Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Bodhi puja for rape suspect outside temple



article_image
by Madura Ranwala-July 24, 2012

A bodhi puja was held on Monday morning near the Polpitiya temple in Yakabedda, to invoke blessings on the remanded chairman of the Akuressa Pradeshiya Sabha S. L. Sunil charged with child abuse.

A source from the area said that the puja, in which the suspect’s wife, too, participated, had been held outside the temple as the resident monks had objected to it being conducted in the temple premises.

The source told The Island that there had been about six police personnel providing security to the suspect chairman’s wife and in addition there had been a police bus to provide security during the puja.

The chairman and two others have been remanded for having raped an underage girl in the area. The remanded chairman had allegedly lured the victim by helping her financially.

The Island learns that about six hundred to seven hundred of his party supporters participated in the puja to invoke blessings on the suspect.
Remembering Black July 1983
Tamil Guardian 22 July 2012


Twenty-nine years on, the massacre of Black July 1983 is remembered by Tamils the world over.
On 23rd July 1983, an anti-Tamil pogram, that is believed to have claimed the lives of 3000 Tamils, displaced 100,000 Tamils and exiled hundreds of thousands more, began.
Reliving '83 (23 Jul 2012) - Black July 1983 through extracts from international newspapers published at the time, and news from today.

Tamil politicians urge global action in releasing POWs, political prisoners


TamilNet[TamilNet, Tuesday, 24 July 2012, 13:52 GMT]
Addressing a press conference in Vavuniyaa on Tuesday, the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) called for immediate release of all political prisoners who are held without any charges in the Sri Lankan prisons. Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam, representing the Tamil National Peoples Front (TNPF) said that the International Community, especially the countries that backed the internal LLRC mechanism of Colombo in the resolution passed at the UN Human Rights Council's Sessions in Geneva earlier this year, are primarily responsible for the fate of the Tamil Prisoners of War and political prisoners. Those who attended the funeral of Nimalarooban, braving the threats posed by the Sri Lankan military and intelligence operatives, told TamilNet that the victim had sustained fatal injuries on his head. 
SL Police was deployed in large numbers in Vavuniyaa on the funeral day

Funeral of Nimalarooban  Funeral of Nimalarooban
[L-R] Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam of TNPF, Sritunga Jayasuriya of USP, Mano Ganesan of DPF, Suresh Premachandran of TNA, Selvam Adaikkalanathan of TNA and Selvarajah Gajendran of TNPF.
The slaying of Nimalarooban and the brutal assault of his fellow prisoners need to be perceived in a proper context, Mr Ponnambalam addressing the press at Vavuniyaa said. 

Funeral of Nimalarooban
Funeral of Nimalarooban
Funeral of Nimalarooban
Funeral of Nimalarooban
Several politicians of political parties, including the TNA, TNPF in the North-East and the USP and DPF from South, came together at Taj Hotel in Vavuniyaa, criticizing the Sri Lankan state for incarceration without legal proceedings and torture, and the International Community for its inaction after having called for the surrender of LTTE fighters 3 years ago. TNA parliamentarian Suresh Premachandran presided the press conference. 

One should take note that the slaying of Nimalarooban, illustrating the pathetic plight of the political prisoners, has come after the resolution in Geneva passed in March 2012 that had sought the Sri Lankan state to conduct investigations confined to the internal justice of the Sri Lankan state, Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam said. 

“The reality today is that the situation in Sri Lanka has deteriorated to a level where one cannot expect delivery of justice internally. There is no double opinion that the Tamil Nation has been denied of internal justice for more than 60 years. As far as Tamils are concerned, we have lost hope in expecting justice from internal mechanisms. However, today, those who disagree with the State even among the Sinhala Nation, are also being targeted,” the TNPF leader said. 

“So, at this juncture, the countries that passed the resolution in Geneva in March this year, expecting justice from an internal mechanism, should reconsider their stance,” Mr Ponnambalam said adding that if the IC failed in taking suitable actions, the situation would continue to deteriorate. 

“Our stand is that it is the responsibility of the International Community to arrest the situation. Because, it was this same IC, that gave its full support to the war, proclaiming the LTTE as terrorists believing that the problem. They were providing support to the war expecting that the leaders in the Sinhala Nation would come forward to take constructive steps in resolving the ethnic question if the Tigers were removed from the picture under the label of terrorism,” he said. 

“Now, even after the war was ended three years ago, the atrocities against Tamils are continuing. The responsibility of arresting the situation falls therefore on the IC,” Ponnambalam said. 

Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam 24 07 2012 by TamilNet

On 29 June, Sri Lankan elite commandos of the notorious Special Task Force (STF) stormed the Vavuniyaa prison where Tamil Prisoners of War and political prisoners had taken three prison officers into their custody, demanding evidence of existence of one of their fellow prisoner who had been subjected to severe torture. 

