As Ban's UN Ignores Press Murders in Sri Lanka, UNCA Stokes Hate Media

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, January 29 -- The position of freedom of the press and freedom of speech at the UN and its partners is declining daily. 

  Thousands of miles from UN headquarters in Sri Lanka, journalists rallied to protest the killing of reporters Lasantha, Sivaram, Nimalarajan and Sugeedarajan, and thedisappearance of Prageeth.

   Inner City Press has repeated asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokespeople about these cases, particularly that of Prageeth, since Ban went to Sri Lanka in May 2009. 

  But the UN has said little, and done less.

   Meanwhile Ban's Secretariat continues to "partner" with the UN Correspondents Association, which became known by some as the UN's Censorship Alliance after it sought to expel and dis-accredit Inner City Press for its reporting on UNCA's screening of a Sri Lanka government film denying war crimes.

 Click here for the story from the Sri Lanka Campaign, with among its leaders Edward Mortimer, the chief of communications of Ban's predecessor.

   UNCA "leaders" from Reuters (Louis Charbonneau),Agence France Presse (Tim Witcher) and Voice of America tried to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN as a whole. 

   UN official Stephane Dujarric thanked VOA's Steve Redisch for his June 20, 2012 request to dis-accredit Inner City Press.

   Only because the attempt was exposed, including by use of the US Freedom of Information Act, was Inner City Press informed of the complaints and arguments against it. The UN provides no due process.

   Since UNCA is no longer in any position to defend the rights of journalists, a new organization has sprung up: theFree UN Coalition for Access. 

   It has petitioned the head of the UN Department of Public Information Peter Launsky-Tieffenthal to allow space for another organization, and his indications have not been unpositive.

  But Stephane Dujarric, in a January 17 meeting and since, has suggested that DPI wants to continue to work, exclusively it seems, with UNCA.

  But here is what UNCA has become: it continued Tuesday defacing and counterfeiting FUNCA flyers which raise substantive issues about journalists' rights at the UN, from due process to the nitty-gritty of non-resident correspondents' right to equal access to information including in the Delegates' Lounge.

   While FUNCA last week asked Peter Launsky-Tieffenthaland Dujarric to either open the glassed in "UNCA" bulletin board for posting by all or to permit a FUNCA board, no answer has been provided.  

   Launsky-Tieffenthal was asked about this, repeatedly, on Tuesday, after earlier it had been posed, not anonymously but without any response, in reply to Dujarric's post of a cartoon of the French President. 

  This can't be bad form: Dujarric tweeted-at Inner City Press in December, defending the UN and Security Council.  At least in those cases, no one was anonymous.

    Now UNCA "leaders" have created counterfeit social media accounts and used them to subcribe to or follow Permanent Missions to the UN and other journalists, hoping for reciprocity.

  Several UN journalists on Tuesday told Inner City Press this disgusts them. But the new president of UNCA, Pamela Falk, has done nothing as the organization had become even worse under her less than one month tenure.

  Falk was present at an exhibit opening about Libya on Tuesday night, chatting with UNCA's (censorship?) partners in DPI, at an event featuring among other Ban's Deputy Secretary General Jan Eliasson, who is supposedly studying the UN's inaction in Sri Lanka in 2009. 

  What is he doing -- including on press freedom and multiparty democracy issues?

   To come full circle, the UNCA "leaders" in their counterfeit social media account have raised, as was done in an UNCA Executive Committee meeting in 2012, fueling Sri Lanka hate media and death threats, the spurious issue of funding by the Tamil Tigers, which don't even exist anymore.

   It's false -- but that a supposed "journalists organization" would try to link competitors with such a group, and continue for now to be partnered with by Ban Ki-moon's UN, is telling. Watch this site.

Fabricated assurance by Minister, resettlement will be within three months. Still, areas not released in the Waligamam north.

Wednesday , 30 January 2013

Assurances were given that some Grama Sevama divisions located in the Waligamam northern divisional secretariat unit will be released within three months period, but still it is in the clutches of military is according to people's reports.

 

Last September month such assurance was given by Minister Douglas Devananda at the Coordination Committee meeting, but still the said localities are not released as it is coming under the high security zone.

 

People, who have registered for resettlements in those areas, are deceived. Still 24 grama sevaka divisions coming under the Waligamam north divisional secretariat are declared as high security zones.

