Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, December 18, 2012


SRI LANKA: Over 6,000 evacuated after flooding

Thousands have been evacuated
COLOMBO, 18 December 2012 (IRIN) - More than 6,000 people have been evacuated following heavy rain and flooding across parts of Sri Lanka, say officials.
 
“The number will likely increase,” Pradeep Kodipilli, assistant director of the Sri Lankan Disaster Management Center (DMC), told IRIN on 18 December in Colombo, noting flood warnings remain in effect across 10 of the country’s 25 districts - Galle, Matale, Kandy, Nuwara Eliya, Polonnaruwa, Badulla, Baticaloa, Hambantota, Moneragala and Kurunegala.
 
“In Kurunegala the water level continues to increase and the Sri Lankan Navy has been deployed to conduct rescue operations.”
 
According to DMC, 6,312 persons (1,791 families) are now in 29 evacuation centres, mostly schools and community centres, after being forced from their homes, mainly in the last 24 hours.
 
To date, some 20,000 people have been affected across six of the country’s nine provinces, DMC reported, with close to 600 homes damaged or destroyed.
 
Of the nine deaths reported, eight occurred in Matale, central Sri Lanka, the worst affected district.
 
Access to affected communities, however, has resumed after a number of roads were made impassable due to landslides. “We have reached all the affected areas, but rescue operations by the Sri Lankan armed forces are continuing,” said Kodipilli.
 
Rain across the island is expected to continue over the next 24 hours which could result in further landslides over the next couple of days, Sri Lanka’s Meteorological Department reported.
 
“People should be careful about possible floods, landslides, earth slips and rock falls,” said Minister of Disaster Management Mahinda Amaraweera.
 
According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Colombo, the situation at the moment appears largely under control.
 
dh/ds/cb
Theme (s)Natural Disasters,
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]

LeN ever triumphant and towering above all – overcomesall odds and obstacles
(Lanka-e-News-18.Dec.2012, 5.30PM) The number of readers who voluntarily showed their great affinity for the Face book page opened by Lanka e news following the ban imposed on it by the Medamulana backwoods crocodiles had reached 15000 today.

Lanka e news opened the Face book page in November 2011 simultaneously with the unjust ban imposed on the website, to enable our avid local viewers to read the truthful , insightful and sensation full news reports of Lanka e news despite the ban. Until today , 15223 viewers have expressed their desire for it , and among them over 13000 are from Sri Lanka. As at today , the number of readers of the Face book page have exceeded 250,000 weekly. It is worthy of note , of them 213000 are from within Sri Lanka. This figure does not include the nearly five lakhs Sri Lankan readers of the website monthly who are taking pains to view via proxy . This means that about 14 lakhs people within Sri Lanka are reading Lanka e news monthly. 

Mind you , we have reached these salutary targets amidst the worst odds deliberately and wantonly arrayed against us by those who caused our media personnel to go missing ( still not traceable after many years) ; chasing them away from their motherland ( the irony being patriots chased away by traitorous rulers who do not wish their atrocities to be exposed) ; imprisonment ; reducing our office to ashes including our precious library and equipments by committing arson; deploying the CID to intimidate and harass other websites falsely alleging that they are transmitting information to us ; threatening our sponsors against giving advertisements to us etc.

We are revealing this data to prove that the deliberate , diabolic and demonic efforts of the Medamulana backwoods crocodiles to ban our website and cause us to perish is a damp squib. We wish to emphasize here that it is only possible to defeat the despotic and sordid goals of bestial and brutal backwoods crocodiles legendary for shedding ‘crocodile tears’ and overpower them , only if there is the support of those who believe that truthful news is indispensable and are seeking them wherever they are no matter what measures are taken to cloud or eradicate them by those in the roles of despots and dictators ; and if there are media Institutions which are prepared to emulate us without fear or favor and act with fervor to highlight and expose the evils of the lawless Medamulana frogs and crocodiles , and the dire perils the country is being plunged into. May we add , we are fortunate that we are having the unstinted support of our readers while we are championing the cause for media freedom , people’s sovereignty , judicial independence and every Democratic Institution which are all under the gravest threats on a scale never before witnessed in Sri Lanka ‘s history. Might we say with pride that with the ever growing unrelenting backing of our readers and viewers , we are more determined to destroy every obstacle however formidable and obnoxious that is placed in our path.

Our triumphs are all the more because we have defeated our formidable fascist and despotic opponents despite all the trials and tribulations they subjected us to.

Let us also notify that the court order banning the Lanka e news website is only issued to the SL telecom regulatory Commission , and not to the viewers or the media personnel. Hence , viewers or the media personnel dealings with the Lanka e news are not legally prohibited.Simply because two CID officers took a piece of paper and produced it to court , the latter issued the ban even without calling the defense to cite reasons , and even without our knowing or being informed . However , we have not suffered defeat because of this unjust unfair order issued by the court or at the request of the Govt. Neither did we kneel down before them . We battled against that injustice using the weapons we are possessed of. The only solace we received was the support of our steadfast, sincere , loyal and faithful readers and viewers. 

