Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, October 22, 2012


The 13th Amendment: Gota Should Remain Loudly Silent On Political Matters

Dangerous Conspiracy To Repeal The 13th Amendment ?
The Agreement came at a time when the JR Jayawardene Government was under extreme pressure simultaneously from the JVP in the South and the LTTE in the North
Colombo Telegraph
The 13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution came by largely as a result of the Indo Lanka Agreement(1987) after substantial and careful study by legal and other experts of both countries. The Agreement came at a time when the JR Jayawardene Government was under extreme pressure simultaneously from the JVP in the South and the LTTE in the North – both having launched island-wide attacks on State utilities as well as the Police and the armed forces. It is reported in a crucial meeting called by President Jayawardena – in the presence of most of the senior Cabinet Ministers the President asked the 4 chiefs of the forces individually if they can hold the government’s writ in the event of attacks both by the JVP and the LTTE. As the Forces chiefs answered in the negative, Jayawardena had obtained the sanction of his Cabinet (1) to call in the IPKF to use both their substantial personnel and material resources to disarm the LTTE within a specified period (2) to concentrate using available Forces personnel in the South to confront the JVP insurrection, which, by that time had succeeded in its mis-information that the JRJ Govt was in the process of handing over the country to India.
It may be recalled from 1971 the JVP had structured their programme, including the initial 5 lessons ofRohana Wijeweera, on an anti-Indian platform. But, in fact, they aimed at the local Tamil population – both indigenous and of recent Indian origin (Estate Tamils) to create anarchy in the country. It was this hatred that was used, in a large measure, to provide the venom for the attack on Tamils and their properties in Colombo and the rest of the country in the pre-planned pogrom against them in July 1983. JVP cadres are known to have created much of the mayhem. It is note-worthy many Indian-owned businesses were also destroyed during this period – although the Sindhi, Gujerati and Memon industrialists, who lost millions then, had nothing to do with the Separatist Agenda – then successfully used to poison Sinhala minds.
While the reality is JR Jayawardena used his considerable political experience and skills to get the better of the younger Indian PM Shri Rajiv Gandhi to Sri Lanka’s advantage to disarm LTTE using Indian soldiers and material resources, the JVP and Sinhala extremists – both lay and cleric – conspired here to project to the Sinhala mind the Indian Govt used coercion on the JRJ Govt to sign the Indo-Lanka Agreement. That mind-set has fertile soil in the semi-educated and confused Sinhala mind in a generation that is now over a quarter century old. The impression then and now in India, among political leaders, historians and academic circles is that India walked into a JRJ laid trap – from which it never regained fully. This is probably why when V.P. Singh took over as PM one of his first acts was to recall the IPKF.
The object of the I-L Accord was to help the alienated Tamils in the North Eastern Province (then 2 Provinces) via the instrument of the 13th Amendment to enable them to secure minimum rights in running their own affairs. Both PM’s and their teams were of the view the Separate State option should be discouraged at all costs. Clearly, Prabakaran and the LTTE were against this line of thought because by then Prabakaran had embarked on his “Eelam or bust” course. There is reason to believe he would have been content with local rule by the Tamils in the North and East, without prejudice to other minorities within, if Mrs Bandaranaike’s or JRJ’s governments had wisely gone on a path to be accommodative to the Tamils. But both failed in that they considered the Tamil struggle as insignificant and, they erre in the belief this could otherwise be addressed by their numerically superior armed forces. This is surely why both refused to yield to the peaceful political agitation of the Tamil people between 1970 to the mid-1980s. This is not to mention the racially-inclined and anti-Indian political forces within both governments which did its share in driving the Tamils to the extra-Parliamentary route.
