Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, January 19, 2018

'Disease pattern of dengue unchanged but unusual variations can occur'


2018-01-19

Dismissing reports indicating that the disease pattern or the dengue virus had significantly changed as baseless, Negombo's Clinical Head of the Centre for Clinical Management of Dengue Dr. LakKumar Fernando said there could be some unusual variations of the dengue virus.

He told the Daily Mirror that all diseases and biological events had a classical pattern that affected the majority while some unusual manifestations could occur to a small minority.

“Clinicians should identify these and treat them accordingly to the best of their ability. Treatment can also turn the disease bringing unusual results and with proper treatment most patients can be saved,” Dr. LakKumar said.

Sources had claimed that a new dengue strain had been detected and the behaviour of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF) had changed drastically during the dengue epidemic.

According to reports several children with abnormal disease patterns were found and consequently it has become a real challenge to detect and manage the disease.

“It is important for the public to improve their own behaviour to protect themselves from mosquito bites and also doctors to improve their clinical management practices than blame the virus for unusual behaviour," Dr. LakKumar said.

Normally the Platelet count decreases on the third day of a dengue patient, but there are also occasions where Platelet count decreases on the second day.

Normally the leaking of fluid occurs between the 3rd and 4th days, but it can also occur before or after the relevant period.

“Settling of fever alone can deteriorate the nature of dengue. It means that some patients presume that when the fever gets cured, the whole dengue situation has come to an end. Perhaps it is not. The patients have to be more vigilant and go for frequent treatments until it is recommended by a qualified physician,” Dr. Lakkumar said. (Sheain Fernandopulle)


A Palestinian family mourns the death of their son after an Israeli raid


Jarrar family face grief and homelessness as Israeli forces demolish their houses while hunting for suspect in settler killing
A Palestinian walks on the rubble of one of the Jarrar family homes on Friday January 19, which were destroyed by Israeli forces one day prior (Akram al-Wa’ara, MEE)

Yumna Patel's picture
Yumna Patel- Friday 19 January 2018 

Late Wednesday night, an elite unit of the Israeli special forces embarked on a manhunt for an alleged “terrorist cell” responsible for the killing of an Israeli settler last week near Nablus, in the northern occupied West Bank.
Around 11pm, Israeli forces raided the Wadi Burqin neighborhood of Jenin in search of Ahmad Nasser Jarrar, 26, who Israeli media reported as the main suspect.
“The intention [of the raid] was to arrest suspects,” Israeli news daily Haaretz said.
But by the end of the night, several Palestinians had been injured and detained, dozens of members of the Jarrar family were made homeless after three of their houses were destroyed, Ahmad Nasser was nowhere to be found, and his cousin, Ahmad Ismail Jarrar, 30, was dead.
In the aftermath of the raid, numerous conflicting reports emerged across Israeli and Palestinian media.
Ismail Jarrar stands in front of a poster commemorating his son, Ahmad Ismail Jarrar, who was killed by Israeli forces in a predawn raid on their hometown of Jenin (Akram al-Wa’ra, MEE)
Israeli media and government officials hailed the mission as a success, saying the murderer of the settler had been killed.
Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman congratulated the forces on a “successful and complex mission,” while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the raid, saying "we will reach anyone who tries to harm Israeli citizens in the State of Israel."
Though initially saying that Ahmad Nasser had been killed, the Palestinian Ministry of Health later released a statement that it was in fact Ahmad Ismail who had been killed.
“We got the news around noon on Thursday,” Fardous, Ahmad Ismail’s younger sister, told Middle East Eye. “We were shocked. My brother left home before the raid to go out with friends as he always did.”
Though no one from his family actually saw when or under what circumstances Ahmad Ismail was killed, every family member that MEE spoke to vehemently denied Israeli police claims that Ahmad Ismail had weapons and engaged in a shootout with Israeli forces.
“My brother was a quiet, peaceful guy. He didn’t get involved in such problems,” Fardous said.

