Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, October 29, 2011

CHOGM leaders discuss human rights commissioner

Updated October 29, 2011 17:11:30
Leaders at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting will tackle the most contentious proposal for reform today when they discuss whether to create a commissioner for human rights and democracy.
Talks on whether to have a charter of Commonwealth values or an independent commissioner will be held in a leaders' retreat session in Perth's Kings Park today.
The leaders have already agreed to give the Ministerial Action Group and the Secretary General more powers to speak out if member states deprive their citizens of human rights or threaten the media or judiciary, or if democracy is threatened through postponing elections.
But the fight for an independent commissioner is tipped to be an uphill battle.
The Action Group will also be empowered to police election rigging and the detention of political leaders, and Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma paid tribute to Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard for winning approval for those changes.
"Be under no illusion of the ambitious reform achieved by the chair, Prime Minister Gillard," he said.
Ms Gillard says the increased powers are a significant step.
Members of the Commonwealth Eminent Persons Group, which made the recommendations, disagree and have stepped up the pressure for a commissioner.
One, former High Court Judge Michael Kirby, says it is the weaker option.
"Here is a problem with politicians having the first word; they are very busy, they are distracted by home problems and they are subject to rules of deference and courtesy to other member countries," he said.
"What they need is an independent, highly respected member of the Commonwealth working with a talented staff."
Former Australian prime minister Malcolm Fraser says the Action Group will have its limits, and is pushing for an independent commissioner.

"These people are going to be ministers in governments and that puts restraint on the way things are said and the way things are done," he said.
"That is not a substitute for an independent commissioner or ombudsman who will speak on the broad on issues of human rights and in relation to commonwealth values."
Mr Fraser says it is enormously disappointing CHOGM is unlikely to support the creation of an independent commissioner.
The former prime minister says an independent commissioner should have the power to write reports and make statements about human rights issues in the Commonwealth.
He says the concept should not be seen as way for developed nations to tell poorer countries what to do.
"It's not something that's aimed at Third World countries," he said.
"Because especially since 9/11, some of the developed countries, I believe, have transgressed quite seriously in relation to human rights in the so-called fight against terrorism, their attitudes towards refugees and sometimes in relations to their attitudes towards indigenous people.
"So, it's not only going to be African countries that would be subject to reports; Australia would be subject to report, Canada would, and I think that would be good.
"The drive for basic human rights, the drive for the rule of law, is much stronger than some governments are prepared to recognise."

AID POLICY: The politics of humanitarian principle


humanitarian news and analysis

a service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Photo: Salih/IRIN
Aid propping up groups like the Taliban is "unavoidable" says MSF (file photo)
BERLIN, 28 October 2011 (IRIN) - For decades aid agencies have been tackling troubling ethical dilemmas about where to draw the line when negotiating with armed forces when trying to deliver aid to vulnerable communities. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) discusses some of the ethical dilemmas it has faced over the past 40 years in Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience, promoted at its annual Berlin Humanitarian Congress.

“Humanitarian actors often claim they are above politics but it is simply not true,” said Fabrice Weissman, one of the co-authors of the book, which will be officially launched at the end of November.

“We do still retain our central tenet, which is saving lives,” Weissman added, but we also “seek to puncture a number of myths. We address the big question of when should and shouldn’t MSF be willing to compromise?”

Contributors lay out a wide range of dilemmas, “seeking to analyze the political transactions and balances of power and interests that allow aid activities to move forward, but that are usually masked by the lofty rhetoric of 'humanitarian principles'”.   full report 

Taking a stand on Sri Lanka

http://static.thestar.topscms.com/app_themes/standard/images/common/thestar_logo.gif Published On Fri Oct 28 2011

Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the Commonwealth Business Forum ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Governments Meeting in Australia.(Oct. 27, 2011)Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the Commonwealth Business Forum ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Governments Meeting in Australia.(Oct. 27, 2011)
TONY ASHBY/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Years after Sri Lanka’s bitter civil war ended in a bloodbath, we still don’t know the half of what went on in the final horrific days.
According to the United Nations, “tens of thousands” died in 2008-2009 as government forces crushed a Tamil Tiger rebellion. The army “systematically” shelled UN facilities, areas where 330,000 civilians were huddled, hospitals and food lines, a UN panel found. The rebels, in turn, used civilians as shields. There are “credible allegations,” the UN said, of point-blank executions, torture, rape and other war crimes by both sides.
Nor has President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s triumphalist government held a credible probe, or honoured promises to give Tamils “substantive” regional autonomy, stronger minority rights and a fair share of jobs in the civil service and military. A “deeply flawed” postwar reconciliation commission is a sham, the UN concluded.
Given this ghastly record, Prime Minister Stephen Harper deserves credit for making Sri Lanka an issue at the Commonwealth summit in Perth, Australia, this week. It’s discouraging that Rajapaksa is slated to host the next summit in 2013. The Commonwealth, comprising more than 2 billion people in 54 nations, prides itself on upholding democracy, human dignity and equality. Sri Lanka’s abuse of its own citizens, and its refusal to be held accountable, rules it out as an appropriate venue. There are better options.
Harper plans to boycott the next summit “if we do not see progress in Sri Lanka in terms of human rights and other issues,” and he hopes others will do the same. The Commonwealth must affirm its relevance by pushing for a credible probe, and a better deal for Tamils.
Harper’s activism is especially timely, given that the summit agenda included adopting a Commonwealth charter that will embody its values and, more controversially, creating a commissioner for democracy, the rule of law and human rights.
To Harper’s credit this is not the first time he has displayed moral leadership at a summit. In 2007 he lobbied, successfully, to suspend Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s military regime in Pakistan for subverting democracy. Pakistan is a democracy today.
This readiness to call out those who flagrantly betray Commonwealth values brings to mind Brian Mulroney’s successful campaign in 1986 for sweeping sanctions against South Africa’s apartheid-era regime. It, too, is now a democracy.
There are other rights offenders in the club, to be sure. But Sri Lanka is in a class of its own. Harper was right to take a stand.

Death threat to Sunday Leader Editor

Death threat to Sunday Leader Editor

The Editor of The Sunday Leader Frederica Jansz has been issued with a death threat in a letter posted to her residential address yesterday.
The letter handwritten in Sinhalese mentions the White Flag case and threatens Ms. Jansz for the evidence she had given in the hearings so far.
A complaint has been lodged with the Mirihana police over the death threat.

baratha-lakshman-killed

Place Duminda Silva Under Arrest – Bharatha’s Family »

The sister of slain Presidential Advisor Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra, has…

 

The Road to Perdition »

President Rajapaksa referred to the Kolonnawa mini-war as a ‘little…

The result of a ‘little blemish’ and Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra
      Lasantha’s murder suspect dies in custody – Editor’s wife Sonali calls for inquiry  
-Nirmala Kannangara
================================
 Lasantha

lasantha vigil at viharamahadevi park
Pitchai Jesudasan (bottom right) dies in custody
================

A Letter to Lasantha’s Widow

================ 0

President’s saffron robe donating pooja at Sri Maha Bodhi for and on behalf of Duminda

http://www.lankaenews.com/English/files/news/2124MR-JayasiriMaha-Bodhi-wandana_J.jpg


Friday, October 28, 2011

Perth Tamils join Australians protesting amidst attempts to bail out genocidal Sri Lanka

http://www.seithy.co...&language=tamil


==============================================

Perth Tamils join Australians protesting amidst attempts to bail out genocidal Sri Lanka

Tamils protest in Perth, AustraliaTamils protest in PerthTamilNet[TamilNet, Friday, 28 October 2011, 22:57 GMT]
While Her Majesty the Queen was inaugurating the Commonwealth sessions in Perth, Australia, a few hundreds meters away, hundreds of Tamils have joined over a thousand of 20 diverse groups of the mainstream population of Perth to protest against Mahinda Rajapaksa attending the Commonwealth Sessions. The protest of the diaspora Eezham Tamils and global civil society took place while some Establishments guilty of abetting the crimes are keen in bailing out genocidal Sri Lanka by diplomatic manoeuvres in Perth and by hijacking the polity of Eezham Tamils elsewhere by simulating that everything is coming to normalcy and is under ‘control’. The outcome of Perth Meet will show to what extent the Commonwealth boasting of its origins from the ‘cradle of democracy’ could prove its effectiveness in checking States globally turning into anti-people Establishments, commented political observers.