The Governments of JRJ, Premadasa and CBK could not ignore the potent threat of the Buddhist hierarchy – under the influence of the considerably powerful Sinhala extremist wing – to ignore concessions to Tamils in the NEP. Therefore, the benefits of the 13th Amendment did not go to where it was originally intended. Instead – costly, ineffective, duplicatory and corrupt Provincial Councils came into effect in all 7 Provinces and remain there. Arguably, they are totally unpopular with the people in general. As to the Tamils, Prabakaran and the LTTE have to accept the blame because they did not allow the PCs to take root in the NEP. The merging of the 2 Provinces into a single North Eastern Province was aimed initially to address the two main burning issues of the Tamil Nation viz:- State-aided Colonisation and the engineered demographic change of the ethnic ratio. These have been going on in full force from 1956.
It needs to be mentioned here the issue was further complicated by the emergence of an important judicial officer around year 2000 – who hardly concealed his ultimate aim of getting into Party politics. This is unprecedented becausen all his illustrious predecessors shunned the thought of politics and went into graceful retirement. The Sinhala extremist fringe was to jump at the opportunity. They made certain the man was properly used by the Sinhala supremacists to commit the sacrilege of violating a solemn Protocol entered into between the Governments of both India and Sri Lanka. India cannot be a silent witness to this deliberate act of truancy. The post-2000 (year) period saw rapid increase in State-aided Colonisation where the once majority community in the Eastern Province, the Tamils, are now rendered to virtually the 3rd position.So much so, in the recently concluded PC Elections, for the first time in the history of post-Independent Sri Lanka, Tamils no longer are in the majority in the EP – a grotesque aberration that needs to be addressed soon.
The story does not end there. It is clear the Rajapakse government is under pressure to allow PC Elections in the North. Not that they want to. But India and the international community have given them sufficient notice to get their act together. While he allows Elections hither and thither Rajapakse finds flimsy excuses to allow the Tamil people to run their own affairs in the North. With the UN/Geneve staring him at the face come November 2012, he is forced to yield to the Northern PC Elections by late 2013. He knows the Tamils of the North will reject him soundly – in spite of the intimidating and omnipresent armed forces – working hand in glove with his band of “rejected” Tamil political goon squads and killer outfits. Such a rejection, the extremist and Sinhala supremacist groupings close to him will tell him, can increase the chances of the Tamil NEP seeking (and perhaps succeeding soon) the status of a Separate Nation. The example of South Sudan and Bandermoro is there for all to see.
The Sinhala extremists have, therefore, geared themselves not to take the chance of a NP PC gamble.
The powerful Defence Secretary Gothabaya Rajapakse – a government servant and who should remain loudly silent on political matters – has fired the first salvo in calling for the repeat of the 13th Amendment. Lapdog Weerawansa is carrying the baton, predictably. The ever obliging JHU is doing its bit – with that man said to be a lawyer, Gammanpila, calling also repeating Gothabaya’s call abrogation. Gammanpila’s clearly lacks understanding how global diplomacy moves in matters of violation of protocols between sovreign States.
Whatever mask Mahinda Rajapakse wears here, it is unmistakeable he is behind every one of these infantile moves.
When this question was posed to TNA’s Sampanthan by the local media last week, he chose his words carefully and exclaimed “there will be consequences to pay” The Indian Govt – the other party to the Accord – is unlikely to allow its nose to be rubbed in public by what it privately considers a recalcitrant neighbour. Certainly not when a crucial General Election is round the corner in India . In the interest of all, it is bestPresident Rajapakse review his options with a group of trusted senior academics, analysts and policy-makers. In the political column of a respected and savvy Sunday English newspaper the subject is given much credence and described as “Indo-Lankan diplomatic ties are tense and have reached the lowest levels in years” This is certainly not a compliment to President Rajapakse’s diplomatic acumen. These are careful words that should not be ignored.