 

Owning to this, 7 thousand and more families are sheltered in welfare centers, and living with their relations and friends for a prolonged period. They initiated many protests to return to their native lands, but their demands were not at all considered.

 

In this situation, last September at the Tellipalai divisional secretariat the Coordination Committee meeting was held, and 24 Grama Sevama units which were not released, were queried by people. In response Minister Douglas Devananda informed that within three months, the localities would be released, and at that time, the people could get resettled.

Local council Deputy Commissioner Jayakaran position suddenly snatched.

Jaffna district local council Deputy Commissioner P.Jayakaran got suddenly transferred from Monday by northern province Governor Major General G.A.Chandrasiri.  

 

This transfer took place after a news story was published in an English newspaper that the divisional councils under the regime of Tamil National Alliance, the finance is taken back by the government.

 

Regarding this, it was stated, that the divisional councils, town councils which coming under the regime of Tamil National Alliance, 560 million rupees finance was allocated for development assignments are taken back by the government.

 

However the finance was not returned to the divisional councils which are coming under government sector was stated.

 

The above activities are processed assuming that the northern provincial council election may be held this year, was the news item published in "Sunday Times" English weekly magazine which quoted Local government Deputy Commissioner.

 

Subsequent to this news item, on Monday evening northern provincial Governor Major General G.A.Chandrasiri immediately sent a directive to Deputy Commissioner Jayakaran to handover the responsibilities to northern provincial local government Commissioner.

 

 The directive further mentioned that the Local government Deputy Commissioner should immediately take over the responsibilities.

 

 Concerning this issue, the Local government Deputy Commissioner P.Jayakaran was several times contacted but he was not reachable.

Wednesday , 30 January 2013

 

Three months have gone after the conclusion of the committee meeting, but so far activities are not processed to release the areas for resettlements. Hence the people are perturbed as their expectations for resettlements have not occurred, and they assume, they now deceived is according to area sources.

End Violence Against Women:”I Am Rising…”: Anoushka Shankar

January 29, 2013

Anoushka Shankar in support of One Billion Rising, a global movement to end violence against women.  Anoushka Shankar, renowned musician and composer, recorded this personal and poignant message from her home in London. 

Meanwhile “One Billion Rising Sri Lanka” says; “In the run up to this day, we’re organizing an online campaign to find out why you will rise; ‘REASONS TO RISE’. We invite you to send in photographs, videos, notes, blog posts, artwork, songs and anything else you can think of, telling us why you will RISE on February 14th. Please note that it can be in Sinhala, Tamil and/or English. Email your submissions in to obrsrilanka@gmail.com and we will feature them daily on the OBR page and twitter account.”

Visit their page;

http://www.facebook.com/OneBillionRisingSriLanka

The Deceiving ‘She’ Journalist

| by Sunalie Ratnayake-Published On:Wednesday, January 30, 2013
 ( January 30, 2013, Los Angeles, Sri Lanka Guardian)

(I)

The Deceiving ‘She’ Journalist,

She was known by the swarm…

She lied through her teeth,

Like a shameless deform…

Once a jobless indolent,

Hungrily hunting for some scope…

Then, ‘Journalism’ she sold,

To keep her thriving with some ‘dosh’…

‘Ethics’ and ‘Morals’, did seem to forever crinkle,

Beneath the rags, she swept them, minus a mere sprinkle…

Just as she “hid the utter truth”, to her benefit,

And “acted her drama”, conning all, like a bandit…

(II)

Rather ‘fishy’ it all seemed, how she rushed like a squall,

At the minute concluding - as all were about to depart…

Many moments had passed, since he breathed - which was his last,

In the cold gloomy theatre - the hospital in which he passed,

The slain ‘editor’, she ‘succeeded’, yet, ‘unmerited’ of course…

Clad in ‘perky crimson’, she looked bright as a ‘peppy horse’,

Not a tear did cascade, from her eyes - no such remorse,

No emotions reflecting the moment - slaying of her ‘precursor’, of course…

Did she entice “The Big Brother”, then and there? - God only knows,

Though ‘old and grey’ by then, he never missed a woman’s allure…

Sure enough, it was the hospital, where his brother did breathe his last,

Yet, for the ‘Old Man’, all what mattered, were his cravings to take flight - real fast…