All a blur

The sequence of events leading up to Ahmad Ismail’s death, according to Fardous, her father Ismail, and several of her male relatives, is all a blur.
Soon into the raid, Israeli forces began firing sound bombs towards Fardous’ family home, where she, her brother Mohammed, her younger sister, mother, father, and two nieces were sleeping.
“We heard the sound bombs, and then a voice over the loudspeaker calling for us to get out of our house,” Fardous, an English teacher, said in a tired voice, her eyes swollen.
“The voice wasn’t so loud, they were quite a distance away from the front door, so we weren’t sure if they were calling for us or our neighbors to leave. My mother didn’t want to leave, but we convinced her. What if they were going to do something bad to the house?”
“They killed our son, and then they destroyed our house”
- Ismail Jarrar, Ahmed Nasser's father
So Fardous and her family, dressed in their pajamas, slowly filed out of their home in the bitter cold, their hands raised up behind their heads as blinding lights from the Israeli jeeps shone down on them.
“My father was the first to exit. They yelled at him to take off his jacket, lift up his shirt and turn around. They did the same with my brother Mohammed.”
Once the family was outside, the soldiers separated the men and the women, taking Ismail and Mohammed to an unknown location, while Fardous, her sister, nieces, and mother waited near the jeep.
“They asked us if there was anyone in the house, and we told them ‘No.’ Then they took dogs inside and searched the house room by room.” Fardous told MEE that the search didn’t take more than a few minutes, adding “it didn’t seem like they were really searching for anything.”
Israeli forces then told Fardous that they needed to ask them a few questions. “I asked them if they could just ask us inside the house, but they said no."
During the hour or so when Fardous was waiting outside in the cold with her family, she saw Israeli forces demolish the home of her cousin Ahmed Nasser.
“They had fired flares onto the house and set it on fire before they demolished it. At the time, we didn’t think anyone was inside. It was only later I spoke to my aunt, Ahmed’s mother, and she told me that she was still inside with her daughter and younger son when soldiers bombed the house, but they managed to escape.”
Fardous would come to learn later, that during the commotion, Ahmed Nasser’s mother saw the body of a wounded man lying on the ground near her home, though she was not sure at the time if it was her son, or Ahmad Ismail.
A Palestinian bulldozer clears the rubble of the Jarrar family homes on January 19. The homes were destroyed by Israeli forces in the predawn hours of 18 January (Akram al-Wa’ra / MEE)
As Ahmed Nasser’s home was being demolished, soldiers told Fardous that they were taking her and her female relatives somewhere to ask them questions.
“I asked if they could just interrogate us here, by our home, but they said no. Then they took us to the home of one of my cousin’s."
When the women entered their relatives’ home, which was surrounded by soldiers, they found Ismail inside with Mohammad, who was sitting on the floor, his hands tied behind his back.
“Hours and hours and hours passed by as we waited inside a room in my cousin’s house,” Fardous said, clutching onto a Quran. “The soldiers brought several of my male relatives to the house where we were, all of their hands tied behind their backs.”
“It was clear they had beaten them up,” she added, “their clothes looked like hell.”
According to Fardous, Israeli soldiers pulled Mohammad away several times to interrogate him, and at one point they told him ‘we have injured your brother and he is in very critical condition.”
“We saw them starting to demolish our house around 4am. But why? They had no reason to do this. We were all out of the house, we saw them search it with the dogs and find nothing.”
By sunrise Thursday morning, Israeli soldiers had finished demolishing Fardous’ family home, the home of Ahmad Nasser, and the home of another one of her uncles.
“There was no reason for them to destroy our houses,” Fardous said, adding that they were not even given a chance to gather any of their belongings.
Just down the road from the women’s mourning area, Ahmad Ismail’s father Ismail spoke to MEE and expressed the same disbelief as his daughter Fardous.
“They killed our son, and then they destroyed our house,” he said, as a chorus of male relatives seated around him exclaimed, like Fardous, that “there was no reason” to destroy the homes.
Despite being condemned by human rights groups like B’Tselem as “court-sanctioned revenge” and “collective punishment,” the Israeli government has continued to employ its home demolition policy against Palestinian families of alleged and accused attackers.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu fast-tracked punitive home demolitions in an effort to “deter” attacks carried out by Palestinian individuals since a wave of unrest peaked in the occupied Palestinian territory in late 2015, despite past recommendations by an Israeli military committee that the practice did not deter attacks.

