Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, February 16, 2013


British-Sri Lankan journalist shot in his bedroom
Faraz Shauketaly shot by three men at his Colombo home
SATURDAY 16 FEBRUARY 2013

The IndependentDoctors have successfully removed a bullet from the neck of an investigative journalist in Sri Lanka who was shot by unidentified gunmen who stormed into his home and fired at close range. The journalist works for the same publication whose former editor-in-chief was murdered four years ago in an attack his wife blamed on the government.


Faraz Shauketaly, who holds both British and Sri Lankan citizenship, was shot by three men who broke into his house in a Colombo suburb late on Friday evening. He was taken to Colombo National Hospital where he underwent surgery to remove the bullet this afternoon. A hospital employee said the 54-year-old remained in intensive care but was in a stable condition.
Mr Shauketaly was employed by the Sunday Leader newspaper, one of the few publications in Sri Lanka that prints articles critical of the government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa. In January 2009, its then editor-in-chief Lasantha Wickrematunga was murdered. Before his death he had penned an essay saying that if he was killed the government would have been responsible. His killers have still not been traced.
According to the Sunday Leader’s current editor, Shakuntala Perera, Mr Shauketaly, had been in his bedroom in his home in the Mt Lavinia neighbourhood, speaking with a sub-editor who was working with him on a story, when the attackers broke in.
“He was talking with the sub-editor. She realised the phone had been switched off and she wanted to know what had happened,” Ms Perera toldThe Independent.
“We rang on another phone but there was no answer. After ten minutes someone picked up the phone and told us he had been shot.”
Ms Perera said the paper had received no threats ahead of the attack. But she said two weeks ago, a group of four unidentified men had gone to Mr Shauketaly’s home and spoke to the journalists’s domestic help to confirm that it was his residence.
Mr Shauketaly is known for his investigative articles on a variety of topics. Ms Perera said that in recent weeks he had been working on a series of articles that focussed on corruption both within “the private and government sectors”.
One of the issues he had been looking into were developments in the Golden Key Credit Card Company affair, a twisting tale relating to a private company that collapsed with losses of $230m, leaving thousands of angry depositors. Those people are still trying to get their money back.
Sri Lanka is one of the most perilous places for journalists. Since 2006, at least 14 journalists or media workers have been killed, according to figures compiled by Amnesty International. Many more have fled overseas. Many of those still working in Sri Lanka privately admit they are obliged to operate with a level of self-censorship.
A spokesman for President Rajapaksa, Mohan Samaranayake, told the AFPthat the president had ordered the police to carry out a thorough investigation into the attack.
It is understood that Mr Shauketaly had recently returned to Sri Lanka from Britain, where his wife and children live. An official at the British High Commission in Colombo said: “We are aware of, and concerned about, the shooting of Mr Shauketaly, a journalist and British national. He will be visited by a member of the consular staff today and given further assistance as required. At this time, our thoughts are with Mr Shauketaly and his family.”

The Sunday Leader has a history of being critical of the government. Yet some observers claim that since last summer, when it was partly sold to a businessman considered close to the party of Mr Rajapaksa, it has been less outspoken. Ms Perera has denied that it has lost its independence, telling the BBC last year: “It’s not just any other paper, it’s really something people believe in and that needs to carry on.”
The paper’s former editor-in-chief, Lasantha Wickrematunga, was shot dead by two men on motorbikes in January 2009. In the preceding weeks, the paper had been increasingly critical of the government’s military operation against Tamil rebels, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), who had launched a bloody, decades-long insurgency against the state.
The government operation ultimately crushed the LTTE in the spring of 2009 but a team of UN investigators concluded that up to 40,000 Tamil civilians may have been killed as well. This week, the Sri Lankan military’s own panel of inquiry announced it had concluded the country’s armed forces did not shell civilians.
Mr Wickrematunga had often clashed with the government. In a now-celebrated essay he had written in the weeks before his death and which was subsequently published posthumously by the Sunday Leader, he pointed the finger of blame at the government. His wife also accused the government for the killing. The government has always denied the accusation.
In his essay, Mr Wickrematunga wrote: “No other profession calls on its practitioners to lay down their lives for their art save the armed forces and, in Sri Lanka, journalism.”