“Baby Brother” no more to make decisions, he was gone - at rest his soul,

Prolocutor of the paper – it became the “Old Man’s” sole voice and chore…

He employed the “Scheming Deceiver” – She gave him ‘bait’ – “bow-chicka-bow-wow”,

That was the “begging of an ending” - of once a nation’s weekly, with much grandeur…

(III)

Soon she invaded, the building five-story, standing ever poised…

Soon she took over his room - once a “true editor’s” peaceful site…

Soon she called the editorial, and babbled her arrogant voice…

Soon old editorial members, one-by-one, slipped the annoying site…

Soon new writers were brought in, most of them ‘outmoded’ or ‘neophyte’…

Soon they were known to be her ‘flunkies’, who kissed her ‘fanny’ with delight…

Soon she produced “fake death-threats”, seeking prominence – what a pathetic life…

Soon filthy games played the “swindler” – it became a phony’s dramatic fight…

‘By day’ she acted “Anti-Government” - fooling audiences, left and right…

‘By night’, she was literally concomitant – with “State Heads”; her cliques of delight…

They funded her under the table, gave ‘security’ and ‘carrots’ of her choice…

They made her do all they wanted – as she ruined, once a forthright news guide…

(IV)

Then came along, such an eminent, and filthy to the core Court Case,

Against the island’s, once a potent, ‘Military Head’, with much weight…

‘White Jack Case’, or ‘Blizzard Flag Case’ - it was known by all sorts of names,

Another podium, the “She Deceiver” took over - playing merrily her disgraceful game…

Even names she distorted,

Said; ‘Yes’ and ‘No’, in equal notions…

Said; she “didn’t have a recording apparatus,”

Leaving no proof to the “dialogue, therefore erupted”,

Between her and the “Martial in focus”,

Hence, “her lies took wings and proliferated”…

The attorneys catechized,

She was all scrutinized,

Yet her ‘deceits’ seemed to be emphasized,

As the audience was all traumatized,

‘Mendaciousness’ - the tool she utilized,

A disgusting way of life, she specialized,

A noble profession, she demoralized,

A ‘squander’ - functioning uncivilized,

“PRESS’S BLACK-MARK”, she did symbolize,

Hard to repair, even if sterilized…

(V)

Not leaving at that,

She acted in fact,

Ruining a family - once compact,

Securing funds, boy, did she distract,

The “Old Man”, who did not seem to obstruct,

Now the paper - his sole construct,

She trapped him in her own contract,

He been rewarded with a fine ‘sex act’,

What more could he ask for, – the evil stale rat,

Her world was his only interact,

Her lust was his only impact,

The ‘weekly’ was all inexact,

It’s baring was simply reenact,

Never matched the ‘original’ – it was whacked,

‘Ethics’ was all it lacked,

The ‘truth’, it did redact,

Had the brother been alive, he would have sacked,

Together the “chair”, and his “taint” – both intact,

The “she journalist”, and “her lover”, she hijacked,

When money was sniffed, both did diffract,

A ‘profession’ they traded for corrupt contracts,

What a dreadful disaster - what a wreck…

(VI)

Some more steps, did the corrupt one trod,

Destroying the slain victim’s, lifetime of great tasks…

The local zones – for her now a mere roughshod,

Hence, “greener pastures”, she began to ask…

“Kangaroos”, at once did reject her, as odd,

They detected her falsified mask…

Even though she performed, inside consulate halls,

Her deceitfulness erupted – unmasked…

Finally she hit, another prolific path;

“Land Of Liberty”, an acclaimed target,

Which she thought, she could easily surpass…

As she passed its façade,

Lied through her teeth, to all who asked…

Passed days, robbing Journalist’s reserve of funds,

She had fooled quite a distinguished bunch…

Through her lies, saying she is in “exile”,

But in reality, been such a ‘deceiving ripe’…

She could glide like an ‘infectious gnat.’

(VII)

The best joke is when local “State” made account,

Of her departure to enhanced, greener shores,

Only “after” she left her home shores,

Was the “State” that unwise and obscure?

Allowing her escape, and then making uproar…

If her life was in ‘danger’ – was the “State” her sole stranger?

How come they missed her – where were the defenders?

Is intelligence such an ineffective, vain horde?

She may be laughing at “all” - now rejoicing of course,

As she fooled all who mattered – what a bite…

The ‘general public’, ‘bodies’, ‘specialists’ of all sides,

As she “jumped her country” – “running from judgment,”

Where “pending court cases” - “against her”, still rumble...