GTF - 'Diaspora will not barter justice'

22 October 2012

සතියේ කාලීන පුවත්See the full interview in Sinhala here.

ශ්‍රව්‍ය දෘශ්‍ය වාදනය


The Global Tamil Forum, an international body comprising of Tamil diaspora groups, has reasserted the position of the diaspora, stating that justice for the deaths of over 40,000 people remains paramount over political negotiations.

Speaking to BBC Sinhala a spokesperson said, 

'If Rajapaksa regime thinks that the Diaspora will compromise on the demand for justice through an independent international investigation into  the allegations of crimes committed at the end of the war, then he is wrong.

We will not barter the justice process to any political negotiations. Over 40,000 of our people were killed, we want to know the truth of what happened and how they perished.'
Responding to reports that the Sri Lankan government was to engage in talks with the Tamil diaspora, the GTF said,
'As far as we know there is no credible Diaspora organisation that is currently in any talks with the Government of Sri Lanka'

If (Sri Lankan President) Rajapaksa wanted to resolve the Tamil National Question he could have easily done so by talking with the elected members of the Tamil people the TNA... Nearly 4 years have passed but no genuine efforts have been made by Rajapaksa government in resolving the Tamil National Question.'

'We feel that because of the UN processes that are forthcoming where  Rajapaksa government will be answerable to the international community is  why he is now coming up with these suggestions of talks in such a rush.'
The spokesperson further stated,
'Unless the current government recognises that just as there is a Sinhala Nation that there is a Tamil Nation too in that island, there will be little point in talking'
On the recent release of KP the spokesperson said,
'Regarding working with KP in Sri Lanka, if someone is doing some good to our people on the ground, what does it matter who does it, we welcome any help.However we certainly are not working with KP. KP is a captured man imprisoned by the Rajapaksa regime.'
See the full interview in Sinhala here.

A Point Of View: What kind of superpower could China be?


BBC
China is on course to becoming a superpower - but not in the way many expect, writes economist Martin Jacques.
China's first aircraft carrier is a former Soviet vessel, the Varyag
chinese aircraft carrier
















They sent their appeal to mark 1,000 days since the disappearance of an anti-establishment cartoonist-cum-journalist, which remains unsolved.
There are still reports of kidnappings, or attempted kidnappings, every month, a BBC correspondent says.
The government and security forces deny abducting people.
Campaigners handed the UN a letter, also delivered to the Sri Lankan president, speaker and opposition leader, saying these men, along with Mr Ban, had the power to make progress in fighting disappearances.
They urged the government to prosecute those responsible and give information about people secretly detained.
The writers of the letter said they believed the victims were being held "somewhere on this island".

Brutality and Violence Escalate in Sri Lanka: Prominent Activists and Journalists Targeted

10/22/2012
2012-10-19-images-SunilaAbeysekera.gif
The Huffington Post"What does it mean to call a country democratic when government critics are exiled and branded terrorists? Who decides what is patriotic and what is not? Whose voices are actually being heard? Whose rights are really being protected?" -- Sunila Abeysekera, Prominent Sri Lankan Human Rights Activist.
Sometimes winners lose.
It's a hard pill to swallow for any activist. After years of struggling to end a violent armed conflict, to usher one's country from a state of "war" to a state of "peace," that the post-war environment should emerge as more corrupt and less safe can be downright disheartening.
In Sri Lanka, those who worked tirelessly to help end the decades-long war are losing the very thing they've fought for, peace and reconciliation. Sri Lankan activists, journalists and outspoken government critics are being arrested, disappeared, tortured and exiled for daring to challenge the Sri Lankan government on its policies during the final phase of the 30-year war against the Liberation Tamil Tigers of Eelam (LTTE). Many of these same activists were once praised for their work in Sri Lanka, while included in international efforts to bring the war to a responsible end. Now, government-sponsored media outlets are vilifying them for speaking against the way in which their government "won" the war in 2009 and thereafter.
One of those brave Sri Lankan activists, Sunila Abeysekera, is the feature of this month's Faces Of Change blog.
The first time I saw Sunila in action was in Nepal in 2003.

The 13th Amendment: UPFA Government Is Heading For Its First Defeat In The Parlaiment

