Cooperatives Ministry building caught fire or set on fire?
![]() There is strong suspicion regarding the fire that had erupted in the Cooperatives and Internal Trade Ministry building at Vauxhall Street in Colombo in the early hours of this morning.
The cause of the blaze is yet to be determined, but ministry employees suspect it was set on fire on purpose to destroy evidence to hide some wrongdoing.
After the COPE report exposed the loss-incurring state entities and the political apointments that had caused them to lose money, incidents of this nature could occur with the intention of sending state enteprises to the guillotine, they observe.
The fire caused extensive damages to the ministry’s media unit and the office of the CWE
chairman. VIDEO: FIRE AT MINISTRY OF COOPERATIVES BUILDING DOUSEDManamendra takes bribes to get UNP slots
![]() Leader of the Nawa Sihala Urumaya, Sarath Manamendra has reportedly requested for Rs. 1 million from Mawjood Hajjiar from the Akurana area assuring him a slot in the UNP’s nominations list for the Central Provincial Council election.When the Muslim national had agreed to make the payment for a slot in the nominations list, Manamendra had requested the UNP leadership to allocate his party a slot in the UNP’s nominations list for the Central Provincial Council election. The UNP nominations committee has said that it was difficult to allocate a slot for a Muslim national when the committee was finding it difficult to accommodate even Azath Sally. However, the UNP nominations committee has said that a slot could however be made for the Nawa Sihala Urumaya to field a Sinhala candidate. An angry Manamendra has said that he had been supportive of the UNP and if the party now treated him in such a manner, he would have to criticize the party in public. Interestingly, Mawjood Hajjiyar who had agreed to pay Rs. 1 million to Manamendra is a friend of Azath Sally. Sally had explained to Mawjood Hajjiyar that even he was finding it difficult to get a slot in the UNP nominations list and asked him not to fall to the schemes of various manipulators. The UNP nominations committee has paid a lot of attention to the fact that Muslims fielded in the UNP list could be defeated if a Muslim from outside the party is given nominations. |
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Search This Blog
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
'Nearly 100 war crimes suspects' in UK last year
By Tom Bateman-30 July 2013
The Home Office last year identified nearly 100 suspected war criminals who had made UK immigration applications, figures released to the BBC suggest.
The majority of cases involved people already likely to have been living in Britain for a number of years.
Suspects originated from countries including Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Rwanda, Serbia and Sri Lanka.
The Home Office says it is determined the UK doesn't become a "refuge for war criminals".
Human rights groups are calling for more criminal prosecutions in Britain as the courts commonly block deportation on human rights grounds if suspects face torture or death in their home country.
The figures emerged from a Freedom of Information request made by the BBC.
They show that, in the 15 months from January 2012, the Home Office researched nearly 800 cases where individuals were suspected of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
It made "adverse recommendations" against 99 people who had applied for British citizenship, asylum or leave to remain in the UK. A further 16 war crimes suspects had applied to enter the UK.
It follows earlier figures suggesting more than 700 suspected war criminals were identified by UK immigration officials between 2005 and 2012.
'Retirement home' Full Story>>>Australia's 'stop the boats' policy is cynical and lawless
From Aborigines to refugees, bashing the vulnerable wins votes in what is still a crudely racist country

Sonya Koppe, Australia's acting high commissioner to Sri Lanka, looks on at a press conference in Colombo on 26 July about new measures to deter refugees, Photograph: Lakruwan Wanniarachchi/AFP/Getty Images
The election campaign in Australia is being fought with the lives of men, women and children. Some drown, others are banished without hope to malarial camps. Children are incarcerated behind razor wire in conditions described as "a huge generator of mental illness". This barbarism is considered a vote-winner by both the Australian government and opposition. Reminiscent of the closing of borders to Jews in the 1930s, it is smashing the facade of a society advertised as benign and lucky. Read More-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Australia's new refugee policy: How we justify our cruelty
- 29 JULY 2013
- BY LIZ CONOR
Over the last week Australians have formed opposing camps on the question of asylum seekers in response to Kevin Rudd’s resettlement deal with PNG. The jingoism of the main political parties has confused intentions between "stop the boats" and "stop the drownings".
Between the refugee advocates and their adversaries
- 29 JULY 2013
- BY LIZ CONOR
The Bradley Manning verdict is still bad news for the press
Bradley Manning arrives alongside a military official to hear the verdict at Fort Meade, Maryland. Photograph: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
Dan Gillmor-Tuesday 30 July 2013 The American journalism trade is breathing a collective – but premature and, in many cases, grossly hypocritical – sigh of relief today. A military judge has found Bradley Manning guilty of many crimes, but "aiding the enemy" isn't one of them.
