Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Handunnetti reveals ‘express robbery’ on expressway

2017-08-30 

Parliamentary Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) Chairman and MP, Sunil Handunnetti yesterday revealed that losses amounting to more than Rs.36 billion had been incurred in Extension of the Southern Expressway Project (ESEP).
He told a news conference organised by the ‘Voice Against Corruption’ (VAC) that the Chinese government was also responsible for the misappropriations that had taken place when carrying out the project.
He said the unity government launched the project at an estimated cost of US$1.9 billion or Rs.243 billion, which was a loan from China's Exim Bank, with the government agreeing to bear 15 per cent of the cost of the first and the second phases.
The MP said the FSDI Company which was constructing the expressway had presented an additional estimate of Rs.36 billion for extending the flyovers by 2.78 kilometers.
He said according to the original document the flyovers were to have a total length of 6.33 kilometers but later requested permission to extend them up to 9.11 kilometers.
“The new requisition was submitted after the construction began and the agreement was signed. On November 13, 2016 the PM’s Secretary approved the estimate but the FSDI had requested approval for the extension on November 30, 2016. It is suspicious whether the Prime Minister had permitted extension before the company's request," the MP said. He said the company had sent a letter to the RDA Senior Project Director on November 19, 2016 requesting approval for salaries of the foreign employees mostly from China with an annex of a letter sent earlier seeking permission from National Economic Council member R. Paskaralingam.
“It is surprising to know that the RDA granted approval on the letter sent to Mr. Paskaralingam,” he said and added that the appointments were confirmed by the RDA Senior Project Director without evaluating their qualifications but just looking at the CVs sent by the company.
The MP said that apart from the other major issues the company was permitted to import a luxury Benz Car duty free to be given to a powerful minister who has authority for the project. He said the matter would be taken up for inquiry by COPE.
“We are not against expressways. But this scam is little more than the whole income received by selling the Hambantota Port to China,” the MP said. (Thilanka Kanakarathna)