Upon much clatter she left, they may now have to stumble…

While she disguised in “Anti-Government” - fake gear,

And truly worked with “State Heads” – undercover…

(VIII)

God only knows, her next boisterous odd flash,

She may aim at experts, who seem to remain in mere dark…

Like the old men she seduced - being a ‘tart’,

So-called “Chairmen” of exceeding high class,

Crumbling “Doctors of Eighty” - more scalawags of the likely art,

To whom she gave bait, their short-lived illusory sweetheart…

Basking in reflected glory, she must be thinking; “Boy, am I not smart”,

By always misleading conceivable ‘Humphrey Bogarts’…

She not knows, it’s only a half-done maquillage,

Like her face, that is worn, and now looks vague…

What a disgraceful deceiving “Alley Cat,”

What a shame to a profession, otherwise “A Fact.”

~ The End ~

Sunalie Ratnayake is a Sri Lankan Journalist based in USA.

She could be contacted at : sunalie.secretandbeyond@yahoo.com / sue@srilankaguardian.org

Ambanpola Seelarathna: A Rapist Monk Exposed

Published On:Wednesday, January 30, 2013

A 42 year-old woman complained of rape by a Buddhist monk

0094 112913694

Address 

Ambanpola Seelarathana

Shanthi Viharaya

939/32,

Kandy road,

Wedamulla 

Kelaniya

(January 30, 2013, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) A 42 year-old woman from Kelaniya (name withheld) complained that she was raped by a monk from Shanti Viharaya, Kalaniya, when she went to meet him for some advice on 04th January 2013. He forced her to a room inside the Viharaya, struck her on the forehead, forcibly removed her clothes and raped her. She begged her attacker not to do this by kneeling at his feet however that did not deter him. The name of the monk is Ambanpola Seelarathna.

The woman was taken to the Ragama Hospital and was warded there for a week. On the date of the incident itself she complained to the Peliyagoda police. When she gave the interview today, she was in a police jeep from the Peliyagoda Police Station and she was being returned to the station to make a further statement. She stated that the police officers had told her that later she will be taken to the Shanti Viharia, presumably so the police can inspect the scene of the crime and to identify her attacker. She complained that despite of her complaints from the very date of the incident the monk has not been arrested. He is well known in the area and engages in selling charms (Gurukam).

Several of the victim’s relatives are living abroad and they are urging justice for the victim.

Seeking Financial Aid To Save A Sri Lankan From Execution In Qatar

By AHRC -January 30, 2013AHRC

Earlier, the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) informed the public in Sri Lanka and abroad about the possibility of yet another person being beheaded in the Middle East like the earlier incident of Ms. Rizana Nafeek. Mr. Wengadasalam Sudeshkar was sentenced to death on December 31, 2012. At the time of the incident that caused an unintentional death, for which Sudeshkar was tried, he was 20 years and six months of age.

After negotiations held by the Sudeshkar’s relatives, with the family of the deceased, the deceased’s family expressed their willingness to enter into a settlement on the case, given the circumstances of the incident that led to the death of their family member. According to the law prevailing in Qatar, it is permissible to arrive at such a settlement on the basis of the payment of what is known as ‘blood money’.

The sum that has been agreed upon is Rs. 3.5 Million, which amounts to US$ 28,000 (QAR 100,000).

The AHRC has earlier published the letters written to His Excellency President Mahinda Rajapaksa and to the Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment. Despite making these urgent requests it has not been possible to get any response from the Sri Lankan authorities guaranteeing assistance to make this payment.

Mr. Wengadasalam Sudeshkar comes from a very poor family living Kala Eliya, Sri Lanka. His mother has appealed for support to rescue her son, stating that the family is not in a position to provide this ‘blood money’.

After publication of the appeals made to the Sri Lankan President, the AHRC has received many responses requesting that under these circumstances the only practical course of action available is to make a public appeal for the collection of this sum in order to save the life of this young man who faces the imminent threat of execution.

Under these circumstances, the AHRC is launching this fund raising campaign to raise the necessary sum to support the family of Mr. Wengadasalam Sudeshkar to enable them to take the necessary steps to rescue their son.

