Sri Lanka Unfit To Lead The Commonwealth After CHOGM: Letters Written To The Guardian UK
The UK’s Guardian Newspaper is receiving letters to its editors castigating the Commonwealth for allowing Sri Lanka to host the grouping’s Heads of Government Meet (CHOGM) in Colombo next month.
The letters state that Sri Lanka’s Human Rights record makes it unfit to lead the 53-member body, of which it will assume the chair after the summit is held in the Sri Lankan capital in November.
“The Commonwealth is making a major mistake in holding its heads of government meeting (CHOGM) in Sri Lanka (Report, 9 October), when that country is in serious breach of the values set out in the Commonwealth charter, and has even failed to comply with the recommendations of its own “Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission”,” writes Michael Ellmanfidh, an officer for the Commonwealth, International Federation for Human Rights
Ellmanfidh says many NGOs accredited to the Commonwealth who successfully persuaded the heads of government four years ago not to hold their 2011 meeting in Sri Lanka insisted that the human rights situation there had not improved by 2013, and in some respects (notably the impeachment of the chief justice and her replacement by a government nominee), the rule of law and governance have got worse.
Why We’re Boycotting Sri Lanka Commonwealth
By John Baird -October 12, 2013
Canada takes its membership in the Commonwealth very seriously. It is for this simple reason that we believe in upholding the basic principles it stands for: freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Without them, what does the Commonwealth stand for?
Despite Canada’s efforts, the Commonwealth, and the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG), failed to utilize this summit as an opportunity to address long-concerns and to catalyze meaningful change for the people of Sri Lanka. The Commonwealth failed to put any pressure on a regime that has so blatantly ignored international calls for change. Despite CMAG’s enhanced mandate, which was based on the recommendation of the Commonwealth Eminent Persons Group and approval by heads of government, it refused to put Sri Lanka on the agenda to allow members an opportunity to discuss these shortcomings.
We failed to use this when it mattered most. As a consequence, we gave this regime a free pass to continue down this path.
The prime minister’s decision not to attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Sri Lanka was based entirely on upholding the principles of the Commonwealth. This was not a decision taken in haste. It was carefully considered with one aim in mind: for Canada to send a message about our displeasure with an organization that has failed to stand up for its fundamental principles. How can an organization like the Commonwealth reward a country like Sri Lanka, not just with hosting a summit, but by allowing it to chair the organization for two years? And after no meaningful reconciliation following a brutal and violent struggle?



The conduct of the Sri Lankan 




