Today , we and our readers have emerged victorious when by a strange quirk of circumstances , the very courts which gave the order against us has come within the firing line of the Medamulana backwoods crocodiles . At this juncture , ironically it is only we who are there to espouse the cause of the judiciary fearlessly , forthrightly and frankly.
We wish to recall , 8 years ago when we launched our website , we published that Lanka e news motto is, ‘we shall be sitting even on the ground and disseminating factual news’. This has been proved absolutely right today. We are now sitting on the ground if not on a hot stove , yet we are fulfilling our obligations as a media with honor , rectitude and integrity without stooping to sordid and unscrupulous levels unlike some others.

As we always advocated truth and nothing but the truth , so we will always stand by it steadfastly even if our enemies relentlessly hound us out . When we reveal the truth we don’t discriminate between enemies and friends . This is precisely why we are standing by the judiciary when they are being hounded out by the wild Medamulana crocodiles.

Our feet are firmly planted on earth . Hence to us who see those on earth well , we can see the deities in the heavens better. Those sinners on earth who are headed for perdition , we can see even better . On the contrary , the sinners who are devil incarnates cannot stand to see anyone but Satan which is a projection of themselves.

The indestructible unalloyed truths we shall continue to bring forth to you .

There are many changes that the Lanka e news website has to effect in order to meet the latest technological advancements and requirements . During the past five years we had not effected any changes. This had militated against our most cherished viewers . In order to eliminate these impediments we have devised a scheme . To implement this scheme we need funds . Towards this we humbly seek your generous support which you have always extended wholeheartedly .

Your contributions can be made by clicking on the ‘Donation’ hereunder.

Thank you
Editor in chief - Lanka e News

BANGLADESH: NGO ban hurting undocumented Rohingya


Thousands of Rohingya are affected
COX’S BAZAR, 17 December 2012 (IRIN) - Some 40,000 undocumented Rohingya refugees are being adversely affected by a government ban four months ago on NGOs working at two makeshift sites in southeastern Bangladesh. 

“If we get some rice, we eat. Otherwise, we don’t eat,” Anowara Begum, an undocumented Rohingya refugee and 40-year-old mother-of-four at the Leda makeshift camp outside Nayapara, one of two makeshift sites outside two official government camps for Rohingya refugees told IRIN.  

"Since the NGOs stopped coming our kids don't get medicine. They don't get treated for what they need. They  don't get the food they need," Sokeya Begum, 39, another undocumented Rohingya, said.

In August, Bangladeshi authorities ordered three NGOs - Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Action Against Hunger and Muslim Aid UK – to stop the formal delivery of humanitarian services, including health care and food to undocumented Rohingya refugees, saying such services would encourage more to flee to Bangladesh.

According to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), there are more than 200,000 Rohingyas in Bangladesh, of whom only 30,000 are documented and living in two government camps assisted by the agency. 

Some 12,000 documented refugees live at the Kutupalong camp in Cox’s Bazar District, with another nearly 18,000 further south at Nayapara - both within 2km of Myanmar. 

Documented refugees are provided food rations by the World Food Programme (WFP), along with shelter assistance, non-food items, water/sanitation services, vocational training and supplementary feeding for malnourished refugees by UNHCR. 

However, most Rohingya - a mainly Muslim ethnic group who fled persecution en masse to Bangladesh from Myanmar’s neighbouring Rakhine State years earlier - are undocumented. 

UNHCR has not been permitted to register newly arriving Rohingya since mid-1992. 

Only those who are documented receive regular assistance, while those who are undocumented are largely dependent on a handful of international NGOs who until recently were allowed to work in the area. 

Poor living conditions

Prior to the government ban, conditions in the makeshift camps were described by Physicians for Human Rights as “among the worst they had ever seen”.

Most people outside the Kutupalong camp are housed in ramshackle huts made of twigs and plastic sheeting, denied food aid, and live beside open sewers, the Boston-based group says. 


Photo: David Swanson/IRIN
Camp conditions are already dire
In its most recent survey, MSF found that global acute malnutrition, one of the basic indicators for assessing the severity of a humanitarian crisis, was as high as 27 percent at the Kutupalong makeshift camp, where an estimated 20,000 unregistered refugees live - almost double the emergency threshold of 15 percent set by the World Health Organization, as reported in international media

No further surveys have been made since the ban took effect. 

In June, the Bangladeshi authorities effectively closed the door to Rohingya fleeing communal violence in Rakhine State in June and October which left dozens dead and thousands of homes destroyed. 

"We are not interested in more people coming to Bangladesh," Foreign Minister Dipu Moni told reporters at the time, noting that Bangladesh was already a densely populated country and could not afford a fresh influx.

Government figures suggest 200,000-500,000 undocumented Rohingya live in villages and towns outside the camps, many of them in Cox’s Bazar, Bandarban and Chittagong.

