded judicial independence and the rule of law. It has also further divided and polarised the community, making reconciliation more difficult.
You keep calling for an international war crimes investigation, particularly, into what happened during the final stages of the war. Why is this still so important?
Because tens of thousands of civilians were reportedly killed. Because there are very credible allegations and some strong pictorial evidence and witness accounts indicating that war crimes and other serious international crimes, including summary executions, use of child soldiers and the use of civilians as human shields took place on a large scale.
These are crimes that are viewed with the utmost seriousness under international human rights and humanitarian law, and there is plenty of evidence to suggest both sides committed them. Unfortunately, none of the steps taken domestically in Sri Lanka, to investigate any of this, inspire confidence. There is a long history of national inquiries in Sri Lanka that have led nowhere, but to impunity. This makes such an international investigation essential. Crimes like these cannot simply be ignored or pushed aside. If there has been exaggeration or distortions, or unjust allegations, then such an inquiry should also expose those. There has to be justice, if there is to be lasting peace.
Why do you suppose an international war crimes investigation is nowhere close to being initiated?
There are plenty of cases where the wheels of justice ultimately turn, although it can take time. But I don’t like to see the victims suffering so long, without any justice or redress for the appalling losses and personal damage they have endured.
Could it be that, given all the crises around the world, there is little international appetite for an investigation into a war that ended three years ago?
I think there is actually increasing appetite, as people start to see more details of what happened. The HR Council is now more active on comparable situations, and it is not surprising it should be returning to this issue.
There is also little local interest (among the majority public) in Sri Lanka, for such an investigation. How would you assess such sentiment?�
I think some people just want to get on and forget, or would prefer not to know the full details of what happened. That is quite understandable after a long and vicious war like this, but it is also counter-productive, because it hinders a long-term solution. The LTTE were a particularly vicious group, and people are happy to see the end of them. But the Tamil population in Sri Lanka, especially in the war-affected parts of the country, must be treated fairly. They went through a quite atrocious experience. Crimes committed against them must be investigated, just like crimes committed by the LTTE.
The HRC is genuinely accused of double standards vis-�-vis Sri Lanka, and some other pro-Western countries (for instance, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, Occupied Territories). Is this exercise merely to inflict continuing diplomatic torture on Sri Lanka, until they fall in line with the West?
None of the countries you mention has gone through a conflict like the one in Sri Lanka. But there have just been similar inquiries on the occupied Palestinian territories: There was one on the 2009 conflict in Gaza, led by Justice Goldstone, about the same time as the last stage of the conflict in Sri Lanka began, and another major report has just been submitted to the HRC on the settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. I have personally spent considerable time and effort on the situations in Bahrain – where an international Commission of Inquiry headed by eminent international jurist Cherif Bassiouni, issued a very important report — and Yemen, where we recently opened an office and are actively engaged in transitional justice issues.
Are you aware of the recent protests against the Muslim community? If you are, do you have any concerns about this?
I am worried that the current climate in Sri Lanka is fostering intolerance and even violence towards minorities including the Muslim and Christian communities. We have seen manifestations of this before, and Sri Lanka should engage its civil society and religious leadership in preventing such tensions. That is why a visit by the Independent Expert on minority issues would be very timely, as she would be in a position to make expert recommendations on how to address the situation.
In the run-up to each HRC session, there is a heavy onslaught against Sri Lanka by rights groups and civil society. Channel 4 routinely times the release of its documentaries with some session or the other. There seems to be an orchestrated “conspiracy” against the Sri Lanka Govt. Do you think this is fair?�
People should not confuse campaigns – which are legitimate activities – with conspiracies. I am not at all surprised that there are campaigns being carried out by HR activists, for all the reasons we have discussed already. This is a symptom of the fact that there has not yet been a proper independent and credible investigation into all the HR violations that took place during the conflict, with the aim of bringing sorely needed justice and reparations.
�Sri Lanka states that it has engaged with the UN system consistently and transparently, and therefore, expects reciprocity from your office. Why do you not reciprocate?
I meet with Sri Lankan govt. officials, whenever they ask for a meeting. My staff engage with the Sri Lanka govt. and Sri Lanka civil society on many different levels – just as I do with other govts. and other civil society actors. I shared my report to the HRC with the Govt., and incorporated many of its comments. I have offered my office’s assistance to the Govt., and hope for a positive response.
Isn’t it the High Commissioner’s mandate to work in cooperation with member States, rather than in a confrontational manner, as HR cannot be promoted and protected without cooperation of the elected govt?
Indeed, I look for cooperation with all govts., but, at the same time, my mandate also involves acting as the voice of the victims, and speaking out when needed.
Baboons oppose human rights in SL : defeat at UN is a foregone conclusion so no Ministers are attending UNHRC
http://www.lankaenews.com/English/images/logo.jpg
(Lanka-e-News- 23.Feb.2013, 11.30PM) The Rajapakse regime which had committed brazen and blatant violations of human rights and is still persisting on those violations being already aware that the resolutions against it to be presented at the UN human rights commission forthcoming sessions in Geneva next month cannot be averted , has decided not to send any of its Ministers for the sessions .