By Sumanasiri Liyanage -October 22, 2012 
Sumanasiri Liyanage
Colombo TelegraphThe virtual repeal of the 17th Amendment as a necessary corollary of the enactment of the 18th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka, the chauvinist forces in the South began to raise the possibility of further amendment to the constitution by using the two-third majority that the United Peoples’ Freedom Alliance (UPFA) have in the Parliament. Their clear target has been the 13th Amendment that introduced in 1987 for the first time in independent Sri Lanka a devolved system of government to make the government structure more democratic and decentralized many flaws of the new system notwithstanding. With the decision of the Supreme Court on theDivineguma Bill and the new issue on if the decision of the Provincial Governor can be considered as the decision of the Provincial Council, we witness today a reemergence of the debate on the place and future of the 13th Amendment in the constitutional landscape in Sri Lanka. My personal opinion is that the decision of the Supreme Court on the Divineguma Bill was not accurate. However, it would be good and justifiable even in the event of the absence of a Supreme Court decision to place the bills of this nature before the Provincial Councils to obtain their views. It is interesting to see that the Divineguma Bill has been used as a scapegoat by the chauvinist forces to revive their long standing opposition to the system of devolution in general and to the 13th Amendment in particular. My argument in this article is based naturally on the conventional position I have been holding since the aggravation of the national question in the early 1980s. I stand for devolved system of governance. Further, I believe that the constitutional structure that defines the power map of the country should be changed in order to accommodate the demands of the numerically small nations living within the boundaries of the country. The failure and unwillingness of the ruling elites of this country in the last 65 years to make such changes is in my view one of the reasons for the aggravation of the national question in the early 1980s.
Minister Wimal Weerawansa has written to the President suggesting him to hold a referendum on 13th Amendment. Minister should be aware that the 13th Amendment cannot be repealed by holding a referendum. Prior to that, the Minister and his government should present a bill to the Parliament clearly notifying that the bill proposes to repeal the 13th Amendment. As the Island reported (October 22, 2012) a government bureaucrat, the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, has advised that the Sri Lanka Freedom Party takes a bold decision to repeal the 13th Amendment in order to face the “post-war strategy of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA)’. A similar view was expressed by a number of spokespersons belonging to Jatika Hela Urumaya. It appears that there is a shift in the argument that they have put forward against the 13th Amendment. Using the Divineguma incident, they argue that the legislative power of the Parliament has been reduced as a result of the 13th Amendment and the presence of the Provincial Council system. This is not true. According to the Constitution of Sri Lanka, peoples’ sovereignty lies with the people and the people exercise this sovereignty through elected bodies, namely, (1) the Parliament and (2) the Provincial Councils and directly through (3) a referendum. A part of the legislative power previously exercised by the Parliament was devolved in 1987 to second-tier governments by creating Provincial Councils. This is an application of the subsidiary principle in taking decision-making. Hence it is not correct to argue that the creation of the provincial council system has reduced the legislative power of the Parliament. It seems that at least one section of the government has started its preparatory work for proposed Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC). I have been arguing that the TNA, SLMC and other opposition parties should not participate in the PSC exercise unless the government promises to clearly identify the point of departure of the PSC deliberation. In an previous article, I mentioned these conditionalities should include the followings: (1) the full implementation of the LLRC should not be a reduction of subjects devolved by the 13th Amendment. Since India appears to be pressing for the TNA to participate in PSC deliberation, India should also assure those three condionalities be fulfilled before the commencement of PSC deliberation.
Will the government seriously think to repeal the 13th Amendment by giving to the pressure exerted by some of the constituent parties of the government and some bureaucrats? It is not easy to offer a definite answer to this question. However, it seems to that the government intends to limit PSC deliberation by introducing a phony power-sharing system in place of the PC system. Of course, there is a general criticism against the PC system that it has become a kind of a white elephant. This is not an outcome of the weakness of the PC system, but a direct result of the continuous encroachment of the central government into the sphere of the PC. So, it is not surprising for common people to view the PCs as duplicating mechanism. If the government intends to repeal the 13th Amendment, it has to present a bill to the Parliament by clearly stating its intention. And the bill has to be passed by the Parliament by two-third majority. Since, it can be interpreted as a major change of the substance of the constitution, the bill after passing has to be place before the people in a referendum.
As the UPFA government today enjoys the two-third majority in the Parliament, Weerawansa, Ranawaka and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa may believe that the constitutional huddles on the path of repealing the 13th Amendment can be thus overcome. However, on the other hand, one may also project that such a bill would bring the UPFA government its first defeat in the Parliament. The SLMC would be forced to sever its relations with the government in such a situation. The five left party members in the UPFA government have to prove that at least the left parties have some courage left so that they can stand up to their principles. Some members of the SLFP that include Cabinet ministers may not support a bill of that nature. So let me make a prediction as concluding remark. Attempts to repeal the 13th Amendment will be the commencement of the downfall of the UPFA regime.
*The writer is a co-coordinator of the Marx School, Colombo, Negombo and Kandy. E-mail: sumane_l@yahoo.com
Poster campaign against CPA executive director - PHRE

Monday, 22 October 2012 

People for Human Rights and Equality, Australia is saddened and disturbed by the recent poster campaign in Colombo threatening harm to Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, the executive Director of the Centre for Policy alternatives.
This is not the first time Dr. Saravanamuttu has been similarly threatened. As a forthright critic of the government’s lack of enthusiasm for freedom of expression, law and order and genuine reconciliation, Dr. Saravanamuttu has often come under attack from groups that have failed to discern the genuine concern for the people of Sri Lanka and patriotism underlying Dr Saravanamuttu’s actions.
PHRE condemns without reservation all such attacks including the latest poster campaign against Dr. Saravanamuttu and holds the government of Sri Lanka responsible for Dr. Saravanamuttu’s safety.
PHRE also calls upon all organisations, governments and individuals who value democracy and freedom of speech in Sri Lanka to exert whatever influence they can bring to bear upon the Sri Lankan government to ensure that Dr. Saravanamuttu and others like him who defend fundamental freedoms and the rule of law in Sri Lanka, remain unharmed and that the steadily narrowing space for freedom of expression in the country is safeguarded.
22 October 2012
The People for Human Rights and Equality (PHRE),Melbourne.

