Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, March 23, 2012

WikiLeaks: “I Haven’t Had An Easy Time With Rajapaksa Brothers” – Mahinda Samarasinghe

Colombo Telegraph March 23, 2012

Sri Lanka’s Mahinda Samarasinghe before a special session of the Human Rights Council. Photo by Jean-Marc Ferre/United Nations
“Ambassador met with Minister of Disaster Relief and Human Rights Mahinda Samarasinghe January 30 to share with him a list of suggested actions the Government could take to address the human rights situation. The deeply frustrated Minister (strictly protect throughout) expressed concern that the President and his two brothers have rendered his human rights and humanitarian access efforts ineffective and that he would not sacrifice his political career to become ‘part of a white wash’ for the Government of Sri Lanka’s (GSL) recent human rights violations.Ambassador invited the Minister to participate in a press conference with several other heads of mission to express support for the good work that NGOs do for the citizens of Sri Lanka and counter the recent negative publicity international NGOs have been subject to. Minister Samarasinghe agreed, and asked that Ambassador also take his humanitarian message directly to President Rajapaksa.” the US Embassy Colombo informed Washington.
The Colombo Telegraph found the related leaked cable from the WikiLeaks database. The cable is classified as “CONFIDENTIAL” and written by the Ambassador Robert O. Blake on January 30, 2007.


Sri Lankan government calls journalists 'traitors'


http://cpj.org/css/images/header5.jpg
New York, March 22, 2012--The Sri Lankan government must immediately halt its intimidation of journalists who supported the adoption of a U.N. Human Rights Councilresolution calling for an investigation into the country's alleged abuses of international humanitarian law during its war with Tamil separatists.
Journalists in the capital, Colombo, told CPJ they were concerned by a state-controlled media campaign against them, which called them "traitors" for supporting the U.S.-backed motion. News accounts reported that Wednesday's vote, which passed 24 to 15, with eight abstentions, infuriated the Sri Lankan government.
The BBC said that after the vote, state television launched an attack on Sri Lankan journalists, both at home and in exile, saying they were helping the defeated Tamil Tiger rebels and "betraying the motherland." The broadcaster also said that although the journalists who had participated in the Council sessions were not specifically named, Sri Lankan state television "repeatedly zooms in on thinly disguised photographs of them, promising to give their names soon and 'expose more traitors.'"
"Things are quite tense here. We've had anti-U.S. and anti-resolution protests the past few days, and now we're waiting to see who they will hit out at next," one journalist in the country told CPJ.
"The government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa has a long and alarming record of intolerance to criticism," said Bob Dietz, CPJ's Asia program coordinator. "The international community must be extra vigilant in ensuring that Sri Lankan journalists are not subjected to reprisals for voicing their concerns to the Human Rights Council."
The U.N. resolution called on Sri Lanka to investigate abuses carried out by its military in 2009, at the end of the decades-long war with Tamil separatists.
Rajapaksa's administration has verbally attacked journalists in the past in an effort to intimidate them, CPJ research shows. In a 2008 letter to Rajapaksa, CPJ voiced concern over government officials repeatedly calling journalists "traitors" in public. At least nine journalists have been murdered in the Rajapaksa era, all of them unsolved, according to CPJ data.
March 22, 2012

Brian Stewart: Why Canada is calling Sri Lanka to account






CBC News  


Posted: Mar 22, 2012

Human rights violations are too big to ignore, Canada and the UN now say


ANALYSIS
Brian Stewart
Canada and abroad

Brian StewartWhen victims of mass abuse are ignored they are twice victimized: first by their oppressors, secondly by the world's indifference.
That's why few failures in the field of human rights are more discouraging than the old double standard of favouring one set of victims over another.
Just ask the ethnic Tamil's of Sri Lanka. In the past three years they've absorbed brutality, military defeat and world indifference all at once, as other of the world's injustices took centre stage.
In the spring of 2009, at the end of that country's long civil war, as many as 40,000 Tamil civilians were allegedly slaughtered by the Sri Lankan military as the insurrection by the Tamil Tiger independence movement collapsed.
This number, based on estimates by the UN and respected human rights' groups, is considerably higher than the number of Libyans or Syrians killed in their respective uprisings, yet it still receives miniscule world attention by comparison.
Western nations like Canada sent fighter-bombers to help in Libya and have even agonized (vaguely) over possible intervention in Syria.
But they have done very little until only recently about the massacred men, women and children in Sri Lanka. Why is that?

