Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, July 2, 2012


Autocracy In Higher Education And The Impending ‘Academic Spring’

By Laksiri Fernando -July 2, 2012 
Dr. Laksiri Fernando
Colombo TelegraphThere is an impending confrontation between the university academics and the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) as the media spokesman for the Federation of University Teachers Associations (FUTA), Dr Devaka Weerakoon, has very clearly stated that they would go ahead with their continuous strike action on 4thJuly as their main demands are not only about salaries but primarily on funding for the university education.
The FUTA is asking the government to commit towards 6 per cent of the GDP for higher education, which is the UNESCO benchmark, as the present contribution is abysmally low as 0.4 per cent, one of the lowest in the world. This increase can be gradual, if the government can promise a substantial increase in the coming future, otherwise the whole system might collapse. Out of the annual budgetary expenditure, the contribution on higher education is only around 1.5 per cent, whereas the expenditure on security is almost ten times.
If the present trends go ahead, Sri Lanka might become a military hub, but not a knowledge hub.
There is already a knowledge hub in Sri Lanka and that is the university system. Before Sri Lanka becoming a knowledge hub in Asia or in the ‘whole world,’ this existing knowledge hub should be properly maintained and managed or otherwise the whole wheel of education might collapse. There are indications that the collapse has already started. No one is against the government having lofty ambitions in any of the five hubs declared. But action should match the ambitions, and ambitions should be realistic. Mere rhetoric is not sufficient.
Contradictory Statements          Read More  
U.S Wants an Action Plan on Sri Lanka
http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpgJul-01-2012
The United States says the government has to have an action plan that deals with reconciliation issues.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner

(COLOMBO Gazette) - During a live video online chat with journalists from around the world including Sri Lanka, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner said that as far as the U.S is concerned there is a big unfinished agenda in Sri Lanka.


“We are going to continue to raise those issues with the government,” Posner said in response to a question raised by a Sri Lankan journalist.
The online discussion was mainly focused on the U.S State Department’s annual global human rights report released recently.
Posner recalled the discussions he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had with External Affairs Minister G.L Peiris in Washington recently.
He said that a range of issues were discussed including issues which continue to be of concern and the U.S government will continue to push on those issues.
“We are happy that there is a Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission but the government has to have an action plan that deals with reconciliation issues, deals with the issues of discrimination still going on in the north and a range of other things to incorporate the Tamil population into the life blood of Sri Lanka,” he said.
He also said that the U.S has not singled out Sri Lanka and that U.S will apply the same standard under the universal declaration to Sri Lanka as is applied with other countries.
Posner meanwhile rejected the characterization that the US has become an arbitrator to human rights around the world.
Asked if the human rights report can be used as a tool to take action against Sri Lanka or any other country, Posner said that the purpose of the report is to give the US a baseline of information on what’s going on in every country in the world.
“Every country is evaluated by the same set of standards or criteria. It gives us a basis for making policy but it’s not a policy making document. It’s a tool for diplomats on how to deal with a country,” he said.



US senator calls to prosecute Assange

Philip Dorling
July 2, 2012

Assange defies UK police

Despite a police order to leave, a spokeswoman for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says he will remain at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
THE head of the US Senate's powerful intelligence oversight committee has renewed calls for Julian Assange to be prosecuted for espionage.
AssangeThe US Justice Department has also confirmed WikiLeaks remains the target of an ongoing criminal investigation, calling into question Australian government claims that the US has no interest in extraditing Mr Assange.
''I believe Mr Assange has knowingly obtained and disseminated classified information which could cause injury to the United States,'' the chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Dianne Feinstein, said in a written statement provided to the Herald. ''He has caused serious harm to US national security, and he should be prosecuted accordingly.''
Seeking asylum in Ecuador … Julian Assange. Photo: AP
Senator Feinstein's call for the Obama administration to move ahead with plans to prosecute Mr Assange came as a US Justice Department spokesman, Dean Boyd, publicly confirmed that ''there continues to be an investigation into the WikiLeaks matter''.
Mr Assange remains in Ecuador's embassy in London while its government assesses his application for asylum.
In a statement made last Friday, one of Mr Assange's British lawyers, Susan Benn, highlighted evidence of the existence of a secret US grand jury investigation targeting Mr Assange and other ''founders or managers'' of WikiLeaks.
The Foreign Affairs Minister Bob Carr, claimed last week there was ''not the remotest evidence'' of the US government wanting to prosecute the WikiLeaks founder.
On June 20, a US State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, denied any US involvement in diplomatic discussions relating to Mr Assange's asylum bid or extradition to Sweden. Yet when asked specifically about the US government's interest in Mr Assagne she said: ''We want to see justice served. Let's leave it at that.''
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/us-senator-calls-to-prosecute-assange-20120701-21b3n.html#ixzz1zTRPVeGx
Please call to nearest Pakistan embassy: Act for Pakistani Dr. SHAKEEL PALH’s release
(Lanka-e-News-01.July.2012, 11.00PM) We condemn the kidnapping of Dr. Shakeel Ahmed Palh brother of human rights lawyer, advocate Ali Palh, practicing lawyer and director RightsNow Pakistan (www.rightsnowpk.org). 