The secretary to the Ministry of foreign affairs had confirmed this today. He had stated this year those attending the Geneva sessions are only a group of officials of the foreign Ministry and the Attorney General’s Dept.

MaRa was recently got down to India as though it was on a pilgrimage and made to meet the RAW chief , who was made to inform MaRa that India is positively going o support the Geneva resolution against SL . Since the regime is aware that a resolution backed by India cannot be defeated, had halted the Ministers from attending the sessions. According to unofficial sources of the regime , irrespective of whatever grave resolutions are passed , at the final stage when the resolution has to be adopted at the UN security Council , China has promised to use its veto power and rescue MaRa regime.

In any event , the regime that has earned the displeasure and abhorrence of the civilized people internationally and locally following its blatant violations of human rights not only of the ordinary citizens but even the chief justice of the country who holds a lofty position in the judiciary , is never short of false excuses and sophistry. It has begun its tomfoolery and buffoonery to parade as heroes after being confirmed that they are villains to their own people.
The regime is ostensibly painting a picture that they are great sentinels of the Buddhist faith and protecting the Sinhala community but is truly seeking to safeguard its own moribund regime via a campaign employing pawns in the process. A true Buddhist will protect human rights like how he would safeguard his soul.. This infernal group is carrying on the campaign that the outcome at Geneva is directed against SL , which is an absolutely wrong opinion this infernal regime is trying to create. Truly it is against the regime who are the human rights violators . Human rights are what every man and human is entitled to . Only baboons and demons will oppose those rights .

Rajapaksa White-Washer Aggrawala To Be Prosecuted For Contempt Of Indian Supreme Court