No 'safe zone'      Full Story>>>

JOINT STATEMENT: Sunila Abeysekara, Nimalka Fernando and Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu



Friday, 23 March 2012 As the three Sri Lankan human rights defenders who have come most under attack by the state media in Sri Lanka in the past week, because of our active involvement with the on-going session of the UN Human rights Council in Geneva, we feel compelled to issue this statement of clarification.
We do not deny that we are critical of the conduct of the government of Sri Lanka, and the institutions and agencies under its control, whenever disregard for the human rights obligations imposed on the government by virtue of its being signatory to almost all international human rights conventions comes to our attention. As the President of Sri Lanka, and his Special Envoy on Human Rights well know, the three of us have offered our services to this government to ensure human rights accountability in the past. For example, all of us served on the National Advisory Council appointed by Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe, when he held the portfolio for Human Rights.
Nor do we deny that we work with a range of human rights organizations, nationally, regionally and internationally, to draw attention to human rights violations in Sri Lanka as well as to the culture of impunity and the lack of accountability for violations of the past and of the present. This is our right, as human rights defenders, and we have exercised that right for many years, under various governments, in spite of a barrage of attacks and intimidation from various quarters, including state and non-state entities.
It is indeed regrettable that at a time in the history of our country when we have the opportunity to transform our society, to move from a post-war to a post-conflict phase, and to enjoy the support of the international community to rebuild a just, humane and prosperous Sri Lanka in which all its citizens can live together with peace and dignity, the government and its media have seen it necessary to launch into an unprecedented and utterly personalized attack against the three of us. There is no attempt to challenge us substantively on any point. None of the comments attributed to us, were actually ever made by any one of us; there are many who were present at the side events where we have spoken who can testify to that.
This attack is totally counter-productive in terms of the government’s campaign to resist the Resolution on Sri Lanka, which has been tabled at the Council. In fact, in Geneva today, there is more focus on the attacks and acts of intimidation of Sri Lankan human rights defenders than there is on the negotiations around the Resolution. Those who accuse us of bringing the country into disrepute would do well to examine both their own motives and the consequences of their actions. Instead of carrying on with advocacy for defeating the Resolution, Sri Lanka’s ambassador to the Council, Ms. Tamara Kunanayagam has had to spend hours of her valuable time talking to delegations, to the President of the Council and to officials of the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights about the campaign of intimidation and attack against Sri Lankan human rights defenders at the Council and in Sri Lanka.
As human rights defenders working to defeat impunity in Sri Lanka and to build a strong system of justice and accountability for human rights violations, whether committed in the past or in the present, we remain committed to our ideals and to our goals. For us, whether there is a Resolution on Sri Lanka at the UN Human rights Council or not, our work to defend human rights in Sri Lanka must, and will, go on. Read more...

S. Lanka press slams 'neo-imperial' war crime vote

YahooNews 
Sri Lanka's media reacted angrily Friday to a US-led resolution demanding a war crimes probe and said the island had done well to go down fighting at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
The state-run Daily News said the 24 nations which voted in favour of the resolution urging a credible investigation into alleged war crimes during Sri Lanka's battle against Tamil rebels in 2009 were being destructive.
The countries that backed the resolution were making "a desperate attempt to disempower and undermine Sri Lanka and they are trying every trick in the bag to further this dark design," the Daily News said.
It reported Thursday's vote at the UNHRC under the headline: "Might overrules right."
The privately-run, but pro-government Island newspaper commended the hawkish administration of President Mahinda Rajapakse for putting up a fight in Geneva.
"The cornered badger bravely fought the mastiffs of neo-imperialism, savage in the fray, and went down fighting yesterday," the Island said. "It certainly was a defeat as good as victory."
The paper also took a swipe at Sri Lanka's traditional ally Indiawhich turned its back on Colombo during the council's contested vote.
"India has been a loser in Geneva, though it helped the US win," the Island said. "India failed to carry Asia, or at least South Asia with it. In other words, Sri Lanka has won against India in Asia."
Tabling the resolution, the US said Colombo had been given three years to hold its own probe into allegations of war crimes, but "given the lack of action... it is appropriate" that the 47-member UNHRC pushed it to do so.
Rights groups say up to 40,000 civilians died in the final months of Colombo's military campaign to crush the Tamil Tigers, who waged a bloody decades-long campaign for a separate homeland for minority Tamils.
Colombo has denied its troops were responsible for any non-combatant deaths, but UN-mandated experts have accused the Sri Lankan military of killing most of the civilian victims in their final offensive against the rebels in 2009.
The United Nations estimates some 100,000 people died during Sri Lanka's ethnic conflict between 1972 and 2009.
International rights activists welcomed Thursday's decision as a step in the right direction.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