Dr. Shakeel Plah was kidnapped while he was going to the High Court to pursue his constitution petition against Sher Mari and his other accomplices involved in corruption in the High Court. Lawyers, doctors and other civil society actors are extremely concerned about the security and safe return of Dr. Shakeel Palh who has been kidnapped by Ghulam Qadir Mari, manager of Asif Ali Zardari, the sitting president of Pakistan.

Brother of Dr. Shakeel Palh, advocate Ali Palh, who is human rights lawyer has registered a case against GHulam Qadir Mari and five other culprits but police is not arresting them because Ghulam Qadir Mari is manager of the president of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari. Please support Dr. Shakeel Palh’s family in developing pressure on the Pakistan Government for Dr. Shakeel’s safe return and arrest of the culprits involved in this heinous crime. 
Please write or call to the president of Pakistan, Mr. Asif Ali Zardari for Doctor Shakeel Palh’s safe return. 

Tel: +92 51 9204801 or +92 51 9214171 
Email: publicmail@president.gov.pk

Please write to Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Mr. Iftikhar Mohummad Chaudhry for taking action against the culprits involved in the kidnapping.

Call: Telephone: 051-9220581-9220600 
Fax: +92 51-9213452
Email: mail@supremecourt.gov.pk

CALL or WRITE to Ambassador Abdullah Hussain Haroon, Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations, New York 
Email: a.hussain.haroon@gmail.com 
Tel: +1 (212) 879 8600 
Fax: +1 (212) 744-7348 

Write or Call Embassy of Pakistan, Washington DC, USA 

Tel: 202-243-6500
E-mail: info@pakistan-embassy.org

WRITE or CALL PAKISTAN’s MISSION TO UN GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 

Tel: +41 (22) 749-1930 
Fax: +41 (22) 734-8085
Weakness In Government’s Short Term Winning Stratergy