Fighter plane gift to British in WWI: diaspora mindset of Jaffna Tamils revisited

TamilNet[TamilNet, Monday, 22 October 2012, 03:27 GMT]
On special requests sent to colonial communities by the British to support them in the war against Germany, on 22 Dec 1915, Jaffna Tamils living in Malaya, donated the cost of a fighter plane and named it “Jaffna,” says an informed source, adding that it shows the ‘characteristic of Eezham Tamils supporting the war efforts of guardians of safety, justice and economic prosperity.’ But almost during the time, poet Bharathi in Tamil Nadu welcomed the Russian Revolution of 1917. During WWII, a number of Eezham Tamils joined the Tamil Nadu Tamils in Malaya in supporting the Indian National Army of Subhas Chandra Bose, aligned with the Japanese. Some among them saw the imperialist games and joined the Malayan Communist Party led by Chinese in Malaya. What is the ideological course of the diaspora today, in response to the establishments-led genocide, ask Eezham Tamil activists in the island. 
A historical note on ‘Jaffna’ fighter plane sent to TamilNet by the informed source:
F.E. 2b, Malaya Tamils' gift to the British
F.E. 2b, Malaya Tamils' gift to the British
"The Malayan Jaffna Tamil community was intensely loyal to the British Crown and when World War I started Ganapathypillai was amongst those who contributed liberally to the British War Fund. A Committee was also elected to start collecting funds to pay for the cost of a British Fighter Plane. Dr E T McIntyre was elected Chairman and Ganapathypillai was prominent amongst the fund-raisers in Taiping.

When the Committee informed the British Government of their intentions, the Government replied that they were aware of the Malayan Jaffna Tamil community’s limited resources and tactfully suggested that they may wish to consider the cheaper alternative of funding the cost of an observation plane. The Committee indignantly replied that they would somehow or the other raise the cost of a fighter plane so as to maximize the damage that could be inflicted on the Germans!

Within a few months the cost of a fighter plane (2250 Pounds) was collected and remitted to the British Government in London with the request that the plane be named “Jaffna”. Bonar Law, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, wrote back to the Jaffna Tamils thanking them for their patriotic spirit in raising the cost of a fighter plane out of their comparatively small resources.

A few months after "The Jaffna" entered war service, a Squadron of FE2Bs of the same type of plane as The Jaffna, flying for No. 25 Squadron of the Royal Flying Corps (the forerunner of the RAF) encountered the Fokker Eindekker piloted by the German Ace, Max Immelmann who had already downed at least 17 British planes. Max's plane was shot down in the encounter and he lost his life. The Jaffna may well have been in this squadron.”
The F.E.2 (Farman Experimental 2) designation of the aircraft refers to three distinct designs, all pushers based on the general layout employed by the French aircraft designers, the Farman Brothers.
War historians have also noted that the F.E. 2 biplane was operated as a day and night bomber, and that the F.E.2 was instrumental in ending the Fokker Scourge that had seen the German Air Service establish a measure of air superiority on the Western Front from the late summer of 1915 to the following spring. 
* * *
Meanwhile, a student of history has recently brought the attention of TamilNet to a World War II surrender clipping of 1945, in which the US General and Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces Douglas Mac Arthur was asserting at the final surrender of Japan at the Tokyo Bay that “The issues involving divergent ideals and ideologies have been determined on the battlefields of the world and, hence, are not for our discussion or debate.”
This is exactly the arrogant stand of genocidal Sri Lanka and its abetters today, for their ideology of achieving an imperialist and agent-imperialist agenda, without shunning genocide or annihilation of a nation.
But annals of history have shown how it was only a matter of just five years for Douglas Mac Arthur to get discredited in the Korean War by a new ideological alignment in the East that forced his crestfallen recall, the student of history told TamilNet, adding that the diaspora Tamils should now seriously think of forging a right course of international struggle that would align their righteous aspirations with a noble cause of entire humanity.
The clipping on WWII surrender of Japan: 
Lanka politics threatens ties with India

, TNN | Oct 23, 2012
The Times of IndiaNEW DELHI: The ongoing one-upmanship between the Sri Lankan government and TNA, which represents a vast majority of Tamil population in the island nation, has taken a dangerous turn with many within the government, including President Mahinda Rajapaksa's brother and defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, demanding that the 13th amendment to the Constitution, a product of the Rajiv Gandhi-Jayewardene 1987 accord, be repealed altogether. 