A bargaining chip

As daylight broke and Israeli forces cleared out of Wadi Burqin, Ahmad Ismail’s family returned to the rubble of their home, still wondering where their beloved son and brother was.
“My mother stood outside all morning in the freezing cold, waiting for my brother to come home. Everyone kept telling her, ‘don’t worry he will come’, until we got the news from Palestinian officials that he was dead."
Since her mother got the news, she has refused any food, drink or medicine, Fardous said.
“Until she sees his body for herself, she will not rest or accept what has happened.”
Israeli forces seized Ahmad Ismail’s body during the raid, and are now using it as a bargaining chip with the Jarrar family in an attempt to pressure Ahmed Nasser to turn himself in.
Israel’s practice of withholding Palestinian bodies as leverage against groups like Hamas has been widely condemned by rights groups as an act of collective punishment and deemed ineffective by Israeli security officials.
A joint statement released by Addameer and Israeli minority rights group Adalah in March 2016 condemned the practice as "a severe violation of international humanitarian law as well as international human rights law, including violations of the right to dignity, freedom of religion, and the right to practice culture.”
Despite statements from the Palestinian Ministry of Health that his son was killed, Ismail Jarrar, a tall elderly man, expressed his doubts to MEE, saying that maybe there had been a mistake.
“You know, we still have not even seen the body. Maybe he is okay, maybe they are just lying and using this to try to get someone to tell them where Ahmed Nasser is.”
Ismail’s nephew, Abd al-Salaam shifted uncomfortably in the chair next to his uncle, and in a soft voice said he was sent a picture of the body by Palestinian officials, and he was sure it was Ahmad Ismail’s.
Visibly shocked, Ismail asked to see the picture. “When did you get this? Why haven’t I seen it?”
Abd al-Salaam hesitantly pulled out his phone and turned the screen towards Ismail. It was a photo of Ahmad Ismail, his face bloodied and his body covered with a blue medical sheet.
A looks of agony quickly swept over Ismail’s face, as he finally saw with his own eyes the body of his dead son, who until that moment, he had tried to believe with all his heart, was still alive somehow.

How Trump’s new civil rights enforcer will attack civil rights



Nora Barrows-Friedman-19 January 2018

On Thursday morning, the US Congress confirmed top Israel lawfare strategist Kenneth Marcus to head the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in a vote split along party lines.

Numerous civil rights groups and legal experts vigorously opposed his nomination.

Marcus previously served as the Office for Civil Rights’ top enforcement officer from 2002-2004, under President George W. Bush, and has held other government jobs.

The Trump appointee is known for filing numerous civil rights complaints – to the office he now leads – claiming that universities fail to protect Jewish students by not cracking down on Palestine solidarity activism.

His legal complaints were thrown out due to lack of evidence.

But now, he will be in charge of adjudicating the outcomes of such complaints in the future.
Marcus has been given the authority to open new investigations, while determining policies that could stifle speech and political organizing on US campuses.

He has called his own leadership style “blunt micromanagement.”

Liz Jackson of Palestine Legal, a firm that defends students, faculty and activists against the kinds of smears and litigation in which Marcus engages, told me that his position as the country’s top enforcer of civil rights in education is “ominous.”

According to Jackson, Marcus’ long record consists of being “singularly focused on attacking First Amendment-protected speech and the scholarship of people who are vocal about Palestinian rights on campus.”

Smears and lawfare

Marcus’ record of hostility or indifference toward Palestinian and Muslim students, LGBTQ students and students of color should have disqualified him from any public office.

As head of the right-wing pro-Israel lawfare group, the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights, Marcus has over the last decade attacked Palestinian human rights and those who advocate for them.

He is also a former board member of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME), a cynically named group supported by leading anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic funders and figures.

SPME’s board members have also included such high-profile anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim agitators as Tammi Rossman-Benjamin and Daniel Pipes.

Erosion of rights

But the elevation of an enemy of civil rights as a top enforcer of civil rights is no aberration.

Like many of Trump’s appointments, Marcus’ leadership is meant to mock and dismantle the basic infrastructure and social needs each federal department is supposed to serve.

This comes after years of austerity, especially in education, that has severely weakened public institutions and made them ever more vulnerable to political pressure.

Students and faculty who advocate for justice in Palestine have learned to work with fewer resources, expect fewer protections and endure more harassment.

The language of civil rights and free speech are weaponized and stripped of their content and meaning.

For example, in the same week that Marcus was confirmed, the Trump administration also created a “civil rights” division within the Department of Health and Human Services.

It is tasked not with protecting patients and members of marginalized communities from discrimination in medical care and social services, but rather with shielding providers who hold bigoted anti-transgender and anti-abortion views from performing services that would violate their religious beliefs.

In short, the job of the new office is to protect the “freedom” to discriminate.

In this spirit, under Marcus’ direction, students, faculty and activists should expect the Office of Civil Rights to mount a direct, systematic and relentless attack on their civil rights.

Protection

To help mitigate these chilling effects, students and faculty should take refresher courses on the First Amendment. “It’s the number one protection here,” Palestine Legal’s Jackson said.
“No matter what Marcus says, no matter what the federal government says, they can’t take away basic free speech rights to criticize Israeli policies and advocate for Palestinian freedom,” she added. “It’s an enshrined right.”

In this climate, the more that students stand up for their rights, the better those rights will be protected. “To survive this period of repression is the best resistance,” Jackson added.