All the 122 prisoners who were inside the raided prison cell in Vavuniyaa were later taken to Anuradhapura prison, where Sinhala prison guards and criminal inmates tortured them for more than 10 hours. 22 of these Eezham Tamil POWs were then transferred to Mahara prison and Nimalarooban, hailing from a poverty-stricken family in Nelukku'lam, a suburb of Vavuniyaa, was one of them. 

He succumbed to the fatal injuries caused during the torture at Mahara prison.

According to the family of the victim, he was arrested merely on allegations that he had been an LTTE member. 

The family was struggling to access the body of the victim for burial. After a prolonged struggle the body was released with several conditions. 

On Monday, SL military and police commandos were heavily deployed in Vavuniyaa. Threats were issued to close relatives of the victim not to attend the funeral. 

Although the military presence was reduced on the funeral day, several people remained in houses fearing reprisals from the SL military and its intelligence squads. 

Apart from politicians and journalists from the North-East and from the South, university students and representatives of the grassroots organizations attended the funeral which took place Tuesday evening.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

SL military surround Nimalaroopan's funeral

Burial at a place of choice by family members is a matter of justice

Burial at a place of choice by family members is a matter of justice

මරා දැමුනු සිරකරුගේ සිරුර ගමට නොයැවේ

BBC
අවසාන යාවත්කාලීන කිරීම :  2012 ජූලි 5 බ්‍රහස්පතින්දා

වවුනියාව සිරගෙදරින් අනුරාධපුර රෝහලට ගෙනා සිරකරුවෙක් වවුනියාව සිරගෙදරින් අනුරාධපුර රෝහලට ගෙනා සිරකරුවෙක්

වවුනියාවේ සිරගෙදර බන්ධනාගාර නිලධාරීන් මුදා ගැනීම සඳහා රජයේ සන්නද්ධ අංශ විසින් එල්ල කරන ලද ප්‍රහාරයෙන් මියගිය දේශපාලන සිරකරුවාගේ මළ සිරුර ගම් පළාතේදී දෙමාපියන්ට භාර දීම අධිකරණය විසින් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කැරිණි.

Burial at a place of choice by family members is a matter of justice

Friday, 06 July 2012 
A prisoner, Ganeshan Nimalarubin, died in prison custody. Allegedly he was a former LTTEr who had been prison custody for a long time undergoing rehabilitation. His death in the prison has given rise to an important controversy.


SL military surround Nimalaroopan's funeral



Photographs Tamilwin-

Tamil Guardian 24 July 2012
Sri Lankan military, intelligence and police officers descended upon the funeral proceedings of Nimalaroopan - the Tamil political prisoner who was murdered whilst in custody - on Tuesday, reports Tamilwin.
Mourners were unable to pay their respects freely as the security personnel surrounding the event.





The body of Nimalaroopan, obtained after much restrictions and prohibitions (see here andhere), was brought to his family home in Nelukkulam, Vavuniya on Monday night. He was buried at Nelukkulam Hindu Cemetery at 4pm on Tuesday.  


Pakistan's help to Sri Lanka for Nuclear plant alarms India

  | New Delhi, July 24, 2012 | 10:14
Pakistan's grand design if increasing influence in Sri Lanka is alarming for India.
India TodayPakistan's grand design if increasing influence in Sri Lanka is alarming for India.
Pakistan is all set to begin consultations with Sri Lanka to help set up a nuclear power plant in Trincomallee's Sampur, it is believed.
The development is being viewed with concern in New Delhi since the Indian embassy in Colombo reported the development to South Block.
The strategy is part of Pakistan's grand design of increasing influence in the island nation by Pakistan, actively backed by China.
Indian high commissioner to Sri Lanka Ashok Kantha was in New Delhi last week and is believed to have briefed senior officials on Pakistan's recent advances in Lanka. Islamabad also wants to expand defence trade with Colombo.
Even as the Congress-led UPA government comes under intense pressure from its allies in Tamil Nadu on its defence relationship with Lanka at the expense of India, Pakistan is quietly making inroads.
The assessment also suggested that Pakistan is believed to have discussed upgradation and rebuilding of T-55 tank engines, incorporation of rubberised tracks on tanks besides modernisation of the fire and tank gun control systems.
Pakistan made inroads into the defence sector in Lanka when the government was pushed back by its Chennai allies not to provide any defence aid or hardware to Colombo. Under pressure, it also put a defence cooperation agreement on hold.
The recent vote against Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council has also created a wedge between the two countries.