The “Toxin-Free Nation” & Its Black-Market In Glyphosate

Prof. Chandre Dharmawardana
logoThe government banned  the popular herbicide  known as “Glyphosate” in 2105 using the epidemic of Kidney Disease in the Rajarata as justification for its drastic action. It proposed to create a “toxin free nation” eventually banning agrochemicals. Ven. Athuraliye Rathana is Sri Lanka’s presidential adviser on agriculture, promising to “rid the country of toxins”. He angrily and passionately holds forth like a modern-day Savonarola. But, unlike Savonarola’s  moral anger, Ven. Ratana’s anger is based on  misinformation  that  totally dominates the internet, and the rejection of main-stream scientific opinion. Having embraced  fake news and exploiting  public fear as its selling point, Ven. Rathana talks of glyphosate killing all bacteria, microbes and soil organisms when it is used in agriculture. In fact earthworms and other soil organisms thrive better in its presence. But he has come forward as the saviour of the nation against this alleged “evil toxin  poisoning the whole environment and the food chain, triggering  innumerable diseases including the chronic kidney disease ravaging the Rajarata”!
On 23rd August the Derana TV  program “Aluth Parlimenthuwa” had assembled a discussion panel  led by Ven. Rathana. Others were an ex-minister of agriculture, i.e., Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena(MYA), Namal Karunaratne (NK) of the “Samastha Govijana Sammelanaya” (a Farmers’ League) , Dr. Priyanka Yapa (PY) of the  Sabaragamuwa University, and Asoka Abeygunawardana (AA). The latter is a government ideologue pushing “sustainable agriculture” and  a so-called  “strategic enterprise management agency” –  SEMA. To some extent Asoka A  is  what Lysenko was to Soviet agriculture.  There was also a  selected set of   “members of the audience”  brought from Trincomalee, Dambulla  Kurunegala etc. Their role was  to ask  rhetorical  “questions” vigorously supporting the  “doing away with all agrochemicals”, not just glyphosate. The  veteran  figures from  Sri Lanka’s science, agriculture,  health,  or experts from  the plantation institutes or the WHO  were conspicuously absent and presumably not invited. In my view, only the ex-minister MYA talked some sense, i.e., stated scientifically valid things about toxins. Namal Karunaratne correctly described the plight of the farmers;  but he as well as his co-panelists were totally wrong on toxicology and agrochemicals.
Namal Karunaratne correctly pointed out that Sri Lanka  has been importing Soya products and soya milk grown using glyphosate technology from the West  for many years. He raised the specter of a poisoned nation ranging from babies to grand mothers. And yet, given decades of such soya consumption, we cannot find anyone stricken down by the alleged toxicity of glyphosate! None  noted that Sri Lanka has consumed Canadian Lentils (“parippu”)  and Canola oil for decades, grown with GM (“genetically modified”) agricultural  technologies intensively using glyphosate.
Nalaka Karunaratne noted that 40% of the fruits and vegetables produced by our farmers go waste due to lack of food preservation technologies and markets. Minutes before, it was noted that a fruit imported from Australia would remain on the table for “months” while the Sri Lanka fruit which rots  in a few  days was claimed to be healthy, “natural” and safer to eat. Not one “expert” panelist noted that the Australian fruit is simply coated with a layer of perfectly harmless wax which seals its aroma, its moisture, and prevents pathogens and mold spores from attacking the fruit. The wax can be washed off with hot water! But then, the toxin-free nation wants natural untreated fruits and nothing less. Let the farmers loose 40% of their produce!
Priyanka Yapa and Asoka A uttered the usual litany of lies about the green revolution and the capabilities of “alternative agriculture” that I have heard from Californian activists, revealing the source of their  borrowed ideas. Dr. Yapa even stated that he “learned organic agriculture” from the West, while attacking Glyphosate as a “Western product”. Amazingly,  he was willing to accept a toxin if produced in Sri Lanka itself!   Priyanka Y mentioned several “alternative techniques” for killing weeds using equipment imported from China (not the West!) as alternatives to glyphosate. Every one of them are well known to most of us old hands, as being  environmentally very harmful and rather ineffective, unlike glyphosate which is effective, inexpensive and environmentally friendly. These alternatives proposed by Priyanka Yapa, e.g., infrared rays, or flames, microwaves  attack all bugs, good and bad, in trying to “burn” the weeds. Gyphosate  acts only on green plants, and does not harm worms, beetles, and other organisms (as long as they do not use photosynthesis- i.e., not in the plant kingdom). Far from killing micro-organisms and earthworms, glyphosate actually helps to remove metal toxins like cadmium (by chelation) from the soil  and allows earth worms to flourish in soils inhospitable to organic life before the use of glyphosate, as has been demonstrated by Chinese scientists who studied extremely contaminated soils (see. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Volume 33, pages 2351–2357, year 2014.)
I have always held that the ban on glyphosate should never have been imposed. It should be lifted, NOT  just for the benefit of the big tea plantations, but for the small-scale farmer, the vegetable farmer and all others. MYA (the ex-Minister) admitted that even after the ban, most practical-minded farmers (including himself) without ideological blinkers have used the glyphosate freely available at black-market in “the toxin-free nation” of Venerable Rathana, just as duty-free cars of MPs are available in the black market.
While Ven. Rathana and his team regard  Glyphosate as the very devil itself, the  vast majority of scientists (including those in Sri Lanka) consider glyphosate to be benign and NOT a health risk. Its “toxicity” is similar to that of Lifebuoy soap. The International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) of the WHO declared it a class-II hazard (i.e., similar to “eating red meat” in the ability to cause cancer) in 2014. The WHO and the FAO clarify that it is not a health risk at all and issued a press release on 16th May 2016. The FAO-WHO Joint Committee on Pesticide Residues effectively says that even a few tea spoons of full strength glyphosate consumed daily is quite safe!  It is so safe that it may be sprayed without wearing gloves and goggles, even using  formulations like “Roundup” which contain  toxic additives like tallowamine to help bind to  leaves. This is  because the quantity in the spray is miniscule, unlike the amount of toxins absorbed by the farmer by inhaling diesel fumes from his own tractor. In 2004 Professor Acquavela  and collaborators made an extended study of farmers in S. Carolina and Minnesota who used no goggles or gloves in spraying glyphosate. He  found a maximum of 223 parts per billion (ppb) of glyphosate in urine, and a mean value of  3 ppb, i.e., well below the US threshold of 700 ppb, showing that the ingestion of glyphosate  is negligible while the ingestion  of the adjuvents is even smaller.
The nonscientific public has misunderstood the IARC classification and concluded that glyphosate is a dangerous carcinogenic toxin. The toxins produced by Ven. Ratana’s duty free cars sold to the public at various times produce more harm to the environment than all the glyphosate used in the ex-minister MYA’s 30 acre tea estate in ten years.