We are urging everyone to support this call with the view to avoid another tragedy like that of Ms. Rizana Nafeek. As a gesture of the AHRC’s own commitment, it will contribute initially US$ 3,000.00 for this fund. We are calling upon all persons of good will to contribute generously for this purpose. The AHRC undertakes to be responsible for all issues relating to accountability for all monies received.

The following account has been opened for the specific purpose of this fund. The account bearer, the Asian Legal Resource Centre is a sister organisation of the AHRC.

Bank information of Asian Legal Resource Centre Ltd.

Name of the Bank:                  Hang Seng Bank Ltd.

Address of the Bank:               Hankow Road Branch

4 Hankow Road

Tsim Sha Tsui

Kowloon

Hong Kong

Swift code:                              HASEHKHH

Account no.:                            295-8-710341

(Multi Currency Saving Account)

Account holder:           Asian Legal Resource Centre Ltd.

Kindly inform us at ahrc@ahrc.asia of any contributions made so that we can keep a track of these and deal with the issue in an expeditious manner as required under these circumstances.

For further information please see the Open Letter written to the President of Sri Lanka here.

2013 WORLD PRESS FREEDOM INDEX: DASHED HOPES AFTER SPRING

Asia-Pacific: 2013 index-Wednesday, 30 January 2013 

Burmese spring an exception to decline in freedom of information in Asia

Only three Asian countries are in the top 25 percent of the table, while 15 countries are among the bottom 45 places. Unsurprisingly, one-party authoritarian governments figure more than ever among the predators of press freedom and languish at the bottom end of the table.

Burma's paper revolution

Burma went through dramatic changes in 2012 and moved up to 151th place, a rise of 18 places, jumping ahead of its usual bedfellows in the media repression stakes. There are no longer any journalists or cyber dissidents in the jails of the old military dictatorship. Legislative reform has only just begun but the steps already taken by the government in favour of the media, such as an end to prior censorship and the permitted return of media organizations from exile, are significant steps towards genuine freedom of information.

China, Vietnam, Laos, North Korea: no signs of improvement

North Korea (178th), China (173rd), Vietnam (172nd) and Laos (168th), all ruled by authoritarian parties, still refuse to grant their citizens the freedom to be informed. The control of news and information is a key issue for these government, which are horrified at the prospect of being open to criticism. North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un, who succeeded his father Kim Jong-il on 30 December 2011, appears to rule in concert with the military junta.

In Vietnam and China, those involved in online news and information, such as bloggers and netizens, are forced to deal with increasingly harsh repression. Many Tibetan monks have been convicted or abducted for having sent information abroad about the disastrous state of human rights in Tibet. Commercial news outlets and foreign media organizations are still censored regularly by the propaganda department. Faced with the growing power of social networks and their ability to muster support, the authorities have redoubled their efforts to hone their capability to track “sensitive” content and delete it immediately from the Web. In less than a year, Vietnamese courts have sentenced 12 bloggers and cyber-dissidents to jail terms of up to 13 years, making the country the world’s second biggest prison for netizens, after China.

General decline in freedom of information in South Asia

The Indian subcontinent was the Asian region that saw the sharpest deterioration in the climate for those involved in news and information in 2012. In the Maldives, which crashed to 103rd place (-30), the events that led to the resignation of President Mohammed Nasheed in February led to violence and threats against journalists in state television and private media outlets regarded as pro-Nasheed by the coup leaders.

Attacks on press freedom have increased since then. Many journalists have been arrested, assaulted and threatened during anti-government protests. On June 5, the freelance journalist and blogger Ismail “Hilath” Rasheed narrowly survived the first attempted murder of a journalist in the archipelago.

Four journalists were killed in India and Bangladesh in 2012, which fell to 140th and 144th respectively in the index. In India, the “world’s biggest democracy”, the authorities insist on censoring the Web and imposing more and more taboos, while violence against journalists goes unpunished and the regions of Kashmir and Chhattisgarh become increasingly isolated. Bangladesh is not far behind. Its journalists are frequently targets of police violence. When they are not acting as aggressors, the security forces stand by passively while enemies of the media enjoy impunity and are rarely brought to justice. The killers of the journalists Sagar Sarowar and Meherun Runi, and those behind the double murder, remained at large and the investigation was cynically entrusted to the Rapid Action Battalion where it remains bogged down.

The ability of journalists to work freely in Pakistan (159th, -8) and Nepal (118th, -12) continued to worsen in the absence of any government policy to protect media workers. Despite having a diverse and lively media, Pakistan remains one of the world’s most dangerous countries for reporters.