Mahinda Rajapaksa had helped Douglas Peiris in Geneva

Tuesday, 24 July 2012 
Former SSP Douglas Peiris who was well known for his terror tactics during the 1988-89 period has told a weekly newspaper that the two politicians who helped during the difficult times are President Mahinda Rajapaksa and Minister S.B. Dissanayake.

The Attorney General has filed several cases against Peiris for allegedly committing murder, the disappearances of several persons and using forged travel documents.
Once Peiris was indicted before the Colombo High Court, his services were suspended under the police department regulations in order to enable the legal proceedings. Therefore, permission has also not been granted for him to retire.
Douglas Peiris has said that he had known the President since 1977. “He spoke to me over the telephone in 1999. He asked about my problems. I said that Chandrika’s government was not letting me retire. The President even helped me retire. Minister S.B. Dissanayake gave me several lakhs to use as legal expenditure,” he has said.
The police department had initiated disciplinary action against Peiris since he was accused of torturing and killing youths arrested during the terror period, sexually abusing and raping young girls who were arrested and forcing wives to have sexual relations with him in order to release their husbands from his custody. The Attorney General served indictment against Peiris before the High Court over murder charges.
A senior police officer told us that the President who at the time appeared to stand to safeguard the human rights of youths who were victimized during the 1988-89 terror period on the other hand had helped those who terrorized society at the time.