Read More

Request: save Doha SL school from Embassy intervention - Kusal Perera

Request: save Doha SL school from Embassy intervention - Kusal Perera

 Aug 30, 2017

The vetern jounalist Mr. Kusal perera write to the Minister of Foreign Affairs & Development Assignments to save Doha SL school from Embassy intervention. The full text of letter as follows

Hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs &
Development Assignments
Thilak Marapana
Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Republic Building,
Sir Baron Jayathilake Mawatha
Colombo
Dear Hon. Minister, 
Re independent inquiry into Sri Lankan school in Doha
I write this to you based on a news report in the "SriLankaMirror" news website on 24 August 2017 and also in few other news media that says the "Sri Lankan government" has decided to hold an independent inquiry into the management of the only school in Doha that caters to over 1,000 Sri Lankan students, whose parents are Sri Lankan migrant employees in Doha, Qatar. I write this also as a person who is quite familiar with SL migrant labour issues and all the ills and corruptions that goes with it. And therefore believes, as Foreign Minister of this "Yahapalana" government you should be briefed on what the Ambassador and the Qatar embassy staff don't brief you on.
This mention of "SL government deciding to hold an inquiry" no doubt means the SL Embassy in Qatar is going to hold an inquiry. Let me say forthwith the Embassy nor the Ambassador have any legal right or authority to investigate any enterprise or agency established under the Qatari law. Thus no right to investigate the management of the Stafford School in Doha.
What therefore has to be explained is the reason for such intrusion by the SL embassy.
This school which is constituted under Qatari law as a "non-profit" business organisation has over the years raised over 09 million QR as a standby fund deposited with the Doha Bank, though the SriLankaMirror says QR 17 million. This QR 09 million is now worth LKR 380 million, some senior embassy staff no doubt is much interested in. The allegations Ambassador Liyanage has drafted against the management of the school is an attempt to interfere in the management to gain access to funds and certainly is not about closing down the school. But, let me stress, the end result of this unwanted, unnecessary and illegal intrusion into the management of the school would result in chaos for the innocent children and their education and that would be as good as closing down the school.
Having said that, let me also give you a short brief about this school and its legal standing, so as to prove the SL embassy in Qatar has no legal role in it other than supporting the school and the parents on the moral ground and the government's obligation that it serves citizens of Sri Lanka who are earning much needed foreign earnings to Sri Lanka.
The Stafford school in Qatar was begun way back in 2001 by a Sri Lankan in Qatar, one Kumudu Fonseka to provide education to children of SL parents employed in Qatar. According to Qatari law, the school had to be established as a business enterprise, but was categorised as "non profit". Qatari law also required a minimum 51 per cent Qatari investment and ownership. Thus Mr. Kumudu Fonseka invited a Qatari businessman, Yusuf Ahamed al Ferudeen who agreed and is still the major shareholder of the managing company of the school. Apart from the Qatari businessman and Mr. Kumudu Fonseka, there are also 18 other shareholders, none of whom earn any profit out of their investments in the school.
About 06 years ago, the management company had requested the Embassy to be its patron expecting better support and co-operation to improve the school. But that acceptance has in no way made the Embassy a legal entity to interfere in the school or in its management. This was proved when Ambassador Liyanage wrote to the Doha Bank claiming the embassy is receiving complaints over mismanagement and requested the bank to freeze the bank account of the school.
1. As the request was made by the accredited representative of a sovereign State, the Doha bank on courtesy froze the account immediately.
2. After perusing documents pertaining to legal ownership of the school, the Doha bank was convinced the embassy has no legal position and immediately removed all restrictions in operating the bank account.