We can also take some small solace from the observation that when the government moves to repress a certain movement, it’s often a sign of that movement’s strength or potential.

That’s exactly why Israel and its lobby groups are attempting to criminalize the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement for Palestinian rights.

But in a leaked secret report last year, Israel conceded that despite its efforts it has failed to stem the “impressive growth” and “significant successes” of this movement.

Appointing a fox like Kenneth Marcus to watch the henhouse of education – where scholarship and critical thought should be nurtured and celebrated – is yet another indication that Israel is desperate.
Marcus may have his sights on them, but students and faculty defending free speech and Palestinian rights have everything to fight for.

Government shutdown: first closure in four years looms hours before deadline

As the minutes ticked towards midnight, dueling parties in Congress showed no signs of breaking impasse over spending and Daca


Sabrina Siddiqui and Lauren Gambino in Washington Fri 19 Jan 2018

The US government on Friday barreled toward its first shutdown in more than four years, as lawmakers in Congress showed no signs of breaking an impasse over spending priorities and the fate of young undocumented immigrants.

With less than 12 hours before a deadline of midnight to fund the government, the White House said the prospect of a shutdown had “ratcheted up” and blamed Democrats for objecting to the short-term spending measure that narrowly passed the House of Representatives on Thursday.

By Friday afternoon it was clear Democrats and a handful of Republicans were steadfast in their opposition. Donald Trump canceled plans to travel to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and summoned the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, to the White House.

But despite huddling behind closed doors for an hour and 15 minutes, the two New Yorkers fell short of reaching a deal.

“We made some progress, but we still have a good number of disagreements,” Schumer told reporters upon returning to Capitol Hill. “The discussion will continue.”

John Cornyn, the second-ranking Senate Republican, said he had spoken with White House chief of staff John Kelly, and heard that “the president told [Schumer] to go back to Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and work it out”.

“The ball is in Senator Schumer’s court,” he added.

The meeting came hours after the White House laid blame squarely on the Democratic leader for bringing the federal government to the brink, even coining the term “Schumer shutdown”.

“We do not want a shutdown,” the White House budget director, Mick Mulvaney, told reporters. “If Mr Schumer insists on it, he is in a position to force this on the American people.”

But a Washington Post-ABC News poll released on Friday found that 48% of Americans would blame Trump and the Republicans in the event of a government shutdown while 28% said the Democrats would be responsible and 18% said both parties would be equally at fault.

In a floor speech in the Senate, Mitch McConnell said a vote on the stopgap spending measure should be a “no brainer”. Democrats were willing to “hold the entire nation hostage” to protect “people who came into the United States illegally”, he said.

“To even repeat this position out loud is to see how completely ridiculous it is.”
Orrin Hatch, a Republican from Utah, was more blunt.

“This is the greatest country in the world, but we do have some really stupid people representing it from time to time,” he said.

Trump was preparing to mark his first year in office on Saturday, potentially as the first president to oversee a shutdown with a single party in control of the government.

In an early morning tweet, he wrote: “Shutdown coming? We need more Republican victories in 2018!”

House Republican leaders, who found enough conservative votes to pass an extension of government funding through 16 February, said they would send their members home, escalating pressure on the Senate to pass something similar. In a subsequent advisory, House Republicans were told to “remain flexible” as further votes were possible.

Schumer has proposed a shorter stopgap measure, which would expire after four or five days, as a way of averting a shutdown without compromising Democrats’ attempts to negotiate an immigration deal.

Republicans balked at that timeline, noting that the shorter-term proposal would not resolve the issues over immigration or domestic spending.

Kevin McCarthy, the House majority leader, called the proposal “unproductive”. Mark Meadows, leader of the powerful conservative House Freedom Caucus, rejected it outright.

Senate Democrats cited a number of shortcomings in the House funding bill, ranging from immigration to emergency disaster relief. A handful of conservatives in the Senate also objected, leaving Republicans short of the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster.

A shutdown would place nearly 40% of federal employees on unpaid furlough and cost the US an estimated $6.5bn a week.

The primary sticking point for Democrats remained a failure to offer protections for the nearly 700,000 undocumented migrants, known as Dreamers, who were brought to the US as children. In September, Trump rescinded an Obama-era program that granted temporary legal status, exposing the young migrants to deportation.

The already-fraught negotiations were severely damaged last week when Trump reportedly questioned the need to admit immigrants from “shithole countries”, in reference to Haiti, El Salvador and Africa.

Trump then undermined efforts by Republicans to garner support for their bill, denouncing the measure for including a six-year reauthorization of a popular children’s health insurance program.