On The 23rd Of Black July, One Man Destroyed His Nation




By Basil Fernando -July 24, 2012
Basil Fernando
Colombo TelegraphMany things are said about Black July, 1983. That there were many culprits who caused the havoc that virtually destroyed the image of Sri Lanka and which gave justification for a prolonged period of violence. However, there was one man who was the creator of this havoc. It was then-President of the country, Junius Richard Jayawardene.
His work of destroying the fabric of Sri Lankan democracy started from the very first day after he won the election as the leader of the United National Party, in 1977. His very first act as the Prime Minister elect was to grant a “holiday to the police”. That holiday lasted for two or three weeks. That was the first act done to intimidate his political opponents. With an ambition to hold onto power and not to give up what he had won, he knew one of his major strategies needed to be to launch a period of violence in order not to allow space for internal challenges from disaffected democratic forces. That process went on through various kinds of initiatives, which are well-recorded. The 1982 referendum was a major assault he made on the electoral politics in Sri Lanka. He was seriously pursuing his ambition to “close the electoral map” of Sri Lanka for some time.
By 1983, he was fully aware of the dissatisfaction among the democratically minded sections of society due to the erosion of democracy that he was causing. He needed a lot more violence and he was looking for events that could enable the unleashing of greater violence. That opportunity came when the news of thirteen soldiers being killed in the north arrived. He was aware that the discontent was growing in the armed forces. He also knew that there were suggestions to have a common funeral for the thirteen soldiers in Colombo Cemetery.
According to accounts published by his own close collaborators, Prime Minister Premadasa himself advised JR Jayawardene of the unavoidable consequence of there being riots in Colombo if this was allowed. However, JR Jayawardene made his own calculations about the opportunity that he had before him to divert the attention of the country away from him. He quite deliberately allowed the funerals to take place in a manner that would bring about what we know today as Black July. It was a calculated action to take advantage of a situation for his own political survival.
Jayawardene’s legacy of causing Black July and for what came after needs much closer scrutiny and exposure. The institution of the Executive Presidency, which was coming under severe resistance from democratic forces, was thus saved. Those who are today benefiting from the survival of the executive presidency owe it to what JR Jayawardene did in July 1983. This aspect of the political history of Sri Lanka has not been adequately highlighted because there are still those who are benefiting from this executive presidential system. Understanding the catastrophe that came about on all Sri Lankan public institutions and political life requires much reflection on the initiative that JR Jayawardene took to unleash Black July.
The following narrative by B. Sirisena Cooray, the former mayor of Colombo and a strong UNPer at the time, describes the situation vividly:
An excerpt from President Premadasa and I – our Story (pp 60-63)
ERRORS AND MISTAKES
The day we heard about the killing of the 13 soldiers in Jaffna I went to see Mr. Premadasa. He was on the phone to the President. There was a lot of tension in the country and we were extremely worried about the way things were moving. Mr. Premadasa turned to me and informed me that the President is planning to bring the bodies of the dead soldiers to Colombo, to be cremated at Kanatte. Mr. Premadasa had been trying to get the President to change his mind when I walked in. When he saw me Mr. Premadasa said: “Sir, Sirisena is here; you ask him”. And he put me on. The President told me: “Cooray, these people want to bring these bodies to Colombo and cremate them at Kanatte. What do you think?” I said: “Sir why do you want to bring these bodies to Colombo? These are not people from Colombo. If you bring the bodies here there will be problems”. This was precisely what Mr. Premadasa had been telling the President before I walked in. Afterwards Mr. Premadasa told me that they had decided against bringing the bodies to Colombo; I remember we were both extremely relieved.
That afternoon I went for a wedding at the Shalika Hall in Narahenpita. Mrs. Jayawardene was also there. I was talking to her when she suddenly said: “Mr. Cooray, you know that they are bringing those 13 bodies to Colombo today”. I was thunderstruck. I said: “Madam, the President promised the Prime Minister only a little while ago that the bodies will not be brought to Colombo”. She responded: “No, no they are going to go ahead and bring the bodies here. I do not know whose idea it is”. I had the impression she too was unhappy about it.
This was madness. Like Mr. Premadasa I knew that all hell was likely to break lose when those bodies are brought to Colombo. I just got up and walked to my car. But I had no clear idea about where I wanted to go. I couldn’t think clearly. I didn’t want to go home and I didn’t want to go to the CMC. Finally I went to the Sugathadasa stadium. That was the time we were reconstructing the Stadium. I walked into the middle of the grounds and just stood there. That was when SP Ariyaratne came to me and told me that there was a radio message from the PM asking me to contact him urgently. When I called Mr. Premadasa he too was extremely upset and worried. He told me about the new decision to bring the bodies to Colombo that evening and asked me to make the necessary arrangements. He told me that the President is planning to attend the cremations and he too was expected to be there. He knew full well there would be problems but he had no choice in the matter. The decisions were made elsewhere and he was just informed of them. If the President listened to Mr. Premadasa, the ’83 July riots could have been avoided and the history of this country would have been different.
Like Mr. Premadasa I too had no choice but to do what bad to be done, given the situation. The Kanatte is owned and managed by the CMC and as Mayor my tasks were clear. So I went to the Municipal Workshop and made all the arrangements. I also phoned the Municipal Commissioners and told them to come to the cemetery. After that I went to the cemetery. As soon as I entered I could feel the tension. There was an organized crowd present, making a huge show of grief, weeping hysterically. I walked up to DIG Edward Gunawardane and I asked him why they allowed this madness. He and the other senior police officers present told me that they had nothing to do with the decision, that they were just following orders. I warned them that this drama would end with a riot. Though the bodies were not brought yet, the crowd was organised and ready. I realized that if I stayed here I too would be thrashed. Gamani Jayasuriya was also there waiting for the bodies to be brought. I went up to him and said: “Sir, what are you doing here? Don’t wait here. There is going to be trouble”. Then I called Mr. Premadasa’s security personnel who were waiting for his arrival and told them: “Tell the PM that there is going to be trouble; tell him not to come here and tell him I said so”. I told the same thing to the President’s bodyguard. I explained that amidst the inevitable disturbance even if a stone hits the President it will be humiliating and therefore he should stay away. I was able to issue orders since the General Cemetery came under the CMC and I was the Mayor.
Fortunately the President decided to heed my warning; this enabled Mr. Premadasa also to stay away (he would have been forced to attend, even though he was not happy about the whole thing, if the President attended). Once I got confirmation that neither the President nor the PM would be attending the cremations I informed the Municipal Commissioners who were present that I will go and change and come back. Of course I did not go back. And as Mr. Premadasa and I predicted, rioting started immediately afterwards. I later heard that the Army wanted the bodies to be brought to Kanatte and that the President succumbed to their pressure.
It was a terrible time and the worst part was that we were almost powerless. We could do nothing to stop the killing, the destruction. The President made a mistake in putting the Army in charge of restoring law and order. After the killing of the 13 soldiers the mood in the military was a very dangerous one and they were not really motivated in stopping the violence. If the Police had been given a free hand they would have done a better job. During this period President Jayawardene was reduced to a state of helplessness. Mr. Premadasa and I used to visit him every day. That was the only time I saw IRJ being speechless. The Army was not taking orders and I think we were very close to a state of mutiny. That was why the Air Force was called in eventually and they quelled the riot.