The Ambassador thereafter complained to the Supreme Council of Qatar citing complaints by parents. Again as the complaint was by the accredited representative of a sovereign State, Sri Lanka, and also because the school is legal entity under Qatari law, the Supreme Council inquired on the complaint. The shareholders including Mr. Kumudu Fonseka, I am informed was in restricted mode in answering allegations raised by the SL Ambassador, as Qatari law prohibits criticism of any foreign diplomat accredited by its government. Nevertheless, nowhere has it been accepted the Embassy or the Ambassador of SL in Qatar has a legal hand in interfering in the school management. 
The Ambassador a businessman and no career diplomat, I believe is being led by officials in the embassy, who perhaps got the Ambassador to inform the school management they should not raise funds without embassy approval, saying it is illegal as the school is a non-profit educational institute, This not only shows how ignorant the embassy is, but also its interest in getting involved in school finances.
The school is not only a non-profit institute but the lowest fee levying private school in Doha, levying QR 400 to 800 per term beginning from pre school to secondary. This is to make education for SL children affordable in Qatar. Therefore the management has only one option in finding funds for maintenance and improvement of the school. That is by fund raising, any kid would understand. Fund raising does not need embassy approval in any way as it is already proved the embassy has no legal binding on the school.
I doubt very much accreditation of a diplomat as the official representative of Sri Lanka allows the ambassador and his embassy staff in Qatar to go beyond playing the role of promoting Sri Lanka, facilitating trade and socio cultural exchanges and taking care of SL migrant labour needs which includes their safety.
About this claim by the Ambassador there are complaints received by the embassy over mismanagement, could most probably be fake complaints the embassy can manoeuvre for their own interest through many Sri Lankan associations that work closely with the embassy. And also with a false promise that the embassy will grant permission for children of this Stafford Sri Lanka school will be allowed entry into Sri Lankan universities, when they cannot even sit for the SL G.C.E O/L and A/L exams held in Sri Lanka.
It is not impossible there cannot be complaints over numerous issues in a school management. But about a school that had gained the confidence of parents to grow from 14 children to over 1,000 in about 14 years, complaints if any should be able to find answers for through parent representation and not by embassy interference.
All the above either imply or even prove there is a sinister plot within the embassy to reach the Qatari Riyal school fund for their own benefit for which the Ambassador and some in the embassy is trying to make case for.
I would therefore request you as the Hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs to, immediately instruct the Ambassador and the senior staff in the SL Embassy in Qatar to refrain from further intervening in the SL Stafford school in Doha as that would create unnecessary and unwanted problems for both parents and their children. With such instructions to also initiate an inquiry at the ministry into why the Ambassador requested the Doha bank to freeze the school bank account and complained against the school management to the Qatar Supreme Council. For such an inquiry at the ministry would allow the Sri Lankans involved in the school management to state their position without being held back by Qatari law.
This would also allow the foreign ministry to understand how scrupulous deals are worked out and corruption grows in most Mid East embassies, with the Sri Lanka Foreign Employment Bureau also accused of being a party in aiding and abetting corruption.
I shall be copying this email to the Hon. State Minister Vasantha Senanayake as he was quoted in the news report mentioned above. 
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Kusal Perera
Journalist /Political Critic and Writer
Colombo – Sri Lanka

Desperate Times and Desperate Measures


BY FAIZER SHAHEID-2017-08-30

Like the pot calling the kettle black, the government came to power pointing fingers at its predecessor, but the shades of a coloured past were revived and all was seen under the sun. Having had an under par performance since attaining power in 2015, the government is now in a desperate situation. They are responding with desperate measures, and in the process, they appear to be fanning the flames that are burning it to ashes.