UNHCR has repeatedly called on Dhaka to lift the ban, but more than four months on it remains in place, leaving aid workers reluctant to comment on the record.  

“The situation here is very bad, it’s horrific,” Shahina Akter, a local nutrition volunteer who asked that her organization not be identified, citing issues of severe malnutrition.

“Because of the ban, it’s harder for us to help the Rohingya,” another aid worker who asked not to be identified, confirmed. 

ms/ds/cb
Theme (s)Refugees/IDPs,
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
Several parts of the island including North and East were vastly affected from heavy rain
[ Tuesday, 18 December 2012, 03:41.01 AM GMT +05:30 ]
Several parts of the island including North and East were vastly affected from the inclement weather conditions.
Six individuals reported dead in the Matale,Rattota and Padhathumbara areas. According to the sources four were killed from the land slide, one was washed away by flood water and the other reported dead from heart attack.
Due to the heavy thunder showers Batticaloa, Ampara,Kurunegal,Kandy,Matale,Nuwara Eliya,Badhulla, Galle, Polonnaruwa, and Puttlam districts.
1129 families which include 4633 individuals from seven districts were affected from land slide and flood waters.
3021 individuals from 735 families affected from the land slide were currently residing in 17 temporary camps. 66 houses were completely and 695 houses were party damaged from this natural disaster.
The Ministry of Disaster Management ordered the divisional secretaries to provide relieves for people affected from this natural disaster.
Officer of the ministry announced they have send dry rations and other necessary equipments flood affected areas.
Senior Researcher of the National Building Research Organization Kumari Weerasinghe stated a warning has been issued for landslides, earth slips and rolling boulders fro next hours in the Kandy, Matale, Nuwara Eliya and Badhulla districts.
Briefing on the Kandy district situation Akurane area was submerged with 8 feet flood water. More than 150 shops were affected from this flood situation.
Mayor of the Kurunegal district Gamini Perera and the Municipal Council member Thiyagaraja visited 225 line houses affected from the flood. Officials ordered to transfer flood victims towards Kurunegal Hindu College.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Complaints increased by 34.

Relations of the Jaffna university students arrested under the Terrorism Prevention Law made complaints to the Human Rights Commission yesterday Friday.
 
Along the complaints recorded of the arrested persons yesterday, the complaints recorded have increased to 34.
 
Jaffna university students were arrested by the Terrorism Investigation unit in the end of last month and many former rebels from the Liberation tiger movement were also arrested.
 
Official figures were not published concerning the arrested persons so far.
 
However concerning the arrested persons, 33 complaints are registered until yesterday at the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission Jaffna Regional branch by their relations.
 
A complaint was made yesterday to the Human Rights Commission in regard to the arrest of a university student on 1st of this month.
Saturday , 15 December 2012

Australian Tamil rights advocate decries deportation from Singapore

ABC HomeAn 81-year-old Australian doctor says he was locked in a small cell without food, water or toilet access for more than five hours, before being deported back to Australia from Singapore on Saturday.