Sri Lanka to cut power for three hours everyday after Chinese plant fails again


Tuesday, July 24, 2012

LogoCOLOMBO- Sri Lanka will turn off electricity across the country for three hours daily until July 28, the state-run power firm said on Tuesday, after technical problems have knocked out almost a quarter of its generating capacity.
The nationwide power cut, which starts on Tuesday, was implemented after Sri Lanka’s 300 megawatt (MW) Chinese-built coal power plant at Norocholai failed last week for a fifth time since it was commissioned in March last year.
Sri Lanka has lost another 100 MW from a combined diesel power plant, and an extended drought has decimated hydro power’s contribution to the national grid.
In all, Sri Lanka has lost 22 percent of its capacity to meet peak demand of 1.81 gigawatts (GW) as a result of the power station failures, state-run Ceylon Electricity Board’s (CEB) website showed.
“The only alternative to resolve the current situation is to go for power cuts,” CEB said in a statement.
Sri Lanka has total electricity generating capacity of 3.1 GW, but hydro power’s normal output of 1.2 GW has been cut by more than 1 GW as a result of the drought which began in March officials at the Power and Energy Ministry told Reuters.
In January, CEB’s Technological Engineers Union blamed a Chinese firm for repeated technical failures at Norocholai, the country’s only coal-fired power plant, say they were either caused by sabotage or negligence by the operator.
Most international businesses have their own backup generators to use during the outages, and it was not immediately clear how disruptive the July power cuts would be.
Sri Lanka has long maintained uninterrupted power supply, one of its main pledges to voters and investors, except in 1996 and 2001-2 when it endured power cuts due to severe droughts.
The 1996 cuts were partially responsible for economic growth slowed to a seven-year low of 3.8 per cent in that year, from 5.5 per cent a year earlier.

Towards a True Republic - Jayampathy Wickramaratne

Tuesday, 24 July 2012
As Sri Lanka completes 40 years as a Republic, we need not only to look back at the two Republican Constitutions but also address the question as to how we could build a true Republic.
1972- Whose Constitution?
Many in the Left saw the 1972 Constitution as ‘our’ constitution because of Colvin’s contribution towards it. This is a grave mistake. As Colvin himself said later, when a constitution is made it is not made by the Minister of Constitutional Affairs. The final product is determined by the resultant of the various political forces involved. When Colvin suggested that the constitution should not be labeled ‘unitary’ although it is in fact unitary so that there would be room for flexibility in the future, the SLFP rejected the proposal. Although the Basic Resolution on religion stated that Buddhism should be given its rightful place as the religion of the majority, the SLFP right wing later wanted Buddhism be made the State religion and Colvin had to accept giving Buddhism the foremost place as a compromise. These go to show whose constitution it was.
1972, 1978 and the National Question
The most positive features of the 1972 Constitution were the complete break from the British Crown, the retention of the parliamentary form of government and the recognition of fundamental rights. Its main drawback was the failure to address the national question. When the Federal Party’s Dharmalingam suggested that if the United Front had no mandate to go beyond a unitary state it should implement what it had promised in its election manifesto, namely the abolition of the Kachcheri system and its replacement by elected bodies at district level, none of the Southern parties responded to the proposed compromise. Instead, they all got together to attack the federal resolution. If such a compromise was agreed and some agreement reached on the language issue, the history of this country may well have been different.
Although J.R. admitted in the UNP’s election manifesto of 1977 that the Tamils had grievances and that the non-resolution of those grievances had pushed them towards separatism, the Round Table Conference he proposed was forgotten once he came to power. Instead, the unitary state was entrenched by the 1978 Constitution. Some devolution was reluctantly agreed to through the 13th Amendment only due to Indian pressure. Today, Provincial Councils operate under the authority of the Centre and the Government is reluctant to hold elections for the Northern Provincial Council.
Executive Presidency
With remarkable foresight, J.R. established the authoritarian constitutional basis necessary to support neo-liberalism that was emerging globally. Chandrika was unable to abolish the executive presidency or give the economy a ‘humanitarian face’ as promised in 1994. Although she was able to get the SLFP to accept that a political solution was necessary to resolve the national question, she could not take it to its logical conclusion. Ranil’s opportunism also added to this.
One practical limit on the executive presidency was the two-term limit. The 13th Amendment limited the powers of the President to some extent. By providing that appointments to the judiciary, certain high positions and independent commissions should be made through a Constitutional Council, the 17th Amendment paved the way for a national consensus on such appointments.
The Left parties have never contested an election together with a party that stood for the continuation of the executive presidency. When Tissa Vitarana and DEW Gunasekera queried about the future of the executive presidency from President Rajapakse before the presidential elections of 2009, the President’s response was that its abolition was already agreed upon. However, the 18th Amendment further strengthened the presidency.
Role of the Left
How do we move forward? There is now talk of a Parliamentary Select Committee on the resolution of the national question. There are signs that the Tamil Nationalist Alliance would join the process, probably due to Indian pressure. However, nothing meaningful would happen until the SLFP leadership takes a clear position on the national question. It is the responsibility of the Left and democratic forces as well as civil society to exert pressure on all political parties to forge a consensus on this issue. Although the Government has a 2/3 majority, Sinhala extremists may not support a solution. However, this should not be a problem if the UNP and Tamil parties offer support. The question is whether the SLFP leadership is committed to a political solution.
Left parties will face a serious problem at the next national elections. For Sri Lanka to be a true republic, the abolition of the executive presidency and the resolution of the national question is a must. These will be central issues at the next national elections. If the SLFP is not committed to either of them, the relationship with that party would be a critical issue for the Left.
The Left’s duty today is to bring the abolition of the executive presidency and a political solution to the national question to the centre stage of politics so that all parties would be forced to take a position on these two issues. To achieve that, the Left must to go beyond meek gestures and weak statements.
Ganegala booted out -Leaves a trail of stench and squalor
(Lanka-e-News-23.July, 10.00PM) Former media Ministry secretary Ganegala notorious for his putrid and sordid record while he was in office , and booted out (since he refused to leave honorably) for those very evils and inefficiency, had however not been able to pack away with him the stench and squalor he created while he was in the Ministry .