Had the judge found Manning guilty of aiding the enemy, she would have set a terrible precedent. For the first time, an American court – albeit a military court – would have said it was a potentially capital crime simply to give information to a news organization, because in the internet era an enemy would ultimately have been able to read what was leaked.
However, if journalism dodged one figurative bullet, it faces many more in this era. The ever-more-essential field of national security journalism was already endangered. It remains so. The Obama administration's war on leaks and, by extension, the work of investigative reporters who dare to challenge the most secretive government in our lifetimes, has been unrelenting.
The Manning verdict had plenty of bad news for the press. By finding Manning guilty of five counts of espionage, the judge endorsed the government's other radical theories, and left the journalism organization that initially passed along the leaks to the public, Wikileaks, no less vulnerable than it had been before the case started. Anyone who thinksJulian Assange isn't still a target of the US Government hasn't been paying attention; if the US can pry him loose from Ecuador's embassy in London and extradite him, you can be certain that he'll face charges, too, and the Manning verdict will be vital to that case.
The military tried its best to make life difficult for journalists covering the Manning trial, but activists – not traditional journalists – were the ones who fought restrictions most successfully. Transcripts weren't provided by the government, for example. Only when the Freedom of the Press Foundation crowd-sourced a court stenographer did the public get a record, however flawed, of what was happening.
That public included most of the press, sad to say. Only a few American news organizations (one is the Guardian's US edition) bothered to staff the Manning trial in any serious way. Independent journalists did most of the work, and did it as well as it could be done under the circumstances.
The overwhelmingly torpid coverage of this trial by traditional media has been yet another scandal for the legacy press, which still can't seem to wrap its collective brain around the importance of the case, and especially its wider context. National security journalist Jeremy Scahillsummed it up after the verdict when he told Democracy Now: "We're in a moment when journalism is being criminalized."
For those who want to tell the public what the government is doing with our money and in our name, there are new imperatives. Governmental secrecy, surveillance and the systematic silencing of whistleblowers require updated methods for journalists and journalism organizations of all kinds. Americans pursuing this craft have to understand the risks and find countermeasures.
That is not enough. The public needs to awaken to the threat to its own freedoms from the Obama crackdown on leaks and, by extension, journalism and free speech itself. We are, more and more, a society where unaccountable people can commit unspeakable acts with impunity. They are creating a surveillance state that makes not just dissent, but knowledge itself, more and more dangerous. What we know about this is entirely due to leakers and their outlets. Ignorance is only bliss for the unaccountable.
Statement by Julian Assange on Verdict in Bradley Manning Court-Martial
30 July 2013, 19:30 UTC

Today Bradley Manning, a whistleblower, was convicted by a military court at Fort Meade of 19 offences for supplying the press with information, including five counts of ’espionage’. He now faces a maximum sentence of 136 years.
The ’aiding the enemy’ charge has fallen away. It was only included, it seems, to make calling journalism ’espionage’ seem reasonable. It is not.
Bradley Manning’s alleged disclosures have exposed war crimes, sparked revolutions, and induced democratic reform. He is the quintessential whistleblower.
This is the first ever espionage conviction against a whistleblower. It is a dangerous precedent and an example of national security extremism. It is a short sighted judgment that can not be tolerated and must be reversed. It can never be that conveying true information to the public is ’espionage’.
President Obama has initiated more espionage proceedings against whistleblowers and publishers than all previous presidents combined.
In 2008 presidential candidate Barack Obama ran on a platform that praised whistleblowing as an act of courage and patriotism. That platform has been comprehensively betrayed. His campaign document described whistleblowers as watchdogs when government abuses its authority. It was removed from the internet last week.
Throughout the proceedings there has been a conspicuous absence: the absence of any victim. The prosecution did not present evidence that - or even claim that - a single person came to harm as a result of Bradley Manning’s disclosures. The government never claimed Mr. Manning was working for a foreign power.
The only ’victim’ was the US government’s wounded pride, but the abuse of this fine young man was never the way to restore it. Rather, the abuse of Bradley Manning has left the world with a sense of disgust at how low the Obama administration has fallen. It is not a sign of strength, but of weakness.
The judge has allowed the prosecution to substantially alter the charges after both the defense and the prosecution had rested their cases, permitted the prosecution 141 witnesses and extensive secret testimony. The government kept Bradley Manning in a cage, stripped him naked and isolated him in order to crack him, an act formally condemned by the United Nations Special Rapporteur for torture. This was never a fair trial.