Though the 13th amendment, which guarantees devolution of power to the provinces and comprises several other major concession to the Tamils, has often been pejoratively referred to as an "imported solution", rarely has it been subjected to such attack by parties within the ruling coalition. Indian officials here said they were "surprised" by the development, but added they would respond at the right moment. Sources confirmed that Gotabhaya will be visiting India this week, and that the issue will be taken up with him. 

Gotabhaya's call for abolition of the 13th amendment is said to be in response to the "post-war strategy" of the TNA. India has repeatedly, and successfully, sought a reiteration from Lanka of its commitment to the 13th amendment, saying it was imperative for reconciliation after the war ended in 2009. Despite raising doubts about the agenda of TNA, described by India as a credible body, President Rajapaksa had told TOI earlier this year that his government remained committed to 13th amendment. A joint statement issued by the two countries last year had said that "a devolution package, building upon the 13th amendment, would create conditions for genuine reconciliation". 

Indian officials underlined how Lanka made the same commitment in the 2008 Universal Periodic Review (UPR), which looks at the human rights record of all UN member states every four years. Interestingly, Lanka's record will be reviewed again by the UPR in early next month with India being one of the three countries that will carry it out. "This is not just a commitment made to India but to international agencies," said an official. 

The reconciliation talks, which started after the war, collapsed in January with President Rajapaksa insisting that the process could be taken forward only through a Parliament Select Committee (PSC). The TNA has refused to join the PSC. 

While ties have suffered because of India's vote at the UN Human Rights Council against Sri Lanka, PM Manmohan Singh did try to save the situation when he met Rajapaksa last month and assured him of New Delhi's support at international fora in future. In the talks, though, India also conveyed to Lanka that it looked upon TNA as a credible entity with which talks must be resumed. The relations now threaten to hit an all-time low with the talk about scrapping the 13th amendment altogether. 

WikiLeaks: A Convicted Norwegian Murderer Is Supported By The GoSL

Colombo Telegraph
A personal threat to Erik Solheim |POTO: HÅKON MOSVOLD LARSEN / SCANPIX
“Bjotveit believes that Rovik is supported by the GSL, and receives funding from Sri Lankan hard-liners. For example, the GSL Ministry of Defense recently posted an op-ed from Rovik and its website also previously advertised one of Rovik’s speaking engagements.” the US Embassy Oslo informed Washington.
A Leaked “CONFIDENTIAL” US diplomatic cable, dated May 02, 2007, recounts the details of a meeting the US Embassy officials has had with the Norwegian MFA Adviser in the Peace and Reconciliation Section,  Sondre Bjotveit in Oslo on April 30, 2007 .The Colombo Telegraph found the related leaked cable from the WikiLeaks database which is classified by Acting DCM Kristen F. Bauer.
Under the subheading “Solheim’s Safety; Seeming GSL Endorsement of Detractor” the embassy wrote “According to Bjotveit, the PST (Norway’s primary intelligence agency) is closely following the actions of Falk Rune Rovik, an outspoken critic of Minister Solheim. Previously jailed for murder in 1997, Rovik served ten years of detention in a mental health institution. Viewed by Norwegian authorities as dangerous, he frequently speaks out against Norway’s role in the Sri Lankan press, and most recently visited Toronto, Canada, where he purportedly met with members of Amnesty International. His views, which include accusing Norway of terrorism in Sri Lanka, have proven problematic and embarrassing to the GON, particularly given that Rovik is a Norwegian citizen.”
“Bjotveit believes that Rovik is supported by the GSL, and receives funding from Sri Lankan hard-liners. For example, the GSL Ministry of Defense recently posted an op-ed from Rovik and its website also previously advertised one of Rovik’s speaking engagements. Bjotveit denied that these inflammatory efforts tacitly (if not overtly) supported by the GSL were detracting from the GON’s facilitation efforts. He admitted, however, that the Norwegian cultural predilection for dialogue was being tested by Rovik’s destabilizing actions, which the MFA has responded to in statements to Sri Lankan press.” they further wrote.
Placing a comment the embassy wrote “The GON continues to press the peace process, while recognizing that both the GSL and LTTE have violated the CFA. Rovik further complicates matters and may pose a potential threat to Solheim’s personal security. The GSL’s apparent encouragement of Rovik’s public diatribe against GON efforts is one more destabilizing factor. Although the resilient Norwegians seem calm and focused, their steadfastness to resolving the Sri Lankan crises is being sorely tested by the deepening Sri Lanka violence and Rovik’s protests.”