Colombo TelegraphFebruary 24, 2013 
The Attorney-General of India has given sanction to prosecute Adish Aggrawala, the controversial President of the International “Council” of Jurists, for contempt of the Supreme Court of India. Aggrawla recently issued a statement white-washing the Mahinda Rajapaksa Government regarding the impeachment of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake.
Adish Aggrawala
Sri Lankan State media gave wide publicity to Aggrawala’s statement and many thought, at least initially, that the internationally respected International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) had given its stamp of approval to the impeachment process, only to realize soon that Aggrawala’s International “Council” of Jurists was not the well-known ICJ. Aggrawala implied that the statement had the backing of several well-known jurists across the globe, including the Chief Justice of Pakistan, who were described as office-bearers of the “ICJ”. TheSupreme Court of Pakistan then issued a statement denyingthat the Chief Justice had anything to do with Aggrawala’s statement. Several other jurists also dissociated themselves.
The sanction of the Attorney General of India to prosecute Aggrawala followed a statement by Aggrawala alleging inappropriate conduct on the part of the Chief Justice of India. Three Senior Advocates, P.P. Rao, K.K. Venugopal and Ranjit Kumar, had been appointed by Supreme Court of India to vet the list of 8000 members of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). The genuine regular practising members at the Indian Supreme Court has been about 1500 only, but the membership had been bloated to 8000 by aspirants for the post of President and the Secretary General of SCBA. These aspirants had paid the enrolment fees for thousands of lawyers from various District Courts in India. The three-member team appointed by the Supreme Court reduced the figure from 8000 to 1500, which apparently upset Adish Aggrawala, who was an aspirant for the post of President of the SCBA. He later withdrew from the contest. Adish Aggrawala then alleged inappropriate conduct on the part of the Chief Justice of India, as well as the three Senior Advocates who sought and obtained the sanction of the Attorney-General to prosecute Aggrawala.
Meanwhile, Malathi Das, Secretary-General of LAWASIA, the Law Association for Asia and the Pacific, comprising the peak bodies representing lawyers in some 30 nations of the ESCAP region, including the Bar Association of Sri Lanka has written to President Mahinda Rajapaksa to express grave concern over recent reports from Sri Lanka which indicate circumstances where lawyers have been threatened and intimidated as a result of carrying out their professional duties.
Ms Das stated that LAWASIA has become aware of allegations that some lawyers acting in matters that relate to the impeachment of the Hon. Shirani Bandaranayke or who have made public comments in their concern for independence of the judiciary have been threatened,harassed and intimidated. LAWASIA called on the government of Sri Lanka to meet its obligations to protect lawyers as outlined in provisions in the Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers as adopted by the 8th United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, in 1990. These principles represent an internationally-agreed standard and LAWASIA urges your government to take immediate and effective action to discharge its duty in this respect towards members of Sri Lanka’s legal community.
“We encourage the Sri Lankan government to take steps to ensure that those responsible for such threats are identified and held accountable. It is hoped that a robust approach from your government in this matter will indicate to the citizens of Sri Lanka and to the international community that such lawlessness and intimidation cannot be tolerated”, Ms Das added.
Related posts;

Karat wants India to demand credible probe into Sri Lanka rights violations

Return to frontpage
February 24, 2013
India should demand an independent, high-level, credible inquiry into the atrocities and human rights violations that took place in the last phase of the war in Sri Lanka, CPI(M) general secretary Prakash Karat said on Saturday.
Asked what should be India’s stand on the resolution that was likely to come upon in the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) against Sri Lanka, he said though it was not clear about the nature of the resolution, India should ask for a high-level, independent, credible inquiry.
The CPI(M)’s state unit had already announced that India should support the resolution against Sri Lanka and make efforts to bring to book those responsible for the killings of innocents and other human rights violations.
Mr Karat, who was here to release the book The Making of the Madras Working Class by the late D. Veeraraghavan, said despite setbacks, the trade union movement in the country had progressed and the two-day strike by all trade unions, irrespective of their political affiliations, proved their unity.
“After a long struggle, trade unions affiliated from BJP to the Congress have come together on a common platform for a nation-wide strike on February 22 and 23. The unity is crucial for the working class,” he said, pointing out how many factors including the emergence of a multi-cultural society impeded the creation of a revolutionary class consciousness among the workers.

Karunanidhi slams Pranab’s remarks on Sri Lanka

February 24, 2013
Return to frontpageDMK president M. Karunanidhi, an ally of the Congress-led UPA at the Centre, on Saturday criticised the reference made by the President in his address to Parliament on improving ties with Sri Lanka.
“When the entire world has taken note of Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s dictatorial policies and condemned him as an international war criminal, I am not able to understand why the President in his address should talk about improving the country’s relationship with Sri Lanka. When will India understand the man who sports a smiling face but harbours a heart full of poisonous vengeance?” he said in statement.
Mr Karunanidhi said though the situation in Sri Lanka had reached such a pass that Chief Minister Jayalalithaa was “shedding crocodile tears”, President Pranab Mukherjee was trying to paper over the real problems faced by Tamils in the country.
“There are empty words like rehabilitation of Tamils and securing rights for them on a par with Sinhalese in the speech. It does not, however, reflect the agony of the Tamils,” he said.
He also ridiculed Ms Jayalalithaa decision to cancel the Asian Athletic Championships on the ground that Sri Lanka would also participate in the event. He wondered whether she was not aware that Sri Lanka would also participate in the Asian event when she made the announcement.

