Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, April 27, 2016


Police parade Mr. Wu in a propaganda video released to media in 1995. (Screen grab via Reuters)-Mr. Wu at the Laogai Museum in Washington in 2011. (Ricky Carioti/Washington Post)
Mr. Wu sits in a museum exhibit showing the dimensions of his solitary confinement cell. (Ricky Carioti/Washington Post)

By Emily Langer-April 27

Harry Wu, a Chinese dissident who mounted an international campaign to expose the horrors of his country’s laogai labor camps, where he endured 19 years of captivity as an alleged counterrevolutionary, died April 26 while vacationing in Honduras. He was 79.

Ann Noonan, a board member of the Laogai Research Foundation, founded by Mr. Wu in 1992, confirmed his death and said she did not know the cause.

Mr. Wu settled in the United States in 1985 after a ghastly odyssey in the Chinese prison system in which he withered to 80 pounds, was worked nearly to death and survived, in part, on food that he foraged in rats’ nests. His offense, as a university student in the years after the Chinese Communist Revolution, had been to criticize the 1956 invasion of Hungary by the Soviet Union, the world’s other major Communist power.

Mr. Wu was imprisoned in 1960. After his release in 1979, three years after the death of Communist leader Mao Zedong, he built a profile as a human rights activist and self-described “troublemaker” who repeatedly slipped back into China to gather undercover footage of the prison camps.

The footage aired on the CBS news magazine “60 Minutes” and on the BBC in the 1990s. With those reports, Mr. Wu helped draw widespread attention to Chinese practices of using forced labor to produce exports — among them wrenches and artificial flowers ultimately banned by the United States — and harvesting organs from executed prisoners. According to his research, more than 50 million prisoners passed through the system over 40 years.

He was at times compared to Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn, the Nobel Prize-winning Russian writer who documented the atrocities of the Soviet gulag. Mr. Wu described the loagai prisons, which purported to deliver “reform through labor,” as the Chinese gulag and said he would not rest until the word loagai appeared in “every language dictionary in the world.”

He testified before Congress, lectured on university campuses, wrote books and established the Laogai Research Foundation and Laogai Museum, both based in Washington, to educate the public about the Chinese labor camps.

In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, he described them as “the cornerstone of the Chinese Communist dictatorship and the machinery for crushing human beings physically, psychologically and spiritually.”

By his account, Mr. Wu stole from prisoners and collaborated with police to survive in prison.
“I became an animal,” he told The Washington Post. “If you are human, you have feelings and suffer because you are always thinking and wishing about what cannot be. But animals never think, never wish. Unless you are an animal, you cannot survive.”

He endured solitary confinement and suffered a broken back when a runaway cart struck him in a coal mine. When his captors discovered that he had hidden Western books, including Victor Hugo’s “Les Misérables,” they broke his arm. He once attempted suicide by refusing to consume the meager provisions the prisoners received.

A turning point came with the death of a fellow inmate and friend. Mr. Wu clutched his body as it was carried to a grave, he recounted in a memoir, “Bitter Winds” (1994), coauthored with a journalist, Carolyn Wakeman.

“Human life,” he recalled thinking, “has no more importance than a cigarette ash flicked in the wind. But if a person’s life has no value, then the society that shapes that life has no value either. If the people mean no more than dust, then the society is worthless and does not deserve to continue. If the society should not continue, then I should oppose it.”

Unstinting in his advocacy, Mr. Wu at times attracted controversy for the stridency of his campaign, which complicated tenuous U.S.-Chinese relations in the years after the Tiananmen Square crackdown. He was arrested after entering China in 1995, a development condemned by both houses of Congress, shortly before first lady Hillary Clinton planned to travel to Beijing for a U.N. conference on women.

Mr. Wu was detained for 66 days and convicted of espionage, but he was expelled in time for the first lady’s trip.

Asked why he returned so many times to China, when the danger to him was so great, he replied, “I cannot turn my back to my homeland.”

“My parents’ graveyard, my former inmates’ graveyards are over there,” he said. “That piece of land is full of my blood and tears.”

Wu Hongda, one of eight children, was born in Shanghai on Feb. 8, 1937. His father was a banker, and his mother died when he was young.

Mr. Wu attended a Jesuit school, where he received the name Harry, and later pursued university studies in geology. As a student, he took part in the Hundred Flowers campaign in which Mao encouraged citizens to air grievances with the party.