Related articles

Video: Sunday Leader journalist Faraz shot

Sunday Leader Journalist Faraz Shaukatally was shot by an unidentified group last night, a reporter said. He was admitted to the Kalubowila hospital.

The injured journalist was thereafter transferred to the Colombo National Hospital where he is to undergo surgery.

Initial inquiries have revealed that three men on two motorbikes had opened fire at Shaukatally in front of a guest house in which he was residing.

Reports said the journalist had been on the phone with a colleague when the line was abruptly disconnected around midnight. Minutes later the Sunday Leader had been alerted about the shooting.

Earlier, Shaukatally was reported to have told his colleagues that a group of individuals had visited his residence and inquired of his whereabouts from residents of the area.



UN 'deeply disturbed' by Sri Lankan shooting

Channel 4 News

Channel 4 News16 FEBRUARY 2013

UN High Commissioner for Human

Rights, Navi Pillay tells Channel 4 News that she is "deeply disturbed" by the shooting of a Sri Lankan journalist and calls on the Sri Lankan government to protect him.

In an exclusive interview with Channel 4 News, Navi Pillay urged the Sri Lankan government to "provide immediate protection" for Faraz Shaukatally, who is currently in intensive care after being shot by three unidentified gunmen on Friday night.
Ms Pillay said: "It's an act of attempted assassination so he needs to be protected immediately."
Mr Shauketaly, 52, who holds joint British and Sri Lankan citizenship, is a reporter for the Sri Lankan newspaper The Sunday Leader.
Ms Pillay said "I'm deeply disturbed by this particular shooting because it's a journalist and he's attached to a newspaper that's known to be critical of the government - particularly on accountability and in justice issues - which are issues that I cover. And I will be reporting to the Human Rights Council my concern over extra judicial killings, abductions and this kind of treatment and suppression of freedom of expression."
Watch on 4OD: Sri Lanka's Killing Fields
The newspaper's editor Sakunthala Perera said the journalist was shot while he was on the telephone discussing a story due to appear in this week's edition.
Police said three men broke into his house and opened fire on him while he was in his bedroom. The journalist, whose family live in Colywn Bay in Wales, was rushed to hospital with bullet wounds in his neck.
UN's Navi Pillar talks to Channel 4 News about the shooting of British/Sri Lankan journalist Faraz Shaukatally (Image: Reuters)

Time to 'demonstrate' integrity

Though he has miraculously survived, Mr Shaukatally is undergoing further tests in intensive care ahead of surgery. In 2009 an editor from the same newspaper was killed and other members of staff have also been attcked. No arrests have been made to date.
Today the Sunday Leader's website reported that Sri Lanka's Presdient Mahinda Rajapaksa has ordered a special investigation into the shooting incident.
However, when asked about suggestions that the government could have been involved in the shooting, Ms Pillay told Channel 4 News: "That's why there has to be a proper investigation before we can conclude that. In the meantime it's law enforcement that has to provide him protection. And it would demonstrate on the part of the government that they care if one of their citizens is fired upon. Everybody should care (about) who are the people who are going around shooting other people. This is what law enforcement is about.
"The Sri Lankan government swears by the integrity of their army and their police, well it's time they demonstrated that. These institutions built into the democracy must now begin to work properly and this is an immediate instance where they can demonstrate that. "
She said Sri Lanka must provide a credible investigation involving the civil society, because "if it is done by the government or the police themselves they do not enjoy the confidence of the people at this stage."