The Shooting Of Faraz Shauketaly


By Emil van der Poorten -February 23, 2013 
Emil van der Poorten
Colombo TelegraphDespite the title of this column, my intention is not to play Sherlock Holmes in the matter of the attempted assassination of yet another journalist but to, briefly, examine how such an event as the shooting of Faraz Shauketaly is being treated (and will be treated and could be treated) in the Debacle of Asia(DoA).
Let me say, at the outset that, given the fact that no one has been charged in the execution-style slaying of Lasantha Wickrematunge despite almost half a decade having elapsed, to expect anything worthwhile emerging from yet another directive issued by an all-powerful President to the Inspector General of Police is nothing if not the most blatant of wishful thinking.
Given the proclivity of Sri Lankans to burst into verse and their particular skill in pillorying those who think they are God Almighty, I would have expected that by now someone would have come up with a take on “Who killed Cock Robin” which would have exceeded the “bite” of that old piece of doggerel with a turn of phrase, particularly in Sinhala, that would have provided all of us with a great deal of enjoyment and food for thought. Alas, we haven‘t even had a simple re-writing of
“Who killed Cock Robin?
I, said the sparrow
With my bow and arrow.”
Instead, we have had the inevitable (now terminally boring) press release from the Centre of the Universe aka The Plumeria Palace/Araliya-gaha Waluwwa/Temple Trees – take your choice – informing us that the IGP had been directed to investigate the attempted murder of (yet another) journalist. I have serious doubts that anyone with an uncorrupted brain cell in his cranium was waiting with bated breath for this unique announcement. There had to be even more serious doubts that this directive was, in the last analysis, going to amount to even the proverbial hill of beans. After all, if proof was needed that future conduct (and results) were best judged on the basis of past behavior and the results therefrom, here was as good an opportunity as any. However, we were saved the proclamations of affection and alleged friendship with the victim that was the case when Lasantha was killed.
Such is the state of the Rule of Law in this country! All the blathering of sycophantic hypocrites, some dressed in academic garb and in or out of favour with our replication of Mediaeval Royalty, cannot obscure that fact one whit! Not even when they strive desperately to portray themselves as champions of human rights now and forever.
What is fascinating, though, are the theories that are emerging from various quarters as to who was behind the shooting and why it was done. The “why” part has produced as much conjecture, inclusive of wild and woolly guesses, as the “who” part.
It is symptomatic of the times though, that there are so many wildly-disparate theories being peddled. The reason for that particular state of affairs cannot but be obvious to anyone who is familiar with what happens when there is massive repression of basic information, leave alone the expression of opinion. I am constantly informed by those near and dear to me that I should not, ever, express an opinion that is, in any way, contradictory to the official line. The manner in which this is expressed is totally unlike what I (and many others) have experienced in countries where common-or-garden democratic practice, inclusive of dissent, prevails. What I am speaking about is not disagreement of a polite or angry nature. What I am being told, over and over again, is that dissent of any description is just not “on” and simply places one in danger of being “terminated with extreme prejudice.”
And now with the attempt on Faraz’s life, the number of “I told you so” comments has simply exploded! The arguments are hard to refute when the one newspaper with familial connections to the Leader of the Opposition has, for a considerable time, been censoring itself, and EVERY other newspaper is under the total control (in some instances, ownership) of the government or those with declared allegiance to it. And the definition and the extent of “declared allegiance” in Sri Lanka should be evident to anyone with even one of the earlier-mentioned uncorrupted brain cells in his cranium.
So where does one go for information of a kind that might be considered un-doctored, un-censored and with at least a kernel of truth?
Using web-proxies, many are getting round the fact that the government has blocked various websites that are critical of the Rajapaksa Regime and are likely to publish some “informational dynamite.” If one has this capacity and unfortunately I don’t, it could be most entertaining if not informative. Then there are those places in the wide world of the internet that presumably escape the attention of a government with access to Chinese technology that is pre-eminent in the matter of intercepting, hacking and doing all those weird and wonderful things to communications out in the ether. And lastly, there are those websites carrying material critical of the government which can be accessed by Sri Lankans because they also carry significant amounts of propaganda from the government’s paid hacks, professorial and otherwise.
This still leaves a substantial part of the Sri Lankan population with no access to any information that isn’t simply of a Goebbelsian dimension. I speak here of those people in a country that has a justified reputation for being addicted to matters political and do not possess computers, leave alone access to the internet.
This fact is the reality for a large (larger?) part of the Sri Lankan population and it carries some real advantages as well as risks to a repressive government which has left no doubt but that it is headed to a complete subjugation of a population the size of Australia’s.
The plus side of that ledger insofar as the Rajapaksa Regime is concerned is the obvious advantage of being able to treat Sri Lanka like a large mushroom farm, keeping it totally in the dark and feeding it bulltweet.
The debit side of that self-same ledger is the fact that word-of-mouth becomes the means by which pretty well all information, particularly of the political kind, gets conveyed.
Do I have to remind anyone reading this column of what happens when information, particularly of a potentially volatile kind, gets conveyed from person to person without benefit of an editorial red pencil of any description? Think about it, folks, and I particularly include our Monarch and Our Rulers in this invitation!