While the diverse groups had their separate calls for issues ranging from Aboriginal Rights and Refugee Rights to Climate change and renewable energy, they all vociferously joined the Tamils when the Tamils demanded to suspend Sri Lanka from the Commonwealth, to stop the Genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka, to Recognize the Independence of Tamils, to arrest the War Criminal Mahinda Rajapakse and similar slogans.

After the initial separate gatherings of the various groups with their demands by voice and by holding banners and placards for about half an hour, then the representatives of the different groups addressed the combined gathering of over 1000 peoples. Ajanthy spoke on behalf of the Tamil community and Yogan of his personal experience of the War.

Ajanthy said the Commonwealth “does have teeth,” which had been used to suspend four member nations – Nigeria, Fiji, Pakistan and Zimbabwe.

“The crimes committed in Sri Lanka are far more serious and much larger in scale than those attributed to the four members who faced suspension,” she said.

Referring to the civil war, which led to the death of nearly 500,000 and displacement if around one million people, she added: “We need Australians to support suspension of Sri Lanka from the Commonwealth, we need to stop the genocide of Tamils and support the independents of Tamils.”

Yogan said Rajapaksa had been given a “red carpet welcome” to CHOGM, but he was a war criminal who should be arrested.

“His place is not in the parliament, it’s behind the barb wire. Please Australia, put him into jail, don’t send him back home,” he shouted to the crowd, the Herald Sun reports.

Yogan, standing in front of a grisly banner showing dead and mutilated Tamil children, said he had lost 79 family members in the Sri Lankan civil war.

The Socialist Alliance convener of the CHOGM Action Network of the 20 groups, in a statement issued for the occasion stated that it recognizes that Tamils are an oppressed Nation within Sri Lanka, and supports their Right of Self determination.

While a consensus of mutual solidarity was developing in the commonwealth of Peoples, the Commonwealth of Heads of State were reported to be n a disarray over the Eminent Peoples Group Report.

The main proposal of the Report for a Commonwealth Commissioner of Human Rights is not likely to be accepted apparently at the insistence of the Indian Delegation. Probably that was a ‘motherly’ protection to Mahinda.

But former Justice Honourable Michael Kirby, a member of the Eminent Peoples Group is reported to have said that the non acceptance of the recommendation would make the Commonwealth irrelevant.

Reflections on Issues of Language in Sri Lanka: Power, Exclusion and Inclusion


http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/877084884/Groundviews_bigger.jpg *groundview journalism For citizens


Photo credit Dinuka Liyanawatte / Reuters, from Time magazine.
24 Oct, 2011 Prof Sasanka Perera
Keynote address delivered on 17th October 2011 at ‘Language and Social Cohesion: 9th International Language and Development Conference, Colombo co-organized by the Ministry of National Languages and Social Integration, Ministry  of Education, GIZ, AusAID and British Council.
Approach
Language is never a simple issue of communication; in contemporary social and political practice everywhere, language goes much beyond its basic utilitarian purposes. In this sense, Sri Lanka is no exception. By now, Sri Lanka has ended an immensely destructive military conflict that had much to do with a crisis of identity linked as much to language as to ethnicity and contested notions of binary-nationalisms and competitive interpretations of history. In this context, this is a crucial time to seriously consider the politico-developmental position of language in imagining the future of the country.    Continue reading »

Commonwealth rights envoy opposed

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sinhala/images/furniture/banner.gif28 October, 2011