Dr Brian Senewiratne is a Sri Lankan-born Australian who has been a long-time critic of the Sri Lankan Government over its treatment of Tamils.
He was on his way to Malaysia and Indonesia to speak at forums on the Tamil refugee issue, when his deportation took place.
Presenter: Liam Cochrane
Speaker: Dr Brian Senewiratne, Tamil rights advocate
SENEWIRATNE: There's one thing I might add to your introduction which I heard. I am actually a Singhalese from the Majority community. I am not a member of the Tamil community and my cousin was the previous president of Sri Lanka. So I've got nothing to gain personally from getting involved in all this except the good name of Australia, because its handling of the asylum seeker problem is a violation of the UN Refugee Convention, the UN Rights of the Child and Human Rights Convention.
COCHRANE: OK.
SENEWIRATNE: So I thought I would just add that to your introduction.
COCHRANE: That is helpful to give us the context of where you're coming from and how you fit into the political and ethnic background of this obviously highly charged issue. So tell us from what... 
SENEWIRATNE: And I have been campaigning  from 1948, when as a 16 year-old boy I protested at the disenfranchisement of the plantation Tamils of Indian origin.
COCHRANE: Well, we might come up to recent times and talk about why you were heading to Malaysia in the first place. What was the point of your trip?
SENEWIRATNE: The point of the trip was that I was invited to come to Malaysia by concerned Malaysians who said, look, Malaysia is part of this refugee problem and to either allow them to sink in the ocean or to lock them up in Malaysian so-called detention centres or whatever is unacceptable. Will you please come and give us a run down of the situation regarding the push factors in Sri Lanka as well as the plight of the refugees and I said yes, beside of the fact that I'm 81 and in heart failure. I will come.
COCHRANE: Were you planning on engaging in any protests or any potentially illegal activities?
SENEWIRATNE: No, I had two closed doors invited meetings of senior Malaysian human rights and leading members of society. They were closed meetings. They were not advertised and there were two meetings, one in Jahore, which is just adjoining Singapore and in Kuala Lumpur. They were not open meetings. I was not there with a megaphone on the streets urging revolts or anything like that.
COCHRANE: OK. So those were your plans. You've left Australia, you've arrived in Singapore. What happened to you in Singapore?
SENEWIRATNE: Right. I left Australia at 11.45 on Thursday 13th. December, arrived at Singapore Changi Airport at 5 am. I filled up the immigration form that they give you. I took my passport and went to the immigration, customs counter. The guy typed in my details and then looked at me and looked at the screen and raised his eyebrows and this raising of the eyebrows went on three times and I realised that there seemed to be some problem. And he said, a momento, I'll just get my boss. The boss came and led me to a room, maybe ten foot by ten foot, maybe a little bigger, with a couple of seats and I was asked to sit there and there was no toilet, no food, no drink, no nothing. And I sat there 8.30, (word indistinct) 5.30, 6, 6.30, 7, and in the meantime there were Tamil boys or boys coming in and out talking in Tamil which is the language I don't understand, but nothing happened to me. 
COCHRANE: Did you at any point request further facilities from the airport staff?
SENEWIRATNE: No, I didn't request security from anybody, because there was nothing to secure.
COCHRANE: Not security, any facilities. Did you ask for a drink, water, a toilet break?
SENEWIRATNE: Oh, well I said, look, I've not had food from 4 o'clock this morning. They said well, that's tough luck.
COCHRANE: And what did they say. Why did they say they were keeping you detained in the airport?
SENEWIRATNE: The deportation order came, was handed to me later and if you want me to read it out right now I can.
COCHRANE:  Can you give us the overall gist of it. What's the main thrust of it?
SENEWIRATNE: It's one sentence. This is to inform you that you are being refused entry into Singapore for 1, 2, 3, 4. The fourth reason is tick,   being ineligible for the issue of a pass under immigration policies. That was handed to me by the armed guard with a revolver in his pocket who took me to the aeroplane.
COCHRANE: That's a fairly vague reason for denying you access and deporting you. Do you have any, were you given any further ideas perhaps verbally about why you were being detained?
SENEWIRATNE: Why I asked, what are these, what exactly do you mean by immigration policies? The police officer with a gun said, well, I'm only a police officer. I said, well, ask the boss who sent you there to explain to me what these immigration policies are? He said, look, you are going to the plane, right. So now you come with me and that was it. And I said, what about my passport? He said, no, you're not going to get your passport. I said can I go to Indonesia where I had a hotel booked. They said no, you're not going anywhere. You're going straight back to this place and they opened the door of the plane, took me to the last, one but the last row, told me to strap myself in and he said goodbye and left, that's it.
COCHRANE: Now, have you been in contact. Well first of all, let me ask you, have you been prevented from travelling before, especially to Malaysia?
SENEWIRATNE: Yes, I was. In 2008, I had an international award awarded to me in recognition of my contribution to human rights by 22 groups in Canada, these are NGOs in Canada and I was invited to Canada to deliver my acceptance speech and receive the award, which I haven't, which I did.
On the way back, I was asked by Malaysia, can you please come to Malaysia. There are about 20,000 people here waiting to hear you and deliver the same address. I said, yep, if you've got police permission and it's all above board. He said it's a dinner party for a start. Can you come? I said yep, of course I can. So I flew into Kuala Lumpur, I got exactly the same treatment. I was kept in a room without food or drink or water or anything like that and then walked before a lady with a veil on her head who said I am deporting you. I said on what grounds. She said because your presence in Malaysia is a threat to Malaysian security. I said Madam, if an unarmed doctor on medicine, I was 78 at that time. If a doctor of medicine who had never carried a weapon in his life and never had advocated violence is a threat to Malaysian security, then your security can't be crash hot. He said I don't care what you think of Malaysia, but you are being deported right now.
COCHRANE: OK. So let's return to the incident that happened on Saturday, your most recent detention in Singapore. You've explained to us the official reasons that you were given fairly vague reasons relating to immigration policy. Why do you believe you were detained and deported?
SENEWIRATNE: I believe that the government of Sri Lanka is in cahoots with Malaysia certainly, possibly Indonesia, certainly Australia, because I was harassed even on the arrival in Brisbane where I've been a resident for 37 years and an Associate Professor of Medicine. I couldn't even get back to this country, back ...
COCHRANE: What was the problem in the Brisbane airport?
SENEWIRATNE: At Brisbane airport, I was searched and detained for at the immigration people who went through every single stitch of luggage that I was carrying for nearly three hours and then the immigration officer who had been a patient of mine, I think, because he came to me and said Doctor, don't hold it against us. We are not responsible. I said look, I know that, but I want to know who is responsible?
COCHRANE: Have you been able to get in contact with the Australian authorities since returning?
SENEWIRATNE: No, I didn't. Since returning this time, yesterday?
COCHRANE: Yes.
SENEWIRATNE: No, I haven't, because the Foreign Minister of Australia is currently distributing your money and mine in Rajapaksa's regime 35 million dollars and he's actually in Colombo. I'm sending a letter to the Department of Foreign Affairs right now and I'm carrying a letter, a copy of a letter, in another hour's time to my member of Federal member of Parliament one, Kevin Rudd and asking him what he is going to do about it.
COCHRANE: Who is, of course, Australia's former prime minister. What do you hope that Kevin Rudd will do?
SENEWIRATNE: I don't care what he does, but I am a member of his. I have voted for him. He has known me for 20 years. He called me Brian introduces me to other people as a worker, both in health as well as in human rights and he knows me very well. And I'm going to say, Kevin, you have to put your money where your mouth is and tell me exactly what you're going to do about it. I'm sending a copy to Sarah Hanson-Young and to Senator Lee Rhiannon and former senator Bob Brown to table this in parliament and I'm going to send a copy to Bishop Desmond Tutu whom I have met a couple of years ago and whose very well, who very well realises the situation and I'm asking him whether he can contact Justice Navanethem Pillay in the UN Human Rights Council to table it.
 