Attack on journalist: Police release sketches of suspects

SUNDAY, 24 FEBRUARY 2013 
Police headquarters on Saturday released to the media a sketched images of two suspects wanted in connection with the attack on the Sunday Leader journalist Faraz Shauketaly.

Issuing a statement the Police said based on the description provided by Shauketaly, the artist of the crime division had drawn a picture supposedly fitting the description given of suspects.

The Police also requested the public to provide any information regarding these suspects by calling the following phone Nos.
011-2662323 and 011-2738088.
Shauketaly was shot by unidentified armed men in Mt Lavinia on February 16 and he is still being treated for the injuries he sustained during the attack.

Maldivian crisis worsens: TV journalist attacked

The Sundaytimes Sri LankaBy Chandani Kirinde-Sunday, February 24, 2013
The crisis in the Maldivian capital, Male, deepened yesterday following the attack on an outspoken television journalist who was rushed to Colombo for medical treatment with serious head injuries.�He is being treated at a private hospital in Colombo.
Ibrahim ‘Aswad’ Waheed, Head of News of Raaje TV, an independent television channel, was attacked by a group of unidentified persons with an iron rod on Friday night as he was heading home after work in Male. He was initially taken to a local �hospital but due to the serious nature of his injuries, he was rushed to Colombo, Raaje TV Chairman Akram Kamaludeen who accompanied the injured journalist to Colombo told the Sunday Times.
“He is semi-conscious, his face is badly swollen and he is on a ventilator. He is under observation for 48 hours, so we cannot know the exact extent of his injuries till then,” Mr. Kamaludeen said.
Mr. Waheed had been an outspoken critic of the Government and he had also received several warnings regarding his programs on TV, Mr. Kamaludeen said. Raaje TV has been on collision course with the government of President Mohamed Waheed after it was banned from covering the nightly protests that have been taking place in Male since former President Mohamed Nasheed sought refuge in the Indian High Commission on February 13 to evade arrest.
Meanwhile, Moosa Malik, an MP from the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) of former President Nasheed said the Government could be behind the attack. “Since this Government took power in a coup last February, it has been destroying freedom of expression which the MDP worked hard to restore in the country,” Mr. Malik said. He was among those who visited the injured journalist in hospital in Colombo yesterday.
Meanwhile the Maldives Media Council yesterday called an indefinite strike to protest against the attack on the Raaje TV journalist as well as the attack on two state TV journalists who were attacked while they were covering protests by the MDP on Friday night.�The council also decided to continue the strike until the police agree to establish a safe environment for journalists.