By Jehan Perera -July 2, 2012
Jehan Perera
Colombo TelegraphThe one day visit of Indian National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon to Sri Lanka is revealing of the power structure in the country in relation to Indian priorities.  He met with President Mahinda Rajapaksa, Minister of Economic Development Basil Rajapaksa and Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa.   The shortness of the visit made it imperative that choices had to be made about who was to be met, and that the three Rajapaksa brothers came first.  They clearly hold the key to Sri Lanka’s present and future directions, at least in Indian eyes.  The only other person to be met by the Indian troubleshooter was Tamil National Alliance leader R Sampanthan, which also gives an indication of Indian concerns with regard to Sri Lanka.
The Indian account of the meetings which appeared in the embassy website noted that recent developments, bilateral relations and areas of common concern were discussed.  These included issues relating to resettlement of displaced persons and infrastructure development projects in the north and south in which India is assisting Sri Lanka on a significant scale, and also the contentious matter of clashes between Indian and Sri Lankan fishermen.  In addition there were more controversial matters not included in the official news release on the website.  These included the demilitarization of the north, holding of provincial elections for the north and the implementation of the report of the Lessons Leant and Reconciliation Commission as resolved by the UN Human Rights Council.
The purpose of the Indian visit would seem to have been to give the government a forewarning of the challenges it was likely to encounter in the international arena in the coming months.  The Indian role in providing crucial support to the US-sponsored resolution on Sri Lanka at the UNHRC in March this year came as a bitter surprise to the government.  India’s softening of the US-sponsored resolution to make any international intervention in Sri Lanka conditional upon its acceptance by the Sri Lankan government failed to assuage Sri Lankan outrage.  Nor was the fact that the resolution only called upon the government to implement the recommendations of its own Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission a sufficient palliative to reduce the sense of betrayal.  Over the past three months there is hardly any sign of any special effort taken by the government to implement the LLRC.
BAD GOVERNANCE
Contrary to any possible expectations on the part of the international community that voted in favour of the US-sponsored resolution, there is no sign that the government is prepared to bow to international pressure to do what it does not wish to do.  The LLRC report written in the English language has still not been translated into the Sinhala and Tamil languages which are the two official languages of the country.  Government spokespersons have come up with the absurd excuse that they do not have sufficient translators to handle the 388 page document.   As for implementing the LLRC recommendations, the government is able to claim that it is committed to its implementation on the basis of its regular programmes of work in the areas of resettlement and development.  But key sections of the report that call for a greater separation of powers and for adherence to the Rule of Law are not being given any attention.
The fact that Mr Menon met only with the President and his two brothers on the government side is an indicator of the concentration of power.  Such a concentration of power is not in line with generally accepted principles of good governance in mature democracies.  On occasion, government spokespersons have been known to try and justify the role of the Rajapaksa family in governance by pointing out to the Gandhi family in India and to the Clinton family in the United States.  Particularly in third world countries a tradition of dynastic politics may be seen, in which son, daughter or wife succeeds a father who has become a great leader of that country.  Sometimes it may be the case that the successor is a worthy leader, such as in the case of the Gandhi family.
An indicator of the problems associated with the Rule of Law is the manner in which the government cracked down on an opposition media website just prior to the Indian visit.  The Sri Lanka Mirror website was one that was playing an important role in providing the general public with information that was unavailable in the mainstream print and electronic media.  The government has sought to justify its arbitrary arrest of nine journalists working for the Sri Lanka Mirror (including the tea girl, initially) on the grounds that they were publishing anti government information.  It has said that the website was “continuously publishing false and unethical news about celebrities and popular personalities, misleading international and local communities.”
SHORT TERM
The fate of the Sri Lanka Mirror and of its journalists will send a message to the country’s mainstream media, its owners and journalists, that there is a need to be cautious when reporting the news.  This is a time when rumours and reports of corruption and abuse of power that reach all levels of society are dampening the morale of the general public.  This is also a time when economic hardships are making themselves felt in a big way amongst the general public who would be resentful when they get to learn about allegations of corruption and excessive wealth in high places.  But this is also a time when the government has decided to go to the people to get a fresh mandate from them.  The government has prematurely dissolved three Provincial Councils and is to hold elections for them in September.  From the perspective of those who seek election victory, suppressing news media that discredits and shows them in the worst possible light is politically advantageous.
In the face of the many problems it faces, the government’s strategy appears to be one of winning the forthcoming provincial elections in the North Central, Sabaragamuwa and Eastern provinces and reaffirming its support from the people.  This will send out a message to the international and local communities that the government is a democratically elected and therefore legitimate one, whatever may be its other infirmities.  The international community is generally deferential to the legitimacy of those governments that have been democratically elected.  The willingness to hold elections and the ability to win them are taken as the best signs of a healthy democracy.  The excessive centralization of power and the breakdown of the Rule of Law get are more difficult for the international community to assess. The easiest assessment is whether elections were held and whether the government won them.
The government may be right in believing that a strong show of electoral support, especially from the Eastern Province where the majority of voters are from the ethnic minorities, will be the best possible answer to those who seek to find fault with it on human rights and good governance-related issues.  The problem is that these issues are not being resolved.  They will continue to fester and generate greater and greater hatred and polarization within those who are treated unjustly.  The recent speech to the British Parliament by Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has a special relevance to Sri Lanka at this time.  She said:  ”If differences remain unresolved, if basic aspirations remain unfulfilled, there cannot be an adequate foundation for sustainable development of any kind – economic, social or political”.  These words are applicable to Sri Lanka also.
Older the bull harder the horn Ganegala (63) makes girls cry –Unable to abandon his habit

(Lanka-e-News-01.July.2012, 11.00PM) The Secretary to the media Ministry Ganegala has once again proved what he is capable of. Despite so many exposures of his perverted traits , he is glued to his seat and stubbornly refuses to give way to a younger Secretary who can perform better and act better- that is, more decently.

The latest in the series of Ganegala’s (naki manamalaya) sex starved cravings came to light, when an attractive young innocent girl (19years old) from the national apprentice Board was selected for training at the media Ministry .