Human rights record

Sri Lanka's rights record has been subject to criticsim over alleged excesses during the military's final phase in defeating Tamil Tiger seperatists. Rights groups say the military killed thousands of minority ethnic Tamil civilians in the final weeks of the conflict.
Ms Pillay praised Channel 4's investigative report, Sri Lanka's Killing Fields, on the last few weeks of the Sri Lankan civil war, broadcast in 2011.

She said: "Let me say how much Channel 4's information is appreciated because you have brought this to the fore. I myself mandated by the Human Rights Council have been filing reports on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka - we will be reviewing that again in March, but I have consistently called for a credible international investigation particularly of the occurrences in the last few days of the conflict."

She added that she was frustrated by the Sri Lankan government's lack of investigation, with offers of UN help, to establish what happened at the end of the country's civil conflict.
The Sri Lankan government has rejected allegations of mass killings and has been dismissive of Ms Pillay's calls for investigation, alongside her calls for the demilitarisation of the Vanni region.
Jonathan Miller blog: Sri Lanka - skeletons in the cupboard?
But Ms Pillay insists: "We want to provide them with expert investigative assistance, we are ready to provide this kind of assistance and I'm really disappointed it has not been taken up."

She added: "It's particularly bad because this was government forces firing on civilians indiscriminately - they were shelled and the normal responsibility of governments is to protect people - not to kill them."

Criticism was also levelled at the UN which was in Sri Lanka at the time of the alleged atrocities and whose people were withdrawn.

She said: "I think that is deeply disturbing because it's a repetition of the criticism that was levelled against the United Nations during the Rwandan genocide and there was a report done after that with recommendations.
"Now, to the credit of the secretary general he set up the Petrie Commission to look at the UN's failures in handling the Sri Lankan conflict and I very much encouraged that, I've read the report and I'm urging now the United Nations to take steps to come up with action plans to implement those recommendations so that the United Nations doesn't repeat these kind of failures."

“Fonseka Killed Lasantha” President Told Lal Three Times: Uvindu Tells Navi Pillay



Colombo TelegraphBy Colombo Telegraph -February 16, 2013 
President Mahinda Rajapaksa told Lal Wickrematunge three times that his brother Lasantha, the founding editor of The Sunday Leader newspaper who was assassinated in January 2009 was killed by Former Army Chief Sarath Fonseka, exiled Sri Lankan Journalist Uvindu Kurukulasuriya told UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay in London yesterday.
Lasantha just before he died
Pillay who delivered a lecture at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) on Friday on the Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: What International Human Rights Law Says was informed of this publicly by Kurukulasuriya following her speech.
Kurukulasuriya said that Lal Wickrematunge had informed him that President Rajapaksa had divulgedFonseka’s hand in Lasantha’s murder three times and he had responded that if so, why the former Army General was not being prosecuted if that was the case. He said Lal Wickrematunge had wanted this conveyed to the UN Human Rights Commissioner when it was possible.
Pillay responded that she gets thousands and thousands of complaints and is very concerned about human rights defenders. “Legitimate speech is threatened by certain governments and we are looking for measures to expose these practices and find solutions,” the UN High Commissioner said.
Refering to yesterdays shooting she said;”that is clearly an extreme form of repression of freedom of speech”
Sunday Leader Journalist Faraz Shaukatally was shot by an unidentified group last night. He was admitted to the Kalubowila hospital.
Later at the dinner, Uvindu handed over a copy of Lal Wickrematunge’s letter to Navi Pillay for further investigation, the Colombo Telegraph learns.
Lasantha Wickrematunge was killed on the way to work on January 8, 2009 in Colombo. His killers were never apprehended.
Last month Uvindu wrote for Lasantha’s fourth death anniversary; ”Two weeks ago when I interviewed Ranil Wickremasinghe he confirmed what he said at Lasantha’s funeral. He re-confirmed that the killers were four army persons. But in my opinion, even if Fonseka is responsible for the Lasantha killing what are the steps the other two people above him have taken so far? The President himself is the Minister of Defence, His brother Gotabaya is the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, both positioned above Fonseka. Killing Lasantha cannot be one of Fonseka’s own decisions.  He may have deployed the killers but killing such a high profile journalist is a political decision. That is why nothing is happening about his killing, I am forced to conclude.” for Lasantha’s fourth death anniversary.