Prof.Kurubaran from Law service states, Tamils will benefit, if terrorism prevention law gets abolished.

Tamil people did not experience benefits by the abolition of emergency law in the country. Some are the examples establish from the ongoing incidents held in recent days in Jaffna.
 
If terrorism prevention law gets abolished only, the Tamil people could benefit from the eradication of emergency law was mentioned by Jaffna University Prof.K.Kurubaran.
 
He made this statement at a debate  held at the Jaffna Thirumarai Cultural center on the human rights day on the theme “civil and political rights" and while he addressed on the subject arrest, detention and torture.
 
He further said, due to the pressure given to Sri lanka, the emergency regulation was abolished from last year August month 30th. However when the law was in practice, according to the legal arrangements if a person does a wrong, he could be punished.
 
Many laws similarly exist in one country. It is, due to the reason of the aspiration of the executive sector.
 
Even though the emergency regulation is abolished in SriLanka the gravest terrorism prevention of law still exists in the country.  If Tamil people need to obtain the benefits of emergency regulation abolishment, the terrorism prevention law should be abolished.
 
 
Two gazette notifications were published on the day before the emergency law was abolished. Through this, some issues from the emergency regulation was attached to the terrorism prevention law.  Gazette 1721/4 paves way to detain those arrested from emergency regulation
 
Arrangements for rehabilitations and safeguarding those surrendered, according to year 2005 under the emergency regulations, conferring to 1721/5 gazette notification it is cited.
 
Section 3 and sub section 2, if any ponder of done crime, those considered are affected due to terrorism activities, if they desire they could surrender.
 
On this basis, the Jaffna university students issue should be monitored. Under this arrangement, those arrested could be sent for rehabilitation
 
The protection which existed in the emergency regulation does not exist in the  new order procedures. Those arrested under emergency regulation should be produced in courts once in every month, but it does appear in the new order. .Therefore abolishment of the emergency regulation, have not benefited was mentioned by him.
Sunday , 16 December 2012

Tamil Nadu protest calls for investigation on 3 UN officials for complicity in Tamil genocide

[TamilNet, Monday, 17 December 2012, 01:47 GMT]
TamilNetUN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, former UN Chief of Staff Vijay Nambiar and former UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian affairs Sir John Holmes were in complicity in the genocidal onslaught on Eezham Tamils by Sri Lanka in 2009, declared a protest held by political activists and grassroot movements in Tamil Nadu on Sunday. May 17 Movement, the organisers of the protest, citing the recent report of the Internal Review Panel on UN Action in Sri Lanka led by Charles Petrie, accused the ‘axis of the UN trio’ for shielding the Sri Lankan government during the peak of its genocidal onslaught on the Eezham Tamil nation. The demonstrators, who blamed the UN for denying justice to the victims after the genocidal war, also accused the UN for having failed to provide a just political solution to the national question of Eezham Tamils. 
Protest against UN in Tamil NaduProtest against UN in Tamil Nadu
Mr Vijay Nambiar, an Indian diplomat, who is alleged of responsibility in the white-flag surrender, is the brother of Lt. Gen. (Retd) Satish Nambiar, who was earlier invited by the SL government during the CFA to report on the military High Security Zones in the North and East. 

According to the accounts of the late veteran war correspondent Marie Colvin, Mr Nambiar had an assurance from the Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa that LTTE's Political Head Mr Nadesan would be safe in surrendering to the Sri Lanka Army carrying a white flag. Although Mr Nambiar was supposed to witness to the surrender in person, he had concluded that it was not necessary for him to witness the episode as he had SL president's assurance. 

Sir John Holmes, was the chief of UN's humanitarian operations in his role as Human Rights Co-ordinator when the UN pulled out of Vanni. He has also been visiting the island at the height of the war. 