Her training period of six months was due to end on 30th June. Ganegala who is noted to work with zest in his office when no one is there after office hours for obvious reasons with one cutee or another , has this time chosen this apprentice beauty to work overtime. On 16th June, Saturday morning to be exact , when the office was closed he had asked this apprentice girl to come to practice something with him .

Of course the peon works on Saturdays, and being fully aware of the old bull’s ways had on that day taken over the task of a peeping Tom as he had nothing to do.
This charming young innocent girl who is with a very good moral background, who was there for sometime alone with this Ganegala in the room had darted out crying and sobbing as though she had been attacked by a bull with a hard horn .

The peon who knows Ganegala’s putrid antecedence immediately knew what could have happened . He had consoled her and inquired as to the cause of her crying. She had been obviously too shaken, shy and ashamed to speak. 

Sorry to say, since that day following Ganegala’s practice sessions that young girl had not reported to work.

The Crisis Within The Human Rights Movement Today


July 1, 2012 

By Sajeeva Samaranayake -
Sajeeva Samaranayake
Colombo TelegraphMost of us are working for human rights – on different themes, in different work settings and in different countries. But we would like to think we have a common objective, and it would be good if this were so. The reality is that we are at cross purposes and sometimes working against our stated objectives.
Deep down there seem to be two things that drive us.
We have this faith in ideals and concepts – fortified by the already massive and ever growing edifice of human rights conventions, rules and guidelines. This seems to have every answer to every human problem. Coupled with this is a desire to control external situations and bring them into conformity with our ideals.
This mindset is legitimised to such an extent that the human rights lobby today has no qualms about using the International Criminal Court at global level and local criminal courts at national level to respond to human rights violations. This is the global panacea for all evil today.
It is true that the criminal law has an established interface with human rights in two areas:
The criminal process itself – with its long delays and miscarriages of justice is among the prime violators of human rights all over the world
This violator is cleverly disguised as our saviour when it comes to human rights violations – and institutions like the ICC it is assumed will be immune from the usual political power dynamics that plague criminal justice nationally
There is no doubt that the criminal law has a role and place in any society. But within crisis ridden divided 3rdworld societies its potential value seems to be grossly exaggerated.
The current seamless connectivity between human rights and the criminal law has brought some human rights activists into a collision course with intransigent governments that violate human rights in several trouble spots around the world. This can go on, but it should not be the centre of our attention.
Other human rights activists who are not so enamoured with the criminal process and who seek a deeper, spiritual, cultural and social approach which seeks to transform attitudes that lie at the root of all problems are becoming increasingly marginalized from this new battlefield as a neo Victorian morality play is being staged with great passion by the protagonists on either side – the accusers and defenders.
Is this new paradigm which also seems to deny human rights a broader role outside the criminal court simply a perpetuation of old categorizations that imprison us? Should we offer help for tomorrow rather than punishment for yesterday? Or do we think, in the idealistic, comprehensive and fence sitting manner of the typical UN official that we can have both? Most importantly what should our role and position be as moderate but committed and concerned citizens?
* Sajeeva Samaranayake :Attorney at Law, LLB (Hons), LLM (Family Justice Studies – Merit) East Anglia; State Counsel 1994 – 2003; Child Protection Specialist – unicef Sri Lanka 2003 – 2008; Independent Consultant on Law and Child Protection 2009 onwards.

WFDY statement on the murderous attacks against Sri Lankan Popular movement and Youth