Sunday, October 21, 2012

More Broken Promises To Farmers

President’s daily expense over Rs.20 million



(1)Sri Lanka’s Deadly Track Record For Journalists Post Independence   

(More Broken Promises)         By Raisa Wickrematunge               Democracy in Jaffna ( )                      


Jaffna-based <i>Uthayan</i> newspaper Editor Gnanasundaram Kuhanathan

Refugees for 20 Years, Tamil Catholic Families Forced to Live in the Jungle(More Broken Promises )




More Broken Promises To Farmers


Banks send letters demanding loan installments
By Niranjala Ariyawansha-Sunday, October 21, 2012
Reminders to farmers to pay their loan installments
Drought stricken farmers in the dry zone lament that the government has failed to honor its promise and that they have been sent letters by banks seeking installment payments for loans taken by them to cultivate the Yala harvest that has failed due to the water shortage.
“At that time we asked the President to give us this promise in writing. Because we knew that at election time they give false promises. But they didn’t give it in writing. As we had no alternative we voted for them. As we suspected, President deceived the helpless farmers this time as well,” said Susantha Kumara Navaratna from Mahaweli system H at Nuwerakalaviya in Anuradapura.
The representatives of the All Island Farmer Federation complained that although President promised to provide relief for the failed crop and to write off the loans taken from banks during the Yala season at Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts, none of those promises have been kept.
According to the official statistics of the Government, more than 100,000 paddy lands have been destroyed due to the severe drought experienced during last five months. President on his visits to Anuradhapura during the North Central Provincial Council elections, promised the farmers to cancel the loans taken by them for cultivation from the state banks.
But barely weeks following the elections the farmers in Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa complain that instead of writing off the loans they are receiving reminders from the banks to pay the loan installments. The state bank officials take the position that they have not received any circular from the government with regard to writing off these loans and therefore they have to take action according to the prevailing financial regulations.
Farmers say they are unable to repay the loans as they find it even difficult to manage their day-to-day life. By now they have not only pawned their jewellery but also items such as tractors, which they use for farming activities.
Namal Karunaratna, President of the All Island Farmer Federation said, “We farmers cultivate the land by pawning our jewellery and becoming indebted to banks. When we collect the harvest we pay the loans. Then we have to borrow again to cultivate the next season. This is a never-ending cycle we undergo in our miserable lives. So how do we repay the loans when the drought destroys our crop? Without repaying how do we get loans to cultivate the next season?”
Now it has started raining in Rajarata ending the drought experienced for the last few months. Although they should start the cultivation for Maha season now, Karunaratna says that they have no funds.
“We asked for compensation for the crop failure. But we were given an election instead of compensation. They deceived us to get the votes. At that time President came to Rajarata, walked in the fields and promised thousand odd things. Among them was the promise that cultivation loans taken from state banks will not be recovered until the harvesting is completed in the Maha Season of 2012 and 2013. He also said the interest charges for pawned jewellery will be written off. This was given as an order from him”            Full Story>>