SC Judge P.A. Ratnayake resigns

Saturday, 16 February 2013
Supreme Court Judge P.A. Ratnayake has handed his resignation letter to the Chief Justice yesterday as part of the controversy faced by the country following Chief Justice Mohan Peiris’ appointment.
Legal experts say that the premature retirement of Judge Ratnayake is symbolic of the current crisis faced by the country’s judiciary.
Meanwhile, Supreme Court Judge S.I. Imam is to retire on February 20th. A senior lawyer said that since the power to appoint Supreme Court judges is vested with the President he would appoint two persons loyal to him to fill the vacancies.

'The Sunday Leader' journalist escapes assassination attempt


In yet another attack targeting scribes in Sri Lanka, a journalist was shot inside his home in Colombo by armed men around midnight on Friday.
The Sunday Leader journalist Faraz Shaukatally narrowly escaped death when an unidentified group opened fire at him injuring him in his neck. He was rushed to Colombo South Teaching Hospital  and is reportedly out of danger.
Mr. Shaukatally is well known for his investigative reporting often involving corruption.
In January 2009, the founding editor of The Sunday Leader, Lasantha Wickramatunge was gunned down in Colombo forcing his journalist wife Sonali Samarasinghe to flee into exile. Mr.Wikramatunge's successor Frederica Jansz left the country last year after allegedly receiving death threats.


Anti-impeachment lawyers being hunted countrywide: Lawyers Collective


  • Anti-impeachment lawyers being hunted, Collective says
  • Call on all members of BASL to elect the ‘progressive’ candidate as the next President of the Bar
  • Claim one BASL presidential aspirant is being backed by Govt.
  • Collective pledges to continue the struggle for judicial independence
By Dharisha Bastians-February 15, 2013 
Legal activists that rallied against the impeachment of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake were being hounded in the impeachment aftermath, the Lawyers Collective said yesterday.
The Collective, which is an umbrella organisation for several legal associations and senior lawyers, told a media briefing yesterday that all over the country, legal activists were being threatened and intimidated and in some cases, even abducted and released soon afterwards, more than one month after Chief Justice Bandaranayake was sacked from office in violation of two rulings by the country’s highest courts.
Many legal activists were under close surveillance, the Collective said.
“In many of these cases, lawyers are choosing not to report the incidents to the law enforcement authorities and have asked that their identities be protected,” senior constitutional lawyer and activist J.C. Weliamuna said. “It expresses a lack of faith in police investigations into such incidents,” he explained.
Weliamuna said that one young lawyer had been abducted and released a few minutes later by an unidentified group while several anti-impeachment activities continued to receive death threats and intimidating phone calls and letters.
Addressing the media briefing, Attorney at Law Sunil Watawala said that with the witch hunt against Bandaranayake concluded, it was now the turn of the lawyers.
“The struggle for judicial independence and rule of law is a struggle for the professionals to carry forward,” Watawala said. “This force will not be stopped,” he charged.
The Lawyers Collective also called on all members of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) to vote for the ‘progressive’ candidate at the BASL election next week. They said another candidate was being fully backed by the Government.
“We denounce this politicisation of our institution – we urge all lawyers to vote for the candidate that will guarantee freedom and independence to the BASL,” representatives of the Lawyers Collective said.
The Lawyers Collective pledged that they would continue to be a key pressure group within the Bar Association and fully endorsed the candidature of a “progressive” candidate for president of the Bar.
Weliamuna said that the silence of the BASL in the face of the Government’s refusal of entry to a high level delegation from the International Bar Association should not be misunderstood as an endorsement of the Government’s actions.
“The Bar is in transition with this election, but the Lawyers Collective and Lawyers for Democracy have all roundly condemned the Government’s refusal of entry to this delegation, without understanding the international dimensions of this action,” he said.