India balm after UN vote against Sri Lanka

MailOnline - news, sport, celebrity, science and health stories 23 March 2012



Endorsing a U.S.-sponsored resolution at the UN Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) on Sri Lanka's war crimes against the Tamil Tigers, India for the first time ever voted on Thursday censuring the government in Colombo. 
But India tried to do the balancing act, so as not to miff the Lankans completely, by persuading the U.S. to make changes in the original resolution. 
It was passed 24 to 15 with eight abstentions in the UN Human Rights Council. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's reaction made it clear that India's vote was shaped by coalition compulsions. 
India voted for a U.S.-backed resolution asking Sri Lanka to probe rights abuses in the war on the Tamil Tigers, though it underlined its ¿strong ties¿ with the nation

India voted for a U.S.-backed resolution asking Sri Lanka to probe rights abuses in the war on the Tamil Tigers, though it underlined its 'strong ties' with the nation

'We don't want to infringe on Sri Lanka's sovereignty but our concerns should be expressed so Tamils get justice and dignity. We had to weigh pros and cons what we did was in line with our stand,' he said. 
The DMK wasted no time in welcoming India's vote saying Tamils across the globe would also be thankful to India for voting for the U.S.-sponsored resolution. 
Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa too echoed the sentiment saying 'amid all this confusion and procrastination, it is heartening to note the government has voted in favour'. 
But DMK chief M. Karunanidhi requested the By Dipanjan Roy Chaudhury in New Delhi Prime Minister to prevent a possible backlash against the Tamils in Sri Lanka. 
'News reaching here indicates that there is widespread apprehension among the Lankan Tamils about possible attacks in view of the UN resolution,' Karunanidhi said. 
India was earlier reluctant to vote on a nation-specific resolution but had to change its stand following pressure from Tamil Nadu parties, particularly DMK that had threatened to pull out its ministers. 
The resolution pulled up Sri Lanka for its internal inquiry report that 'does not adequately address serious allegations of violations of international law' and urged it to investigate alleged abuses during the final phase of war with Tamil rebels. 
But Colombo reacted sharply to India's stand. Foreign minister G.L. Peiris said: '...voting at the council is now determined not by the merits of a particular issue but by strategic alliances and domestic political issues in other countries.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2119010/Title-goes-here.html#ixzz1pwKOqtQM 

A wake up call for Colombo

Return to frontpage March 23, 2012

The passage of the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution on Sri Lanka is proof that the international community disapproves of the manner in which the Rajapaksa government is addressing the fallout of its Armageddon moment of mid-May 2009. The resolution, backed by India, asks Sri Lanka credibly to investigate allegations of rights violations in the course of its war against the LTTE. The wording of the resolution was tweaked by India to say the implementation assistance the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights will provide must be with Sri Lanka's “concurrence”. Yet, Colombo must not misread this concession. Thursday's resolution is the first real sign that the world will no more let itself be guided solely by Sri Lankan claims that it has the will to carry out its own probe. It also means that gentle prodding and quiet diplomacy will not be the main means the world will adopt towards the island nation. Few would dispute that Sri Lanka took too long to acknowledge the allegations of extra-judicial killings and enforced disappearances and delayed moves towards a political settlement indefinitely. Ultimately, its own ‘Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission' came out with some constructive recommendations, but these have not been followed up. President Rajapaksa may not like the Geneva resolution but he has brought it upon himself.
India's vote has already aroused consternation in some sections in Colombo but it is crucial that its intentions not be misread. There is no change in the Indian defence of the unity and integrity of its southern neighbour, only a realisation that the tardy progress towards reconciliation could undermine the prospects for peace and stability there. For the first time in decades, New Delhi is in concord with popular sentiments in Tamil Nadu but it would be wrong to look at its Geneva vote as merely the product of domestic political pressure. Over time, the false assurances on devolution and implementation of “the 13th amendment and beyond” it received from Colombo have frustrated South Block and forced it to reconsider its diplomatic options. What is welcome in India's latest stand is that it has outgrown its misplaced fear of the growing regional presence of China. Having voted for the resolution, the onus is now on India to remain engaged with the Lankan authorities, as its interests lie in promoting reconciliation and supporting the quest of Tamil Sri Lankans for justice, equality and dignity. The solution has to be Lankan-led. Persistent emphasis on accountability from outside may jeopardise the larger goal of reconciliation by giving a fresh thrust to Sinhala nationalism. India needs to brace for extraordinary diplomatic challenges ahead.