The Obama administration has been chipping away democratic freedoms in the United States. With today’s verdict, Obama has hacked off much more. The administration is intent on deterring and silencing whistleblowers, intent on weakening freedom of the press.
The US first amendment states that "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". What part of ’no’ does Barack Obama fail to comprehend?
Bradley Manning case shows that US government's priorities are 'upside down'
Posted: 30 July 2013
![]() ‘It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you’ - Widney BrownDespite an acquittal on the most serious “aiding the enemy” charge against him, today’s verdict against the US Private Bradley Manning reveals the US government’s misplaced priorities on national security, said Amnesty International this evening. Amnesty International’s Senior Director of International Law and Policy Widney Brown said: “The government’s priorities are upside down. The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence. “Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing - reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government. You investigate and prosecute those who destroy the credibility of the government by engaging in acts such as torture which are prohibited under the US Constitution and in international law. “The government’s pursuit of the ‘aiding the enemy’ charge was a serious overreach of the law, not least because there was no credible evidence of Manning’s intent to harm the USA by releasing classified information to WikiLeaks. “Since the attacks of September 11, we have seen the US government use the issue of national security to defend a whole range of actions that are unlawful under international and domestic law. “It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you, no holds barred, if you're thinking of revealing evidence of its unlawful behaviour.” The court martial today found Manning guilty of a range of additional charges, including ten lesser charges relating to misuse of classified information to which he had already pleaded guilty. Amnesty insisted that any sentence imposed for the other charges must take into account information relating to Manning’s reasonable belief that he was exposing serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Amnesty believes it undermines accountability when the US government is so selective about who it chooses to investigate and prosecute. This is particularly true when they seem intent on punishing those who reveal unlawful government behaviour and protecting those who actually engaged in or ordered such behaviour. The hundreds of thousands of documents Manning released to WikiLeaks included videos and dossiers that pointed to potential human rights violations - including breaches of international humanitarian law - by US troops abroad and the CIA closer to home. Earlier this month Amnesty described the judge’s decision not to drop the charge accusing Manning of “aiding the enemy” as ludicrous and as a decision which “makes a mockery of the US military court system”. |
Complaints prompt Pakistan to ban racy condom commercial
A Pakistani model is shown in this image taken from a condom commercial that was posted to YouTube but deemed too racy for Pakistani television.

A Pakistani model is shown in this image taken from a condom commercial that was posted to YouTube but deemed too racy for Pakistani television.
Asif Shahzad, The Associated Press
Published Thursday, July 25, 2013
Published Thursday, July 25, 2013
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- Pakistan's media regulatory agency has banned a condom commercial starring a sultry Pakistani model after it received hundreds of complaints the ad was too racy, a senior official said Thursday.
Associated Press writer Munir Ahmed contributed to this report
The 50-second television commercial shows a Pakistani couple wondering why their neighbour's new bride, the model and actress Mathira Mohammed playing herself, is working so hard to keep her husband happy. When asked about his secret, the neighbour smiles and holds up a pack of condoms made by Josh, which means excitement in Urdu.
"Bring Josh into your life," the neighbour says, just before explosions flash behind boxes of condoms on the screen.
Pakistan's media regulatory agency banned the commercial Tuesday after reviewing it and determining that it violated the group's code of conduct, said Mohammad Saleem, a senior regulatory official.
"We don't take any arbitrary decisions," Saleem said.
Though mentioning strawberry-flavoured condoms, the ad otherwise isn't racy by Western standards. A conservatively dressed Mohammed greets her new husband's mother, feeds him by hand and knocks on the neighbour's door to get ice for a cold drink.
Josh is a subsidiary of DKT International, a non-profit organization founded to promote family planning and HIV/AIDS prevention through social marketing, according to Josh's Facebook page.
DKT, which is funded by both the United States and Britain, has been working in Pakistan since 2012 in attempt to help women meet their needs for contraception, the group says on its website. A telephone number listed for the group rang unanswered Thursday.
Pakistan has the sixth largest population of any country in the world with roughly 180 million people. If the current rate of growth continues, the population will double by 2050, DKT says.
Pakistan's rapid population growth has strained the country's health and education systems, and its faltering economy has not been able to provide jobs for millions of people entering the work force.