The White House strongly rejected the notion that the president had been disengaged and bore some of the blame for the breakdown in bipartisan talks.

“There is no way you could lay this at the feet of the president of the United States,” Mulvaney said. “He is actively working to get a deal.”

Amid the chaos on Friday morning, the Democratic congressman Al Green once again forced the House to vote on Trump’s impeachment. Though the resolution was again postponed on a strong bipartisan vote, it drew more support from Democrats than previously.

Additional reporting by Ben Jacobs

Is a UK-France bridge possible?


The foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, has hinted at building a road bridge between the UK and France.

By Martin Williams19 JAN 2018

Although he didn’t go into specifics, Johnson said it was “ridiculous” there was only a single railway line connecting the two countries.

He added: “We are establishing a panel of experts to look at major projects together. Our economic success depends on good infrastructure and good connections. Should the Channel Tunnel be just a first step?”

But would such a project be feasible?

Old ambitions

The idea of building a bridge across the English Channel is nothing new. In fact, there were design proposals as far back as the 19th Century.

1889 edition of the Spectator talks about engineers who want to construct “a huge iron bridge across the Channel”.

“A detailed plan to this end … was read on Tuesday before the Iron and Steel Institute, assembled this year in Paris. The success of the enormous spans used at the Forth Bridge, 130 ft. above high-water mark, have shown the project to be by no means impossible.”

It adds: “The scheme, if ever carried out, will cost, it is calculated, about £34,000,000,—a fact in itself enough to con- demn the proposal, when a system of steam ferry-boats could be managed at a tenth of that sum.”
More recently, detailed plans for a 21-mile toll bridge, suspended at 67m, were submitted to Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s. Cars would have paid £5.60 and lorries £8 to cross.

The engineers estimated the cost of building it would be around £3bn, but said they could raise £220m in tolls every year.

How difficult would it be these days?

Dr Stergios Mitoulis, a lecturer in bridge and structural engineering at the University of Surrey, told FactCheck that building such a bridge now would be perfectly possible in theory. After all, there are already longer bridges elsewhere in the world, such as the Jiaozhou Bay bridge in China.

“I certainly believe this is a feasible project,” he told FactCheck. “Certainly this is something that can happen within three to five years from the day that the designer puts the first line on the paper.”
But there is no doubt the project would be hugely challenging and costly.

“The main challenge is usually the local soil conditions,” Mitoulis explained. “And then someone needs to think about the problems along the deck, which is the horizontal part of the bridge. Having a bridge as long as 22 miles means that someone has to provide certain design considerations, such as expansion joints every 500m.

“So its a combination of a very expensive foundation under the sea bed, and obviously certain considerations for the design and construction of the deck. But there are techniques that can support very long decks.”

Dr Alfredo Camara, from City University’s Department of Civil Engineering agrees that – in principle – the engineering required would be possible. “The technology is there now,” he says. “I think it will be done one day.”

But he says it would still be a very expensive and challenging project nevertheless.

This echoes comments to the BBC by Ian Firth, a director at engineering firm COWI, who said there was “no real issue particularly nowadays with modern technologies.

“It would be a huge undertaking but it would be absolutely possible,” he said.

How would it affect ships?

It’s not just the construction that would be challenging. The Dover Strait is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, so the bridge would need to avoid obstructing ships.

Not only would there need to be enough distance between the supports, the bridge would also need to be high enough to allow tall ships from passing underneath.

“Technically, the problem would be the fact that the Channel is very busy,” says Camara. “You’d need less supports because you need less obstruction to the ships. So, you would need a very big span [between the supports] to allow ships to cross.”

At the moment, the biggest span between supports is 2,000 metres, he says.

But, in what is already a relatively narrow stretch of water, there may also be concerns about the potential for ships to crash.

However, Mitoulis told FactCheck: “That’s something that has been tackled in the past. There are ways and designs that can be used to avoid such occurrences – it’s a matter of designing certain protective barriers before and after the bridge pylons.”

Other experts we spoke to were more skeptical about how feasible the project would be overall. They all agreed it would technically be possible, but some warned that the costs would be so huge that it may simply not be worth it.

And one shipping expert said that, if there was any obstruction to shipping, it could have a huge economic impact across Europe.

However, these problems can be put to rest for the time being: Downing Street has clarified that there are “no specific plans” for a bridge at the moment.

U.S. Withholds Millions of Dollars in Promised Palestinian Food Aid

The U.N. relief agency has been left with millions in unpaid bills.