Palmyrah trees, toddy and Jaffna’s cottage industry

The Nation

Palmyrah trees, toddy and Jaffna’s cottage industry
  • Sunday, 21 October 2012

For centuries, Palmyrah and Palmyrah products have played an integral part in the lives of those in the North.
Therefore, the North is also known as the Palmyrah jungle (Panai marak kaadu). Beyond Vavuniya, acres of Palmyrah trees adorn either side of the A9 road that leads to Jaffna.
The unique factor about the tree is that almost all parts of it can be used for human needs.
The Palmyrah palm of Jaffna is found in the Northern parts of Sri Lanka and in South India. The growth of the tree is generally very slow and takes more than 15 years to bear.
Acres of palm trees were destroyed over the years due to war. Even today a drive towards the North reveals the extent of damages to palmyrah trees. Many continue to stand majestic, having withstood the brunt of the 30 year fighting. Some are not fortunate and have lost their crowns. The partially standing trees are those that tell of the destruction.
Three years after, steps have been taken to replant palmyrah trees. This initiative is likely to encourage cottage industries that depend on palmyrah products.
The tree, as mentioned before, has many uses. A few of them are listed below.
Palm leaf
The palm leaf is used for roofing and as a fence. Even though its use as a roofing material has decreased in the town areas, several houses in the villages continue to use them to cover their houses as it cools the interior despite the scorching heat outside. However, the leaf’s usage as a fence can be seen even within town areas. The wood is used for roofing. The fiber can be used to make brushes while the ridge of the leaf is used to make ropes.
Toddy and jaggery
The Palmyrah palm is of two kinds, the male and the female. The male kind does not bear fruit. But, both kinds can be used to tap toddy. At sunset men climb the trees and collect toddy. The beverage is tapped from the tree’s bark. The drink can be distilled to produce jaggery.  
The toddy tastes sweet when fresh, but it turns bitter when fermentation  sets in. A little bit of lime is put into the pot where the toddy is to be collected to sweeten beverage. The sweetened toddy is used to make jaggery (Panamkatty). The sweetened toddy is poured into small baskets made of palmyrah leaf after being boiled down to syrup, to cool down and crystallize.
Jaggery is considered nutritious and healthy than the normal sugar because it is unrefined and it does not contain additional flavors and preservatives. The calorie level of jaggery is slightly less than table sugar, and is sweeter than table sugar.
The panam kizhangu or kotta kelangu is another popular product of the palmyrah tree and is used as food.
Panam kizhangu can be eaten boiled, or dried. Though not considered nutritious, the panam kizhangu continues to be a popular food item in the North.

Rajapaksa Govt Looking At Abolishing 13th Amendment

Sunday, October 21, 2012
  • Opposition plagued with divisions
  • Divi Neguma Bill puts Sri Lanka and India on collision course
The Mahinda Rajapaksa government is edging towards a head on collision with neighboring India over the implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
The government’s steadfastness in getting the controversial Divi Neguma Bill implemented amidst accusations that the piece of legislation usurped powers vested with the provincial councils would mess up Indo-Sri Lanka relations that are being mended following the March resolution.

Mahinda Rajapaksa, Manmohan Singh, R. Sampanthan and Ranil Wickremesinghe
President Rajapaksa’s visit to New Delhi last month was the icebreaker after India voted in favor of a US backed resolution on Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) sessions in March.
New Delhi also wanted to make its peace with Sri Lanka seeing how the Rajapaksa government was cozying up to the Chinese. In fact it only took three high-powered Chinese government delegations to arrive in the country for New Delhi to show a shift in its stance towards Sri Lanka.
During the President’s visit to New Delhi, Indian Premier Manmohan Singh said that India would stand by Sri Lanka at future international fora and that it would try to convince the TNA to take part in the political process to find a lasting solution.
Be that as it may, New Delhi is now at a crossroad where it is faced with showing its displeasure at the Sri Lankan government for not honoring its promises or turning a blind eye and continues to get closer to the government to keep the Chinese at bay.
Nevertheless, the TNA parliamentary delegation that recently visited New Delhi also drew attention to the Divi Neguma Bill. The party to show the Indians that they had a genuine grievance since the Sri Lankan government was not keen on devolving powers to the provinces cited the Bill as an example.
The TNA delegation explained in detail about the Bill and how it encroaches on provincial powers.
The TNA noted that the government would not honor its continuous commitment to India that it would devolve power in line with the 13th Amendment and would even go beyond it to find a lasting political solution.
TNA Leader R. Sampnathan says that the notion of power being exercised by the people is completely lost when power is excessively centralized by taking powers from the provinces.
During the visit to New Delhi, the Indian government had requested the TNA to participate in the proposed parliamentary select committee (PSC), but had later remained silent after hearing the lack of interest shown by the Rajapaksa government to honor its commitment to India.
The 13th Amendment has always been a sensitive issue to the Indians given that it was imposed on Sri Lanka during the tenure of President J. R. Jayewardene.
Since the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, the Indians have been continuously pushing for the full implementation of the legislation.
The Indian government is now closely monitoring the process of pushing for the Divi Neguma Bill and how the government plans to move forward with the provincial councils and the 13th Amendment.
Following discussions on the matter with the Indian government, the TNA returned to the country maintaining their previous stance – bi-lateral talks with the government before attending the PSC.
Abolishing the amendment                                        Read More »