President Mahinda Rajapaksa
President's spokesman says Sri Lanka has a right to oppose the moves to appoint a rights envoy
The Sri Lanka government has confirmed that it objects to a move by a group of countries to establish a special envoy aimed at making the Commonwealth more effective on human rights.
A report by an advisory group has made over 100 recommendations aimed at reforming the organization, including bolstering the organization's ability to tackle violations of its core principles by member states.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa's spokesman, Bandula Jayasekara told BBC Sinhala service that a group of countries including Sri Lanka opposed to one of the key proposals to appoint a rights commissar.
“It is not only Sri Lanka. There are also other countries who are opposing this,” he told BBC Sandeshaya from Perth.
Amnesty International 'biased'
"Let me also add that Sri Lanka has the right to oppose when other countries have the right to propose.”
 It is time that Amnesty International clears their backyard before pointing the finger at a democratic country
 
President Rajapaksa's spokesman, Bandula Jayasekara
Media reports said India also supports Sri Lanka’s policy on the issue.
Rights watchdog Amnesty International has, meanwhile, said the two countries have “a lot to lose” if the human rights records in Sri Lanka and India were open to scrutiny.
The watchdog has also questioned the decision by the Commonwealth to host next Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in a country with a questionable human rights record.
The Commonwealth, said AI, “risks becoming irrelevant” if the next CHOGM held in Sri Lanka in 2013.
But in a strong worded attack, the Sri Lanka government has accused the AI of being biased against the island nation.
Gay rights
"We have seen how biased Amnesty International is and they have been issuing many anti-Sri Lankan statements,” Bandula Jayasekara told BBC Sandeshaya from Perth.
Amnesty International
'It is absurd to even consider allowing Sri Lanka to host CHOGM as long as it fails to account for alleged war crimes'
“It is time that Amnesty International clears their backyard before pointing the finger at a democratic country,” he added.
But the rights watchdog is not impressed.
"It is absurd to even consider allowing Sri Lanka to host CHOGM as long as it fails to account for alleged war crimes," said Madhu Malhotra, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific Deputy Director.
The BBC's Duncan Kennedy in Perth reports that the summit is divided over several key issues including moves to get rid of laws in some member states which discriminate against gay men and lesbians, our correspondent says.
“I am not qualified to comment on that. It is a matter for the external affairs minister who is taking part in the ministerial discussions,” was the response by Mr Jayasekara when asked about Sri Lanka’s response.

TNA MPs advocate for Tamils rights in U.S. capital


[TamilNet, Friday, 28 October 2011, 03:33 GMT]
Four Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Members of Parliament visiting the U.S. on an invitation by the State Department arrived Tuesday night and have completed two days of meetings at the State Department and with Congress persons including members of the Sri Lanka caucus, sources close to the MPs said. The team led by Parliamentary group leader Mr Sampanthan said that they were aware of the political significance of this unique gesture by the State Department in inviting a non-State political party and that they would use every opportunity available to articulate Tamils position to the decision makers in Washington.
The visiting TNA delegation included Rajavarothayam Sampanthan, Maavai Senathirajah, Suresh Premachandran and M.A. Sumanthiran.

Mr Sampanthan said that the team would prepare a press statement on the nature of the discussions held and the positions articulated by them as representatives of Tamils.

After further meetings in New York, some members are scheduled to travel to Canada.

The group is scheduled to return to Sri Lanka end of next week.

=========================================

TNA meets US officials in Washington

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sinhala/images/furniture/banner.gif 28 October, 2011  
TNA meets US officials in Washington
 
TNA leader R Sambanthan, MP (R) with Mawai Senadhiraja, MP (file photo)
The delegation visited Washington at the invitation of the State Department
A delegation of MPs of the Tamil National Alliance ( TNA) has been discussing the current situation in Sri Lanka with the US State Department officials in Washington.
The delegation led by R Sampanthan, leader of the TNA parliamentary group, has been meeting State Department officials since 26 Oct and would be in US until 04 Nov, meeting a range of policy makers in the US.
TNA Member of Parliament, Suresh Premachandran, told BBC Tamil that their visit was at the invitation of the State Department and was planned during the recent visit of Robert O Blake, US Assistant Secretary of State, to Sri Lanka.
Mr Premachandran said senior officials of the US State Department listened to their views on the lack of progress in addressing humanitarian concerns of the Tamil population in the North and East.
He said the US officials were also aware of the lack of progress in arriving at a political solution to the ethnic conflict.
Mr Premachandran said the international community, including US, Europe and India, had to exert pressure on Sri Lanka to address the humanitarian concerns and for political reforms.