Democracy is violated in Sri Lanka with political protection from the government, having more than one incidence of attacking and shooting on peaceful rallies and protests which always leads to the death and injury of protesters. The effort of the reactionary forces in Sri Lanka to terrorize the popular movement and the youth is more than obvious. It is their political need in terms of realization of their reactionary plans.
The last incidence was attacking by 8 to 10 armed persons on the political meeting of JVP, which was held in Hambantota district on 15 June. The armed men started were first shooting and then they attacked the people with iron rods and wooden poles, 2 persons were dead due to this brutal attack and two more were injured, with much material destruction as well. The incident happened in the area that is considered to be a stronghold of the President, Defense Secretary, and Speaker of the Parliament of Sri Lanka, and such an attack could not take place with the political protection by the government.
The popular movement in Sri Lanka was attacked in more than one protest or rally during 2011 and 2012, with the political protection of the government, which is protecting the murderers instead of arresting them.
WFDY stands in solidarity with the comrades from JVP, SSU, peoples and workers of Sri Lanka who are fighting peacefully for their democratic and human rights of freedom of expression; condemns any attack or repression of the peoples by any means and under any excuse.
We are sure that despite the murderous attacks against the people and the youth who struggle against imperialism and its local representatives, the struggle will go on. Our comrades in Sri Lanka and all over the world have suffered a lot for many decades. Persecutions, executions by the states or the deep state, exiles and imprisonment could not stop the anti-imperialist struggle nowhere in the world.
WFDY salutes the people of Sri Lanka in their struggle towards democracy and the fulfillment of the rights of the workers and youth. Despite the high price they pay, the people of Sri Lanka are still on the path of the struggle. We express our deep grief on the death of two persons, we are sure that the blood that fell in defense of freedom, peace, democracy and struggle for social progress shall be the peoples’ motive in their way towards freedom from all forms of abuse.
June 2012

Sunday, July 1, 2012


Removing the tattoos – Remembering the heroes
Sunday 01 July 2012
VikramabahuThere were two mass protests that took place last week, both very important. On 19 June there was a protest in the North against land grabbing, called by the TNA. The NSSP was also invited and a group led by Jenagen and Ranath participated in the event. Riot control commandos of the Police were deployed in large numbers, confronting hundreds of peaceful protesters. Protesters objected to the land grab undertaken by the military command which behaved like an occupying army in the Tamil homeland.

Armed riot commandos
The protesters were demanding immediate resettlement in Valikamam North. Parking several vehicles across the road and deploying armed riot commandos, the officers of the police told the protesters that they would not be allowed to march on the KKS Road to hand over a petition at the Divisional Secretariat in Thellippazhai. Army showed a court order issued to them to justify their action. The document has no relevance to the peaceful protest of the displaced people 17-2led by political leaders. This point was clearly explained by the leaders.
Finally, Police allowed the leaders to meet the AGA, and all political leaders present addressed the crowed. Ranath said “Land in the Tamil homeland should be controlled by the people of the area. Without any consultation with the people of the soil the army has taken authority behaving like an occupying army.
We must face this with mass actions and legal action against the Mahinda regime. These are done with orders from above. Mahinda regime is interested in grabbing land to be given to alien investors. They get the commission and the support to carry on. We must combine all our struggles, including the struggle on the international plane, to defeat this enemy of the people.” Ranath demanded Mahinda to respond quickly and warned to step up the protest campaign unless there is a favourable response from the government.
The June 22 meeting organised by the ‘Platform for Freedom’ in Matara was a success. It was a seminar held in the postal department public hall. Over three hundred attended and the hall was full. MP Sumanthiran was the special speaker at this meeting which was to discuss the LLRC recommendations and other relevant matters.
Sumanthiran explained in very simple way and in an attractive style the meaning of ‘the right of self determination’. “Sinhala are a great people and we respect them” he said and added “So are we, the Lankan Tamils. We expect equal respect and we want to live in our way, within our traditions, in our homeland. We do not want to separate but if that is the only respectable option given to us, certainly we will take it.” Some body in the audience said that it is the only occasion he could remember where a Tamil leader came to address Matara people. Sumanthiran said in answer that in the early period of the freedom struggle Tamil leaders came to the South to support the common issues. Probably he was referring to the days of Ponnambalam Ramanathan. One of Ramanathan’s remarkable achievements was the winning of the election for the Educated Ceylonese seat in the Legislative Council, in 1911. He defeated Dr. Marcus Fernando, a popular Physician. Ramanathan retained the seat for over ten years.

Sir P. Ramanathan
In 1915, Sir P. Ramanathan was very much in the forefront during the widespread and prolonged ‘Sinhala Muslim’ riots in Lanka; when he battled for the release of the Sinhala leaders who were held in detention. In October 1915, he even made a hazardous journey to England, during the First World War, to present their case personally. He won their release, and on his return, the supporters of the leaders showed their appreciation by carrying him in a palanquin from the landing jetty to his residence at “Sukhastan” Ward Place, in Colombo. Contrary to widespread Sinhala chauvinist view, Sir Ponnambalam Ramanathan was not only steeped in Hindu and Christian theology, but was deeply involved in the revival of Buddhist activities in Ceylon. He was responsible for the Government declaring Wesak a public holiday, and was closely associated with Col. Henry Olcott, the co-founder of the Buddhist Theosophical Society (BTS), in promoting Buddhist education in schools. His brother Sir Arunachalam was the founding chairman of The Ceylon Reform League which became later the Ceylon National Congress. History is important but future is for us to win back what we lost in blind alleys. 
Unseasonal Elections, Family-Theatrics And Development Of Underdevelopment