It is very unfortunate the govt. was able to detect his sinister activities and incompetence a trifle too late . By the time it came to light through the countless media exposures , Ganegala had done all the irreparable damage any self seeking sex starved scoundrel could have done to his place of work and the country. Some of the many colossal losses and damages sustained during his tenure of office are briefly enumerated below :

A Large number of computers under his control were found locked in a room that could not be opened . These and other equipments purchased out of public money had been languishing instead of being used , like himself who was lingering without any use to any one in the Ministry or the country after his retirement age and even when asked to quit. Despite showing clear signs of senile decay, he stubbornly refused to retire honorably. Consequently he had to be booted out. 
He made a hash of the Ranminithenna project so much so that the whole country became aware of its total fiasco, despite the President and Govt. doing their utmost to conceal this.

In the day to day official work too he had created such misery and despair due to his utter inefficiency and incompetence to all colleagues that they are now having a sigh of relief . They say in unison ‘GROBR’ – Good riddance of bad rubbish. Specially the fairer sex who had no peace and helpless when he was around, as he had demonstrated to many of them who fell victims , that he is an old bull with a hard horn , are thankful to those who saw to it that he is put out lock , stock and barrel.
We have only reported just a few of the many bungles and blunders of Ganegala due to paucity of space . In any event by this we hope to drive home the point to those in the highest in the hierarchy that , at least in the future , please ensure suitable responsible persons of good moral conduct with integrity and honesty are appointed to those posts , as they must be there to serve the public and not themselves and their starvations, sexual and otherwise. Though in some cases a solution may be found after the appointment , that is by removing them , yet , in the interim they could have caused irretrievable damage , as was in the case of Ganegala.
Tamara Digs In Her Heels: Ministry And Political Appointees Still On Collision Course

By Colombo Telegraph -July 23, 2012 
Colombo TelegraphIn an exacerbation of tension between the Ministry of External Affairs and politically appointed ambassadors and heads of mission, former Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, Tamara Kunanayakam has been refused travel reimbursement and other costs that would enable her to continue to function as a member of a UN committee even after she takes up her new appointment as Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to Havana, Colombo Telegraph exclusively learns. 
Tamara Kunanayakam
The Ministry of External Affairs has turned down a request by Kunanayakam, after she requested that the Ministry absorb her travel costs from Havana to Geneva to attend committee sessions even after she takes up her new post.
In May this year, Ambassador Kunanayakam was elected Chairperson/Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council Working Group on the Right to Development and also served as Vice Chair representing the Asia Group of the Trade and Development Board (TDB) of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. It is unclear whether either of these are ex officio positions for Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva.
Colombo Telegraph learns that the Ministry has sought clarification in the matter from her successor Ambassador Ravinatha Ariyasinha who arrived in Geneva last Friday (20). Ariyasinha has recommended that Kunanayakam attend in her personal capacity but the Ministry has refused to meet her expenses towards that end.
Meanwhile, diplomatic sources in Geneva said that Ambassador Ariyasinha is presently being provided accommodation in a Geneva hotel after Kunanayakam has decided to remain in her official residence until the conclusion of her leave on July 24. Ariyasinha’s family has stayed behind at his previous station, Brussels until the residence is vacated by his predecessor. A weekend newspaper in Colombo reported that Kunanayakam had failed to leave the residence keys behind for Ariyasinha forcing him to stay in a hotel in the city.

“Gotabhaya has to also be responsible for Mannar incident” – intelligence officials

Tuesday, 24 July 2012 
A senior police officer said that there are doubts over Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa’s conduct during the Mannar incident since it seems that he too had aided in the attack.

The police officer said intelligence officers had received information that a group of Muslim fishermen were trying to attack the Mannar Magistrate’s Court on Minister Bathiudeen’s instigation and instead of working to prevent such a scenario, the Defence Secretary had provided a helicopter to the Minister to travel to Mannar.
Minister Bathiudeen had told The Sunday Times newspaper that he had discussed the situation in Mannar with the Defence Secretary and that he was then provided a helicopter to travel to Mannar.
“The State Intelligence Service had received all details about the attack before the incident. The head of the Intelligence Service had personally met the Defence Secretary on the 16th and explained the details about the issue due to the severity of the situation (due to the Minister’s involvement),” the police officer said.
The officer alleged that although the Defence Secretary should have acted to prevent the situation, his actions were to the contrary and had further instigated the situation.