Japan resorts to press restrictions

Japan, demoted from 22nd to 53rd place, recorded the biggest drop of any Asian country. The reason was the ban imposed by the authorities on independent coverage of any topic related directly or indirectly to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Several freelance journalists who complained that public debate was being stifled were subjected to censorship, police intimidation and judicial harassment.

The continued existence of the discriminatory system of “kisha clubs”, exclusive press clubs which restrict access to information to their own members, is a key element that could prevent the country from moving up the index significantly in the near future.

Afghanistan: genuine but fragile improvement

Afghanistan (128th, +22) has a considerably better rating than in previous years, although violence against journalists did not disappear completely and the government neglected to tackle the issue of impunity. No journalists were killed in 2012 and arrests of media workers declined. The withdrawal of some foreign troops from the international coalition and deteriorating conditions in neighbouring Pakistan meant these improvements were precarious.

Cambodia and Malaysia: drift towards authoritarianism

Conditions for the media are critical in Cambodia, which fell 26 places to 146th in the index, its lowest ever position. Since 2011, news organizations, in particular independent local and foreign radio stations, have been subjected to a policy of censorship orchestrated by an increasingly ruthless information ministry. On 1 October 2012, Mam Sonando, the owner of an independent radio station, was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment for insurrection and inciting others to take up arms against the state. The decline in freedom of information also involved deadly attacks and death threats aimed at journalists who exposed government corruption and illegal activities harmful to the environment.

Malaysia (145th) also presented a sorry record, falling 23 places to a position below the one it had in 2002. Despite an all-out battle by rights activists and online media outlets, a campaign of repression by the government, illustrated by the crackdown on the “Bersih 3.0” protest in April, and repeated censorship efforts, continue to undermine basic freedoms, in particular the right to information.

Papua-New Guinea and Fiji: threats against journalists greeted with indifference

Threats to the media should not be taken lightly in these two Pacific archipelagos. In Papua-New Guinea (41st, -6), the security forces are regularly involved in attacks on journalists. In Fiji (107th), despite a 10-place rise explained in part by the decline of other countries in this section of the index, news organizations are threatened under the Media Industry Development Decree with exorbitant fines, or even imprisonment, as in the case of a recently convicted editor of the Fiji Times.

Dashed hopes follow spring

After the “Arab springs” and other protest movements that prompted many rises and falls in last year’s index, the 2013 Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index marks a return to a more usual configuration.

The ranking of most countries is no longer attributable to dramatic political developments. This year’s index is a better reflection of the attitudes and intentions of governments towards media freedom in the medium or long term.

The same three European countries that headed the index last year hold the top three positions again this year. For the third year running, Finland has distinguished itself as the country that most respects media freedom. It is followed by the Netherlands and Norway.

Although many criteria are considered, ranging from legislation to violence against journalists, democratic countries occupy the top of the index while dictatorial countries occupy the last three positions. Again it is the same three as last year – Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea.

“The Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted,” Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Christophe Deloire said.

“In dictatorships, news providers and their families are exposed to ruthless reprisals, while in democracies news providers have to cope with the media’s economic crises and conflicts of interest. While their situation is not always comparable, we should pay tribute to all those who resist pressure whether it is aggressively focused or diffuse.”

Reporters Without Borders launches media freedom "indicator"

Coinciding with the release of its 2013 Press Freedom Index, Reporters Without Borders is for the first time publishing an annual global “indicator” of worldwide media freedom. This new analytic tool measures the overall level of freedom of information in the world and the performance of the world’s governments in their entirety as regards this key freedom.

In view of the emergence of new technologies and the interdependence of governments and peoples, the freedom to produce and circulate news and information needs to be evaluated at the planetary as well as national level. Today, in 2013, the media freedom “indicator” stands at 3395, a point of reference for the years to come.

The indicator can also be broken down by region and, by means of weighting based on the population of each region, can be used to produce a score from zero to 100 in which zero represents total respect for media freedom. This produces a score of 17.5 for Europe, 30.0 for the Americas, 34.3 for Africa, 42.2 for Asia-Pacific and 45.3 for the former Soviet republics. Despite the Arab springs, the Middle East and North Africa region comes last with 48.5.