When party leaders received more criticism than they wished to hear, they cracked down on so-called counterrevolutionary rightists. Among them was Mr. Wu. His stepmother committed suicide during his captivity.

After his release, Mr. Wu worked in China as a geology lecturer. In 1985, he came to San Francisco, where he was homeless for a period before finding work in a doughnut shop. In time, he established himself through scholarly associations with the University of California at Berkeley and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

In 1994, he became a U.S. citizen, taking the name Peter Hongda Wu. His books included “Laogai: The Chinese Gulag” (1992) and “Troublemaker” (1996), coauthored with former New York Times sports columnist George Vecsey.

Mr. Wu was married several times, most recently to Ching Lee. Their marriage ended in divorce. 

Survivors include a son, Harrison Wu of Vienna, Va.

“I want to enjoy my life,” Mr. Wu told the Los Angeles Times in 1995. “I lost 20 years. But the guilt is always in my heart. I can’t get rid of it. Millions of people in China today are experiencing my experience. If I don’t say something for them, who will?”

The Strange Death of Hugo Chavez

Hugo Chavez

An Interview with Eva Golinger

by Mike Whitney
Courtesy: Counter Punch
“Hugo Chavez defied the most powerful interests, and he refused to bow down….I believe there is a very strong possibility that President Chavez was assassinated.” — Eva Golinger

( April 26, 2016, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) MW– Do you think that Hugo Chavez was murdered and, if so, who do you think might have been involved?

Eva Golinger– I believe there is a very strong possibility that President Chavez was assassinated. There were notorious and documented assassination attempts against him throughout his presidency. Most notable was the April 11, 2002 coup d’etat, during which he was kidnapped and set to be assassinated had it not been for the unprecedented uprising of the Venezuelan people and loyal military forces that rescued him and returned him to power within 48 hours. I was able to find irrefutable evidence using the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), that the CIA and other US agencies were behind that coup and supported, financially, militarily and politically, those involved. Later on, there were other attempts against Chavez and his government, such as in 2004 when dozens of Colombian paramilitary forces were captured on a farm outside of Caracas that was owned by an anti-Chavez activist, Robert Alonso, just days before they were going to attack the presidential palace and kill Chavez.

There was another, lesser-known plot against Chavez discovered in New York City during his visit to the United Nations General Assembly in September 2006. According to information provided by his security services, during standard security reconnaissance of an event where Chavez would address the US public at a local, renowned university, high levels of radiation were detected in the chair where he would have sat. The radiation was discovered by a Geiger detector, which is a handheld radiation detection device the presidential security used to ensure the President wasn’t in danger of exposure to harmful rays. In this case, the chair was removed and subsequent tests showed it was emanating unusual amounts of radiation that could have resulted in significant harm to Chavez had it gone undiscovered. According to accounts by the presidential security at the event, an individual from the US who had been involved in the logistical support for the event and had provided the chair was shown to be acting with US intelligent agents.

Disabled migrants accused of 'mass riot' in Hungary

Two disabled migrants are being prosecuted in Hungary after being accused of breaching the country's border fence with Serbia and taking part in a "mass riot".
News
Fattoum Hassan and Faisal Hamad were caught up in a mass disturbance at the border in September 2015.
WEDNESDAY 27 APRIL 2016

Ms Hassan is 64 and partially sighted after being blinded in one eye in an air strike in Syria. Her other eye is affected by diabetes.

Mr Hamad, a 29-year-old Iraqi, was also hurt in an air strike in Syria. He uses a wheelchair because he has lost the power in his legs.

They are part of a group that has been held in detention for the last seven months, accused of taking part in a "mass riot" while attempting to cross the border after it had been suddenly closed.

At the time, Hungary had just passed a law making it a crime to breach the border fence - a reponse to the 400,000 migrants who had passed through the country last year on their way to western Europe.

Their lawyer and the UNHCR say it was not illegal for them to cross the border that day after it was officially closed, due to the terrible circumstances in their home country. They also say their disabilities make it impossible for them to have taken part in violence.

Water cannon

Police officers at the border in Roszke were hurt when stones were thrown at them by migrants trying to cross from Serbia. Tear gas and water cannon were used against migrants and refugees.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is renowned for the tough line he has taken during the migrant crisis, which saw more than a million people - many of them refugees - make their way to Europe in 2015. Hungary accepts very few asylum applications.

