8th November 2013, Colombo, Sri Lanka: According to a new survey conducted by Social Indicator, the survey research unit of the Centre for Policy Alternatives, Sri Lankans continue to be divided on the topic of reconciliation. However, when it comes to the economy and development, priorities across the four main communities are similar.
The top line survey report is available for immediate download
here as a PDF (~10Mb). It can also be read online
here.
26.5% of people from the Tamil community say that the Government has done nothing to address the root causes of the conflict while 35.5% from the Sinhalese community say that the Government has done a lot. Almost 50% from the Tamil community, 58.8% from the Up Country community and 39.3% from Muslim community believe that the Government has done a little but not enough.
61.1% of Sri Lankans think that the Government should give priority to allocating resources to rebuilding the conflict affected areas, even if this means that less money is spent on the rest of the country. This opinion is held by 80% from the Tamil community, 59.1% from Sinhala, 63.5% from Up Country Tamil and 49% Muslim communities.
Positive changes since the end of war include being able to travel within the country without fear (43.4%), roads, highways and bridges being developed (20.1%) and the development of the country (17.4%). When it comes to negative changes, 52.8% of the respondents chose not to answer the question. 10.6% said increase in crime (murder, robbery etc), 9.7% said increase in the cost of goods and 8.8% said increase in corruption.
The financial situation in the household has got worse in the last two years with 31.8% saying it has got a little worse and 21% saying it has got a lot worse. The quality of food consumed by people appears by the most affected by this financial strain, with 30.6% admitting that they have cut back on the quality of food purchased in the last year while 20% say that they have either not taken medicine or undergone medical treatment at a time it was needed.
Cost of living is what is mostly on people’s minds when talking about the economy and development. Reduction in the cost of living is what a majority of people (78.3%) would like to see from the current development process followed by creation of more jobs and better education facilities. Given the opportunity, the top three sectors Sri Lankans would allocate money to from the National Budget would be education, health and agriculture.
Tolerance is a topic that has been debated frequently in 2013 in the light of the attacks and hate speech directed at the Muslim community. Majority of Sri Lankans (91.4%) say that their religion can be practiced without any restrictions – however, 21% from the Muslim community say that they can practice their religion but with some restriction while almost 10% say that they have no freedom. The varying degrees of tolerance of people are evident in the findings – almost 60% of Sri Lankans are agreeable to schools that are multi ethnic while 41% are not agreeable to a close family member marrying someone from a different ethnicity. 36% also are not agreeable to living in a residential neighbourhood where more than half the neighbours are from a different ethnic group.
Ninety percent (90%) of those polled are proud to be Sri Lankan and on the question of who a true Sri Lankan is, the top three descriptions given were ‘someone who was born in Sri Lanka’, ‘someone who loves Sri Lanka’ and ‘someone who lives in Sri Lanka’. The differences in opinion across the four main ethnic communities were interesting – while the description most mentioned by the Sinhalese community was ‘someone who was born in Sri Lanka’, for the Tamil community it was ‘someone who speaks both Sinhalese and Tamil’.
‘Democracy in post-war Sri Lanka’ sought to record public perspectives on democracy in Sri Lanka today and the findings are presented under seven key sections – Economy and Development, Post War Sri Lanka, The Government, Media, Tolerance, Identity, and Role of Religion and Ethnicity in Politics. This survey is a follow up to the
first survey which was conducted in 2011.
Conducted in the 25 districts of the country, the survey captured the opinion of 2045 Sri Lankans from the four main ethnic groups. The selection of respondents was random across the country except in a few areas in the Northern Province where access was difficult. Fieldwork was conducted from August – September 2013.
Writing in the Tamil Guardian on Thursday, British Premier David Cameron set out his government’s rationale for rejecting the growing calls, both at home and abroad, for him to boycott the Commonwealth leaders’ summit in Sri Lanka next week. Whilst noting the Sri Lankan government’s “poor record on human rights and cruel treatment of the Tamils” – an understatement given the steadily mounting evidence – and the grave “allegations” of war crimes and sexual violence, Mr Cameron’s argument, in sum, is that to secure the “change” he wants to see, “the right thing to do is to engage” with Colombo. 
Sri Lanka's human rights record dominates a Twitter Q&A session, with FCO minister Hugo Swire, about the next week's Commonwealth summit. Foreign Affairs Correspondent Jonathan Miller got involved.
Universities around the country will be closed during the whole of next week and the purpose of this sudden decision according to the Chairwoman of University Grants Commission, Kshanika Hirimburegama, is to allow the students the opportunity to experience the Commonwealth Heads of Governments Meeting (CHOGM) that is scheduled to be held next week. Speaking to media, former Vice Chancellor of the University of Colombo cajoles, the students that this is in fact a great chance to learn and gain knowledge and asks them to study, the event (from home) and prepare their own reports. Kshanika Hirimburegama during her days in the University played the mother to thousands of students who were away from home, she would reprimand the students if there was a strike, make sure that their activities were under surveillance and keep them on a tight leash, because every mother knows that young children are impressionable and the world is waiting to devour them! However the tiny detail she missed back then and seems to be unaware of even today is that university students are above the age of 18, all of them can vote at elections to decide on the government that is entrusted to appoint all the administrative officers like herself, most of them are allowed to drink and get married without parental consent, allowed to enter to into contracts of employment and allowed in general to make decisions about their lives for the simple reason that they are capable of doing so. To be protected when one is a child is to feel loved, to be treated like children when you are grown up adults is condescending and demeaning, to be treated like idiots when you are engaged in serious academic activity is outright insulting and offensive and that is precisely what Hiriburegama has done with this bogus reasoning for closing universities during CHOGM. Read More
The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) accused the government today of spending millions of unnecessary rupees for the upcoming Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), instead of spending money to resolve the Ratupaswala water issue and other pressing needs in the country.
'The innocent has become the victim and the wrong doer has been evicted. Those who carried out the law have been punished. The government is ready to protect any racketeer even If he is engaged in anti social activity, for its sustenance' said by by Hon. Karu Jayasuriya,Chairman of United Leadership Council of United National Party, on a media statement released today.
[TamilNet, Friday, 08 November 2013, 00:43 GMT],%20British%20Tamil%20Conservatives%20(BTC),%20Tamils%20Against%20Genocide%20-%20UK%20(TAG-UK)%20and%20Tamils%20For%20Labour%20representatives%20at%2010%20Downing%20Street.)
In an astonishing move, it was reported this morning that the Government of Sri Lanka had blocked both the UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers Gabriela Knaul, and her predecessor Param Cumaraswamy, from entering the country. Despite assurances from Sri Lankan High Commissioner Chris Nonis earlier in April that they would be welcomed, the recent revocation of their visas suggests that the regime is now determined to repress critical discussion concerning the unconstitutional impeachment of the Chief Justice that took place earlier this year.
The UAE based Etisalat telecommunications company has become the latest victim of threats by the Mahinda Rajapaksa government.