The gathered activists in Chennai also raised slogans in solidarity with the protesting Eezham Tamil students in the island, demanding the immediate release the student leaders of the University of Jaffna and the students who have been detained by the occupying Sri Lankan military. 

Prof Dheeran, the president of Thamizhaka Vaazhvurimaik Kadchi, Avadi Antharidoss from MDMK, Aruna Barathi from Thamizh Theasiya Pothuvudamaik Kadchi, Thapasi Kumaran from Dravidar Viduthalaik Kazhagam, Thiyagu from Thamizh Theasiya Viduthalai Iyakkam, film director Pugazhenthi Thangaraj, Umar and Thirumurugan Gandhi from May 17 Movement spoke at the demonstration.        Full story >>
Tension in Jaffna concerning the attack against students. Norway ambassador disappointed.

 “We are focusing attention towards the incidents occurred in the university. We personally met Jaffna District Government Agent and expressed our discontent”. Norwegian Ambassador for Sri Lanka said, the attacks against the Jaffna University students, have created a tension situation in Jaffna.
 
Norwegian ambassador to Sri Lanka, Grete Løchen, was on a tour to north on last 12th and visited Jaffna. He met Jaffna District Agent, Jaffna university administrators, and Jaffna Archbishop and had discussions.
 
He returned to Colombo and expressed his views in a report "We are focusing more attention regarding the incidents occurred in Jaffna university. We spoke concerning this with Jaffna District Government Agent and expressed our disappointment”.
 
Attacks against the Jaffna university students have created a tension situation in Jaffna was further mentioned by Norwegian Ambassador to Sri lanka in his report.
Sunday , 16 December 2012

Colombo punishes Tamil officials with transfer for opposing Sinhala encroachment

TamilNet[TamilNet, Sunday, 16 December 2012, 16:47 GMT]
Tamil civil servants, who take legal action against Sri Lankan State and military run Sinhala encroachment of lands belonging to Tamils in the Batticaloa district, are under threat of transfer by the Colombo government, civil sources in Batticaloa said. Recently, the Divisional Secretary of Koa'raippattu South, Mr M. Thavarasa, who filed cases against illegal encroachers in Vadamunai, Oottuch-cheanai and Kallichchai, is to be transferred from January next year by the Colombo government. 

About five thousand acres of pasture lands allocated for grazing in Koa'raip-pattu South DS division are encroached by Sinhalese with the backing of SL military and its Sinhala paramilitary caled ‘home guards’. 

Mr Thavarasa, in his position as the divisional secretary of the said area, filed a complaint against the encroachers at the Vaazhaich-cheanai courts. 

When the case was taken up for investigation at Vaazhaichcheani Courts on 03 December, none of the respondents who had encroached the lands were present at the hearing. The Magistrate had to put off the hearing of the cases for a date in January 2013. 

Following this, Mr Thavarasa has received transfer notice by the Colombo government. 

In the meantime, Tamil dairy farmers complain that the Batticaloa district Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentararians have failed to visit their pasture lands where encroachment had taken place despite several requests made to them by affected farmers.