Since September, more than 2,500 migrants have been put on trial in Hungary for alleged border offences, with 99 per cent convicted.

Human rights groups say the system is unfair, with courts reaching decisions too quickly.
Many are sentenced to deportation, but none expelled to Serbia, which refuses to accept them. Instead, they are left in limbo in Hungary and banned from travelling to Schengen countries in Europe.

'Explosive consequences'

Mr Orban, from the right-of-centre Fidesz party, and Hungary's largest opposition party, the ultra-nationalist Jobbik, take a similar line on migrants and refugees.

In September, Mr Orban said the migrant crisis "threatens to have explosive consequences for the whole of Europe", adding: "We shouldn't forget that the people who are coming here grew up in a different religion and represent a completely different culture.

"Most are not Christian, but Muslim."

China: Obesity 'explosion' in rural youth, study warns

This file photo taken on May 25, 2015 shows a nurse taking the blood pressure of an overweight youth during his acupuncture and exercise treatment at the Aimin (Love the People) Fat Reduction Hospital in the northern port city of Tianjin.
Obesity is more prevalent in boys because they are likely to enjoy more of the family's resources, the study says
BBC27 April 2016
Obesity has rapidly increased in young rural Chinese, a study has warned, because of socioeconomic changes.
Researchers found 17% of boys and 9% of girls under the age of 19 were obese in 2014, up from 1% for each in 1985.
The 29-year study, published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, involved nearly 28,000 students in Shandong province.
The study used a stricter cut-off of the Body Mass Index (BMI) than the World Health Organization standard.
"It is the worst explosion of childhood and adolescent obesity that I have ever seen," Joep Perk from the European Society of Cardiology told AFP news agency.
The study said China's rapid socioeconomic and nutritional transition had led to an increase in energy intake and a decrease in physical activity.
The traditional Chinese diet had shifted towards a diet "with high fat, high energy density and low dietary fibre".
SHANGHAI, CHINA: A doctor treats an obese patient at a hospital in Shanghai, 25 May 2004.Image copyrightAFP/Getty Images

'Preference for sons'

The data was taken from six government surveys of rural school children in Shandong aged between seven and 18.
The percentage of overweight children has also grown from 0.7% to 16.4% for boys and from 1.5% to nearly 14% for girls, the study said.
On the reason for the higher prevalence of overweight and obesity in boys, the study says: "The traditional, societal preference for sons, particularly in rural areas, may mean that boys are likely to enjoy more of the family's resources."
The WHO classifies a BMI - the ratio of weight-to-height squared - of 25-29.9 as overweight and from 30 upwards obese.
This study used a lower cut-off of 24-27.9 for overweight and 28 and above for obese.
The researchers recommend that "comprehensive strategies of intervention should include periodic monitoring, education on the pattern of nutrition, physical exercises and healthy dietary behaviour".

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

SJV Chelvanayakam remembered


 26 April 2016

Today marks the death of SJV Chelvanayagam QC, who is remembered across the Tamil nation for spear heading the Vaddukoddai resolution, which was overwhelmingly ratified by the Tamil votes in the 1976 parliamentary elections.

After representing the Tamil people for five general elections, experiencing repeated disappointments in over 3 decades of negotiation with the Sinhala majoritarian government, Chelvanayagam QC formulated the Vauddukoddai resolution, which remains a cornerstone of the Tamil movement for self-determination in Sri Lanka. 

In the late fifties, Chelvanayagam QC signed the first ever pact between the Sinhala and Tamil community to resolve the issue of Tamil political demands. The Bandaranaike-Chelvanayam pact, signed in 1957, was abrogated by the then President due to vehement opposition by Sinhala parties.

Following another decade of civil disobedience and negotiations, Chelvanayagam QC signed a pact to settle Tamil political demands with the then UNP leader Mr Dudely Senanayake. The 1965 general elections, which preceded the signing of the Chelva-Dudely pact, saw no Sinhala political party obtain an absolute majority in parliament. Despite having the support of the Tamil political parties in parliament Mr Senanayake abrogated the pact as vehement opposition arose in the Sinhala South. 

Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MPs and Northern Provincial Councillors marked the veteran Tamil politician’s death anniversary by gathering at his statue in Jaffna today.