By Tisaranee Gunasekara -
Colombo Telegraph
“Conquest creates tyrants.” - Baron d’Holbach (The Social System)
Three provincial councils have been dissolved, years ahead of time. Millions of rupees will be wasted on untimely elections, unneeded by the country and unwanted by the people.
These incessant elections are not about democracy or devolution; nor are they in popular or national interests. They are about shoring-up Rajapaksa-power.
Unseasonal elections keep SLFP (national/local) leaders in constant trepidation about their own political futures and thus disinclined to think beyond their positions, perks and privileges. This increases their dependence on the Ruling Family, for nominations, electoral assistance and political preferment. The consequent combination of fear (of political death) and desire (to prolong the good life of gilded-slavery) is a potent impediment to any inner-party resistance to Sibling-rule.
Unseasonal elections also enable the Ruling Family to increase the presence of Rajapaksa-loyalists (as distinct from SLFP-loyalists) in national and local assemblies. Incessant elections ensure the accelerated transmogrification of the SLFP from a Ratwatte-Bandaranaike fief to a Rajapaksa fief.
The Katuwana attack is a timely reminder of the dangers of opposing the Rajapaksas, politico-electorally. The threats meted out to the President of the Federation of University Teachers Association, Nirmal Ranjith Devasiri, demonstrate that under Rajapaksa rule mere criticism is a de facto crime. The 18th Amendment has emasculated the Elections Commissioner, turning him into a presidential-underling.
The unending elections happen in this landscape of repression, fear and abuse. They are more politico-propaganda gimmicks than real exercises in democracy and popular franchise – the electoral-equivalents of a Carlton sports encounter, guzzling funds which should have been spent on providing relief for drought-stricken farmers or reducing the tax-burden on consumers.
The provincial council system was enacted as a political solution to the ethnic problem. Today the South, which neither demanded nor wanted devolution, is being inundated with provincial elections while the North is deprived of an elected provincial council. The resultant absence of devolution cannot but render even more difficult the near-Sisyphusean efforts of Northern Tamils to rebuild their shattered lives, post-war.
Unseasonal provincial/local elections are not in Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim or Lankan interests. They just serve Rajapaksa interests.
The Rajapaksas might have personal differences; or disagreements about how the power-and-wealth pie should be shared. But when it comes to protecting Familial Rule, the Siblings operate in a truly polyphonous manner.
Take l’affaire Kolonnawa. In the immediate emotional aftermath of the murder of Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra, Mahinda and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa were publicly decried by Bharatha-supporters as Godfathers of the alleged killer. Basil Rajapaksa worked tirelessly, soothing incensed tempers, calming the impending storm, preventing closet dissenters within the SLFP from teaming up with furious Bharatha-supporters and causing a pocket-revolt in the party.
Last week, the CID informed the courts that the AG’s Department (under President Mahinda) did not give a directive to record a statement from Duminda Silva (the protégé of Defence Secretary Gotabhaya). 24 hours later, Speaker Chamal presided over the foundation-stone laying ceremony for a Bharatha-statue. The two incidents in juxtaposition demonstrate, again, the Rajapaksa modus operandi; the seeming familial differences are often nothing more than a necessary (and useful) division-of-labour in protecting and promoting familial interests.
Country, nation, race, religion and party: all are ruses and slogans. The raison d’être of Rajapaksa Rule is Rajapaksa Rule.
Economic Pitfalls
Last week, award-winning actress-cum-environmentalist Iranganie Serasinghe appealed to the Navy “to refrain from engaging in activities that would have an adverse impact on the Panama lagoon” (The Island – 27.6.2012). According to the Spokesman of the Panama Lagoon Fisheries Management Authority, “the Navy had already acquired land belonging to the villagers and places considered by the Central Environment Authority as rich in biodiversity” (ibid). The Navy had built a jetty in fish-breeding grounds and cut down mangroves.
Conflate this outrage with the recent statement by the Army Commander about the need for “a complete overhaul of the Army along military and development lines” (Sri Lanka Mirror – 25.6.2012). The military, transformed from a state-entity into the Rajapaksa Praetorian Guard, will be tasked with implementing unpalatable and shady politico-economic dictats of the Ruling Family. A stake in the economy will be their reward for acting as Rajapaksa enforcers and yeomen.
The military, in turn, will bring into the economy the habits of lawlessness, abuse and impunity it internalised during the war. The ongoing devastation of Panama is but a forewarning of the ills of militarising the economy. These ills will impact as adversely on Sinhalese as it will on Tamils and Muslims. In their pursuit of profit for the Siblings and for themselves, the military will not discriminate between the majority and the minorities, and will not hesitate to treat as enemy-aliens anyone opposing their ‘developmental work’.
The Rajapaksa economic strategy is not aimed at promoting productive and self-sustaining economic development or popular welfare. Its aim is to create the necessary basis for Rajapaksa Rule by marrying familial political power with familial economic power.
In the Rajapaksa-book, development is a show, garish and gargantuan, with little relevance to the lives, occupations, needs and expectations of most Lankans.
The Minister of Higher Education is simply echoing the thinking of his masters – albeit his own inimitably execrable manner – when he celebrates the closing down of rural schools as a sign of development.
Rajapaksa development means agricultural decline and industrial stagnation, a crisis-ridden educational system and an under-funded health system, an ailing rupee and a ballooning debt plus worrying hikes in income inequality, inequality before the law and crime levels.
In dictatorships trains are no more punctual than in democracies. The former is better not at ensuring punctuality but at creating an illusion of punctuality. When real economic/developmental problems crop up in Rajapaksa Sri Lanka, they are swept behind a curtain of roseate hues, woven with interlocking threads of lies, deceptions and denials.
Last week when the rupee hit a new low, the Central Bank, instead of dealing with the problem, ordered commercial banks not to trade the rupee above 133.00 against the US dollar.
Maintaining appearances is all that matters. Let the basics haemorrhage and innards rot, so long as the economic-facelifts and developmental-makeup are in place.
So the regime which is going hell-for-leather to enforce the plastic crates law is planning the wanton destruction of pivotal agricultural land and the closure of the country’s sole Agricultural Institute, to build a domestic airport. If farmers, battered by government maltreatment and climatic assaults decide to sell their lands and migrate to cities, that would suit the regime. Their land, bought for a song, can be used to increase the worldly wealth and glory of the rulers. The resultant decrease in rural population can be hailed as another sign of development.
In ancient Greece the agora was a marketplace for goods and ideas. This dual function is symbolic of the totality of democracy, of its bipedal nature, political and economic. To be complete, and safe, economic democracy and political democracy must complement each other. An economic strategy which ignores the needs of the majority might ill-fit with political democracy. But such a strategy, which aims at enriching a minority, will be the perfect corollary of despotism.
Familial Rule must cause Familial Development.