A Palestinian child carries UNRWA food donations outside a U.N. food distribution center in Gaza City on Jan. 15, 2018. (Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images) 

No automatic alt text available.
BY , -
JANUARY 17, 2018, 7:07 PM
In mid-December, the U.S. State Department assured the United Nations it would contribute $45 million to purchase emergency food rations and other critical supplies for 1 million needy Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The check, Washington promised, would be formally approved in the first week of January.

So the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, or UNRWA, went ahead and bought millions of dollars worth of rice, lentils, flour, and other vital staples. But the United States has yet to cut a check, leaving the U.N. agency responsible for Palestinian refugees in limbo, according to diplomatic sources.

The agency is now confronted with a massive unpaid bill at a time when it is facing huge cuts from the Trump administration for its education and health care programs and uncertainty over further U.S. giving.

The U.S. pledge was made just days before Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution denouncing President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Trump and Haley have since threatened to cut off humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians unless the Palestinian Authority agrees to participate in U.S.-brokered peace talks with Israel.

The United States, Trump complained on Twitter, pays the Palestinians hundreds of millions of dollars each year and gets “no appreciation or respect.… [W]ith the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?”
For now, the Trump administration has yet to inform the U.N. whether it will abide by its promise to pay for the food aid or whether its commitment will be subject to a new review in the wake of Trump and Haley’s demands that the Palestinians pledge peace talks in exchange for humanitarian assistance. The State Department and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment.

UNRWA was created nearly 70 years ago, after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, to assist more than 700,000 displaced Palestinians. Today, it provides food, education, and other services for more than 5 million Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria, including some 30,000 schoolteachers who serve more than half a million children.

Last year, Haley assured UNRWA that the United States would maintain current levels of funding for its operations. But she reversed course after the Palestinians introduced resolutions at the U.N. Security Council and the General Assembly that denounced Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem and called on the United States to rescind the decision.

The Palestinian aid issue has divided the Trump administration’s top national security team, with Jared Kushner — the president’s son-in-law and top Middle East advisor — and Haley favoring a total cutoff of humanitarian assistance to Palestinian refugees until the Palestinian Authority agrees to participate in U.S.-brokered peace talks with Israel.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defense Secretary James Mattis, and representatives of the U.S. intelligence community have pressed to maintain funding for Palestinian refugees. In an effort to bridge the gap, Tillerson proposed during a luncheon last week with Trump splitting the difference and giving the U.N. $60 million, just under half of the $125 million the United States was due to pay UNRWA on Jan. 1. The money, which is primarily earmarked for salaries for teachers and health workers, cannot be used to cover the $45 million food bill.

For the first time ever, the United States has also insisted that the money can be spent only to support UNRWA programs in the West Bank and Gaza. None of the money can be used to pay for programs in Lebanon and Syria.

In contrast to Trump and Haley, who directly linked aid cuts to political talks, State Department officials have insisted that the decision to reduce funding is about pushing UNRWA to enact management and financial reforms.

“We would like to see some reforms be made,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters on Tuesday. “This is not aimed at punishing anyone.”

But she declined to say whether the United States has given UNRWA a list of specific changes or reforms it needs to undertake to unlock the rest of the U.S. funding.

Nauert said other countries should shoulder more of the costs for UNRWA. “We would like other countries — in fact, other countries that criticize the United States … to step forward and actually help with UNRWA, to do more,” she said.

The move has sparked an outcry from some in the assistance community. Jan Egeland, the head of the Norwegian Refugee Council, called the move “politically motivated” and warned it would have “devastating consequences for vulnerable Palestinian refugees,” including hundreds of thousands of children.

The decision, which has divided Israeli officials, was welcomed by Israel’s U.N. ambassador, Danny Danon.

“UNRWA has proven time and again to be an agency that misuses the humanitarian aid of the international community and instead supports anti-Israel propaganda, perpetuates the plight of Palestinian refugees and encourages hate,” Danon said in a statement Tuesday. “It is time for this absurdity to end.”

In a Wednesday statement, UNRWA Commissioner-General Pierre Krahenbuhl noted that every U.S. government since the Harry Truman administration has supported the refugee agency. Last year, the United States contributed $350 million to UNRWA, far more than any other country.

The reduced U.S. contribution “threatens one of the most successful and innovative human development endeavors in the Middle East,” he wrote. “At stake is the access of 525,000 boys and girls in 700 UNRWA schools, and their future.”