TAMIL EELAM: RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION

  Vaddukodai Resolution
14 May 1976
தமிà®´்த் தேசியம்
"This convention resolves that restoration and reconstitution of the Free, Sovereign, Secular Socialist State of TAMIL EELAM based on the right of self determination inherent to every nation has become inevitable in order to safeguard the very existence of the Tamil Nation in this Country."
Political Resolution unanimously adopted at the First National Convention of the Tamil United Liberation Front held at Pannakam (Vaddukoddai Constituency) on 14 May 1976 presided over by Mr. S.J.V. Chelvanayakam, Q.C, M.P.
Whereas throughout the centuries from the dawn of history the Sinhalese and Tamil nations have divided between them the possession of Ceylon, the Sinhalese inhabiting the interior of the country in its Southern and Western parts from the river Walawe to that of Chilaw and the Tamils possessing the Northern and Eastern districts;
And whereas the Tamil Kingdom was overthrown in war and conquered by the Portugese in 1619 and from them by the Dutch and the British in turn independent of the Sinhalese Kingdoms;
And whereas the British Colonists who ruled the territories of the Sinhalese and Tamil Kingdoms separately joined under compulsion the territories of the Sinhalese Kingdoms for purposes of administrative convenience on the recommendation of the Colebrooke Commission in 1833;
And whereas the Tamil Leaders were in the forefront of the Freedom movement to rid Ceylon of colonial bondage which ultimately led to the grant of independence to Ceylon in 1948;
And whereas the foregoing facts of history were completely overlooked and power was transferred to the Sinhalese nation over the entire country on the basis of a numerical majority thereby reducing the Tamil nation to the position of subject people;
And whereas successive Sinhalese governments since independence have always encouraged and fostered the aggressive nationalism of the Sinhalese people and have used their political power to the detriment of the Tamils by-
(a) Depriving one half of the Tamil people of their citizenship and franchise rightsthereby reducing Tamil representation in Parliament,(b) Making serious inroads into the territories of the former Tamil Kingdom by a system of planned and state-aided Sinhalese colonization and large scale regularization of recently encouraged Sinhalese encroachments calculated to make the Tamils a minority in their own homeland,
(c) Making Sinhala the only official language throughout Ceylon thereby placing the stamp of inferiority on the Tamils and the Tamil Language,
(d) Giving the foremost place to Buddhism under the Republican constitution thereby reducing the Hindus, Christians, and Muslims to second class status in this Country,
(e) Denying to the Tamils equality of opportunity in the spheres of employment,education, land alienation and economic life in general and starving Tamil areas of large scale industries and development schemes thereby seriously endangering their very existence in Ceylon,
(f) Systematically cutting them off from the main-stream of Tamil cultures in South-India while denying them opportunities of developing their language and culture in Ceylon thereby working inexorably towards the cultural genocide of the Tamils,
(g) Permitting and unleashing communal violence and intimidation against the Tamil speaking people as happened in Amparai and Colombo in 1956; all over the country in 1958; army reign of terror in the Northern and Eastern Provinces in 1961; Police violence at the International Tamil Research Conference in 1974 resulting in the death of nine persons in Jaffna; Police and communal violence against Tamil speaking Muslims at Puttalam and various other parts of Ceylon in 1976 - all these calculated to instil terror in the minds of the Tamil speaking people thereby breaking their spirit and the will to resist injustices heaped on them,
(h) By terrorizing, torturing, and imprisoning Tamil youths without trial for long periods on the flimsiest grounds,
(i) Capping it all by imposing on the Tamil Nation a constitution drafted under conditions of emergency without opportunities for free discussion by a constituent assembly elected on the basis of the Soulbury Constitution distorted by the Citizenship laws resulting in weightage in representation to the Sinhalese majority thereby depriving the Tamils of even the remnants of safeguards they had under the earlier constitution,
And whereas all attempts by the various Tamil political parties to win their rights by co-operating with the governments, by parliamentary and extra-parliamentary agitations, by entering into pacts and understandings with successive Prime Ministers in order to achieve the bare minimum of political rights consistent with the self-respect of the Tamil people have proved to be futile;
And whereas the efforts of the All Ceylon Tamil Congress to ensure non-domination of the minorities by the majority by the adoption of a scheme of balanced representation in a Unitary Constitution have failed and even the meagre safeguards provided in article 29 of the Soulbury Constitution against discriminatory legislation have been removed by the Republican Constitution;
And whereas the proposals submitted to the Constituent Assembly by the Ilankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi for maintaining the unity of the country while preserving the integrity of the Tamil people by the establishment of an autonomous Tamil State within the framework of a Federal Republic of Ceylon were summarily and totally rejected without even the courtesy of a consideration of its merits;
And whereas the amendments to the basic resolutions intended to ensure the minimum of safeguards to the Tamil people moved on the basis of the nine point demands formulated at the conference of all Tamil Political parties at Valvettithurai on 7th February 1971 and by individual parties and Tamil members of Parliament including those now in the government party were rejected in toto by the government and Constituent Assembly;