SL  minister Badurdeen competes with SLA on appropriating lands in Vanni amid protests


TamilNet[TamilNet, Sunday, 22 July 2012, 21:59 GMT]
While more than 2,000 war-affected families are struggling without lands in Karaithu'raip-pattu division of Mullaiththeevu district, Sri Lankan minister of Trade, Rishard Badurdeen, has planned to appropriate 1,500 acres of forest land along Mu'l'liyava'lai - Nedungkea'ni Road promising the lands to his supporters from elsewhere in the island, sources at Karaithu'raippattu divisional secretariat told TamilNet. Even the occupying SLA had opposed the move, but the SL minister has exerted pressure from the top to implement his plan, the sources further said. In the meantime, protests against the SL minister, who is blamed for violent attack on the court complex in Mannaar is being stepped up by the lawyers, who have also protested against the attack on the residence of Point Pedro District Judge on Wednesday. 



The Divisional Secretary of Karaithu'raip-pattu has received a ‘personal offer’ from the notorious SL minister that he was prepared to share 50% of the sales from the sales of the trees to be felled in the lands with the divisional secretary. 

The divisional secretary has already sold the trees from a 500 acre land which was given to a Sinhala businessman from the south of the island for sand scooping, civil officials in Mullaiththeevu told TamilNet.

The officials also said Tamil civil officials who get trapped by their wrongdoings are deployed by the SL ministers and the officials of the occupying SL military in their programme of committing structural genocide on the country of Eezham Tamils. 

The SL minister has provided most of the land plots in Karaithu'raippattu to rich businessmen outside Vanni, informed sources said, adding that only some of the lands are to be given to resettling Muslims. 

Muslims had been living in Neeraavip-piddi and Kichchaapuram before they were evicted by the LTTE in 1990. Most of them have now returned to their villages. 

The SL minister has been engaged in strengthening his voter-base creating divisions among the resettling people in Mannaar and Mullaiththeevu districts.

Protesting lawyers in Jaffna on Friday shouted slogans ‘Rishard, Rishard go home’, ‘Arrest Rishard’, ‘Don't create divisions’ and ‘We want justice’. 

Lawyers and legal activists in South have also engaged in protests expressing solidarity with the judges and lawyers in North. 

The protesting legal activists, who gathered at the premises of Jaffna Court also voiced against the recent attack on the house of Point Pedro District Judge Srinithy Nandasekaran. 

SL military intelligence operatives are believed to be behind the attack on Wednesday night.



Kanakalingam Kesavan, the secretary of Jaffna Lawyers Association, on Friday said that the association has passed a resolution against SL Minister Rishard Badurdeen's phone threat to Mannaar Judge and against the attack on Srinithy's official residence. He also said that the lawyers would continue to boycott their work demanding action on SL minister Rishard Badurdeen. 

Laywers protest against Rishard Badurdeen
Lawyers in Jaffna protest against SL Minister Rishard Badurdeen's phone threat and against the attack on the residence of Point Pedro District Judge.