Canada: House of Commons debate on Sri Lanka


Logo
Members of House of Commons (Canada) debated on Sri Lanka on Wednesday October 26 and Thursday 27th of October 2011.
Here are the Experpts:
HumanRights
Hon. Bob Rae (Toronto Centre, Lib.):Mr. Speaker, I have a question for the Minister of National Defence regarding Sri Lanka. Apparently the Prime Minister is going to be taking a position with respect to the human rights record of the government of Sri Lanka. The government opposite has not always been consistent on this question. With respect to the situation in Sri Lanka, as the minister is being prompted by his colleague next to him, I would ask him very directly, can he tell us that it is the position of the Government of Canada that there need to be minimum standards for membership in the Commonwealth?

Hon. Peter MacKay (Minister of National Defence, CPC):Mr. Speaker, quite to the contrary of what the interim leader has just said, the reality is the Prime Minister has been crystal clear on the international scene. He has made statements definitively with respect to Sri Lanka and our desire to see that country reconcile the very appalling human rights record we have seen over the last number of years.
That is a situation the Prime Minister will address at the Commonwealth. That is a situation on which the Prime Minister has already very firmly advanced a position.
Ms. Hélène Laverdière (Laurier-Sainte-Marie, NDP):
Mr. Speaker, the Commonwealth is at the crossroads with respect to human rights. The next meeting is scheduled to take place in Sri Lanka, where the United Nations has confirmed that there are credible allegations of atrocities committed during and after the war. The Commonwealth must not condone this.
Will the Conservatives show leadership and ensure that the next Commonwealth meeting does not take place in Sri Lanka unless it accepts an independent UN investigation of alleged war crimes?
Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has spoken out very loudly and clearly on this important issue of human rights. He has certainly relayed the Government of Canada's position to both the high commissioner and directly to the minister of foreign affairs of Sri Lanka, as well as his counterpart in Sri Lanka.
Canada will continue to speak loudly and clearly on behalf of human rights around the world, and especially Sri Lanka.
Ms. Hélène Laverdière (Laurier-Sainte-Marie, NDP): Mr. Speaker, at the Commonwealth meeting in Australia, the Canadian government must take a firm stance against impunity. However, a unilateral boycott of the next meeting in Sri Lanka is far from enough. Instead of isolating itself, Canada must be a leader within the Commonwealth.
What initiatives will this government take to ensure that other countries agree to hold the meeting elsewhere, unless Sri Lanka agrees to an independent investigation of alleged war crimes?
Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the Government of Canada's position is very clear. The Prime Minister has stated it, and he has stated it very clearly in Perth, Australia at the Commonwealth Conference.
He has said he would like to see Sri Lanka move forward to address the allegations of human rights abuses. If there is no credible movement toward addressing that issue, he will then rethink about his attendance at the next Commonwealth Conference in Sri Lanka.
Mr. Joe Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh, NDP): Mr. Chair, as always, we have the problem of finding that balance of recognizing its sovereign rights. However, again, it is a very clear requirement. The Egyptian government has signed on to the Declaration of Human Rights just like everybody at the UN has. It has to live up to that. That declaration includes religious freedom.
It is our responsibility at the UN, with our foreign aid, to hold the Egyptian government accountable, as we have done with any number of other countries over the years, as we are doing right now. In spite of some of the things he has done historically, the Prime Minister has begun to push the Sri Lankan government. I can point to work that we have done in the past as we fought apartheid in South Africa. I can go down the list.
We need to take strong, consistent positions. The Declaration of Human Rights is there and we have all signed on to it. That government must live up to it. If it expects support and co-operation from us government to government, it has to live up to that standard.