And whereas even amendments to the draft proposals relating to language, religion, and fundamental-rights including one calculated to ensure that at least the provisions of the Tamil Language (Special Provisions) Regulations of 1956 be included in the Constitution were defeated resulting in the boycott of the Constituent Assembly by a large majority of the Tamil members of Parliament;
And whereas the Tamil United Liberation Front, after rejecting the Republican Constitution adopted on the 22nd of May, 1972 presented a six point demand to the Prime Minister and the Government of 25th June, 1972 and gave three months time within which the Government was called upon to take meaningful steps to amend the Constitution so as to meet the aspirations of the Tamil Nation on the basis of the six points and informed the Government that if it failed to do so the Tamil United Liberation Front would launch a non-violent direct action against the Government in order to win the freedom and the rights of the Tamil Nation on the basis of the right of self- determination;
And whereas this last attempt by the Tamil United Liberation Front to win Constitutional recognition of the rights of the Tamil Nation without jeopardizing the unity of the country was callously ignored by the Prime Minister and the Government;
And whereas the opportunity provided by the Tamil United Liberation leader to vindicate the Government's contention that their constitution had the backing of the Tamil people, by resigning from his membership of the National State Assembly and creating a by-election was deliberately put off for over two years in utter disregard of the democratic right of the Tamil voters of Kankesanthurai,
And whereas in the by-election held on the 6th February 1975 the voters of Kankesanthurai by a preponderant majority not only rejected the Republican Constitution imposed on them by the Sinhalese Government but also gave a mandate to Mr.S.J.V. Chelvanayakam, Q.C. and through him to the Tamil United Liberation Front for the restoration and reconstitution of the Free Sovereign, Secular, Socialist State of TAMIL EELAM.
The first National Convention of the Tamil United Liberation Front meeting at Pannakam (Vaddukoddai Constituency) on the 14th day of May, 1976 hereby declares
that the Tamils of Ceylon by virtue of their great language, their religions, their separate culture andheritage, their history of independent existence as a separate state over a distinct territory for several centuries till they were conquered by the armed might of the European invaders and above all by their will to exist as a separate entity ruling themselves in their own territory, are a nation distinct and apart from Sinhalese
and this Convention announces to the world that the Republican Constitution of 1972 has made the Tamils a slave nation ruled by the new colonial masters the Sinhalese who are using the power they have wrongly usurped to deprive the Tamil Nation of its territorylanguagecitizenship, economic life, opportunities of employment and education thereby destroying all the attributes of nationhood of the Tamil people.
And therefore, while taking note of the reservations in relation to its commitment to the setting up of a separate state of TAMIL EELAM expressed by the Ceylon Workers Congress as a Trade Union of the Plantation Workers, the majority of whom live and work outside the Northern and Eastern areas,
This convention resolves that restoration and reconstitution of the Free, Sovereign, Secular Socialist State of TAMIL EELAM based on the right of self determination inherent to every nation has become inevitable in order to safeguard the very existence of the Tamil Nation in this Country.
This Convention further declares -
(a) that the State of TAMIL EELAM shall consist of the people of the Northern and Eastern provinces and shall also ensure full and equal rights of citizenship of the State of TAMIL EELAM to all Tamil speaking people living in any part of Ceylon and to Tamils of EELAM origin living in any part of the world who may opt for citizenship of TAMIL EELAM.(b) that the constitution of TAMIL EELAM shall be based on the principle of democratic decentralization so as to ensure the non-domination of any religious or territorial community of TAMIL EELAM by any other section.
(c) that in the state of Tamil Eelam caste shall be abolished and the observance of the pernicious practice of untouchability or inequality of any type based on birth shall be totally eradicated and its observance in any form punished by law.
(d) that TAMIL EELAM shall be secular state giving equal protection and assistance to all religions to which the people of the state may belong.
(e) that Tamil shall be the language of the State but the rights of of Sinhalese speaking minorities in Tamil Eelam to education and transaction of business in their language shall be protected on a reciprocal basis with the Tamil speaking minorities in the Sinhala State.
(f) that Tamil Eelam shall be a Socialist State wherein the exploitation of man by man shall be forbidden, the dignity of labor shall be recognized, the means of production and distribution shall be subject to public ownership and control while permitting private enterprise in these branches within limit prescribed by law, economic development shall be on the basis of socialist planning and there shall be a ceiling on the total wealth that any individual or family may acquire.
This Convention directs the Action Committee of the TAMIL UNITED LIBERATION FRONT to formulate a plan of action and launch without undue delay the struggle for winning the sovereignty and freedom of the Tamil Nation;
And this Convention calls upon the Tamil Nation in general and the Tamil youth in particular to come forward to throw themselves fully in the sacred fight for freedom and to flinch not till the goal of a sovereign state of TAMIL EELAM is reached.