U.N. body urges Sri Lanka to probe alleged war crimes

 By Elizabeth Joseph
CNN
Thu March 22, 2012 
(CNN) -- The United Nations Human Rights Council urged Sri Lanka Thursday to thoroughly investigate allegations of atrocities committed during the island nation's long and brutal civil war.
The Geneva-based U.N. body adopted a U.S.-initiated resolution calling on the Sri Lankan government to "initiate credible and independent actions to ensure justice, equity, accountability and reconciliation for all Sri Lankans."
The measure was adopted in a 24-15 vote; eight nations abstained.
Sri Lanka's 26-year war with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam rebels, otherwise known as the Tamil Tigers, ended three years ago when government forces declared victory.
A U.N. report last year found credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both sides during the final stages of the fighting.
The Sri Lankan government, however, rejected the findings as "biased, baseless and unilateral."
Between September 2008 and May 2009, the Sri Lankan army advanced into Vanni, an area of northern Sri Lanka where tens of thousands of civilians were killed, according to the U.N. report.
Questions of accountability for the mass killings of civilians remain unanswered.
"There cannot be impunity for large-scale civilian casualties," Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. council, said last month.
"If governments cannot tell the truth about large-scale atrocities, whatever else they're doing that's positive can't eradicate the despair that will be there on the part of the victims," she said. "If that despair isn't acknowledged or dealt with in some way by the government, it will sow seeds of future violence."
Last year's U.N. report was issued by a panel appointed by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in 2010 as a way to address accountability in the Sri Lankan war.
The panel's report last April gave credence to allegations of serious human rights violations by both government forces as well as the rebels that could amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Many civilians were killed in the final phases of the war because of government shelling, the U.N. report found. It said the government attacked no-fire zones after encouraging the civilian population to gather there. Those places included food distribution lines, front-line hospitals and Red Cross ships picking up the wounded.
The Sri Lankan government continued to shell these areas in spite of knowing its impact from its own intelligence systems and notification from the United Nations and other international humanitarian agencies, the U.N. report said.
U.N. investigators said the Sri Lankan government deprived people of humanitarian aid and deliberately underestimated the number of civilians who remained in the conflict zone.
The report also blamed the Tamil Tigers, known as a terrorist group responsible for the assassinations of two world leaders -- Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa in 1993 and Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991.
The U.N. report accused the rebels of forced labor, suicide attacks, using civilians as human shields, killing civilians attempting to flee, using military equipment in the proximity of civilians and recruiting children.
Donahoe said it was imperative for Sri Lanka to reconcile its bloody past.
"I think this outcome is also important not only for the people of Sri Lanka, but for human rights generally and for the international human rights principle that when there are mass-scale civilian casualties and human rights violations, there must be some credible investigation and some form of accountability," she said. "Without that element, there cannot be real reconciliation or lasting peace."

Baird Welcomes Support for Canadian Co-sponsored UN Resolution on Sri Lanka


Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
      Symbol of the Government of Canada


March 22, 2012 - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird today welcomed the adoption of a resolution, co-sponsored by Canada, to promote reconciliation and accountability in Sri Lanka:
“I am very pleased by the response of members of the UN Human Rights Council to the resolution on Sri Lanka.
“Canada has consistently urged the Government of Sri Lanka to implement the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission’s report and to develop a complementary road map to that end.
“This resolution, and the support it garnered, is a clear message to Sri Lankan leaders to work with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to develop its implementation plan.
“Canada remains concerned that the Government of Sri Lanka has not fully addressed the grave accusations of serious human rights violations that occurred toward the end of the conflict. We continue to call for an independent investigation into the credible and serious allegations raised by the UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka that international humanitarian law and human rights were violated by both sides in the conflict.”
- 30 -
For further information, media representatives may contact:
Foreign Affairs Media Relations Office
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
613-995-1874
Follow us on Twitter: @DFAIT_MAECI