Let us be more responsive and responsible!


logoThursday, 31 August 2017

If one attribute has to be named that is seriously at an all-time low in Sri Lanka, then that is discipline. Discipline of all types may be but one area stands out. That is our sheer lack discipline with respect to waste management, where no amount of awareness and regulations appear to have had not much positive impact.

If Meethotamulla incident was to raise one’s awareness and subsequently commitment – “Let us be determined that no such incident to happen again or our own waste is not going to affect our own fellow citizens, etc.” – towards effective waste management. The observations on current practices tell another story.

The pictures of waste being deposited outside the bins provided, no commitment towards segregation, littering with no second thoughts are to be seen quite frequently. Call for recyclables to be separated out for reprocessing, etc. is drumming into zero-committed citizens. While we spend on vehicles and drinks we will not spend on a composting bin and really would like that to be given free.

Regulations to curb plastic usage were announced not across the entire board but were targeting basically three product categories. This was done with reason and there were enough justification and precedence for enacting such a requirement. Yet our response had been to stage protests and sit-ins and seek exceptions and calling for postponement of the decision.

Like the recent incident of a student who was quite committed to find perhaps a state-of-the-art solution to cheat in an examination but appeared to have had zero interest in studying and understanding the subject, those of who are involved with the industry only wants to cite reasons for keeping the business as usual going with no apparent regard to consider reasons for the state’s decision.

When the United States moved on with vehicular emission controls for vehicular pollution after identifying the widespread pollution that was taking place with automobiles the catalytic converter technology was not available. One identifies the need and the rest responded with suitable technologies in addition to compliance.

There has to be the sharing of vision when one fights for a just cause. Solid waste management demands individual participation in realising the solution. The same with plastics where the producers should share the concern, which led to this state of affairs and should have plans for compliance and definitely innovation rather than fighting for the abolition of proposed regulations. State needs to consider the transition management too.

A viable alternative 

Yes there is the question of a viable alternative. In many an instance the most viable solution is the rejection of these products and resort to action that embed avoidance. However some needs in meeting certain functional requirements cannot easily be met with avoidance. Can Sri Lankan industry be supported to develop bioplastics from raw materials available locally?

When one particular ministry comes forward with a regulation in addressing a negative situation, another ministry needs to internalise an action that could really support the cause. A national road map for bioplastics perhaps is a necessity which actually can have many more benefits too.

Though a statement to support machinery to produce alternatives, etc. are included in the proposed new regulations, a national road map goes much beyond such a statement. Can a technology package be developed and made available to the industry for adoption to move forward without any risk to occupations and incurred investments to-date?

In real societies transitions actually may not be possible without zero business casualties. Electronic mail cannot be introduced while safeguarding the snail-mail infrastructure and similar scenarios are plenty in this era of disruptive change. Sadly in Sri Lanka we are still willing to keep the ‘edanda’ while scorning at the pandit!

The power of recycling

As per recycling, which we really need to be engaged with, we should understand the power of recycling. Consider the story of the first Chinese woman billionaire, the first woman to be the richest person in China, richest self-made woman in the world – Zhang Yin.

She achieved this economic status at the age of 49 in a country, which had a galloping economic engine. However her engagement was different. She along with her husband was scouring the garbage dumps or landfills in United States of America. They were recovering paper and cardboard from these landfills and started exporting the collection to China and in time she became the biggest exporter to China from United States. She was essentially benefitting from the inherent value of waste. With time she ended up as the first woman billionaire in China.

She also had the sharp business sense to understand the power of reverse logistics as she used to get the space cheaply from ships that were arriving at US Ports from China bringing in goods As the ships had to go back anyway there was plenty of space for her to use at low cost.

The collection of waste paper and cardboard was quickly devoured by the expanding Chinese economy and then as packaging to manufactured products the scrap went back to the USA! Today she is running the world’s largest recovered-paper-based paper manufacturing factory, which operates in China – The Nine Dragons Paper. This is not an isolated case and one could find many an example to demonstrate the power of recycling.