Saturday , 16 February 2013
Four persons in civil clothes attacked people during Waligamam north hunger protest, and the camera belonging to a Journalist was smashed.



This incident occurred yesterday at 11.30 a.m.

Hundreds of Sri Lankan police force was deployed on duty at the location where the hunger protest was held, in view of providing security.

Meanwhile protestors caught those persons engaged in the attacks and handed over to the police. However police showed reluctance to arrest the attackers and even to prevent them from disturbing the protest were the allegations made by those gathered at the protest.

Police and military performed in an act, of chasing some of the attackers but they were dispatched safely.

 People from the protest notified some of the attackers were transported to the military vehicles which were parked.

A civilian who chased the attackers involved in disrupting the hunger protest, was given death threat by one of the attackers attired in civil clothes  had remarked "I know you very well, I will kill you" and left the area.

The hunger protest was arranged by the Waligamam north displaced resettlement committee, and the main opposition party leader United National Party Leader Ranil Wickramasinghe participated the event and after he left the locality, such incidents occurred was stated.
Military personals attacked people engage in hunger strike at Waligamam North
[ Friday, 15 February 2013, 08:49.08 AM GMT +05:30 ]
Military personals carried out brutal attack against people engage in hunger strike at Waligamam North, short while ago.
People together with politicians engage in hunger strike protest on demanding to release lands and resettle people at the high security zone in the Waligamam north.
Due to the attack tense situation reported in the area. However people were confident on their protest. According to the sources hunger strike protest commenced at 8.30 am this morning. Opposition leader Ranil Wickramasinghe was also present at this site.
More than thousands of people were present at this hunger strike protest. A group comprise with 6 members suddenly arrive to the location ordered people to evacuate from the site. On this time parliamentarians requested police officials to arrest the suspects cause disturbances to the peaceful protest.
However police personals have arrested a suspect and others were taken out by the military personals. Military personals carried out attack against secretary of the Mannippai Divisional Secretariat and the member of the Waligamam North Pradeshiya Sabaha.
(2nd Lead)
Opposition leader Ranil Wickramasinghe delivered special speech at the hunger strike protest currently underway in the Thelipalai area Jaffna. End of the speech group of unidentified personals carried out attack against people present at the hunger strike protest.
Journalist of the Uthayan news paper was also attacked and suspects have taken away his camera. Members of the Tamil National Alliance have field complaint on this alleged attack at the Thellipalai police station.
(3rd Lead)
TNA Jaffna district parliamentarian E.Sarawanabawan hold discussions with army and police personals on this attack.
Military personals have take away the "memory card"  and return back the camera towards Uthayan news paper journalist.