Menon calls for elections to the Northern PC

Swiss Francs 85 Million Invested In Swiss Banks By Sri Lankans Last Year

July 1, 2012
By Feizal Samath -

Colombo TelegraphInvestments by Sri Lankan individuals, companies or the Sri Lankan government in secret Swiss accounts totalled more than 85 million Swiss francs (CHF) in 2011 while liabilities listed against Sri Lanka were 44 million in the same year, official data from the Swiss National Bank (SNB) show.
The Swiss franc is higher or equal in value against the US dollar (1CHF = 1.048 US$). SNB is Switzerland’s central bank. However it doesn’t provide details of who owns these assets or liabilities and has listed these data under each country. Swiss secrecy laws protect the identity of the investor/debtor, which is among a host of reasons why much black money or ‘dirty’ money is believed to be stashed by corrupt governments, individuals or businesspersons.
Assets and liabilities of more than 200 countries are listed from 2002 to 2011, in SNB’s latest 2011 annual report.
In 2002, Sri Lanka’s assets in all Swiss banks totalled 22.9 million CHF, 2003 – 34.7 million, 2004 – 105.5 million, 2005 – 177.6 million, 2006 – 56.5 million, 2007 – 123.5 million, 2008 – 104.8 million, 2009 – 87.5 million and 2010 – 111.3 million.
Under this category, most of the investments were made in savings accounts.
Liabilities were 2002 – 36.3 million, 2003 – 84 million, 2004 – 205.4 million, 2005 – 206.2 million, 2006 – 166.8 million, 2007 – 171.4 million, 2008 – 53.1 million, 2009 – 50.7 million and 2010 – 51.9 million.The figures also showed that Sri Lankan banks had invested CHF 12.3 million, 12.3, 24.2, 78.4, 41.5, 94.1, 60.6, 82.1, 85.7, and 77.7 from 2002 to 2011.
In comparison, Bangladesh with a larger population (about 150 million) and wealthier per capita group than Sri Lanka had lesser investments.
Its highest asset-year was 2005 – CHF 94.4 million and lowest in 2006 – CHF 22.2 million. Its liabilities were, however, as high as Sri Lanka at CHF 243 million in 2007.
It was unclear to some local bankers who analysed the data as to whether each annual figure reflected a carry-forward amount from the previous year or whether each year was a separate, new investment figure. If it was the latter, investments under Sri Lanka would total 910.3 million (for the past 10 years) while liabilities would total 1.07 billion.
Bankers also questioned as to whether the Central Bank and its Financial Investigation Unit (FIU) is aware of the SNB annual report and whether action is being taken. Central Bank officials were not available for comment.
Here is the SNB web link with the details of assets and liabilities of all countries:
Courtesy Sunday Times
Related posts;
Tamil Diaspora on GL’S alleged statement to Clinton that