India: Secularism — A Grossly Abused Concept in Politics

The country experienced worst ever communal riots, bloodbath, arson and other crimes against humanity consequent to the creation of two independent dominions for the Muslims and Hindus by dividing the nation after the partition in 1947.


by Dr. Jaipal Singh- 
( January 17, 2018, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) The secularism implies equal treatment to all religions in India without endorsing or giving any preferential treatment to any one by the state. At the time of independence from the British imperialists, the division of the country was made on the basis of the ‘Two Nation Theory’ pursued by Mohammad Ali Jinnah and other Muslim League leaders – the essence of which was that the Hindus and Muslims are so different that they cannot peacefully co-exist together. Though Pakistan opted for and progressed as a Islamic state but India practically opted for secularism without specifically adopting it through the Constitution. The term secular was later included in the Preamble to the Indian Constitution through the 42nd amendment in 1976 but neither the Constitution nor any other law specifically defines the relationship between the state and religion.

Exclusive: Rohingya refugee leaders draw up demands ahead of repatriation


Zeba Siddiqui-JANUARY 19, 2018

KUTUPALONG, Bangladesh (Reuters) - Rohingya leaders in a Bangladesh refugee camp have drawn up a list of demands they want Myanmar to meet before authorities begin sending back hundreds of thousands in a repatriation process expected to begin next week and last for two years.

The petition is the latest indication of the challenges ahead for Bangladesh and Myanmar as they try to engineer the return of refugees who fear continued military operations in Rakhine State and are dismayed about the prospect of a prolonged stay in “temporary camps” in Myanmar when they go back.


A half-dozen Rohingya elders, saying they represented 40 villages from Rakhine, showed the list of demands to a Reuters reporter at the Kutupalong refugee camp, where most of the 655,500 Rohingya refugees are staying.

The petition, handwritten in Burmese, said none of the Muslim Rohingya would return to mainly Buddhist Myanmar unless the demands were met.

The petition, which has still to be finalised, demanded the Myanmar government publicly announce it is giving Rohingya long-denied citizenship and inclusion on a list of the country’s recognised ethnic groups. It asks that land once occupied by the refugees be returned to them and their homes, mosques and schools rebuilt.

It wants the military held accountable for alleged killings, looting and rape, and the release from jails of “innocent Rohingya” picked up in counter-insurgency operations.

It also wants Myanmar to stop listing people with their photographs as “terrorists” in state media and on government Facebook pages.

Myanmar state newspapers this week issued a supplement listing the names and photos of alleged members of the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA), whose attacks on security posts on Aug. 25 triggered a sweeping counter-insurgency operation.
The United Nations has described the Myanmar military operations in the northern part of Rakhine as a classic case of ethnic cleansing.

The military says it has only conducted legitimate operations and denies there have been cases of sexual assault.

But the military said last week soldiers had killed 10 captured Muslim “terrorists” during insurgent attacks at the beginning of September, after Buddhist villagers had forced the captured men into a grave the villagers had dug.

It was a rare acknowledgment of wrongdoing by the Myanmar military during its operations in the western state of Rakhine.

ARSA said in a statement last week the 10 Rohingya in the mass grave were “innocent civilians” and not members of their group.

Rohingya refugees are seen in a refugee camp at no-man's land at the Bangladesh-Myanmar border, in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh January 12, 2018. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu

CHALLENGES AHEAD

The Rohingya elders Reuters spoke to said they were still finalising their list of demands before showing it to Bangladesh authorities and to aid agencies administering the camps.

They said the 40 village leaders they discussed the petition with represent the interests of all Rohingya at the camp, but that could not be independently verified and aid agencies were unable to comment pending formal issuance of the petition.

Bangladesh and Myanmar this week agreed to complete the return of the refugees over the next two years, with the process due to begin on Tuesday.

But even as preparations get underway for the repatriation, Rohingya Muslims continue to pour into Bangladesh.

More than 100 Rohingya have crossed into Bangladesh from Myanmar since Wednesday and scores more were waiting to cross the Naf river that forms the border, newly arrived refugees in Bangladesh told Reuters.

The new arrivals said they fled Myanmar because of military operations in their village of Sein Yin Pyin, and gave accounts of young men being rounded up and of discovering dead bodies in a pond and a forest.

They said they fled out of hunger, after hiding in their homes for days, unable to go to work in the fields and forests that provided their livelihood.

Myanmar Police Colonel Myo Thu Soe, spokesman for the military-controlled Home Affairs Ministry, told Reuters on Thursday “there’s no clearance operation going on in the villages”.

But, he added, “security forces are still trying to take control of the area” in northern Rakhine. He declined to elaborate.

Rights groups and the UN say any repatriations must be voluntary.

Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human RightsWatch, told Reuters in an email authorities cannot deal with the Rohingya refugees “as if they are an inert mass of people who will go where and when they are told”.