Hon. John McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood, Lib.):
Sri Lanka is a classic example. Sri Lanka has had a low grade civil war for several generations. In 2009, the conflict came to an end without justice for the Tamils. If there is no justice and respect for the religious and ethnic minorities, as it has debilitated Sri Lanka for literally generations, it will also debilitate Egypt.

*(Wednesday, October 26, 2011)
Ms. Rathika Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River, NDP): 
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the parliamentary secretary for taking the time to be here tonight.
On September 27, I was grateful to have had the opportunity to co-host a screening of the channel four documentary, Sri Lanka's Killing Fields, with my fellow parliamentarians, the hon. member for Scarborough—Guildwood, as well as the hon. member for Barrie. Also present was a representative from Human Rights Watch.
This documentary detailed the alleged human rights violations and crimes against humanity that were committed in Sri Lanka during the final phase of the Sri Lankan civil war. The screening of this documentary moved me, as it did everyone else in the room who was watching. That night, we demonstrated that partisan lines could be crossed in order to seek justice for those whose human rights have been violated.
On this side of the House, we have been calling on the government to take action and commit to fighting for justice for Sri Lankans. We called for action in 2009. New Democrats stood with hundreds of thousands of Canadians from across the country who were calling on the very same government to take action. Jack Layton stood with these Canadians and facilitated an emergency debate in the House, on the Sri Lankan conflict, demanding that the government stand up for human rights and justice.
We have been asking the government to call upon the United Nations to follow the recommendations provided by its own panel of experts and to launch an independent investigation into the allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity that may have been committed during the final phase of the Sri Lankan conflict. Canada is home to one of the largest communities of Tamil diaspora in the world, outside of India, many of whom live in my constituency of Scarborough—Rouge River and across the greater Toronto area in general.
These are people who have lived through the atrocities committed during the Sri Lankan conflict. These are people who have witnessed their loved ones being murdered or kidnapped. These are people who have felt unsafe in their own homes. My family joined these people, fleeing our home country to come to Canada, leaving behind our friends, families and loved ones. Many of us risked our lives in order to escape the horrors taking place inside our homes and in our own backyards.
During the almost 30 years of this conflict, and particularly during the final phase of the war, Canadians and the rest of the world stood idly by. Though there were many cries for help, there was no foreign intervention in the spring of 2009. Even the United Nations left Sri Lanka during the final phase of the conflict. We cannot continue this inaction. The United Nations expert panel, as well as the channel four documentary, Sri Lanka's Killing Fields, show that there are serious allegations that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed during the final phase of the war. It is time for the global community to come together to fight for peace and justice in Sri Lanka.
Representatives are meeting later this week in Perth, Australia for the Commonwealth leaders summit. With these allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity, we know that Sri Lanka will be a topic of discussion as Sri Lanka is scheduled to host the next summit in 2013.
When is the government going to fight for justice for Sri Lankans? What concrete steps will Canada take to ensure that Sri Lanka complies with and demonstrates human rights values consistent with those held by Canadians, members of the Commonwealth and the United Nations?
Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, CPC): Mr. Speaker, this issue is quite important for this government, a government that stands up for human rights.
We are very much aware of the tremendous sacrifices made by the people of Sri Lanka during the civil conflict and the relief felt as a result of the successful end to this civil war.
The Prime Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and myself, on my visit to Sri Lanka immediately after the war, stated Canada's position quite clearly.
Canada is very concerned that the underlying sources of conflict are not being addressed and we are of the view that a political solution, including the devolution of power, is a critical component of sustainable peace in Sri Lanka.
Canada urges the government of Sri Lanka to establish an independent investigation into the credible allegations of serious violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights committed by both sides of the conflict. We expect Sri Lanka's lessons learned on the reconciliation commission will address these issues, including the recommendations of the UN Secretary-General's panel of experts.
Canada is of the view that the government of Sri Lanka must show tangible progress in the handling of political reconciliation and seriously address the credible allegations of violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law as reported by the UN Secretary-General's panel of experts.
To add to what the hon. member said about the Commonwealth conference that is taking place now in Perth, Canada is of the view that this issue must be addressed. We have made it very clear to the Sri Lankan government that we expect to see some tangible progress in Sri Lanka in terms of human rights, political reconciliation and accountability. The Prime Minister has made it clear that if he does not see any tangible evidence moving toward that direction, then he will not attend the next Commonwealth conference to be held in Sri Lanka.
Ms. Rathika Sitsabaiesan: Mr. Speaker, we all know the saying, “actions speak louder than words”. We can talk all we want, but nothing will change until we actually take action. We need action now, not just words.
We need to call upon the United Nations to launch an independent inquiry into the allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. We know that the reconciliation committee as created by Sri Lanka was deemed to be biased and not independent by the United Nations panel of experts.
We need to take concrete action to ensure that Sri Lanka demonstrates respect for human rights and human dignity and complies with these values held by progressive democracies.
Mr. Deepak Obhrai: Mr. Speaker, as my hon. colleague is a new member of Parliament, I would like to let her know that diplomacy works behind the scenes. We have been sending a message to the government in power that these are our concerns. That is how people can achieve results. That is what we have been doing since the civil war ended. I have visited there. If the government does not address the issues of what transpired during the reconciliation process, then we would be in a situation where possibly down the road the same conflict would start up again. In order for the country to move ahead, it is in the best interests of Sri Lanka to do that. We, as a Commonwealth nation, are willing to help Sri Lanka move down the reconciliation path.
Sri Lanka must also address the credible concerns of the UN Secretary-General on the violation of human rights in that country.