One Hundred Thousand Tamils Missing After Sri Lanka War

Frances Harrison

uk
17/12/2012
World Bank population data from Sri Lanka indicates up to a hundred thousand Tamils are unaccounted for after the final war against the Tamil Tiger rebels in 2009, raising questions about whether they could be dead.
A UN report cited a death toll of forty thousand for the climax of the war in 2009 but a UN internal inquiry last month acknowledged for the first time that up to seventy thousand civilian deaths were possible.
The leaked World Bank spreadsheets broken down by village for the north of the island estimate numbers of returnees to the former conflict area in mid 2010. The Bank also cites Statistical Handbook Numbers for population in 2007 - before the fighting intensified. The two sets of data reveal 101,748 people missing from Mullaitivu District - the area that bore the brunt of the final fighting. This is the equivalent of 28,899 households. This number has been confirmed to me by the World Bank, though they add "other interpretations about the population data that are not included in the document can not be attributed to the World Bank".
A similar conclusion about the missing population can be drawn when comparing the 2010 World Bank data with census numbers from 2006. The latter were the result of a joint government and rebel head count in the area.
Sceptics might argue the 2006 figures were probably exaggerated by the Tigers and local officials close to them in order to secure more aid. However exactly the same argument could be made for inflating numbers in 2010, which were similarly used for allocating aid.
It's also not clear if the 2010 World Bank resettlement estimates include the 11,000 Tamil combatants held in detention at that point - or many thousands of Tamils who bribed their way out of the internment camp and escaped to southern India. It's also possible some of the missing Tamils settled elsewhere in the island but unlikely very large numbers because they do not appear elsewhere in the northern provinces judging by the Bank's own data. The onus is now on the Sri Lankan government to explain why huge numbers of people appear to be missing from their own population data.
"I lost count of how many bodies I buried in 2009," says Murugan, a Tamil fisherman from Sri Lanka now in France, with a scar under his right eye from fighting for the naval wing of the Tamil Tigers. "I just keep seeing the bodies of babies just four or five months old, their limbs and heads and body parts spread all over the place," he says, tormented by nightmares.
By the climax of Sri Lanka's conflict in 2009, hundreds of thousands of Tamil civilians were penned into a tiny spit of sandy land along the eastern coast, living in squalid makeshift encampments, starving, exhausted and under fire from the Sri Lankan military. Rebel fighters like Murugan couldn't go out to sea to fight in their gunboats because they were hemmed in, so these burly men were ordered to dispose of the bodies as quickly as possible before they started to rot in the tropical heat. They had experience - after the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami Sea Tigers pulled out the rotting limbs from the marshes.
By late January 2009 the corpses started mounting up as the army shelled a safe zone it had demarcated for civilians and hundreds of thousands of people fled under fire towards the coast. "I saw a river full of dead bodies. I can't describe it. It was as if a tsunami had come again but this time inland," says Murugan.
In March in a small coastal village called Puttumattalan where a hundred thousand people had taken shelter, Murugan says he was ordered to bury 700 people who died trying to cross over the lagoon to the army side at night. "I think the army must have thought they were Tigers advancing on them and they were all killed near the edge of the water," he says.
It took five or six days to dispose of all the corpses. Murugan had to erect a fence to block the view of the Sri Lankan snipers on the other side of the water so he could bring in an earthmover to scoop up the dead without being shot at.
"We just dropped the bodies in ditches because there were so many. It was the worst thing in the world. They were all sorts - men, women and kids. More women than men, but children of all ages. Sometimes even now I think of committing suicide. It was terrible. It was like a crematorium, bodies and more bodies and blood everywhere. Till I die I will never forget what I saw there".
Murugan's account is consistent with testimony from many other survivors, who describe a nightmarish place. Many have stories of climbing out of their primitive bunkers after a night of relentless shelling only to find the dismembered body parts of their neighbours strewn about.
Today the scale of the tragedy in 2009 in that tiny corner of Sri Lanka is not known. The Sri Lankan government excluded international aid workers and independent journalists from the war zone, making reliable information hard to come by. We now know a UN data collection team received unconfirmed reports of fifty thousand deaths and injuries during the war but by the final weeks it was impossible to count bodies. Wikileaks cables reveal the UN came to a very rough estimate of between 7,000-17,000 people missing presumed dead in the final week of fighting in May 2009.
By then the makeshift hospital had ceased functioning, leaving the injured to die. Already the survival rate had dropped drastically; people were exhausted, their reserves depleted. Medicine and food were desperately short. On May 10th a Catholic priest wrote to the Pope saying there had been 3318 dead the night before and 4000 injured. On the final day of the war another Catholic priest told me he'd seen thousands of bodies lying about as he left the war zone. I questioned him about whether he meant hundreds and he repeated thousands.
Nearly four years on there is no agreed death toll, even to the nearest ten thousand lives. That's why an international investigation is required to establish the truth about what may be one of the least reported but worst atrocities of recent decades - both in terms of the speed and the scale of the killing.

War Widows Struggle in a ‘Man’s World’

Monday, December 17, 2012
, Nepal, Dec 13 2012 (IPS) - Sita Tamang’s husband went missing sometime in 2004, two years before Nepal’s civil war came to an end. A native of Dharan, a town about 600 kilometres southeast of Kathmandu, Tamang waited seven years after his disappearance before she tried to claim compensation offered by the government after a 2006 peace deal ended this country’s bloodshed.
"War or no war, it is still a man's world out there,” says war widow Rajina Mary from Sri Lanka's northern Kilinochchi District. Credit: Amantha Perera/IPSWhen she finally managed to get hold of government officials in Dharan overseeing compensation procedures, she was met with the thorny request that she “prove” her marriage to the father of her three children, whom she had lived with for a decade and a half.
As was customary, Tamang and her husband had gone through the traditional marriage ceremony but had not obtained any civil documents.
In addition to taking care of her three children, including two daughters, Tamang was saddled with the added burden of seeking the required paperwork before even beginning the bureaucratic process of securing compensation.
“That is the way things are here,” she told IPS simply. “Women will always have it a bit hard.”
Thousands of miles away, in northern Sri Lanka, Rajina Mary, a 38-year-old war widow with four children, ran into similar hurdles when she began constructing a new house with assistance from the Sri Lanka Red Cross in late 2010, about a year and a half after this country’s civil war ended.
“The labourers would not take orders or instructions from me because I was a woman. They are used to taking orders from men,” Mary told IPS, standing in front her house in the village of Selvanagar in the northern Kilinochchi district, deep in the former war zone.
When the workmen refused to follow her instructions, Mary and her children were forced to take over the construction themselves, digging most of the foundation and carrying hundreds of bricks and cement sacks.
“It was cheaper for us. But that is the way things are here, it is a very male-dominated society,” Mary said, echoing Tamang’s words.
Aid workers, counsellors and experts working in post-conflict regions in the two South Asian countries say the patriarchal nature of rural societies makes them unenviable locations for widows or female heads of households.