The repatriation deal does not cover over 200,000 other Rohingya refugees living in Bangladesh prior to October 2016, who had been driven out of Myanmar during previous episodes of ethnic violence and military operations.

Blood test for early detection of 8 cancers looks promising

Test includes some of the most deadly cancers currently lacking screening tools

A patient has blood drawn for a liquid biopsy at a hospital in Philadelphia. A study released Thursday showed promising results for a new blood test that detects eight cancers at an early stage. (Jacqueline Larma/Associated Press)

image
19 Jan 2018
Scientists are reporting progress on a blood test to detect many types of cancer at an early stage, including some of the most deadly ones that lack screening tools now.
Many groups are working on liquid biopsy tests, which look for DNA and other things that tumours shed into blood, to try to find cancer before it spreads, when chances of a cure are best.

In a study Thursday in the journal Science, Johns Hopkins University scientists looked to see how well their experimental test detected cancer in people already known to have the disease. The blood tests found about 70 per cent of eight common types of cancer in the 1,005 patients. The rates varied depending on the type — lower for breast tumours but high for ovarian, liver and pancreatic ones.
We're very, very excited and see this as a first step.-  Nickolas Papadopoulos, study co-author
In many cases, the test narrowed the possible origin of the cancer to one or two places, such as colon or lung, important for limiting how much follow-up testing a patient might need. It gave only seven false alarms when tried on 812 others without cancer.
The test is nowhere near ready for use yet. It needs to be validated in a larger study already underway in a general population, rather than cancer patients, to see if it truly works and helps save lives — the best measure of a screening test's value.
"We're very, very excited and see this as a first step," said Nickolas Papadopoulos, one of the Hopkins study leaders. "But we don't want people calling up" and asking for the test now, because it's not available, he said.
Some independent experts saw great promise.
"It's such a good first set of results" that it gives hope this approach will pan out, said Dr. Peter Bach, a health policy expert at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who consults for a gene testing company.
"Anything close to 50 per cent or 40 per cent detection is pretty exciting stuff," and this one did better than that, he said.


A radiologist examines mammography images in Wichita Falls, Texas. Breast cancer is one of the cancers the new blood test can detect. (Torin Halsey/Associated Press)
Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, was encouraged that the test did well on cancers that lack screening tests now. If a blood test could find 98 per cent of ovarian cancers at an early stage, as these early results suggest, "that would be a significant advance," he said.
But he cautioned: "We have a long way to go to demonstrate its effectiveness as a screening test."

Testing the test

The test detects mutations in 16 genes tied to cancer and measures eight proteins that often are elevated when cancer is present.
It covers breast, colon and lung and five kinds that don't have screening tests for people at average risk: ovarian, liver, stomach, pancreatic and esophageal. Prostate cancer is not included. A blood test for prostate cancer is already widely used — the PSA test — but its value for screening is controversial.
Researchers tried the new test on people whose cancers were still confined to where it started or had spread a little but not widely throughout the body. It detected 33 per cent of breast cancers, about 60 per cent of colon or lung cancers and nearly all of the ovarian and liver ones. It did better when tumours were larger or had spread. It did less well at the very earliest stage.

Caveats and next steps

The test probably will not work as well when tested in a general population rather than those already known to have cancer, researchers say. Hopkins and Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania have started a study of it in 10,000 Geisinger patients who will be tracked for at least five years.
The work was financed by many foundations, the Mayo Clinic, the National Institutes of Health and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, which provides The Associated Press with funding for health and science coverage. Many study leaders have financial ties to gene testing companies, and some get royalties for patents on cancer detection methods.
Researchers say the test could cost around $500 based on current materials and methods, but the ultimate goal is to commercialize it, so what a company would charge is unknown.

Other progress on liquid biopsies

Also this week, Taiwan-based CellMax Life gave results on its liquid biopsy test, which looks for whole tumour cells shed into blood, at an American Society of Clinical Oncology conference.
Researchers tested 620 people getting colonoscopies or with confirmed colon cancer at a hospital in Taiwan. The company said its test had an overall accuracy of 84 to 88 per cent for detecting cancer or precancerous growths and a false alarm rate around three per cent.
The company's chief executive, Atul Sharan, said U.S. studies should start this year. The test is sold now in Taiwan for $500 US, but should cost around $150 in the U.S., he said.
Dr. Richard Schilsky, chief medical officer of the oncology society, said results are encouraging, but the test needs more study, especially to see if it gives too many false alarms.
"The last thing you'd want is a test that tells you you might have cancer if you don't," he said.