When nations calculate their recycling rate they do so that with a purpose as there is value in that activity. It is important to indicate Sri Lanka has no validated answer if a query is made to seek out a value for the national recycling rate.

Upcycling

Recycling is a concept that is practiced in multitude of ways. Another area of activity one should be aware of is upcycling. Upcycling actually adds more value to the material that is undergoing such a process.

Upcycling, also known as creative reuse, is the process of transforming by-products, waste materials, useless, or unwanted products into new materials or products of better quality or for better environmental value. Are we engaged in upcycling? One could identify many instances of such practices such as with textiles, etc.

An interesting project that is currently being implemented is a University of Moratuwa project that is being carried out with University of Western Australia. If one is to make a visit to the laboratory, one could find locally-developed machinery ably led by a Sri Lankan researcher who transferred the technology from her PhD work in Australia – Dr. Randika Jayasinghe, who has researched into waste management in Sri Lanka, producing many types of value added products from waste plastics and other wastes.

There is plenty of potential for this type of activity to grow into small and medium scale enterprises engaged in upcycling. The opportunity space perhaps is only limited by the limitations of one’s creativity as these type of opportunities result from exercising one’s imagination which when supplanted with technology results in products that can definitely fly!

Value resources

An essential first step in sustainable living is starting to value resources. There has to be the understanding of limited resources and when we all start consuming without limits it is an unsustainable exercise. That is why today we have Sustainable Development Goals with many an indicator. To be seen with SDGs may be caerre-enlivening but what is more important is putting into practice the underlying values.

A recent visitor to the island, Pavan Sukdhev, who is an UN Goodwill Ambassador, made an eloquent speech, which had an interesting statement embedded as he argued for greening the accounts.


With most of our accounts in the red, greening is far from our minds but the statement attributed to Bertrand de Jouvenel is as follows: “National accounts are based on financial transactions they account nothing for nature, to which we do not owe anything in terms of payments but to which we owe everything in terms of livelihood.”

Think when we breathe quality pristine air, we gain in health but incur no payments but when the quality changes, many issues surface but in today’s GDP calculations we may still see positive growth when we are sick too! Pavan’s push is to change from such calculations and not to get misled with such positive growth scenarios when time will tell otherwise. This transition requires definitely responsible living.

Internalising this responsibility may involve lots of learning and some lateral thinking. Living with impunity is not an option, I must hasten to add.