Issues of Divergence and Contestation: Some Reflections on the Concept of Halal



Halal
Photo by AFP’s Ishara S Kodikara, via ABC
Click to download app from Apple iTunes-23 Feb, 2013
“Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumour; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another’s seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, ‘The monk is our teacher.’ Kalamas, when you yourselves know: ‘These things are bad; these things are blameable; these things are censured by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to harm and ill,’ abandon them.”- Kalama Sutta: The Buddha’s Charter of Free Inquiry
Introduction
Violence in the name of religion has become the predominant model for politics in the modern world. In the present context, has increased in its frequency, scale of violence, and national reach in Sri Lanka.  Too much emphasis is wrongly placed among the majority on various aspects on the practice of other religions especially on the concept of halal. It’s telling that more verbal and political energies are being channelled to create anxiety about this.
The purpose of this article is to provide a basic understanding on the concept of halal and how it operates internationally, to people from my own community since they often tend to be provided with inaccurate, lacking and sometimes simply fabricated facts of the same. Hence, right understanding of the concept may help to alleviate vague or poor understandings and in some way enhance peaceful relationship between Sinhalese and Muslims which we have been maintaining it for more than thousand years without any cracks.
What is halal?
Twenty years back when I was reading for my first degree at University of Moratuwa, I raised this question to one of my batch mate and now it is at the heart of a controversy for the majority Sri Lankans.
Oxford dictionary defines ‘halal’ as ‘religiously acceptable according to Islamic law.’ The word halal refers to anything that is considered permissible and lawful under religion. Muslims are supposed to live their lives by this concept, with its connotations of cleanliness, integrity and self-restraint. The opposite of this word is haraam. The term halal is widely used to designate food seen as permissible according to Islamic law. In fact, it refers to permissible behaviour, speech, dress, conduct, manner and dietary. In a Muslim’s life, every aspect of life is regulated by Islamic law; therefore, the Halal-Haraam dichotomy almost always applies to everything, and Muslims make sure they understand what is what since saying or doing Halal will lead to Paradise and Haraam to Hell.
Halal Foods
Halal foods are foods that Muslims are allowed to eat under Islamic dietary guidelines. The criteria specify both what foods are allowed, and how the food must be prepared. Why Muslims want halal foods at all? “the logic behind this is that remaining blood in the body may become polluted and harmful to humans”.
The foods addressed are mostly types of meat. In order to be halal, permitted animals must be slaughtered according to prescribed methods of slaughtering (halal slaughtering), which emphasised on the aspects of hygiene, health, safety and humane treatment.  A study conducted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Humane Society International concluded that the animals that are slaughtered according to halal method complies with the hygiene and environmental health issues and halal  meat should be labelled when it is put on sale, so that members of the public can decide on the choice.
Halal Certification
Halal is not only concern on meat foods, it emphasise that Muslims must ensure that all foods, particularly processed foods, pharmaceuticals, and non-food items like cosmetics, are also halal. Frequently, these products contain animal by-products or other ingredients that are not permissible for Muslims to eat or use on their bodies.
Halal certification tells Muslims that their ingredients and production methods have been tested and declared permissible by a certification body (i.e., internationally or locally recognised halal certification bodies certifies the product as halal, preferably with a trademarked and unique symbol). It also allows companies to export products to most Middle Eastern countries and South East Asian Countries.
Since the introduction of halal certification, many mainstream manufacturers, especially pharmaceuticals, prepared foods, and other products, as well as hotels, restaurants, airlines, hospitals, and other service providers have pursued the halal market. These companies purchase halal-certified products. 
International Perspective
Halal Food Authority (HFA) is one of the UK’s largest regulators of halal foods. HFA is well established, both within the halal slaughter and wider food industry. Today, from Kelloggs cereals to KFC; from ASDA to British Airways, the HFA logo can be found on food products declaring them to be approved as halal.
The oldest and most well-known halal certifier in the United States is called the ‘Islamic Services of America’. In 2011, ‘Halal Products Certification Institute’ was established in California and became the first worldwide corporation that certified halal consumer products such as cosmetics, personal care products and perfumes & fragrances. The institute was established by Islamic intellectual scholars and Muslim scientists to assure the dissemination of halal consumer products.