No Sleep Need Be Lost In Delhi About The Rajapakse Sleeping With Beijing


Colombo Telegraph
By Kumar David -February 16, 2013
Prof Kumar David
The Indian Ocean power balance: China, India and the USA
The befuddlement in Delhi regarding the procedural resolution on Sri Lanka to be tabled by the US at the March UNHRC meeting is seen as a reaction to its Indian Ocean strategic funk. I will address this in this essay; the UNHRC-Lanka dimension is marginal to today’s topic. The legendary pusillanimity ofManmohan Singh, above all on Sri Lanka related matters, is not explanation enough. That Indian decision makers have taken fright at a Chinese strategic threat in the Indian Ocean, if true, signals bad judgement, and if untrue, what on earth lies at the root of Delhi’s state of flummox?
To begin at the beginning, my title includes three elephants and quite intentionally omits a mouse, Sri Lanka, because, notwithstanding Colombo’s delusions, it is not of itself a vital consideration. This piece advances two propositions. The first, to put it bluntly, is that China is not, and will not for three more decades be a naval or air power that can fling its noose far away into distant oceans and continents. Its strategic obsession is the littoral waters of the motherland and its southern and westerly land borders. Indian policy makers seem to be misreading this, obvious as child’s play, reality.
Though this is my first proposition let me begin by speaking against it. The Chinese defence budget in 2012 was huge at $150 billion (US $700 billion, India $50 billion) and spending was probably larger since defence related expenditure is concealed under other headings. A more important factor is that a dollar in China goes a longer way than in the US; what a scientist costs in the US, will buy, say five scientists of corresponding standing in China, albeit with less experience and somewhat inferior education. A dollar spent on research or manufacturing in China delivers what it would cost, say three dollars, to assemble in the US. I grant all this; but notwithstanding, China is nowhere near floating a blue-water fleet or flying an air-force that can make a serious indent in the world’s great oceans and distant continents. I will focus on sea power in the next paragraphs. I will also not deal with cyber warfare, the real, not science fiction, struggle of the future, where the gap between the US and China is not as big as in naval and air capability.
China’s strategic priorities
A nuclear powered (101,000 ton) carrier of the super-Nimitz class costs $8 billion for ship alone, $5 billion for a complement of 70-odd aircraft and a fleet of 10 to 15 escort and support vessels to make a battle group, and say $2 billion for training a crew of hundreds of airmen and 7, 500 sailors. This is what it takes to float a carrier strike group or a larger carrier battle group. China’s first nuclear-powered carrier is expected in 2020 and it may take a decade to commission an operational blue-water battle group; but still without combat experience. Contrast this with the US navy which, over the years, has built 80 carriers and acquired active experience in the Pacific Theatre in WW2 and in post-war imperialist exploits in Korea and Vietnam. The US currently has 10 carriers, all super-carriers; most are in port but two or three are always out in far flung seas with strike groups. Those in port can be fitted out with escort fleets and floated quickly.
The purpose of all this is to make the point that Chinese military planners are no fools. They will not tangle with the US Navy or more seriously a US-Indian naval presence, in the Indian Ocean anytime in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, and this is the key, the Chinese have no strategic motivation for sailing out in strength into the Indian Ocean. What for, to give military support to Gothabahaya Rajapakse! On what planet do these people live, expecting Chinese sampans to come sailing in to rescue them from the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group?
China’s naval priorities are crystal clear; assertion of power in the littoral waters of the Mainland and Taiwan. The perspective is defined by the first and second island chains. These seas include the South China Sea, the East China Sea, Sea of Japan, the Philippine Sea and the Yellow Sea (Korean Sea). China has no strategic interest in looking over the Straits of Malacca and into the Indian Ocean or the Arabian Sea. This remark does not refer to the protection of oil import and trade routes where the Chinese Navy has an interest in protecting shipping from pirates and nuisances. This is a one or two ship operation and China has the naval resources for this; it involves no entanglement with America or India. Hambantota is insignificant for naval purposes, but useful as a bunkering point for commercial shipping which is another matter.
Delhi’s paranoia
It is hard to understand Delhi’s paranoia with a Chinese threat in the Indian Ocean when it should be turning its attention to its northern and eastern land borders and sorting out its relationship with Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Is there a struggle for resources between the Indian army and the navy – I don’t know? Typical of the paranoia is the string of pearls theory where China is seen to be encircling India by building harbours in Burma (Sitwe), Bangladesh (Chittagong), Hambantota, Pakistan (Gwadar), and Puerto Sudan in the eponymous country. To be best of my knowledge Chittagong, Gwadar, Puerto Sudan and of course Hambantota are nothing but commercial facilities. True, Chinese investment is indispensable but there is no pressure for housing naval facilities and commercial considerations are an adequate motivation.
To go further, if Hambantota were to become a strategic threat to India it will be taken out in a few hours, even without American assistance, and there is bugger all Colombo can do. Washington decided it faced a strategic threat in 1964 when the Soviet Union moved to place nuclear missiles in Cuba, and nothing short of a comparable adventure would constitute a threat to Indian security. Beijing is far too intelligent to land itself in a confrontation with the Americans or the Indians about military facilities in Hambantota (or heaven forbid Trincomalee); these are but wet-dreams the Rajapakses lust after.
China will not enter a strategic stand-off with the Indo-American alliance on anything to do with Sri Lanka. Hence my second hypothesis is this: China’s interests are in access to economic resources and protecting trade routes. Sure, economic competition puts a political squeeze on India, but thoughtful Indian policy makers should aim at enhancing economic cooperation with China to mutual benefit.
Since Delhi’s boneheads are familiar with the a-b-c case that I have argued thus far there has to be another reason for its paranoia. I think it’s to do with the Great Game (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Central Asia) and India’s wider relationship with the USA, or more exactly its limited place in the relationship. China is a threat in Indian eyes in this generic context. No sleep need be lost in Delhi about the Rajapakse sleeping with Beijing; if the fruit of these loins grows strategically troublesome it will be squashed by overwhelming exercise of power. I am repeating, so let us move on, but it would be politically savvy for Delhi to put across a tough message and bury Colombo’s illusions, than to coddle the Colombo regime.
What is it in the new relationship with America that could trouble Indian strategic thinkers? I think it is America’s political promiscuity, its admitted strategic philandering. Obama’s shift to an Asian pivot courts three wives (Japan, India and Australia) and a bunch of minor concubines (S Korea, Indonesia, Singapore and Pakistan). This is not a grand alliance but a collection of separate bi-lateral alliances between a patriarch and a bevy of subordinate partners. Areas of influence are farmed out as follows: Japan keeps China in check within the Island Chains (if Japan rearms it has the resources and technology to overtake China), India sails in the littoral seas, and Australia will suckle the South Pacific and Indonesian Archipelago. India is a subordinate partner; it is not consulted on strategy relating to China, Pakistan and Central Asia.
India is aware of this unequal relationship; Delhi knows that it must think on its feet, but it is dim-witted in so doing, hence befuddlement writ large on Delhi’s countenance. This is clear; however it’s not my business, nor do I have the competence, to say how Delhi should address its larger conundrum. If it takes a hard line with Colombo, reads the riot act as Kennedy did to Cuba in 1962, and acts firmly, it will settle accounts with a pestilential gadfly to which there will be no Chinese strategic response. It will also clear the decks in preparation for turning Delhi’s mind to the real issues vis-à-vis China: building economic relations and smoothing strategic concerns in the Himalayas and Central Asia. 