The Inconvenient Truth about Sri Lanka’s North and East

Taylor Dibbert-04/25/2016

People for Equality and Relief in Lanka (PEARL) has recently published a timely report. The document is based upon field research that was conducted in January 2016 and will be of interest to anyone trying to make sense of the new government’s performance since Maithripala Sirisena assumed the presidency in January 2015, especially as it relates to Tamil issues.
The report focuses on the current state of affairs in the country’s Northern and Eastern Provinces. It documents serious human rights violations that have occurred since the unexpected ouster of the island nation’s previous president, Mahinda Rajapaksa.
Frankly, the scope and scale of the problems in the country’s Tamil-dominated areas are staggering. According to the report, Sri Lanka’s military is still heavily involved in civilian affairs. Unsurprisingly, sustained militarization continues have extensive negative effects on the Tamil community; this includes ongoing reports of sexual violence and fewer livelihood options for Tamils, among other problems. More fundamentally, the military’s strong presence in the north and east undermines even the most modest of reconciliation agendas. Some of the report’s findings jive broadly with my own recent visit to the north and east. For additional context, PEARL has included numerous case studies.

Lately, the Sri Lankan government has come under fire for its unhelpful rhetoric regarding transitional justice and the implementation of a resolution at the U.N. Human Rights Council which it co-sponsored in October 2015. Without question, those are important issues. However, ongoing debates about Colombo’s approach to transitional justice sometimes miss an important element: Sri Lanka remains a post-war county and the violations, especially those committed in the north and east, have not stopped since the new government came to power.
In the months ahead, let’s not lose sight of these difficult ground realities. Failing to acknowledge the truth about what’s currently happening across the Northern and Eastern Provinces makes healing the wounds of war that much more difficult.

Sri Lanka’s Play In The International Stage


By Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan –April 26, 2016 
Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan
Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan
Colombo TelegraphAll the world’s a stage, and all the states are merely players? Sri Lanka in the family of states
Sri Lanka is member of the United Nations since 1955 and has signed the major human rights treaties. Being a member of the family of states is not solely a privilege and distinctive trait of belonging; it also affords constant commitment towards this family. Like in every family, ties must be fostered, nurtured and strengthened. Affirming a voluntary pledge and commitment in order to enter the United Nations Human Rights Council, the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations addressed to the President of the General Assembly in the Annex to his letter dated from the 31st of March 2008 with following words:
“(…) Sri Lanka has opened itself to scrutiny of multiple international mechanisms on the belief that openness and accountability, through international means, can strengthen national efforts at promoting and protecting all human rights. (…)”
Y.K. Sinha High Commissioner Sri Lanka and RanilHowever: in recent years, in particular under the previous government of the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, vituperative attacks against the United Nations were common practice. The relationship was badly affected by repetitive allegations that the United Nations were pursuing a hidden agenda and interfere into the island’s sovereignty. G.H. Peiris writes in his book Twilight of the Tigers: “(…) To the Sri Lankan government, being placed at par with the Tigers in accusations of human rights violations is, of course, a damning indictment and humiliating diminution of status in the community of nations. (…) It is the weaker countries that have the highest propensity of falling prey to the human rights vigilantes. (…) In short, it is the economically weak, dependent, conflict-ridden countries with a tradition of subservience to the West that bear the brunt of the challenge to sovereignty from supposedly ‘humanitarian’ external intervention. (…)”
Is this claim true? Should the United Nations rather remain silent, reduced to a numb witness of atrocities and not interfere in domestic situations? Aren’t we living in an era of open states, a distinctive character of contemporary international law, as Prof. Stephan Hobe once famously claimed?