Also in Europe, several organizations have been created over the past 20 years in order to certify halal products. A survey recently published by a French association of Muslim Consumers (ASIDCOM) shows that the market of halal products has been developed in a rapid way.
In South Africa, most chicken products have a halal stamp. The South African National Halal Authority (SANHA) issues certificates and products bearing this logo range from water, snacks, and even meat-free products (which may contain non-halal ingredients). The South African National Halal Authority also licenses the usage of the Halal logo in restaurants where the food is halal in addition to no alcohol or pork products being served.
McDonald’s and Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) have been declared to be halal in most of the countries. In the United Kingdom, China, Malaysia or Singapore, halal fried chicken restaurants having thousands of outlets serve halal foods, such as the ChicKing Fried Chicken, Brown’s Chicken, and Crown Fried Chicken companies.
Also, in New York City there are numerous halal food carts in business which serve gyros, chicken platters, and other halal fast foods, whereas in Europe, there are many of halal certified Doner kebab shops. Very recently, twelve stores in the Mary Brown’s chain in Ontario and Alberta became 100% halal.
Thailand and Philippines also has a noticeable population of Muslims and halal meat shops country wide. Within the People’s Republic of China, which has a sizable Muslim minority population, halal food is known as ‘Qingzhen’ means ‘pure truth.’
Charges justifiable?
Almost all the halal certifying institutions around the world incorporated as non-profit organisations and they are categorised under service sector. Besides, Halal certification is a long and meticulous process that requires investment in expertise, equipment and manpower. Therefore, organizations certify halal products are compelled to charge a fee to meet their expenses. Like any other certification process, halal certification also has a management cost involved. For example, when a company obtains the quality standard, the system standard or the risk management standard certification, it is charged for various costs with regard to logistics, communication, human resources, professional services and consultation fees. In addition to that, halal certifying institutions has to bear the costs in relation to  technological testing and research, human resource costs as they are obliged to maintain a dedicated team of food scientists, administrators, Halal auditors and a large team of supervisors based at certified plants.
Conclusion
From the above, it appears that the concept of halal has a global recognition and is wider in its scope. Specifically as far as Muslims are concern, the concept of halal is embedded with their day to day life and is considered as one of the significant aspects of practicing there religion.
As Buddhists, we must know how to regard other religions and their practices as we belong to the religious group that accepts and appreciates the reasonable teachings of every religion.   Buddhists can also tolerate the practices of other religious, cultural traditions and customs, although they may not necessarily wish to emulate them.
In other words, Buddhists respect the other man’s views and appreciate other practices without harbouring any religious prejudices. If there are certain Buddhists who feel they are unable to appreciate the ways of other religious practices, then the least they could do is to maintain their silence and refrain from any undue criticism: this attitude is very important for peaceful co-existence. If we study the teachings of Buddhism, then we can understand the basis of our religion and our attitude towards the other religions. To practise a religion we must be honest, sincere, truthful and kind to others: we must avoid deceit and cruelty: and in our relation with others we must be broad-minded.
According to the Buddha, if we adopt aggressive and violent methods to solve our problems, we cannot find the real solution to overcome them. No doubt, we can suppress some troubles and temporarily win the battle as long as our opponents remain weak.    But when our opponents get the chance, they will not keep quiet and will not forgive us.   Therefore, if we act with violence, we can never find lasting peace.   This is why the Buddha once said:  “Hatred is never ended by hatred, but only by loving-kindness.”    Buddha also said:  “It is not that I quarrel with the world but the world quarrels with me.   A   teacher of truth never quarrels with others.
Accordingly, non-violence is at the heart of Buddhist thinking and behaviour. Nothing in Buddhist scripture gives any support to the use of violence as a way to resolve conflict. One of Buddha’s sermons puts this very clearly with a powerful example that stresses the need to love your opponent no matter how cruelly he treats you:
“Even if thieves carve you limb from limb with a double-handed saw, if you make your mind hostile you are not following my teaching.”Kamcupamasutta,  Majjhima-Nikkaya I – 28-29