Commonwealth adopts better rights monitoring but skirts fundamental reforms





Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers a speech to the Commonwealth Business forum in Perth, Australia Thursday Oct. 27, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

570News Logo

Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press  Oct 28, 2011 10:00:00 AM
PERTH, Australia - Commonwealth leaders agreed to better monitoring of existing rules on human rights issues Friday, but are balking at more fundamental reforms that have been called critical to the association's survival.
Talks will continue Saturday at the biennial summit of the 54-member organization, however the creation of a new Commonwealth commissioner of human rights appears to be in trouble.
"I think it's fair to say there's not unanimity amongst Commonwealth countries on that recommendation — I think that's probably an understatement," said Senator Hugh Segal, the Canadian representative on a panel commissioned to recommend reforms.    Full Story>>>

Sri Lanka: How to relate to foreign involvement

28-Oct-2011

Guest Column: Dr Kumar David 
After the victory of the Libyan Revolution, the success of the first-ever elections in Tunisia and the prospect of modest democracy in Egypt, all with some degree of foreign involvement, the world has suddenly become very small. It’s not only in relation to Syria and Yemen, but also Lanka, where the heat has been on for some years that the practical and moral significance of foreign participation in domestic affairs has turned into an agitated topic. Most stuff in the local Lankan media on foreign linkages, especially Sinhala press and TV, is feeble minded, but condescension will get us nowhere. Nationalism is an anachronism in modern times but folks everywhere are still fired by jingoism and patriotism, and let there be no illusion, they will not speedily change. Hence a middle-level approach, limited to the benefits of collaboration that “we” should adopt, rather than the abstract philosophy of internationalism, will be more productive. First and most important though, who is this my generic, “we”? Certainly not the state, for most times the state is the champion of oppression and agent of xenophobia while experience has shown that international probing and pressure provides at least some protection for oppressed people; consider Libya, India’s 90 million Adivasis or Lanka’s Tamils.  

Turning Former LTTE Personnel into Sri Lankan Citizens?



http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/877084884/Groundviews_bigger.jpg *groundview

journalism Forcitizens


Whatever the death toll during the last stages of Eelam War IV in 2009 the official government data in that year acknowledged that 11,696 (9078 male and 2024 female)[i] of those who survived had identified themselves or been identified as members of the LTTE — whether combatants or active functionaries. There were others who had been arrested elsewhere in the island (that is beyond the battlefields), often on flimsy evidence, in the years 2006-09. Muralidhar Reddy stresses that “once bracketed in the category of a combatant, irrespective of the degree of their involvement in the war, there was no mechanism for those detained to prove their innocence.”[ii]  Continue reading »