EXPLAINED: Why India voted against Sri Lanka at UNHRC

Rediff.com 
"Sri Lanka [ Images ] is our next door neighbour. Geography bounds us. We have overwhelming trade ties with them. India [ Images ] is their biggest trade partner and the largest investor in Sri Lanka. Every fifth tourist in Sri Lanka arrives from India. Both countries' bilateral relation are so intertwined that both of us will soon take India's vote against them in the United Nations Human Rights Council in their stride." says an Indian government officer involved in bilateral trade ties while responding to the query, by rediff.com, if the Indian stand would be advantage China in the Island nation. 
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [ Images ] said after the voting, ''We had to weigh the pros and cons. What we did was in line with our stand.'' The Indian side insists that they have voted in favour of resolution only because it is 'non judgmental and non-intrusive'.
Soon after the voting, Indian diplomats were going at length to explain, "We don't see any contradictions in the position we have taken on Sri Lanka and in general." 
After the controversial vote against Sri Lanka, Indian sources in New Delhi [ Images ] highlighted how India played part in diluting the draft of the American sponsored resolution.
India insisted one correction in the preamble and another in the body of the draft.More 

Sri Lanka Unfazed by U.N. Rights Resolution

    By Amantha Perera
President Rajapksa has vowed not to allow outside interference in  Sri Lanka's affairs. / Credit:Amantha Perera/IPSCOLOMBO, Mar 22, 2012 (IPS) - As the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) voted in, Thursday, a resolution asking Colombo to act on recommendations made by its own Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), Buddhist prayers reverberated through the Sri Lankan capital.

"It is a resolution that encourages Sri Lanka to implement the recommendations of its own LLRC and to make concerted efforts at achieving the kind of meaningful accountability upon which lasting reconciliation efforts can be built," United States ambassador to the Council, Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe, said in Geneva. 
 MORE >> 

President Rajapksa has vowed not to allow outside interference in Sri Lanka's affairs. 
Credit:Amantha Perera/IPS

Buy this picture



UN urges Sri Lanka to take ‘credible’ steps to ensure accountability for alleged war crimes

UN LogoUN News Centre logo and link back to News Centre home


Mahinda Samarasinghe, Sri Lankan Minister of Plantation Industries, addresses a meeting of the Human Rights Council on his country. UN Photo/Jean-Marc Ferré
22 March 2012 – 
 The top United Nations human rights body today called on the Government of Sri Lanka to take “credible” steps to ensure accountability for alleged serious violations committed during the final stages of the country’s civil war.In a resolution adopted today, the 47-member Human Rights Council called on the Government to take “all necessary additional steps to fulfil its relevant legal obligations and commitment to initiate credible and independent actions to ensure justice, equity, accountability and reconciliation for all Sri Lankans.”
The text, tabled by the United States, was adopted by a vote of 24 in favour to 15 against, with 8 abstentions.
Sri Lankan Government forces declared victory over the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in 2009 after a conflict that had raged on and off for nearly three decades and killed thousands of people. A report by the country’s Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission was released last December.
In its resolution, the Council – which is responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe and for addressing human rights violations – called on the Government to implement the recommendations made in that report and to present “as expeditiously as possible” a comprehensive action plan detailing the steps it has taken and will take towards that end, and also to address alleged violations of international law.
A three-member UN panel of experts on accountability issues during the civil war found there were credible reports that both Government forces and the LTTE committed war crimes during the final months of the conflict.
It recommended that the Government respond to the allegations by initiating an effective accountability process starting with genuine investigations.

UN Rights Council: Sri Lanka Vote a Strong Message for Justice

 MARCH 22, 2012
Broad International Support for Resolution Seeking Accountability

The Human Rights Council’s vote demonstrates broad international dissatisfaction with Sri Lanka’s accountability efforts in the three years since the end of the war. Many countries have recognized that this resolution is an important first step toward serious action to investigate the many abuses by both sides during the conflict.”
Juliette De Rivero, advocacy director
(Geneva) - The United Nations Human Rights Council’s adoption of a resolution on Sri Lanka demonstrates strong international support for accountability for abuses committed in Sri Lanka’s armed conflict, Human Rights Watch said today.  The resolution passed the council by a vote of 24 to 15, with 8 abstentions.  Member countries voting for the resolution included India, Nigeria and the United States.

“The Human Rights Council’s vote demonstrates broad international dissatisfaction with Sri Lanka’s accountability efforts in the three years since the end of the war,” said Juliette De Rivero, advocacy director at Human Rights Watch in Geneva. “Many countries have recognized that this resolution is an important first step toward serious action to investigate the many abuses by both sides during the conflict.”    Full Story>>>