Friday , 15 February 2013
Pandemonium occurred at the Cabinet meeting yesterday morning. The Cabinet yesterday was commenced on the leadership of President Mahinda Rajapakse, and a controversy occurred concerning Halal issue.

Cabinet meeting was held yesterday morning at 10.00 a.m on the leadership of President, and Muslim Ministers brought to the attention of President concerning the oppose activities occurring in the country against the Muslim people.

The discussion was about the activities to be taken concerning this issue.  Minister Sampika Ranawake during this time, attempted to say some opinions, and Muslim Ministers together raised their allegations.

Minister Sampika Ranawakae alleged some are attempting to force Halal system on others, and this is a violent act and anyone has the right to oppose against this injustice by organizing protest.

This caused severe anger to the Muslim Ministers and they were involved in arguments with Minister Sampika.

“It may be right to hold demonstrations. But cannot accept to hold protest and oppose against a religion” was the statement given by  Justice Minister and Sri lanka Muslim Congress leader Rauf Hakeem.


Rauf Hakeem alleged some elements are operating to instigate the Muslims and annoying their patience, and if President fails to take immediate action in this issue, a situation may get originated to tarnish the reputation of the government was a prior warning given by him.

Minister Rizad Badihudeen also gave his objection to the activities against the Muslims.


To bring an end to the arguments, President Mahinda Rajapakse gave an instruction to the associate party leaders of the government, to merge and hold discussions.

Cabinet meeting held yesterday, consumed more time, with arguments concerning Halal issue.