Kilinochchi controversy: TNA denies forcible entry, demands troops vacate public property


article_image
By Shamindra Ferdinando-

Strongly denying accusations regarding Opposition and Tamil National Alliance (TNA) leader R. Sampanthan, MP and a group, forcibly entering an army camp at Kilinochchi on April 16, TNA spokesperson M.A. Sumanthiran yesterday called for an urgent review of public property still occupied by the military.

Jaffna District MP Sumanthiran insisted that Trincomalee District leader Sampanthan had gone there to inspect a cluster of houses occupied by the military for over six years after the conclusion of the conflict.

The Army captured Kilinochchi on January 1, 2009 following a four month battle.

Attorney-at-law Sumanthiran told The Island that the TNA leader accompanied by owners of some of those houses occupied by the military had visited the area situated east of the Kandy-Jaffna A9 road. Sumanthiran quoted Sampanthan as having said that sentry opened the barrier. Therefore, there was absolutely no basis for claims that Sampanthan stormed an army base at Kilinochchi.

Responding to a query, MP Sampanthan said that he had been among four members of parliament, including Sampanthan who met those having grievances. People complained about disappearances, continuing detention of their loved ones as well as the army refusing to vacate public property.

Those who had been trying to exploit MP Sampanthan’s intervention to tarnish the image of the TNA leader as well as the grouping were silent on the suffering of those still denied their own property.

MP Sumanthiran said that a proper inquiry would reveal the failure on the part of the military to give up land occupied during the conflict. The MP insisted that there couldn’t be any justification whatsoever to occupy Kilinochchi houses nearly seven years after the conclusion of the war.

The TNA spokesman said those who had been demanding action against MP Sampanthan should verify facts. The MP urged the army to vacate Kilinochchi houses without further delay. The attorney-at-law said that the TNA welcomed an inquiry as it would help establish the ownership of the houses.

The TNA couldn’t keep quiet over contentious issue of the military occupying public property.

The reportage by a section of the media was meant to cause a rift between communities, the MP said.

Senior military officials told The Island that since late 2010, troops had vacated substantial part of land captured during operations. Unfortunately, the TNA had conveniently failed at least to acknowledge gradual release of army-held land and property in the Northern and Eastern Provinces.

MP Sumanthiran said the people wanted their property back. It would be the responsibility of the government and the military to ensure facilitate early release of public property.

Medamulana MaRa blows his top seeing the advertisement of Liyanage ; Threatens and berates him in filth


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -26.April.2016, 10.30PM) Machiavellian mendacious Mahinda Rajapakse who is now out of power, displaying his base  qualities and crude politics has threatened and furiously berated A.S.P. Liyanage , SL labor party leader for publishing an advertisement in support of president Maithripala Sirisena.
As the  SL labor party leader, Liyanage has in a newspaper today published a full page advertisement expressing his best wishes for the May day rally to be held at Galle under the leadership of president Maithripala Sirisena.  A copy of this advertisement is herein.

This advertisement which is full of praise for the present government carried  slogans such as ‘Join with president Maithri to commemorate the May day of the working class ; flock to Galle to join with the good governance force that made the   country free from fear and suspicions; join to build the country and so forth  while also quoting what Maithripala Sirisena had said “ it is better to be a genuine leader in the  service of the people and die honorably  rather  than rob public funds and become a ‘King’.”
Medamulana Mahinda Rajapakse who saw this advertisement has  flown into a rage . He had this evening phoned Liyanage from Thailand and blasted him in the choicest language , and furiously threatened him.
‘How much help I have rendered to you . I made you a foreign envoy too . Is this how you are treating me? You do not know who I am. Just wait and see  what I will do to you.’ Mahinda has thundered over the phone. The words used were so filthy and foul that those cannot be mentioned herein.
Later on , Rohan Welivita who identifies himself as a media spokesman of Mahinda Rajapakse who was released  on bail  recently , has also scolded and threatened Liyanage over the phone.
Liyanage who had got frightened following these threats, had contacted the ministers and M.P.s of the government and implored  them to  help him by providing security.
By the way , Liyanage is an individual of a rare ambiguous specie who even places advertisements relating to Barack Obama in Sri Lankan newspapers.
---------------------------
by     (2016-04-26 17:20:44)