The high number of journalists and netizens killed in the course of their work in 2012 (the deadliest year ever registered by Reporters Without Borders in its annual roundup), naturally had an a significant impact on the ranking of the countries where these murders took place, above all Somalia (175th, -11), Syria (176th, 0), Mexico (153rd, -4) and Pakistan (159th, -8).

From top to bottom

The Nordic countries have again demonstrated their ability to maintain an optimal environment for news providers. Finland (1st, 0), Netherlands (2nd, +1) and Norway (3rd, -2) have held on to the first three places. Canada (20th, -10) only just avoided dropping out of the top 20. Andorra (5th) and Liechtenstein (7th) have entered the index for the first time just behind the three leaders.

At the other end of the index, the same three countries as ever – Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea – occupy the last three places in the index. Kim Jong-un’s arrival at the head of the Hermit Kingdom has not in any way changed the regime’s absolute control of news and information. Eritrea (179th, 0), which was recently shaken by a brief mutiny by soldiers at the information ministry, continues to be a vast open prison for its people and lets journalists die in detention. Despite its reformist discourse, the Turkmen regime has not yielded an inch of its totalitarian control of the media.

For the second year running, the bottom three countries are immediately preceded by Syria (176th, 0), where a deadly information war is being waged, and Somalia (175th, -11), which has had a deadly year for journalists. Iran (174th, +1), China (173rd, +1), Vietnam (unchanged at 172nd), Cuba (171st, -4), Sudan (170th, 0) and Yemen (169th, +2) complete the list of the ten countries that respect media freedom least. Not content with imprisoning journalists and netizens, Iran also harasses the relatives of journalists, including the relatives of those who are abroad.

Big rises...

Malawi (75th, +71) registered the biggest leap in the index, almost returning to the position it held before the excesses at the end of the Mutharika administration. Côte d’Ivoire (96th, +63), which is emerging from the post-electoral crisis between the supporters of Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara, has also soared, attaining its best position since 2003. Burma (151st, +18) continued the ascent begun in last year’s index. Previously, it had been in the bottom 15 every year since 2002 but now, thanks to the Burmese spring’s unprecedented reforms, it has reached its best-ever position. Afghanistan (128th, +22) also registered a significant rise thanks to the fact that no journalists are in prison. It is nonetheless facing many challenges, especially with the withdrawal of foreign troops.

...and big falls

Mali (99th, -74) registered the biggest fall in the index as a result of all the turmoil in 2012. The military coup in Bamako on 22 March and the north’s takeover by armed Islamists and Tuareg separatists exposed the media in the north to censorship and violence. Tanzania (70th, -36) sank more than 30 places because, in the space of four months, a journalist was killed while covering a demonstration and another was murdered.

Buffeted by social and economic protests, the Sultanate of Oman (141st) sank 24 places, the biggest fall in the Middle East and North Africa in 2012. Some 50 netizens and bloggers were prosecuted on lèse majesté or cyber-crime charges in 2012. No fewer than 28 were convicted in December alone, in trials that trampled on defence rights.

Journalists in Israel (112th, -20) enjoy real freedom of expression despite the existence of military censorship but the country fell in the index because of the Israeli military’s targeting of journalists in the Palestinian Territories.

In Asia, Japan (53rd, -31) has been affected by a lack of transparency and almost zero respect for access to information on subjects directly or indirectly related to Fukushima. This sharp fall should sound an alarm. Malaysia (145th, -23) has fallen to its lowest-ever position because access to information is becoming more andmore limited. The same situation prevails in Cambodia (143rd, -26), where authoritarianism and censorship are on the increase. Macedonia (116th, -22) has also fallen more than 20 places following the arbitrary withdrawal of media licences and deterioration in the environment for journalists.

Varied impact of major protest movements

Last year’s index was marked by the Arab spring’s major news developments and the heavy price paid by those covering the protest movements. A range of scenarios has been seen in 2012, including countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, where regime change has taken place, countries such as Syria and Bahrain where uprisings and the resulting repression are still ongoing, and countries such as Morocco, Algeria, Oman, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, where the authorities have used promises and compromise to defuse calls for political and/or social and economic change.

Some of the new governments spawned by these protests movements have turned on the journalists and netizens who covered these movements’ demands and aspirations for more freedom. What with legal voids, arbitrary appointments of state media chiefs, physical attacks, trials and a lack of transparency, Tunisia (138th, -4) and Egypt (158th, +8) have remained at a deplorable level in the index and have highlighted the stumbling blocks that Libya (131st, +23) should avoid in order to maintain its transition to a free press.