The Reproductive Justice Debate: Time To End The Quagmire


Dr. Chamindra Weerawardhana
logoThe cabinet of ministers of Sri Lanka has given the green light to allow access to terminations to birth givers in specific circumstances. This is surely an insufficient provision, as full access to reproductive justice is an inalienable right.
When it comes to the termination or the continuation of a pregnancy, it is solely up to each birth-giver to decide on what they wish to do with their bodies.
The hashtag #mybodymyrights perfectly embodies this basic reality.
Yet, in the patriarchal and gender-stratified world we live in, reproductive justice has become a topic of intense contention, of opposition, of intense debate. In the Sri Lankan case, it is the Catholic bishops who have taken up arms against official government policy, calling for a blanket ban on all terminations. This opposition is nothing new, as the Catholic church has long held a resolutely anti-choice view. 
Picture: Avantha Artigala
The most striking factor is the highly patronising nature of the statement the church has released. It is as if the bishops, a bunch of cis men with tremendous levels of cis-male privilege, assume that cis women, trans men and birth-givers of all gender identities in Sri Lanka have to follow the dictates of the Catholic church when making extremely private decisions on their bodies.
The Catholic church: enemy of gender justice
In many jurisdictions across the world, the Catholic church has a problem with uteruses. In many Latin American countries, the church, a colonial and patriarchal institution on Indigenous land, maintains a tight grip on access to terminations and to the provision of reproductive justice. This has resulted in absolute aberrations of human rights violations, flushing gender justice down the toilet.
To give but one example, it was only recently that Evelyn Beatriz Hernandez Cruz, 19, from a small rural community in Cuscatlán, eastern El Salvador, was convicted on the grounds that failing to seek antenatal care amounted to murder. Her story is an extremely traumatising one, having been repeatedly raped by a gang member over several months, in a forced sexual relationship. This very Catholic country has put all the blame on Evelyn, and sentenced her to thirty years in prison.
The Catholic church is also the primary obstacle for the provision of reproductive justice in Ireland. In the Irish Republic, a termination is a criminal offence that carries a 14-year prison sentence. The Eighth Amendment to the Irish Constitution grants unborn foetuses the same citizenship rights and legal protections as cis women, trans men and birth givers of other gender identities. The #repealthe8th campaign, which calls for the repeal of the 8th amendment and the introduction of modern reproductive justice legislation that respects bodily autonomy, is indeed the foremost gender justice struggle in present-day Ireland.
The denial of reproductive justice in Ireland (North and South), and the political establishment’s intransigence, also water down to a class issue. Wealthy people can access the treatments they require under clement conditions abroad, and it is the under-privileged who suffer from existing restrictions.
In Northern Ireland, where this writer mostly resides, the British Abortion Act, which became law back in 1967, is still not in force. Today’s campaigns for reproductive justice call for the repeal of the existing ban on access to terminations, replacing it with new legislation that gives each birth giver decision-making power over their bodies and also takes a wholesome and comprehensive approach to reproductive justice.
It is beyond belief that even today, 19th century Victorian legislation still form the basis of anti-choice legislation in Northern Ireland. Birth givers are forced to travel to Great Britain for terminations, and are charged in the region of GBP 900 for a termination. Although this policy was changed through a Westminster amendment in June 2017, reports suggest that it is not applied evenly at all times). Once again, those who cannot afford to seek services outside Northern Ireland are the worst affected.
Cases of the Catholic church leaving women to die abound across the world, and the blood-stained record of that church is beyond shameless. This impunity stretches to a range of related issues. It was just recently that the Catholic archbishop of Melbourne Denis Hart said he is prepared to be jailed for refusing to report sexual abuse by the clergy to the police, adding that sexual abuse was “a spiritual encounter with God through the priest” and was “of a higher order” than criminal law.
Policymaking on gender justice
On issues that are related to gender justice, state authorities should understand their primary responsibility of ensuring the fundamental rights of their citizens. This enables the state to fully deploy its law-making capacity to draft policies that improve citizens’ quality of life.
In the case of Sri Lanka, the best of signs of sensibility come from reproductive justice and gender justice activists, especially of the younger generation, who have taken to social media and active campaigning to stand against the patriarchal and misogynist dictates of religious denominations.

Read More

UN chief calls for lifting of Gaza blockade in face of humanitarian crisis


UN chief Antonio Guterres also held talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders in Jerusalem and Ramallah on Monday and Tuesday
United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres during a visit to a UN School in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip on 30 August (AFP)

Wednesday 30 August 2017
UN chief Antonio Guterres called for the blockade of the Gaza Strip to be lifted Wednesday as he visited the Palestinian enclave enduring "one of the most dramatic humanitarian crises" he had seen.
"I am deeply moved to be in Gaza today, unfortunately to witness one of the most dramatic humanitarian crises that I've seen in many years working as a humanitarian in the United Nations," Guterres said.
He later said it was "important to open the closures," in a reference to Israel's decade-long blockade of Gaza and to the border with Egypt that has remained largely closed in recent years.
Guterres made the comments at a school run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, in the northern Gaza Strip.
Palestinian militants in Gaza and Israel have fought three wars since 2008.
Israel says the blockade is necessary to keep Islamist movement Hamas, which runs the enclave, from obtaining weapons or materials that could be used to make them.
The blockade also serves to isolate Hamas.
UN officials say the enclave is fast becoming unliveable, with sparse electricity and a lack of clean water.
Guterres's comments came as he wrapped up a three-day visit to Israel and the Palestinian territories.
He held talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders in Jerusalem and Ramallah on Monday and Tuesday and was due to give a speech in Tel Aviv later Wednesday before departing.