Sunday 01 July 2012
By Sulochana Ramiah Mohan

5-2The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) views all Tamil parties in  Sri Lanka as partners working for the same cause and having the same objectives, and in many ways working together as any family that is doing its best under the circumstances. GTF spokesperson, Suren Surendiran, in an exclusive interview with LAKBIMAnEWS said that the Tamil Diaspora should be approached for talks by Sri Lanka, because it is they who have felt insecure, been victimized, and felt or experienced the danger for their as well as their family’s lives.

What do you intend to do arising from the LLRC report?
The LLRC report is a document that was commissioned by President Rajapaksa and his government. Therefore it is for them to do whatever they see fit with its recommendations and it is not for the GTF to do anything with it.
GTF, as an organization, has gone on record welcoming the LLRC recommendations and suggesting that if  implemented in full, it will take the reconciliation process a long way forward. GTF has also highlighted the substantial inadequacies of the LLRC report in addressing the issue of accountability, the allegations of breaches of international laws, international human rights and humanitarian laws. 
GTF has also highlighted the fact that the LLRC never had the means or authority in the first place to investigate the alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both sides at the end of the war.
The GTF as a representative organization of the Tamil Diaspora, amongst whom there are many thousands of victims – as relatives and friends, has always maintained that sustainable reconciliation in Sri Lanka amongst communities is possible only if justice is served for the tens of thousands of lives that were lost, and the over 146,000 people who have been unaccounted for during the last stages of the war.
As far as GTF and the Tamils as a whole are concerned, fair and equitable justice can only be served by commissioning an independent international investigation into the alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both sides. Therefore, we will continue to pursue calling for such an investigation to be held as soon as possible.
Did you know about Prof. G.L. Peiris’ visit and the presenting of a document to the US Secretary to the State Hillary Clinton? One of the LLRC recommendation is, ‘The government should engage with the so called hostile Diaspora groups constructively and address their concerns.’ What points do you raise about the recommendation itself?
Yes, we did hear about Prof. G.L. Peiris’ visit to Washington in May and as a matter of fact, in early June as well. GTF was also invited by the State Department to be de-briefed on the discussions held between GLP and Secretary Clinton. I represented GTF along with our local US member organization, United States Tamil Political Action Council (USTPAC) president at this debriefing session at the State Department.
Regarding the recommendation for the government to engage with the Tamil Diaspora, I think you should pose that question to President Rajapaksa and his cabinet/government as we believe the recommendation is directed at them. 
However, GTF also firmly believes that in any conflict, if both conflicting parties are serious and have the will to resolve the conflict genuinely and with sincerity, the best way to resolve any conflict would be by directly engaging the conflicting parties, perhaps with the assistance of independent mediation.
Do you welcome such an approach to involve the 
Diaspora to address your concerns too?
Of course! A large portion of the Tamil Diapora left the island because they felt insecure, victimized, had family members murdered, kidnapped, and felt or experienced the danger for their and their family’s lives. It is not out of choice that they left. It is therefore only right that the Diaspora also is given a say.
What do you want for the Tamil community of Sri Lanka?         Full Story>>>