The deadliest country for journalists in 2012 was Syria (176th, 0), where journalists and netizens are the victims of an information war waged by both the Assad regime, which stops at nothing in order to crack down and impose a news blackout, and by opposition factions that are increasingly intolerant of dissent. In Bahrain (165th, +8) the repression let up slightly, while in Yemen (169th, +2) the prospects continue to be disturbing despite a change of government. Oman (141st, -24) fell sharply because of a wave of arrests of netizens.

Other countries hit by protests saw changes for the better and worse. Vietnam (172nd, 0) failed to recover the six places it lost in the previous index. The world’s second biggest prison for netizens, it has remained in the bottom ten. Uganda (104th, +35) has recovered a more appropriate position although it has not gone back to where it was before cracking down on protests in 2011.

Azerbaijan (156th, +6) and Belarus (157th, +11) both fell last year after using violence to suppress opposition demonstrations and this year they just moved back towards their appalling former positions. Chile (60th, +20) is beginning to recover after plummeting 33 places to 80th in last year’s index.

Political instability puts journalists in the eye of the storm

Political instability often has a divisive effect on the media and makes it very difficult to produce independently-reported news and information. In such situations, threats and physical attacks on journalists and staff purges are common. Maldives (103rd, -30) fell sharply after the president’s removal in an alleged coup, followed by threats and attacks on journalists regarded as his supporters. In Paraguay (91st, -11), the president’s removal in a parliamentary “coup” on 22 June 2012 had a big impact on state-owned broadcasting, with a wave of arbitrary dismissals against a backdrop of unfair frequency allocation.

Guinea-Bissau (92nd, -17) fell sharply because the army overthrew the government between the first and second rounds of a presidential election and imposed military censorship on the media. In Mali (99th, -74), a military coup fuelled tension, many journalists were physically attacked in the capital and the army now controls the state-owned media. This index does not reflect the January 2013 turmoil in the Central African Republic (65th, -3) but its impact on media freedom is already a source of extreme concern.

“Regional models” found wanting

In almost all parts of the world, influential countries that are regarded as “regional models” have fallen in the index. Brazil (108th, -9), South America’s economic engine, continued last year’s fall because five journalists were killed in 2012 and because of persistent problems affecting media pluralism.

In Asia, India (140th, -9) is at its lowest since 2002 because of increasing impunity for violence against journalists and because Internet censorship continues to grow. China (173rd, +1) shows no sign of improving. Its prisons still hold many journalists and netizens, while increasingly unpopular Internet censorship continues to be a major obstacle to access to information.

In Eastern Europe, Russia (148th, -6) has fallen again because, since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidency, repression has been stepped up in response to an unprecedented wave of opposition protests. The country also continues to be marked by the unacceptable failure to punish all those who have murdered or attacked journalists. The political importance of Turkey (154th, -6) has grown even more because of the armed conflict in neighbouring Syria but it has again fallen in the index. It is currently the world’s biggest prison for journalists, especially those who express views critical of the authorities on the Kurdish issue.

There is no comparison with South Africa (52nd, -10), where freedom of information is a reality. It still has a respectable ranking but it has been slipping steadily in the index and, for the first time, is no longer in the top 50. Investigative journalism is threatened by the Protection of State Information Bill.

Democracies that stall or go into reverse

The situation is unchanged for much of the European Union. Sixteen of its members are still in the top 30. But the European model is unravelling. The bad legislation seen in 2011 continued, especially in Italy (57th, +4), where defamation has yet to be decriminalized and state agencies make dangerous use of gag laws. Hungary (56th, -16) is still paying the price of its repressive legislative reforms, which had a major impact on the way journalists work. But Greece’s dramatic fall (84th, -14) is even more disturbing. The social and professional environment for its journalists, who are exposed to public condemnation and violence from both extremist groups and the police, is disastrous.

Japan (53rd, -31) plummeted because of censorship of nuclear industry coverage and its failure to reform the “kisha club” system. This is an alarming fall for a country that usually has a good ranking. Argentina (54th, -7) fell amid growing tension and clashes between the government and certain privately-owned media about a new law regulating the broadcast media.

See full report here

Download the 2013 world press freedom map