‘Development’ Ousts Tamil Families from Sampoor


By Dinouk Colombage
Registration paper of Mitchell Consortium, identifying Prabath Nanayakkara as sole director, Copy of Parliamentary debate between Basil Rajapaksa and R. Sampanthan and The Cabinet Memorandum signed by President Mahinda Rajapaksa. This highlights Asset Holdings’ role with the Mitchell Consortium
Land owners in Sampoor in Trincomalee have petitioned the Supreme Court challenging the acquisition of land for what is said to be a multi-billion-dollar investment project to establish a special zone for heavy industries. They allege that the government has illegally acquired their land for the project.
The land acquired by Gazette Notification No. 1758/26 dated May 17, 2012, is to be developed as a Special Zone for Heavy Industries
TNA MP Mathiaparanan Sumanthiran said that the development project would prevent over 200 families from resettling in their original homes after being displaced by the war in 2006.
The inhabitants of the Sampoor area were prevented from returning to their homes in 2006 as their lands fell within the Trincomalee Special Economic Zone which was published in the Gazette Notification No. 1467/03 dated 16th October 2006.
In 2007, despite hostilities in the region having ended, Gazette Extraordinary No. 1499/25 dated 30 May 2007 demarcated the area as a High Security Zone.
“The land that this project is going to take place on belongs to these people. We respect that development must take place, but it must do so without displacing the inhabitants. We are asking the government to choose a new location; these people have been displaced for the last five years because of the war. They must be allowed to return,” Sumanthiran said.
Prabath Nanayakkara, Chairman of Sri Lanka Gateway Industries (SLGI) and head of the project, denied that the land which is to be developed was inhabited by anyone. “I am aware of the court case going on and our lawyers have requested that we be named as respondents so we can clear our names. The land is owned by the state and is leased by the Board of Investment (BOI); in turn we have leased the land from the BOI. These people who claim it is their land have produced false deeds before the court.”
Sumanthiran rejected this accusation, saying that “these are genuine deeds dating back over a 100 years.”
The issue was debated in Parliament on October 21, 2011. TNA MP Rajavarothiam Sampanthan accepted that the coal power plant project must go ahead; but he requested that the people of the region be allowed to return to their lands. Minister of Economic Development, Basil Rajapaksa, responded that, “any land that is not necessary and which will not be acquired for the construction of the power plant will be given back to these people and they will be resettled.”
Sumanthiran questioned why, despite the Minister’s assurance, these people have still not been allowed to return. “Many of these people’s lands are not close to the proposed site of the power plant, they are being prevented from entering as it is supposedly BOI land”, he said.
BOI Chairman, M. M. C. Ferdinando, refused to comment on the case.
Nanayakkara defended the project, “even if these lands had been used for farming in the past, we must look at the investments such a project will bring to the country. The development will see over 20,000 jobs created, and will help improve the standard of living of the locals.”
He added that the locals had also been compensated for their land by the government, “several new housing schemes have been already handed over to the people of the area, and they are happily living there.”
The case is expected to be taken up in the Supreme Court on Monday.
Apart from the tussle before the courts, controversy also surrounds the project with contradictions emerging over ownership of the development company SLGI.
According to Cabinet Memorandum No. 12/0051/504/006 dated 9 January 2012 the Mitchell Consortium, comprising  the Mitchell Group of Australia, Asset Holdings (Pvt) Ltd of Sri Lanka and its Brazilian partner, had presented an unsolicited proposal to the BOI in 2011 to develop a special zone for heavy industries in the Sampoor area.
In that same year, after getting approval to carry out the feasibility studies, Prabath Nanayakkara (chairman of Asset Holdings) bought over the Mitchell Group’s shares in the Consortium and changed the name of the company to Sri Lanka Gateway Industries (Pvt) Ltd.
Nanayakkara explained that the government had expressed reservations about a foreign company having part ownership over the project, and so he bought out Mitchell Group’s shares.  Despite the cabinet memorandum recording Asset Holdings as a member of the Mitchell Consortium, Nanayakkara denied that Sri Lanka Gateway Industries was an arm of Asset Holdings. “I formed the Mitchell Consortium in 2007 which comprised of the Mitchell Group of Australia and myself”, he said.
SLGI is a completely Sri Lankan owned company and is independent of Asset Holdings, according to Nanayakkara. According to the registration forms, Nanayakkara is the sole director and shareholder of the company. The project is expected to cost US $4 billion and will take place over three phases. The first phase will see the construction of a jetty and coal stock pile yard. Nanayakkara said that Phase One would coincide with the construction of the Sampoor Coal Power Plant.

Monday, July 23, 2012


Never Again: Remembering ’83

Groundviews

Groundviews


First broadcast on aired on the MTV, Shakthi and Sirasa terrestrial TV channels in Sri Lanka from 23rd to 30th July 2008, Never Again in Sri Lanka featured 22 videos in Tamil, Sinhala and English on the anti-Tamil pogrom of July 1983 in Sri Lanka. The 30 second videos on the site featured well-known Sri Lankan civil society, film, teledrama, entertainment, academic and religious personalities including:
  • Bellanwila Wimalaratne Thero
  • Asoka Handagama
  • Iranganie Serasinghe
  • Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne
  • Upekha Chitrasena
  • Sunila Abeysekera
  • Kasun Kalhara
  • Prof. S. Sandarasekaram
View the videos in Tamil, English and Sinhala below.
In addition to these videos, the following content was submitted to Groundviews in July 2008, 25 years after the riots of 1983 and 50 years after those in 1958. Nearly all submissions were exclusive for Groundviews and came from award winning poets and novelists, senior Government Ministers, Members of Parliament, renown scholars, human rights defenders, civil society activists, artistes, senior civil servants, a former Secretary of Defense and others.
It bears reflection today, 29 years after the horrible events of July 1983.
Also in 2008, Vikalpa’s YouTube Channel also recorded 35 short interviews with prominent persons from civil society as well as from ordinary citizens on their thoughts on the events of ’58 and ’83. The combined playlist can be viewed below. For more videos, visit the channel here.