SRI LANKA: A TV Interview with Basil Fernando regarding the appointment of public officials and in Sri Lanka

AHRC LogoApril 26, 2016
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) wishes to forward an interview by Mr. Basil Fernando, Director - Policies & Programmes of the AHRC in Sirasa TV, News 1st, Live on 26th April 2016.
In the interview Mr. Fernando speaks on the modalities of appointments to the public services including the police service, the Attorney General’s Department, in the light of the recent appointment of the Inspector General of Police, and elaborates on the constitutional framework in making these appointments, and a critical analysis of the role the present Constitutional Council, and other instituions such as the Police Commission in this process.
In the interview, Mr. Fernando explains the features of the basic structure of a constitution in making appointments to the public services in a country including espeacially the main law enforcement agencies. The interview could be watched here.

Economic crisis looms large



By Umesh Moramudali and Rathindra Kuruwita-2016-04-27
In late 2015, presenting his economic strategy in Parliament, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said the indirect and direct tax revenue ratio in the country will be adjusted to 60-40 by 2020, currently the ratio is 80-20. This was to be done by bringing at least 60 per cent of the affluent class who were not paying taxes under the tax net.
However, those who had been keeping tabs on Wickremesinghe's economic outlook and his policies felt that the UNP leader was just playing lip service regarding the changes to the tax structure. He was compelled to say this due to the populist economic proposals made during the campaign to bring Maithripala Sirisena into power.
The UNFGG Government led by Wickremesinghe considers itself to be 'business friendly,' which translates into lower taxes for the rich. Any effort in the opening phase of the 100-day government to tax the rich and the corporate sector, through the interim budget of January 2015 were done half-heartedly.
Direct taxes
Given below is a list of direct taxes proposed by the 29 January 2015 interim budget, but were not implemented.
1. Super gain tax – any company of which the profit exceeded Rs 2,000 million – tax amount worth 25 per cent off its profit will be charged.
2. Rs 1,000 million tax imposed on television stations dedicated to sports.
3. One time tax of Rs 250 million to be paid by mobile phone operators.
4. One time tax of Rs 250 million to be paid by telecommunication providers.
5. Casino business-owners to pay
Rs 1,000 million as a tax – first payment to be made before April.
6. Vehicle assembly plants have neglected their income tax payments during the previous regime. Rs 120,000 million revenue expected through prompt payments.

SL’s sovereign credit constraint level comparing favourably in South Asia




By Hiran H.Senewiratne-

The debt levels of numerous governments in the South Asian region are elevated and pose a sovereign credit constraint for several of these countries, including Sri Lanka, Moody's rating agency said.

Sri Lanka has been rated B1 (stable) when compared to India which has been rated Baa 3 (positive) and Pakistan B3 stable, which indicates that Sri Lanka's sovereign credit constraint level is better when compared to top SAARC region countries, Moody's ratings indicated.

Moody's ratings for other countries are; Japan (A1 stable), Malaysia (A3 stable). But the government debt ratios have climbed in Australia (Aaa stable), Mongolia (B2 negative), Papua New Guinea (B2 stable) and Vietnam (B1 stable). Although Indonesia's (Baa3 stable) government debt is moderate, its reliance on foreign currency and external debt poses risks.

State-owned enterprise liabilities are large in China (Aa3 negative), and smaller but still material in Korea (Aa2 stable), Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Vietnam.Therefore, the Sri Lankan government has taken a policy decision for SriLankan Airlines (unrated), which has been running operating losses for several years, to be merged with a private sector entity, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said.

Sri Lanka has Treasury guarantees of over 4 percent of GDP. Some of the guarantees, such as those related to the Road Development Agency, which has little revenues of its own, have to be met by the government while loss making State Owned Entities (SOE's) will be also ultimately bailed out by the people.Sri Lanka had a central government debt of 76 percent of gross domestic product compared to an average of 48 percent for other 'B' rated countries.

When it comes to corporate leverage in international financial centers, Hong Kong (Aa1 negative) and Singapore (Aaa stable) appear high relative to GDP, partly because they fund borrowers' overseas operations, not captured in domestic growth data but reflected in large foreign assets. If slower regional growth reduced the debt repayment capacity of some borrowers, bank asset quality would suffer.

However, strong bank capitalization and regulatory oversight mitigate this risk. In Indonesia, corporate borrowing is moderate compared to output, but a previous build-up in private sector external debt exposes companies to currency fluctuations.