Lawmakers in France demand release of citizen held by Israel


Salah Hamouri (GUE/NGL)

Ali Abunimah-29 August 2017

Lawmakers and activists in France are demanding action from their government to free Salah Hamouri, a Palestinian-French human rights defender detained by Israel.

On Tuesday, the Israeli military ordered Hamouri held without charge or trial for six months.
The administrative detention order came after a judge in Jerusalem had ruled that he should be released to house arrest. Instead, Hamouri will stay in prison.

Under Israel’s administrative detention system, a relic of British colonial rule, occupation forces can jail Palestinians indefinitely without ever charging them with an offense or presenting them with evidence.

Hamouri, 32, was arrested from his home in occupied East Jerusalem last Wednesday. He is a field researcher with prisoners rights group Addameer. He had previously spent seven years in Israeli prisons but was freed in a prisoner exchange in 2011.

“An example for us all”

Israeli forces previously charged Hamouri in 2005, claiming he was part of a plot by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine to kill Ovadia Yosef, a prominent Israeli rabbi who habitually incited genocidal levels of violence to “annihilate” Palestinians.

Hamouri always maintained his innocence. He was held for three years in administrative detention, before accepting a plea deal from Israel’s military court in order to obtain a shorter sentence. Israel’s military court has a conviction rate for Palestinians of nearly 100 percent.

French citizens organized in support of Hamouri, and even Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s right-wing president at the time, urged Israel to release him in 2011.

After his release, according to Addameer, Hamouri was banned from entering the occupied West Bank until September last year, and his wife is currently still banned.

“This case is not simply the arrest of an individual,” Addameer stated on Tuesday. “It is part of a systematic policy of disempowerment. The aim is to ensure that any work supporting the Palestinian quest for self-determination is punished severely.”

The group added: “For human rights defenders, there are two choices. Give up on your cause, or accept the life of constant punishment. It is not an easy choice to make. Salah could easily leave, live in France, and have a quiet life with his wife and child.”

But Hamouri’s choice to stay in Palestine and work for people’s rights is “an example for us all,” Addameer added.

An “injustice and a scandal”

Calls from French activists and politicians demanding Hamouri’s release intensified on Tuesday.
Eric Couquerel, a lawmaker with the left-wing La France Insoumise movement of former presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon, called Hamouri’s detention “an injustice and a scandal” and demanded his immediate release.
La condamnation de @salah_hamouri Ã  6 mois renouvelables est une injustice & 1 scandale. Je demande sa liberation immédiate 
The Communist Party, which holds 10 seats in France’s lower house, condemned the detention of Hamouri as “totally illegal under international human rights conventions.”

“President Emmanuel Macron and foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, who have remained silent since Salah Hamouri’s arrest, must intervene firmly, today, with their Israeli counterparts so that our fellow citizen is immediately released without condition,” the party added.
Other lawmakers and activists have been tweeting similar messages.
 a été placé à l'isolement, sans connaître la raison pour laquelle on l'a arrêté. Libération sans discussion !
Je viens d'interpeller E.Macron pour exiger des autorités Israéliennes, la libération immédiate de  ! https://lc.cx/c6Sm 
Le silence du @gouvernementFR au sujet de détenu arbitrairement par les forces israéliennes d'occupation est insupportable

Surge in administrative detentions

According to Addameer, there are currently 450 Palestinians in administrative detention, including 10 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council.

This number is lower than it has been in recent months, but there has recently been a sharp rise in Israel’s use of the measure.

More Palestinians were detained without charge in August than in any month this year, according to the Palestinian Prisoners Society.

Last Thursday, the Israeli military court issued 20 new administrative detention orders or extensions to Palestinians, according to prisoner solidarity group Samidoun. That brought the total for August to over 100.

The youngest Palestinian held in administrative detention is 16-year-old Nour Kayed Faiq Issa, arrested by dozens of soldiers in a night raid on his family’s home in the West Bank village of Anata in April.

With Hamouri’s jailing, at least two of Addameer’s staff are now in Israel’s prisons.


In June, the Israeli military renewed for a second six-month term the administrative detention of Hassan Safadi, the group’s media coordinator.