One of the things holding back contraceptive use in Pakistan has been the conservative norms of the majority Muslim country. Some Pakistanis complain that the country is growing even more conservative as hard-line versions of Islam gain greater influence. The lack of contraception results in hundreds of thousands of unwanted or unplanned pregnancies every year, according to demographic experts.
A controversial TV host, Aamir Liaquat Hussain, raised eyebrows on Sunday when he surprised a couple during a broadcast by giving them an infant girl who had been abandoned outside a charity in the southern city of Karachi. The husband, Zulfiqar Hussain, said he and his wife had been trying to have kids unsuccessfully for at least 17 years.
"I am grateful to God for giving me this child," Hussain's wife, who was dressed in a full-length burka, said during the show. The wife, who was crying with joy, did not identify herself.
Zakir Samad, a spokesman for the charity where the child was abandoned, Chhipa, said the organization puts cradles outside its offices so people can drop off their unwanted children. He confirmed the charity worked with Hussain to hand the girl over to the shell-shocked couple.
Some critics questioned whether it was simply an attempt by Hussain to boost ratings and advertising revenue during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Three WorldView-funded projects shortlisted for Griersons

WorldView
July 30, 2013
The shortlist for the prestigious Grierson 2013: British Documentary Awards has been announced, and we are proud that three projects we have supported, No Fire Zone, Why Poverty? and 5 Broken Cameras are in the running for awards.
We are particularly proud of No Fire Zone’s nomination for one of this year’s new categories, Best Documentary on Current Affairs. Dawn Airey, Chairman of the Grierson Trust said: “I’m delighted to announce the shortlist for the 2013 Griersons including our two new categories. This year in particular current affairs documentaries have shaken the world and our category shortlist reflects the films and the themes that have become some of the most talked about issues of the year. I anticipate that this new category will be one of the toughest for our jury to judge.
The shortlist categories are as follows:
Best Documentary on Current Affairs
A film revealing the true extent of crimes against humanity in the final weeks of the Sri Lankan civil war — told through eyewitness testimony and shocking video evidence recorded by both the victims and perpetrators. While the world looked away, as many as 40,000 civilians lost their lives in a few bloody months. It is both a call to the conscience of the world, a definitive film of record and an uncompromising indictment of the men responsible for the bloody crimes at the end of the Sri Lankan civil war.
Best Documentary Series
Worldview is an institutional partner of Why Poverty? a project consisting of eight one-hour and 33 short documentary films tackling various issues concerning poverty, including the effectiveness of global aid, education, and gender equality. WorldView supported three of the long-form films, Give Us the Money, Welcome to the World and Stealing Africa. All of the films can beviewed across our websites.
Best Cinema Documentary
A first-hand account of protests in Bil’in, a West Bank village affected by the Israeli West Bank barrier. When his son is born in 2005, Bil’in villager Emad Burnat gets his first camera. At the same time his fellow villagers begin to resist a separation barrier being built nearby. Burnat, a self-taught cameraman, begins to film this non-violent struggle. In the resulting conflicts one camera after another used to document these events is destroyed in the conflict, and each tells its own story.
Final nominations will be announced on 17 September, and the winners will be announced at a star-studded awards ceremony in London on 4 November 2013.
Above and home page: WorldView’s Phil Cox and team, receiving the award for Most Entertaining Documentary forThe Bengali Detective from Grayson Perry last year.
Black July: The Testimony Of Lionel Bopage, Then General Secretary Of The JVP
Sri Lanka’s Black July – Part 6 -
In the morning of 25th July he was near Angoda at their press, proof reading their journal. A crowd coming from Colombo advised people to close up and go home.Bopage drove home to Kelaniya, passing through Colombo. In Kelaniya cars were being stopped on the road opposite the Tyre Corporation and vehicles carrying Tamils were being burnt with their occupants. (Sources from Kelaniya University told us that one Omar, a well-known thug of Cyril Mathew’s, was responsible for killing a Tamil doctor and burning him along with his vehicle.) The thugs wanted to remove some petrol from his car. Someone recognised him and waved him off. He then got into the road to go to his home in Mawarandiya. A Ceylon Transport Board breakdown truck came towards him with 25 to 30 passengers wielding clubs and long knives.