A woman remains pensive during a support group meeting for families of missing persons in the southeastern Nepali town of Biratnagar Credit: Amantha Perera/IPS.
“There is a lot of anxiety, a lot of depression. Most of these women live in isolation without anyone to talk to, even when they live among family,” Srijana Bhandari, a counsellor with the Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC) working in Dharan, told IPS.
After her husband disappeared in 2004, one woman struggled for seven years to send her son to school and seek assistance for her young daughter’s epileptic condition. It was only in November 2011, when WOREC began talking to her, that she finally opened up about the many challenges confronting women suddenly left to fend for themselves and their families.
Now, thanks to the advocacy group’s intervention, her son has a scholarship at the village school and she receives a monthly medical stipend for her daughter.
“Before we spoke with her, she was finding it really hard, there was no one to help her, some members of her family even looked at her as a burden,” Kamal Koirala, WOREC’s programme coordinator, told IPS.
Even on the rare occasions when women find new marriage prospects, they come under enormous pressure – ironically from their female in-laws – to reject the offer. As a result, many women end up eloping, leaving their children behind, WOREC officials said.
Koirala told IPS that women rarely, if ever, open up about pressure brought on them to turn to sex work, but said aid workers have strong suspicions that the practice is widespread.
The situation is not much different in Sri Lanka according to Saroja Sivachandran, who heads the Centre for Women and Development, a non-governmental organisation working on gender issues in the country’s northern Jaffna peninsula.
Despite a three-decade-long conflict in which many females fought alongside their male counterparts, especially among the ranks of the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), northern Tamil society is still steeped in patriarchal values, Sivachandran told IPS.
“The problem is that now, single women or female heads of households – and there are thousands of them – have to compete with males for everything from jobs to housing assistance,” she said.
In both countries, scores of women were left to navigate the post-war landscape after the fighting ended.
The Nepali Red Cross lists 1401 persons as still missing, six years after the conflict ended. Officials say at least 90 percent of the families left behind are now headed by women, 80 percent of whom are mothers.
In Sri Lanka, the United Nations estimates that around 30,000 of the 110,000 families that have returned to the former war zone in the northern province are headed by women.
In 2010, the World Bank found that two-thirds of the participants in a cash for work programme worth 5.5 million dollars were women.
In fact, programme managers made special allowances for the women by offering more flexible working hours. The programme also paid elders who looked after children while their mothers or caregivers took part in the work scheme.
But the women who are faced with rebuilding their lives after decades of war, while also dealing with the suffocating customs and traditions of male dominance that date back generations, say there is very little chance of things changing.
“It was like this even during the fighting, why should it change when there is no fighting?” Mary asked.

The Pitfall Of Implementing LLRC Only In Part

By Jehan Perera -December 17, 2012
Jehan Perera
Colombo TelegraphRecent incidents in Jaffna are a matter for concern.  Two such incidents have widely publicized and have attracted much commentary.  Both of them involve the civilian population and the security forces. One case has involved Tamil women recruits into the army and the other university students who were commemorating the war dead.  As a result of these incidents the political debate about inter-ethnic relations in relation to the government has taken a turn for the worse.  The good work that the government is doing in terms of post-war economic development and recovery is being negated in increased acrimony.  The cycle of political grievance, protest, repression and violence that culminated in internal war needs to be guarded against.   The experience of the past would suggest that the better way is through political reform that is mutually acceptable.
In its most significant observation, the final report of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission appointed shortly after the end of the war by President Mahinda Rajapaksa stated that the political situation at has become basically similar to the situation that existed when the country obtained its independence in 1948.  The problem at that time was how to share political power equitably between the ethnic majority and minorities. This problem remains unresolved to this day.  In its voluminous report the LLRC has provided country with the vision and tools to make a break with its divided past.  There are more than 160 well thought out recommendations in the report of which about one half have been taken on board by the government in its LLRC Action Plan.  But even the half that has passed muster with the government has yet to be implemented in any substantial manner.
The LLRC report can be counted as among the major achievements by the government.  The LLRC was originally established by the government as a defensive measure.  It was to forestall an anticipated hostile UN investigation into the last phase of the war and human rights violations that allegedly took place at that time.  Due to its comprehensive quality the LLRC report has gone far beyond the original scope of what was intended or hoped for, as noted by its nationalist detractors.  Indeed, it has taken the centre stage of the international dialogue with the Sri Lankan government regarding post-war reconciliation.  The government is bound by the UN Human Right Council’s resolution of March 2012 to implement the LLRC report.  In March 2013 the government will have to report back to the UN about how well it has implemented the LLRC recommendations.
PARTIAL IMPLEMENTATION                            Read More