About five of them got down and asked if he were a Tamil. He got down and shouted, “Are you fellows mad?” They went off. This and his experience over the next few days and testimony from JVP officers elsewhere convinced him that the State was the main party to the violence. Following the ban on the JVP he was detained and taken to the CID Building. The reasons for the arrest of JVP-office bearers, Bopage said, was ‘complicated.’ The house of a Tamil DIG, Vamadevan, was burnt during the riots and he had accused the JVP of burning his house. Vamadevan had earlier made a report that the JVP was re-arming, and this had been referred to on JVP platforms. Bopage felt that this was only a pretext. The real target he believed was the election petition against the 1982 Referendum filed by Wijeweera, which had a strong chance of succeeding, since these same charges were later confirmed in the Election Commissioner’s report. Read More
Part four - Sri Lanka’s Black July: The Cover Up
Part five - 30th July 1983: The Second Naxalite Plot
Expectations and disappointments
A six-member Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) delegation representing the UK Parliament visited Sri Lanka last week, on the invitation of the Sri Lankan Government. However, they were disappointed that neither President Mahinda Rajapaksa nor Defence Secretary, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, could meet them.
Commonwealth election observers to arrive in Sri Lanka early next month
TNA candidates intimidated by Army
Two candidates of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), had been intimidated by the Army, soon after they had filed their nominations yesterday, to contest the Northern Provincial Council polls.
by Our Jaffna correspondent-2013-07-30
Two candidates of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), had been intimidated by the Army, soon after they had filed their nominations yesterday, to contest the Northern Provincial Council polls.
TNA Spokesperson and Jaffna District Parliamentarian, Suresh K. Premachandran told Ceylon Today, that Army personnel had gone to the residences of S. Sayanthan, a TNA candidate from Chavakachcheri, and Ananthi Sasitharan, the wife of the LTTE's former Trincomalee political wing leader, Elilan, and had questioned them on their political activities.
"This is a gross violation of election laws. Even President Mahinda Rajapakse promised our Leader, R. Sampanthan, that he would ensure a free and fair polls in the Northern Province (NP), without any interference from security forces personnel, whereas soon after nominations were filed yesterday, the Army had behaved contrary to expectations by intimidating two TNA candidates contesting the NP polls.
This is ridiculous. We have brought the issue to the notice of the Commissioner of Elections, and our Leader, R. Sampanthan, who is furious over the two separate incidents, will lodge a complaint with the President as well. We will also take up the issue with the diplomatic circle in Colombo," Premachandran said.
PRESIDENT WILLING TO MEET WITH VIGNESHWARAN
July 30, 2013
President meets electronic and printed media editors at Temple Trees today (July 30). Pic by: Nalin Hewapathirana

President Mahinda Rajapaksa today hinted that he is willing to meet and hold discussions with the TNA Chief Ministerial candidate for the North, C. V. Vigneshwaran, if the need arises. Responding to a question during a meeting with the heads of electronic and print media at Temple Trees this morning, the President expressed that a discussion with the retired judge was not impossible.
President also stated that he is of the same stance he had held earlier regarding distribution of police and land powers to Provincial Councils.
He pointed out that land and police powers were not implemented since the introduction of the Provincial Council system to the country and that he is not of the opinion that it should be given special emphasis only at this moment.
On the subject of selecting Chief Ministers for the Provincial Councils, Rajapaksa said special emphasis was given to preferential voted when naming Chief Ministers at previous PC polls and that the same strategy would be applied for the upcoming election.
It also applies to the North Western Province, for which former UNP parliamentarian Dayasiri Jayasekara is contesting under the UPFA, he said.
On the decision to appoint a three-member commission to look into incidents of disappearances that have taken place during the conflict, Rajapaksa clarified that the move is not done under duress from anyone.
The President said he had been sensitive on the issue since the ‘70s and that is the reason he decided to look into incidents of disappearances, not at all due to international pressure.
| TNA filed nomination papers for Jaffna district |
| [ Monday, 29 July 2013, 09:59.27 AM GMT +05:30 ] |
TNA leaders and contestants visited the Katcheri to file nomination papers.We need support from our people to implement 13th amendment - C.V.Vickneswaran Tamil National Alliance chief ministerial candidate C.V.Vickneswaran filed the northern provincial council election nomination papers at the election commission in Jaffna this afternoon. TNA Chief ministerial candidate C.V.Vickneswaran was accompanied by secretary of the alliance Mawai Senadhiraja, MP’s Suresh Premachchandran, Sumandhiran and several other party representatives. Speaking to media Chief Ministerial candidate C.V.Vickneswaran went on to say, We have commenced new journey. For the past 25 years we did not hold elections in North. At present we need support from our people which would help to implement 13th amendment in this country. In the past decades Tamil people strength Tamil National Alliance and also work for the development of the party. People should support us to achieve massive victory in the Northern Province. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







‘It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you’ - Widney Brown








